id000082
10.3205/id000082
urn:nbn:de:0183-id0000829
Research Article
Dynamics of immunity over time: decline of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and T-cell responses after mRNA vaccination in residents and health care workers in nursing homes and homes with assisted living support
Schiffner
Schiffner
Julia
J
Health Protection Authority, Luebeck, Germany
author
Eisemann
Eisemann
Nora
N
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Germany
author
Baltus
Baltus
Hannah
H
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Germany
author
Jensen
Jensen
Sina
S
Health Protection Authority, Luebeck, Germany
author
Wunderlich
Wunderlich
Katharina
K
Health Protection Authority, Luebeck, Germany
author
Schuesseler
Schuesseler
Stefan
S
Health Protection Authority, Luebeck, Germany
author
Eicker
Eicker
Charlotte
C
Health Protection Authority, Luebeck, Germany
author
Teegen
Teegen
Bianca
B
Klinisch-Immunologisches Labor Stoecker, Luebeck, Germany
author
Boniakowsky
Boniakowsky
Doreen
D
Vorwerker Diakonie gemeinnuetzige GmbH, Luebeck, Germany
author
Solbach
Solbach
Werner
W
Center for Infection and Inflammation Research, University of Luebeck, Germany
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Luebeck, Germany
author
Mischnik
Mischnik
Alexander
A
M.D.
Gesundheitsamt, Sophienstr. 2–8, 23560 Luebeck, GermanyHealth Protection Authority, Luebeck, Germany
alexander.mischnik@luebeck.de
author
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
Düsseldorf
610
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
immunoglobulin
IgG
IgA
T cell immunity
20230906
engl
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).
2195-8831
11
GMS Infectious Diseases
GMS Infect Dis
02
Background: In the present study, we investigated the dynamics of immunity over time by measuring anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses (interferon-gamma release assay) after two doses of vaccines in residents and health care workers (HCW). Mostly, 224 (98%) residents and 244 (89%) HCW received two doses of mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech); the rest of the participants received heterologous vaccinations with mRNA and vector vaccines. The study was conducted at the time when the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 prevailed.Methods: We analyzed blood samples of 228 residents (median age 83.8 years) and of 273 HCW (median age 49.7 years) from five nursing homes and one home for the elderly with assisted living support at one specific time point. Participants received two vaccinations. The blood samples were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody and T-cell responses.Results: The initial immune responses in the younger participants were about 30% higher than in the older age group. Over time the estimated mean of the parameters (estimated from the study sample for the total population) decreased in all groups within the maximum observation period of 232 days. Comorbidities such as coronary heart disease or diabetes mellitus reduced the initial immune responses regardless of age. With regard to measured IgG antibody levels, absolute values decreased over time, whereas the interferon-gamma response remained at a constant level between day 120 and 180 and seemed to be less dependent on the time elapsed after vaccination.Conclusions: Based on our data, it does not seem possible to determine a reliable threshold of robust immunity, but we suggest that high titres of neutralizing capacity and interferon-gamma response might be an indicator of protection against severe COVID-19 courses.
IntroductionMultiple COVID-19 vaccines have been developed that offer protection against severe course of disease by generating immune responses against the spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2. In Germany, the national vaccination program started with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (B/P Comirnaty) on December 27, 2020, followed by the approval of Spikevax mRNA (mRNA; Moderna) on January 6, 2021, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vector vaccine (Vaxzevria; AstraZeneca (AZ)) on Januar<![CDATA[y 29, 2</PlainText></TextGroup>021 <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. Initially, vaccines were administered to priority groups, including residents of old people’s and nursing homes, persons aged ≥80 years, personnel with a particularly high risk of exposure in medical facilities (e.g. in emergency rooms or in the medical care of CO<TextGroup><PlainText>V</PlainText></TextGroup>ID<TextGroup><PlainText>-</PlainText></TextGroup>19 patients), personnel in medical facilities with close contact to vulnerable groups (e.g. in oncology or transplant medicine), nursing staff in outpatient and inpatient care for the elderly, other workers in homes for the elderly and nursing homes with contact to residents. Later, vaccines were recommended population-wide for each individual ≥6 years. </Pgraph><Pgraph>It has been reported by our group <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink> and others <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink> that the cellular and humoral immune response wanes over time after infection and also after vaccination. In the present study, we were primarily interested how anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses declined over time after two doses of mRNA vaccines, especially by age-group and comorbidity status. We analyzed the long-term course of the immune response with respect to serum IgG antibodies and the capacity of peripheral blood cells to produce interferon-gamma upon viral S-protein specific stimulation. We did not compare individual antibody titers over time. Rather, we collected one sample per patient and considered the time elapsed since the last vaccination.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Recently, several papers comment on waning humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. A recent systematic review on a threshold of humoral immunity suggests that high titres might correlate with robustness of protection <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. In comparison to many other studies our present work focused on determining humoral and T-cell based immunity at the same time after twofold vaccination.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The recommendations for vaccination at the time of the study did not rely on individual reactivity of the immune system but solely on protection data in large cohorts. What is missing is a clinical parameter to support practitioners in deciding if an individual is protected or not. The need of a booster vaccination is extensively documented in various studies <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, but the currently recommended timepoint – from three months after the second vaccination – might not be appropriate for the individual person.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Material and methods">
<MainHeadline>Material and methods</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Study population</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The study includes persons either living or working in six old people’s homes in Northern Germany. Because of the study’s exploratory nature, we aimed for the largest possible sample size that was affordable. The recruitment took place in five facilities that are stationary retirement homes and one facilitiy that is a so-called assisted living home. The study period was between August 31 and September 9, 2021.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In total, 1,228 persons were invited by e-mail or personal contact to participate. Inclusion criteria were being vaccinated twice against SARS-CoV-2, an elapsed period of at least 14 days since the second vaccination (as the vaccination effect is first built up during this time) and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were a third vaccination, unknown date of second vaccination, unsuccessful blood drawings, no laboratory result of the blood sample or a positive test for anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NCP) antibodies. Such a positive test may indicate an undetected infection, which would bias the results. Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/> shows the flow-chart of recruitment. </Pgraph><Pgraph>At the study visit, blood samples were taken from the participants and transferred directly to the laboratory within four hours. In addition, the participants filled in a questionnaire on personal data (e.g. age, sex, body height and body weight) and comorbidities (such as diabetes, autoimmune diseases, cardio-vasculary disease). </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Laboratory methods</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The blood samples were analyzed for four main outcomes: anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibodies, antibody neutralization capacity, SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T cells (i.e. interferon-gamma release assay, IGRA) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antibodies. