<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE GmsArticle SYSTEM "http://www.egms.de/dtd/2.0.34/GmsArticle.dtd">
<GmsArticle xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>id000080</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/id000080</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-id0000802</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType>Review Article</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Bacterial infections in patients with nipple piercings: a qualitative systematic review of case reports and case series</Title>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Acu&#241;a-Ch&#225;vez</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Acu&#241;a-Ch&#225;vez</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Luis M.</Firstname>
          <Initials>LM</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Roma Av. 338, Trujillo, Peru, Phone: &#43;51 939402229<Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation><Affiliation>Sociedad Cientifica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>lacuna&#64;unitru.edu.pe, lmiguel.acunac&#64;gmail.com</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Alva-Alayo</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Alva-Alayo</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Christian A.</Firstname>
          <Initials>CA</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Aguilar-Villanueva</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Aguilar-Villanueva</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Giamfranco A.</Firstname>
          <Initials>GA</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
          <Affiliation>Sociedad Cientifica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Zavala-Alvarado</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Zavala-Alvarado</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Kevin A.</Firstname>
          <Initials>KA</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
          <Affiliation>Sociedad Cientifica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Alverca-Meza</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Alverca-Meza</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Cristhian A.</Firstname>
          <Initials>CA</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Aguirre-S&#225;nchez</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Aguirre-S&#225;nchez</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Mar&#237;a M.</Firstname>
          <Initials>MM</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Amaya-Castro</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Amaya-Castro</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Anyelo A.</Firstname>
          <Initials>AA</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">bacterial infections</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">breast abscess</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">nipple piercing</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">MeSH-NLM</Keyword>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20220330</DatePublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <License license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
      <AltText language="en">This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</AltText>
      <AltText language="de">Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).</AltText>
    </License>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>2195-8831</ISSN>
        <Volume>10</Volume>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Infectious Diseases</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS Infect Dis</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>03</ArticleNo>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph>The main objective of this review is to identify the most frequently isolated bacteria in patients with infections related to nipple piercings in case reports and case series. In addition, the aim is to describe clinical manifestations and antecedents. There is a protocol of this review. The terms &#8220;bacterial infections&#8221;, &#8220;nipple piercing&#8221; and their synonyms were considered. Pubmed&#47;Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science core collection and Ovid&#47;Medline databases were searched until November 15, 2021 without date or language restrictions. Two authors extracted the articles and three other authors performed the selection, first by title and abstract, and second by full-text revision. Discrepancies were resolved with yet two other authors. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs checklists. Finally, data extraction was realized. A total of 1,531 articles were extracted, of which 20 articles were included, and one article was added by hand-searching. The final number of articles included was 21, all of them with acceptable quality of evidence. Twenty-seven patients were considered (23 women and 4 men), aged between 15&#8211;60 years old. The most frequent bacterial genus in case reports and case series was <Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> (n&#61;10), and the most frequent species was <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> (n&#61;6), although etiology seems to be diverse. The breast was the main affected organ, and the most frequent findings were fluid collection, pain, erythema, granulation tissue and swelling. The suspicion of infection by this bacterial species could be taken into account when it is associated with nipple piercings; however, larger studies are required to give a conclusion based on the evidence.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Introduction">
      <MainHeadline>Introduction</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Piercing is a type of body modification performed by inserting a large gauge needle through skin or cartilage, creating a fistula-like opening, usually adorned <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. A survey in the United States reported that 35&#37; of participants claimed to have had piercings, and 14&#37; in places other than the earlobe <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Additionally, a survey conducted in France showed that people aged 25 to 34 had the highest prevalence of having a piercing, with greater frequency in women <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. The most common visible locations for those perforations are the face, nose and ears; the semi-visible areas are the navel and tongue; and not-visible, such as nipples and perineum, have become common types of body art in both genders <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Nipple piercings (NP) can cause both non-infectious and infectious complications. Non-infectious complications include injuries when playing contact sports, galactorrhea when nipples are stimulated, etc. <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. On the other hand, NP could favor the access of pathogens that lead to local infections at the area of perforation that could spread to surrounding tissues, causing mastitis or abscesses <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The isolation of the specific type of bacteria could be essential to choose the most appropriate treatment. In general, the therapeutic approach for breast abscess recommends accompanying the drainage with antibiotics focused on the suspicion of <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. However, the presence of NP may predispose to infections caused by other types of pathogens. There are systematic reviews about etiology and complications from ear cartilage <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, tongue <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink> and lip <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink> piercings. However, to date there is no systematic review about the complications or etiology of NP, the incidence of which appeared to be 21&#37; <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. Additionally, the presence of NP is significantly associated to the development of breast abscess <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, a clinical manifestation of bacterial breast infections. Therefore, in order to answer a specific question with evidence-based methodology, this systematic review focuses on bacterial infections in patients with nipple piercings. Nowadays, the main source of information about bacterial infections associated with NP are case reports and case series. Consequently, in order to determine which are the most commonly isolated bacteria in these patients, these types of publications have been critically reviewed in this article. In addition, clinical manifestations and antecedents are described.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Materials and methods">