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibodies</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Serum IgG antibodies against the viral (strain Wuhan-1) S1 domain of the spike protein including the receptor binding domain (RBD) were detected by using the “Anti-SARS-CoV-2 QuantiVac ELISA” detection kit (EUROIMMUN; Luebeck, Germany, product no. EI 2606-9601-10 G) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The measured “relative units/ml” were calibrated with the “First WHO standard of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin” (NIBSC code 20/136) and converted into Binding Antib<TextGroup><PlainText>ody U</PlainText></TextGroup>nits (BAU)/ml by multiplication with the factor 3.2. Interpretation is as follows: <25.6 BAU/ml=negative; ≥25.<TextGroup><PlainText>6 B</PlainText></TextGroup>AU/ml=positive.</Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Detection of antibody neutralization capacity</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Antibody binding of SARS-CoV-2-S1/RBD neutralizi<TextGroup><PlainText>ng an</PlainText></TextGroup>tibodies was detected by applying the “Anti-SARS-CoV-2 NeutraLISA” detection kit (EUROIMMUN; Luebeck, Germany, product no. EI 2606-9601-4) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. This is a surrogate neutralization test which has 98.6% concordance when compared to plaque-reduction (PRNT<Subscript>50</Subscript>) testing. Specificity is 99.7% and sensitivity is 95.9%. Values are interpreted as follows: <20%=negative; 20%–<35%=borderline; ≥35%=positive. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Determination of SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T cells (interferon-gamma release assay, IGRA)</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>T cells in peripheral blood reacting to SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein were detected by using the “Quant-T-Cell ELISA” (EUROIMMUN; Luebeck, Germany product no. EQ 6841-9601 and ET 2606-3003). In brief, heparinized <TextGroup><PlainText>blood cells</PlainText></TextGroup> were cultured with S1 antigen for 24 hours. Subsequently, interferon-gamma release was determined in the culture supernatant by ELISA.Values are expressed in mIU/ml. Interpretation is as follows: <100 mIU/ml=negative, 100–200 mIU/ml=borderline; ≥200 mIU/ml=positive.</Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NCP) antibodies</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>To discriminate between vaccine-induced antibody response and convalescent SARS-CoV-2 infection, serum IgG antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein were detected by using the “Anti-SARS-CoV-2 NCP ELISA” detection kit (EUROIMMUN; Luebeck, Germany product no. EI 2606-9601-2 G) in a semi-quantitative manner. Values are given in ratios. Ratios are calculated from the extinction of the sample and that of a standardized calibrator. Interpretation of values was done as follows: <0.8=negative; ≥0.8–<1.1=borderline; ≥1.1=positive. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The tests yielded 15 positive results. These individuals were excluded from the study. The validity and reliability test characteristics have been described recently <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Statistical methods</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody values above 384 BAU/ml were reported as ‘above 384’ by the laboratory and conservatively set to 385 for further analysis, as was the case with values reported as ‘below 3.2’, which were set to 1.6. Similarly, SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T-cell values above 2,500 mIU/ml were set to 2,500 mIU/ml. Pairwise correlation coefficients were calculated for SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T cells, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibodies and antibody neutralization capacity. As the Spearman correlation between anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibodies and antibody neutralization capacity was very high, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody data appeared dispensable and we continued only with SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T cells and antibody neutralization capacity. The time after second vaccination was measured on a continuous scale. The values of interferon-gamma and of neutralizing capacity were each plotted against the number of days since second vaccination. Local polynomial regression models (with linear polynomials) were fitted to describe the change in the outcomes over time, together with the corresponding 95% prediction intervals. Subgroup analyses by age (age below 65 years versus 65+), sex (female versus male) and comorbidity (no versus any comorbidity) were performed. Local polynomial regression models (with linear polynomials) were used. All analyses were conducted with R 4.1.1 <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Results">
<MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Characteristics of the study participants</SubHeadline><Pgraph>We analyzed blood samples of 228 residents (<TextGroup><PlainText>median age</PlainText></TextGroup> 83.8 years) and 273 health care workers (HCW; median age 49.7 years) from five nursing homes and one home for the elderly with assisted living support. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Of the final 501 study participants, 273 were HCW (in the retirement homes) and 228 were seniors living in the facilities. A description of the characteristics of the study population is given in Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>. The age of the participants ranged between 19 and 100 years, with a median age of 83.8 years in residents and 49.7 years in HCW. The majority of residents and HCW was female (67% and 75%, respectively). The body mass index (BMI) was in the normal range for 50% of the residents and 39% of the HCW, while few participants were underweight (3.9% and 1.5% in residents and HCW, respectively) and most were overweight or obese (47% and 59% in residents and HCW, respectively). Comorbidities were very common among residents (96%) but also among HCW (54%). The most frequent comorbidities were coronary heart disea<TextGroup><PlainText>se in r</PlainText></TextGroup>esidents (79%) and HCW (25%) and neurological disease in residents (48%). Diseases of the immune system (not specified) were mentioned in about 20% of both residents and HCW. Only 8 patients regularly received immunosu<TextGroup><PlainText>p</PlainText></TextGroup>pressive treatment including steroids or TNF alpha blockers.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Different combinations of vector (AstraZeneca) and mRNA (B/P and Moderna) vaccines were possible, but the vast majority received B/P as first and second vaccine (98% in residents and 89% in HCW). The first vaccination was given between December 24, 2020, and June 29, 2021, and the second between January 19, 2021, and Augus<TextGroup><PlainText>t 1</PlainText></TextGroup>0, 2021. The time between second vaccination and blood sampling ranged from 22 to 232 days. No data was collected for the first three weeks after second vaccination because the natural immune response takes about two weeks. We did not observe any symptomatic breakthrough infection during the observation period. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Immune responses</SubHeadline><Pgraph>First, we determined how the anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels corresponded to the neutralising capacity. The bivariate scatterplot in Figure 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="figure"/> shows a high correlation (Spearman correlation of 0.959, 95% confidence interval [0.951 to 0.966]). Thus, for further considerations we concentrated on the neutralizing capacity. Pairwise scatterplots and correlation coefficients between all three outcomes are given in Figure S1 in Attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1"/>. If we look at the dynamics of the neutralising antibodies, Figur<TextGroup><PlainText>e 3</PlainText></TextGroup> <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/> (lower panel) shows an almost linear decrease over the entire study period. After about 200 days after two doses of the vaccine, the neutralisation capacity had dropped from >90% to about 40%.</Pgraph><Pgraph>For the subgroup analysis, we formed two age groups: persons under 65 years of age, which included mostly the HCW, and those over 65 years of age, i.e. the residents of the old people’s homes. As expected, shortly after the second vaccination the antibody response was only almost half as high in the elderly group as in the younger group (Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>, lower panel, middle). However, the relative decline over time was comparable. It is therefore not surprising that the duration of the protective effect of vaccination is limited in the elderly. <TextGroup><PlainText>We were then</PlainText></TextGroup> interested in seeing how the comorbidities reported by the subjects were reflected in the antibody response. The predicted neutralisation capacity is slightly lower for persons with existing comorbidities at any time. The kinetics of the antibody decrease were comparable (Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>, lower panel, right). The low number of study participants did not allow any meaningful conclusions to be drawn about the effect of any single comorbidity (data not shown). Further subgroup analyses did not show relevant differences regarding sex or BMI category. Subgroups were too small (and in some cases observations were too differently distributed over time) to make reliable comparisons by care level, vaccine or individual diseases. </Pgraph><Pgraph>When looking at the T-cell response with regard to spike-protein specific interferon-gamma secretion IGRA, it is noticeable that the values also drop linearly between about 50 and about 120 days after the second vaccination but then remain on a plateau (approx. 700 mIU/ml) until about 180 days, after which they drop further (<TextGroup><PlainText>Figure 3 </PlainText></TextGroup><ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>, upper panel, left). Here, too, there is a clear difference between the older (65+ years) and younger participants (<65 years). In the elderly, the T-cell reactivity was only about 50% in comparison to the younger participants (Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>, upper panel, middle). The average value of interferon-gamma halved 111 days after second vaccination (95% prediction interval: 80 to 190 days) and the antibody neutralization capacity did so after 199 days (95% prediction interval: 189 to more than 232 days).</Pgraph><Pgraph>A division of the study participants into those with and without comorbidities showed a similar picture as in the analysis of the antibodies. Comorbidities of any kind <TextGroup><PlainText>led to</PlainText></TextGroup> reduced T-cell reactivity. It is therefore plausible to assume that the duration of the protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection is also limited. Our data show and confirm the data of others that the immune response after two vaccinations varies greatly from individual to individual but clearly diminishes within the observation period of up to 232 days. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion">
<MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Many observational studies in which the course of the vaccine efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines is analyzed show that over a period of 4–6 months after completion of the basic immunisation there is only a slight decline in efficacy against severe COVID-19 disease (hospitalisation). The decline in efficacy against symptomatic infections of any severity, on the other hand, is more pronounced in most studies and amounts to between 10% and 50% (depending on the vaccine and age group) <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. In consequence, a third vaccination, usually 3 months after the second vaccination, is recommended in most countries to booster the immune system <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In our study, we compared the humoral and cellular immune response after two vaccinations of residents of nursing homes over 65 years of age with that of equally vaccinated under-65-year-old employees in these facilities. At the time of the study, the Delta variant prevailed (98%). Double vaccination with mRNA vaccines provides less protection against infection with the Delta variant. The protection against a severe course is still very high. As of December 14 and since December 13, 2021, only 101 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VOC) cases have been confirmed in Germany <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. We were able to show that, on average, the initial immune responses in the younger participanta were about 30% higher than in the older ones. Over time, all parameters dropped continuously in all groups within the maximum observation period of 232 days. The existence of any comorbidities such as coronary heart disease or diabetes mellitus reduced the initial immune responses, regardless of age. These data support and extend the findings by Delbrück et al. <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink> and clearly demonstrate the need for a third vaccination. Interestingly, in contrast to a tendency to lower values of IgG antibody levels, we observed that the interferon-gamma response remained at a constant level between about day 120 and 180, only to decline further thereafter (Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>). This might reflect a twofold reaction from the T-cell compartment. In the first wave after vaccination, primary T cells with limited longevity are stimulated to produce interferon-gamma, followed by a second wave of long-lived T memory cells that compensate (b<TextGroup><PlainText>et</PlainText></TextGroup>ween 120 and 180 days) for the further drop in i<TextGroup><PlainText>n</PlainText></TextGroup>te<TextGroup><PlainText>r</PlainText></TextGroup>fe<TextGroup><PlainText>r</PlainText></TextGroup>on-gamma levels <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Our data thus show that measurable immune parameters may decline within months, accordingly resulting in increasing risks for breakthrough infections in health care workers and in the general population <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. Little is known about what the measurable immunological values mean for the protection of the individual. Although most of the currently accepted correlates of protection are based on antibody measurements, there is currently no validated threshold value for protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection, albeit it is urgently needed <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. However, an association between anti-S1 RBD IgG and neutralization antibody levels after immunization with BNT162b2 has been reported <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. At the time of the study, the messaging from regulatory agencies states that antibody tests should not be used to evaluate a person’s level of immunity or protection from COVID-19 <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. The attempt to set a clear threshold value for protection against a severe course of COVID on the one <TextGroup><PlainText>hand and a</PlainText></TextGroup> limit value for the general prevention of infection on the other has been unsuccessful in recent years.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Although seroprevalence is currently used as a crude measure of community immunity, having a correlate of protection would allow more precise estimations that could then trigger interventions such as vaccination campaigns if the percentage of immune individuals is deemed to be too low.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Finally, there are many participants, who are recovered from COVID-19 and have high antibody levels for a long time <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Chau et al. <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink> report a median of 91.1% and an interquartile range of 77.3% to 94.2% for neutralizing antibody levels in vaccinated individuals who remained uninfected. Feng et al. <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink> determined that an IgG antibody level of at least 264 BAU/ml is associated with an 80% vaccine efficacy against primary symptomatic CO<TextGroup><PlainText>V</PlainText></TextGroup>ID<TextGroup><PlainText>-</PlainText></TextGroup>19. For T-cell parameters, so far no studies make a link of titres to the level of protection. A one-time measurement can necessarily only be a snapshot. To estimate the continuity of the protection status, the examinations must be repeated regularly, approximately at intervals of two to three months. In practice, analysis of the T-cell response may not be necessary (Figure S2 and Figure S3 in Attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1"/>). Conversely, we were able to show that a higher threshold affects the estimated proportion of people protected (Figure S4 in Attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1"/>).</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Lacking evidence of correlate of protection</SubHeadline><Pgraph>For many technical and medical reasons, there is currently no immunological parameter that allows a reliable statement about the protection status against COVID-19 disease for the individual. Although numerous studies suggest a strong correlation between neutralizing antibody levels and protection <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, many of the regulatory agencies state that antibody tests should not be used to evaluate a person’s level of immunity or protection from COVID-19. This is highly unsatisfactory but may be difficult to determine. At the time of the study, a person living in Germany who had recovered from COVID-19 more than three months ago had many restrictions in everyday life, irresprective of documented high antibody levels and high IGRA levels. We have therefore analyzed the data collected here to estimate what the course of protection would be depending on the time passed after the second vaccination. Based on these assumptions, it appears that the vast majority of persons (95%) can be <TextGroup><PlainText>assumed to be</PlainText></TextGroup> protected three weeks after the second vaccination, although the small sample size at this observation time causes a quite large amount of uncertainty, as indicated by the wide 95% prediction interval (Figure 4 <ImgLink imgNo="4" imgType="figure"/>). The proportion of protected individuals decreases continuously over time. Fifty percent of persons are still protected 106 days after second vaccination. Younger individuals under 6<TextGroup><PlainText>5 y</PlainText></TextGroup>ears are protected for a longer time; on average, it takes 164 days until only 50% are still protected, while the proportion of protected older individuals is always below 50%. Those without comorbidity are protected up to 50% for 149 days after second vaccination and those with comorbidity for 81 days. </Pgraph><Pgraph>We are convinced that increasing neutralization capacity might correlate with robustness of immunity. We are also convinced that increasing IGRA may lead to sufficie<TextGroup><PlainText>nt i</PlainText></TextGroup>mmunity. Like for other vaccines (e.g. rubellavirus), it would be highly desirable to reach a consensus on laboratory threshold levels as correlates of protection.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Limitations and restrictions</SubHeadline><Pgraph>We are very aware that immunological tests are subject to a number of limitations. Although manifold evidence suggests that there is a correlation between neutralising activity in plasma and protection from symptomatic infection at the population level, the titres of neutralising antibodies decrease over time after infection or vaccination; the kinetics of the decrease vary from person to person. Even normalisation to the WHO standard may not fully compensate for the inter-assay variability of pseudovirus-based neutralisation assays. The neutralization surrogate test used was created with the Wuhan variant and therefore does not correctly reflect the neutralization capacity against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. High speed development of variants (of concern) with presumably altered surface properties made the prognosis of protection somewhat difficult, e.g. the shift from Delt<TextGroup><PlainText>a to Om</PlainText></TextGroup>icron basically led to a shift from protection against infection to “limited protection against severe sequelae/severe disease”. Consequently this surrogate of protection might (as an absolute value) only hold true for conditio<TextGroup><PlainText>ns pre</PlainText></TextGroup>sent during the study period. Furthermore, exposure to high viral loads would require higher protective titres than exposure to low viral loads (e.g. when masks are worn).</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Conclusions">
<MainHeadline>Conclusions</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Our study offers statements from a time when the Delta variant was predominant. The conclusions do not necessarily apply to other variants such as Omicron. For residents, the mean time between the second vaccination and blood collection was 22 days longer than for HCW (195 days and 173 days, respectively). This could influence the results in such a way that the decline of SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T cells and of the neutralisation capacity over time may be overestimated. On the other hand, this bias may be counteracted by our conservative approach to deal with the summary categories for laboratory results above certain thresholds. We substituted such observations with continuous values very close to the respective threshold. It can be assumed that the truncated values are in truth higher and that consequently reductions over time would be more pronounced (sensitivity analyses not shown). Despite the limitations of our study, it is time to shift the consideration from the population level to the individual.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Abbreviations">
<MainHeadline>Abbreviations</MainHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">COVID-19: coronavirus disease 19</ListItem><ListItem level="1">ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</ListItem><ListItem level="1">IgG/A: immunoglobulin G/A</ListItem><ListItem level="1">rtPCR: real-time polymerase chain reaction</ListItem><ListItem level="1">SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndro<TextGroup><PlainText>me coron</PlainText></TextGroup>avirus 2</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes">
<MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Ethics approval and consent to participate</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink> and approved by the ethics committee of the University of Luebeck (21-353).</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Availability of data and materials</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Funding</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The study was financed by the City of Luebeck, University Luebeck, Vorwerker Diakonie, Euroimmun AG, and Kli<TextGroup><PlainText>n</PlainText></TextGroup>isch-Immunologisches Labor Stoecker.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>First and senior authorship</SubHeadline><Pgraph>JS and NE contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. WS and AM contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Authors’ contributions</SubHeadline><Pgraph>JS, NE and HB had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of data analysis. SJ, KW, SS, CE and DB were responsible for blood collections and appropriate pre-analytic procedures. DB provided the data of the suitable study participants. BT was responsible for laboratory testing. WS and AM developed the study design and supervised the study. All authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript and agreed with the final version.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Acknowledgements</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors would like to thank the patients for sharing their data and all medical and laboratory personnel and administrative staff who contributed to obtain the results. </Pgraph><Pgraph>This manuscript has been released as a pre-print at medRxiv <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<References linked="yes">
<Reference refNo="1">
<RefAuthor>Paul-Ehrlich-Institut</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle></RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefBookTitle>COVID-19-Impfstoffe – Nachweis eines vollständigen Impfschutzes</RefBookTitle>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. COVID-19-Impfstoffe – Nachweis eines vollständigen Impfschutzes. 2022. Available from: https://www.pei.de/DE/arzneimittel/impfstoffe/covid-19/covid-19-node.html</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://www.pei.de/DE/arzneimittel/impfstoffe/covid-19/covid-19-node.html</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="2">
<RefAuthor>Schiffner J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Backhaus I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rimmele J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schulz S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Möhlenkamp T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Klemens JM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Zapf D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Solbach W</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mischnik A</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Long-Term Course of Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Outpatients After SARS-CoV-2 Infection</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Front Public Health</RefJournal>
<RefPage>732787</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Schiffner J, Backhaus I, Rimmele J, Schulz S, Möhlenkamp T, Klemens JM, Zapf D, Solbach W, Mischnik A. Long-Term Course of Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Outpatients After SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front Public Health. 2021;9:732787.
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.732787</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.732787</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="3">
<RefAuthor>Solbach W</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schiffner J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Backhaus I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Burger D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Staiger R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tiemer B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bobrowski A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hutchings T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mischnik A</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Antibody Profiling of COVID-19 Patients in an Urban Low-Incidence Region in Northern Germany</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2020</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Front Public Health</RefJournal>
<RefPage>570543</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Solbach W, Schiffner J, Backhaus I, Burger D, Staiger R, Tiemer B, Bobrowski A, Hutchings T, Mischnik A. Antibody Profiling of COVID-19 Patients in an Urban Low-Incidence Region in Northern Germany. Front Public Health. 2020;8:570543.
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.570543</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.570543</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="4">
<RefAuthor>Romero-Olmedo AJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schulz AR</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hochstätter S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Das Gupta D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Virta I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hirseland H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Staudenraus D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Camara B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Münch C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hefter V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sapre S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Krähling V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Müller-Kräuter H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Widera M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mei HE</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Keller C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lohoff M</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Induction of robust cellular and humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in previously unresponsive older adults</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Nat Microbiol</RefJournal>
<RefPage>195-9</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Romero-Olmedo AJ, Schulz AR, Hochstätter S, Das Gupta D, Virta I, Hirseland H, Staudenraus D, Camara B, Münch C, Hefter V, Sapre S, Krähling V, Müller-Kräuter H, Widera M, Mei HE, Keller C, Lohoff M. Induction of robust cellular and humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in previously unresponsive older adults. Nat Microbiol. 2022 Feb;7(2):195-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-021-01046-z</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-01046-z</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="5">
<RefAuthor>Schwarz T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tober-Lau P</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hillus D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Helbig ET</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lippert LJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Thibeault C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Koch W</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Landgraf I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Michel J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bergfeld L</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Niemeyer D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mühlemann B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Conrad C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Dang-Heine C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kasper S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Münn F</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kappert K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nitsche A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tauber R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schmidt S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kopankiewicz P</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bias H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Seybold J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>von Kalle C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Jones TC</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Suttorp N</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Drosten C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sander LE</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Corman VM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kurth F</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Delayed Antibody and T-Cell Response to BNT162b2 Vaccination in the Elderly, Germany</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Emerg Infect Dis</RefJournal>
<RefPage>2174-8</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Schwarz T, Tober-Lau P, Hillus D, Helbig ET, Lippert LJ, Thibeault C, Koch W, Landgraf I, Michel J, Bergfeld L, Niemeyer D, Mühlemann B, Conrad C, Dang-Heine C, Kasper S, Münn F, Kappert K, Nitsche A, Tauber R, Schmidt S, Kopankiewicz P, Bias H, Seybold J, von Kalle C, Jones TC, Suttorp N, Drosten C, Sander LE, Corman VM, Kurth F. Delayed Antibody and T-Cell Response to BNT162b2 Vaccination in the Elderly, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;27(8):2174-8. DOI: 10.3201/eid2708.211145</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2708.211145</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="6">
<RefAuthor>Wei J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Stoesser N</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Matthews PC</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ayoubkhani D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Studley R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bell I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bell JI</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Newton JN</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Farrar J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Diamond I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rourke E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Howarth A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Marsden BD</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hoosdally S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Jones EY</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Stuart DI</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Crook DW</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Peto TEA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Pouwels KB</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Eyre DW</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Walker AS</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor> COVID-19 Infection Survey team</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in 45,965 adults from the general population of the United Kingdom</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Nat Microbiol</RefJournal>
<RefPage>1140-9</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Wei J, Stoesser N, Matthews PC, Ayoubkhani D, Studley R, Bell I, Bell JI, Newton JN, Farrar J, Diamond I, Rourke E, Howarth A, Marsden BD, Hoosdally S, Jones EY, Stuart DI, Crook DW, Peto TEA, Pouwels KB, Eyre DW, Walker AS; COVID-19 Infection Survey team. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in 45,965 adults from the general population of the United Kingdom. Nat Microbiol. 2021 Sep;6(9):1140-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-021-00947-3</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00947-3</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="7">
<RefAuthor>Levin EG</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lustig Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Cohen C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Fluss R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Indenbaum V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Amit S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Doolman R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Asraf K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mendelson E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ziv A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rubin C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Freedman L</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kreiss Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Regev-Yochay G</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Waning Immune Humoral Response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine over 6 Months</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>N Engl J Med</RefJournal>
<RefPage>e84</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Levin EG, Lustig Y, Cohen C, Fluss R, Indenbaum V, Amit S, Doolman R, Asraf K, Mendelson E, Ziv A, Rubin C, Freedman L, Kreiss Y, Regev-Yochay G. Waning Immune Humoral Response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine over 6 Months. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec;385(24):e84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114583</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114583</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="8">
<RefAuthor>Perry J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Osman S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Wright J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Richard-Greenblatt M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Buchan SA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sadarangani M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bolotin S</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Does a humoral correlate of protection exist for SARS-CoV-2? A systematic review</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefJournal>PLoS One</RefJournal>
<RefPage>e0266852</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Perry J, Osman S, Wright J, Richard-Greenblatt M, Buchan SA, Sadarangani M, Bolotin S. Does a humoral correlate of protection exist for SARS-CoV-2? A systematic review. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0266852. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266852</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266852</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="9">
<RefAuthor>Delbrück M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hoehl S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Toptan T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schenk B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Grikscheit K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Metzler M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Herrmann E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ciesek S</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Characterization of the humoral immune response to BNT162b2 in elderly residents of long-term care facilities five to seven months after vaccination [Preprint]</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>medRxiv</RefJournal>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>Delbrück M, Hoehl S, Toptan T, Schenk B, Grikscheit K, Metzler M, Herrmann E, Ciesek S. Characterization of the humoral immune response to BNT162b2 in elderly residents of long-term care facilities five to seven months after vaccination [Preprint]. medRxiv. 2021. DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.09.21266110</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.09.21266110</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="10">
<RefAuthor>Scheiblauer H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nübling CM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Wolf T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Khodamoradi Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bellinghausen C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sonntagbauer M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Esser-Nobis K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Filomena A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mahler V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Maier TJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Stephan C</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 for more than one year – kinetics and persistence of detection are predominantly determined by avidity progression and test design</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefJournal>J Clin Virol</RefJournal>
<RefPage>105052</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Scheiblauer H, Nübling CM, Wolf T, Khodamoradi Y, Bellinghausen C, Sonntagbauer M, Esser-Nobis K, Filomena A, Mahler V, Maier TJ, Stephan C. Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 for more than one year – kinetics and persistence of detection are predominantly determined by avidity progression and test design. J Clin Virol. 2022 Jan;146:105052.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105052</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105052</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="11">
<RefAuthor>R Development Core Team</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle></RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefBookTitle>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</RefBookTitle>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.</RefTotal>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="24">
<RefAuthor>Committee for Human Medicinal Products</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle></RefTitle>
<RefYear>2018</RefYear>
<RefBookTitle>Guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R2)</RefBookTitle>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>Committee for Human Medicinal Products. Guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R2). London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2018.</RefTotal>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="12">
<RefAuthor>Maier BF</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Burdinski A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Klamser P</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Wiedermann M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Jenny MA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Betsch C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Brockmann D</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Die 4. COVID-19-Welle wurde durch fehlenden Impfschutz angestoßen: Was ist zu tun?</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Epid Bull</RefJournal>
<RefPage>3-5</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Maier BF, Burdinski A, Klamser P, Wiedermann M, Jenny MA, Betsch C, Brockmann D. Die 4. COVID-19-Welle wurde durch fehlenden Impfschutz angestoßen: Was ist zu tun? Epid Bull. 2021;49:3-5. DOI: 10.25646/9363</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.25646/9363</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="13">
<RefAuthor>World Health Organization</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle></RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefBookTitle>Interim statement on booster doses for COVID-19 vaccination – Update 22 December 2021</RefBookTitle>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>World Health Organization. Interim statement on booster doses for COVID-19 vaccination – Update 22 December 2021. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-12-2021-interim-statement-on-booster-doses-for-covid-19-vaccination---update-22-december-2021</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://www.who.int/news/item/22-12-2021-interim-statement-on-booster-doses-for-covid-19-vaccination---update-22-december-2021</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="14">
<RefAuthor>Dan JM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mateus J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kato Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hastie KM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Yu ED</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Faliti CE</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Grifoni A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ramirez SI</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Haupt S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Frazier A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nakao C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rayaprolu V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rawlings SA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Peters B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Krammer F</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Simon V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Saphire EO</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Smith DM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Weiskopf D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sette A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Crotty S</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Science</RefJournal>
<RefPage>eabf4063</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Dan JM, Mateus J, Kato Y, Hastie KM, Yu ED, Faliti CE, Grifoni A, Ramirez SI, Haupt S, Frazier A, Nakao C, Rayaprolu V, Rawlings SA, Peters B, Krammer F, Simon V, Saphire EO, Smith DM, Weiskopf D, Sette A, Crotty S. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science. 2021 Feb;371(6529):eabf4063. DOI: 10.1126/science.abf4063</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf4063</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="15">
<RefAuthor>Bergwerk M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Gonen T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lustig Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Amit S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lipsitch M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Cohen C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mandelboim M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Levin EG</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rubin C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Indenbaum V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tal I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Zavitan M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Zuckerman N</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bar-Chaim A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kreiss Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Regev-Yochay G</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>N Engl J Med</RefJournal>
<RefPage>1474-84</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Bergwerk M, Gonen T, Lustig Y, Amit S, Lipsitch M, Cohen C, Mandelboim M, Levin EG, Rubin C, Indenbaum V, Tal I, Zavitan M, Zuckerman N, Bar-Chaim A, Kreiss Y, Regev-Yochay G. Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct;385(16):1474-84.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109072</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109072</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="16">
<RefAuthor>Krammer F</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>A correlate of protection for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is urgently needed</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Nat Med</RefJournal>
<RefPage>1147-8</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Krammer F. A correlate of protection for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is urgently needed. Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1147-8.
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01432-4</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01432-4</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="17">
<RefAuthor>Openshaw PJM</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Using correlates to accelerate vaccinology</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Science</RefJournal>
<RefPage>22-3</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Openshaw PJM. Using correlates to accelerate vaccinology. Science. 2022 Jan;375(6576):22-3.
DOI: 10.1126/science.abn0007</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn0007</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="18">
<RefAuthor>Feng S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Phillips DJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>White T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sayal H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Aley PK</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bibi S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Dold C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Fuskova M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Gilbert SC</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hirsch I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Humphries HE</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Jepson B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kelly EJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Plested E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Shoemaker K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Thomas KM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Vekemans J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Villafana TL</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lambe T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Pollard AJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Voysey M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor> Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Nat Med</RefJournal>
<RefPage>2032-40</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Feng S, Phillips DJ, White T, Sayal H, Aley PK, Bibi S, Dold C, Fuskova M, Gilbert SC, Hirsch I, Humphries HE, Jepson B, Kelly EJ, Plested E, Shoemaker K, Thomas KM, Vekemans J, Villafana TL, Lambe T, Pollard AJ, Voysey M; Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group. Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-40. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01540-1</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01540-1</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="19">
<RefAuthor>Khoury DS</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Cromer D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Reynaldi A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schlub TE</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Wheatley AK</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Juno JA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Subbarao K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kent SJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Triccas JA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Davenport MP</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Nat Med</RefJournal>
<RefPage>1205-11</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, Schlub TE, Wheatley AK, Juno JA, Subbarao K, Kent SJ, Triccas JA, Davenport MP. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-11. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="20">
<RefAuthor>Lustig Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sapir E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Regev-Yochay G</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Cohen C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Fluss R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Olmer L</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Indenbaum V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mandelboim M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Doolman R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Amit S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mendelson E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ziv A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Huppert A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rubin C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Freedman L</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kreiss Y</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and correlates of humoral immune responses and dynamics: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal cohort study in health-care workers</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Lancet Respir Med</RefJournal>
<RefPage>999-1009</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Lustig Y, Sapir E, Regev-Yochay G, Cohen C, Fluss R, Olmer L, Indenbaum V, Mandelboim M, Doolman R, Amit S, Mendelson E, Ziv A, Huppert A, Rubin C, Freedman L, Kreiss Y. BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and correlates of humoral immune responses and dynamics: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal cohort study in health-care workers. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):999-1009. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00220-4</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00220-4</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="21">
<RefAuthor>Spitzer A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Angel Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Marudi O</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Zeltser D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Saiag E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Goldshmidt H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Goldiner I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Stark M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Halutz O</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Gamzu R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Slobodkin M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Amrami N</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Feigin E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Elbaz M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Furman M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bronstein Y</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Chikly A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Eshkol A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Furer V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mayer T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Meijer S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Melloul A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Mizrahi M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Yakubovsky M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Rosenberg D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Safir A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Spitzer L</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Taleb E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Elkayam O</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Silberman A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Eviatar T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Elalouf O</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Levinson T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Pozyuchenko K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Itzhaki-Alfia A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sprecher E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ben-Ami R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Henig O</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Association of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine With Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Workers in Israel</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefJournal>JAMA</RefJournal>
<RefPage>341-9</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Spitzer A, Angel Y, Marudi O, Zeltser D, Saiag E, Goldshmidt H, Goldiner I, Stark M, Halutz O, Gamzu R, Slobodkin M, Amrami N, Feigin E, Elbaz M, Furman M, Bronstein Y, Chikly A, Eshkol A, Furer V, Mayer T, Meijer S, Melloul A, Mizrahi M, Yakubovsky M, Rosenberg D, Safir A, Spitzer L, Taleb E, Elkayam O, Silberman A, Eviatar T, Elalouf O, Levinson T, Pozyuchenko K, Itzhaki-Alfia A, Sprecher E, Ben-Ami R, Henig O. Association of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine With Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Workers in Israel. JAMA. 2022 Jan;327(4):
341-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.23641</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.23641</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="22">
<RefAuthor>Robert Koch Institut</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Antikörpernachweise (Indirekter Nachweis einer Infektion)</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefBookTitle>Hinweise zur Testung von Patienten auf Infektion mit dem neuartigen Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 - Antikörpernachweise und immunologischer Schutz</RefBookTitle>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>Robert Koch Institut. Hinweise zur Testung von Patienten auf Infektion mit dem neuartigen Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 - Antikörpernachweise und immunologischer Schutz. 2022 [updated 12 Jan 2022]. Antikörpernachweise (Indirekter Nachweis einer Infektion). Available from:
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Vorl_Testung_nCoV.html?nn=13490888#doc13490982bodyText30</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Vorl_Testung_nCoV.html?nn=13490888#doc13490982bodyText30</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="23">
<RefAuthor>Chau NVV</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ngoc NM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nguyet LA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Quang VM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ny NTH</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Khoa DB</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Phong NT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Toan LM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hong NTT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tuyen NTK</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Phat VV</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nhu LNT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Truc NHT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>That BTT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Thao HP</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Thao TNP</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Vuong VT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tam TTT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tai NT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bao HT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nhung HTK</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Minh NTN</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tien NTM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Huy NC</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Choisy M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Man DNH</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ty DTB</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Anh NT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Uyen LTT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tu TNH</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Yen LM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Dung NT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hung LM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Truong NT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Thanh TT</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Thwaites G</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Tan LV</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>An observational study of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infections among vaccinated healthcare workers in Vietnam</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2021</RefYear>
<RefJournal>EClinicalMedicine</RefJournal>
<RefPage>101143</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Chau NVV, Ngoc NM, Nguyet LA, Quang VM, Ny NTH, Khoa DB, Phong NT, Toan LM, Hong NTT, Tuyen NTK, Phat VV, Nhu LNT, Truc NHT, That BTT, Thao HP, Thao TNP, Vuong VT, Tam TTT, Tai NT, Bao HT, Nhung HTK, Minh NTN, Tien NTM, Huy NC, Choisy M, Man DNH, Ty DTB, Anh NT, Uyen LTT, Tu TNH, Yen LM, Dung NT, Hung LM, Truong NT, Thanh TT, Thwaites G, Tan LV. An observational study of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infections among vaccinated healthcare workers in Vietnam. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Nov;41:101143.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101143</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101143</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="25">
<RefAuthor>Schiffner J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Eisemann N</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Baltus H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Jensen S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Wunderlich K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Schuesseler S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Eicker C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Teegen B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Boniakowsky D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Solbach W</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Immune responses after twofold SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in elderly residents and Health Care Workers in nursing homes and homes with assisted living support – Proposal for a correlate of protection [Preprint]</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2022</RefYear>
<RefJournal>medRxiv</RefJournal>
<RefPage></RefPage>
<RefTotal>Schiffner J, Eisemann N, Baltus H, Jensen S, Wunderlich K, Schuesseler S, Eicker C, Teegen B, Boniakowsky D, Solbach W. Immune responses after twofold SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in elderly residents and Health Care Workers in nursing homes and homes with assisted living support – Proposal for a correlate of protection [Preprint]. medRxiv. 2022.
DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.09.22270747</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.09.22270747</RefLink>
</Reference>
</References>
<Media>
<Tables>
<Table format="png">
<MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
<MediaID>1</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Description of the study population</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Table>
<NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables>
</Tables>
<Figures>
<Figure format="png" height="439" width="527">
<MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
<MediaID>1</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: Flow chart of the ISCOV-VAC study recruitment</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Figure>
<Figure format="png" height="289" width="285">
<MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
<MediaID>2</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 2: Bivariate scatterplot for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-Protein IgG antibodies and neutralisation capacity (N=501)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Figure>
<Figure format="png" height="602" width="837">
<MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
<MediaID>3</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 3: SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T cells and neutralisation capacity over time in the total group by age group and by comorbidity status</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Figure>
<Figure format="png" height="265" width="834">
<MediaNo>4</MediaNo>
<MediaID>4</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 4: Proportion of persons that are protected against COVID-19 disease over time after second vaccination in the total group by age group and by comorbidity status. </Mark1><LineBreak></LineBreak>A person is considered to be protected against COVID-19 if the SARS-CoV-2 S1 reactive T-cell test is positive, i.e. >200 mIU/ml, and the neutralisation capacity is >75%. Dots and crosses indicate the individual protection status (0%=not protected, 100%=protected), the line indicates the predicted proportion and the grey area indicates the 95% prediction band.</Pgraph></Caption>
</Figure>
<NoOfPictures>4</NoOfPictures>
</Figures>
<InlineFigures>
<NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
</InlineFigures>
<Attachments>
<Attachment>
<MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
<MediaID filename="id000082.a1.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf" origFilename="id000082_Attachment1.pdf" size="888245" url="">1</MediaID>
<AttachmentTitle>Supplementary figures</AttachmentTitle>
</Attachment>
<NoOfAttachments>1</NoOfAttachments>
</Attachments>
</Media>
</OrigData>
</GmsArticle>]]></plaintext></textgroup></pgraph></textblock></origdata></gmsarticle>