      <MainHeadline>Materials and methods</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Case reports and case series about bacterial infections in the mammary region, heart, skin or blood in patients with an antecedent of NP were searched. In this review, &#8220;case series&#8221; are defined as those studies in which more than 5 cases are reported <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. There is a pre-published protocol of this systematic review registered in PROSPERO, CRD42021236900 (<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.crd.york.ac.uk&#47;prospero&#47;display&#95;record.php&#63;ID&#61;CRD42021236900">https:&#47;&#47;www.crd.york.ac.uk&#47;prospero&#47;display&#95;record.php&#63;ID&#61;CRD42021236900</Hyperlink>). This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink> (Attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1"/>, Supplementary Material 1).</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Data sources and search</SubHeadline><Pgraph>PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science core collection and Ovid&#47;Medline databases were searched until November 15, 2021. The terms &#8220;bacterial infections&#8221;, &#8220;nipple piercing&#8221; and their synonyms were considered; however, terms referring to piercings in other body locations were excluded. There were no date or language restrictions. The PubMed search strategy was modified for use in other databases (Attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1"/>, Supplementary Material 2). Additionally, a hand-search was performed in the same databases to identify other potentially relevant articles.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Selection criteria</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The inclusion criteria were: 1) having an NP; 2) bacterial infection in the mammary region, associated skin, heart or blood; and 3) isolation and identification of the bacterial genus and species. The following exclusion criteria were considered: 1) incorrect population: patients infected by other types of microorganisms (viruses, fungi, parasites) or patients without NP; 2) incorrect publication type: revisions, misprints, etc.; 3) not having access to full-text; and 4) reports that did not specify causative agent. In addition, not all patients from every selected article were included; in contrast, just those patients in which the infection-causing bacteria was identified were included, defined as &#8220;eligible cases&#8221;.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Selection of studies</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Two authors (GAAV, MMAS) exported the articles from the databases to Rayyan software (<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.rayyan.ai&#47;">https:&#47;&#47;www.rayyan.ai&#47;</Hyperlink>). Then, duplicates were removed to continue with the selection, carried out independently by three authors (LMAC, KAZA, CAAM), first by title and abstract, and second by full-text revision. Discrepancies were resolved with two other authors (CAAA and AAAC).</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Data extraction</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Data were extracted and verified by all the authors. The following data were extracted: 1) author; 2) age and sex of the patient; 3) compromised nipple; 4) the length of time the patient had the NP; 5) clinical presentation and antecedents; and 6) isolated bacteria and treatment in each case.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Quality assessment</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case reports <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink> and for case series <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. Acceptable quality was considered for cases that satisfied 5 appraisal items <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Results">
      <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Selected studies</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A total of 1,531 articles were extracted from PubMed (n&#61;175), Scopus (n&#61;444), Embase (n&#61;486), Web of Science core collection (n&#61;137) and Ovid&#47;Medline (n&#61;288). Additionally, one article was added by hand-searching in the five electronic databases mentioned <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. Removal of duplicate articles resulted in a total of 488. In the selection by title and abstract, 431 articles were eliminated. With the remaining 57, a full-text review was carried out, in which 36 articles were excluded for the reasons given in Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>, where the flowchart of the selection process according to PRISMA is shown <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. Finally, 21 articles were considered in this review <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Characteristics of the selected studies</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Twenty-one articles were included for qualitative synthesis, all of them with acceptable quality of evidence (Attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1"/>, Supplementary Material 3). Four out of 21 articles were case series, and the rest were case reports. Regarding the case reports, one of them presented three eligible cases <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>; on the other hand, three of the case series presented more than one eligible case: one of them presented three <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink> and the other, four <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. All other articles only presented one eligible case, such that 27 patients were considered in total. The following data is summarized for each eligible case: 1) patient characteristics; 2) clinical presentation and antecedents; and 3) isolated bacteria. Additional information can be found in Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Patient characteristics</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Of the 27 patients, 23 were women <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink> and 4 were men <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, with an age range between 15&#8211;60 years old. With regard to the piercing location, 15 patients had the piercing in the right nipple <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, 7 in the left nipple <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, and 1 in both nipples <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>; however, in four patients this information was not described <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. The time between the placement of the piercing and the infection was not specified in nine cases <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>; on the other hand, regarding those that were specific: 3 patients had NP for a period less than 1 month <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>; 7 patients had NP for a period greater than 1 month but less than 6 months <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>; 6 patients had NP for a period greater than or equal to 6 months but less than or equal to 1 year <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>; and only 3 patients had NP for more than 1 year <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Clinical presentation and antecedents</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The breast was the main affected organ in the clinical presentation. Breast fluid collection was found in 22 patients <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, breast pain or tenderness in 10 patients <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, breast enlarging or swelling in 9 patients <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, breast erythema in 8 patients <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, and granulomatous tissue in 5 patients <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. The following findings were not reported in more than one patient: chest wall cellulitis <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, retroareolar cellulitis <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, dyspnea and productive cough with bloody sputum <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, hyperpigmentation <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, breast induration <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink> and endocarditis <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Some antecedents were reported, as follows: sexual contact with possible exposure of the pierced nipple <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, smoking <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, breast implants <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, pectoral and calf implants <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, exposure or swimming in dirty water <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, or in the ocean <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, touching the nipple with objects <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink> and the presence of prosthetic aortic valve <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Clinical presentation and antecedents of the patients are summarized individually in Table 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>.</Pgraph><Pgraph></Pgraph><SubHeadline>Isolated bacteria</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The most frequently isolated bacterial genera were <Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> (n&#61;10) and <Mark2>Mycobacterium</Mark2> (n&#61;9), all in different patients except for two of them <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>. All isolated <Mark2>mycobacteria</Mark2> were non-tuberculous <Mark2>mycobacteria</Mark2> (NTM). In total, there were 6 cases of infection due to <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>; 8 cases due to coagulase-negative <Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, 4 of them confirmed as <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>; 2 due to <Mark2>N. gonorrhoeae</Mark2> <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>; 2 due to <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>; 2 due to <Mark2>S. agalactiae</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>; and 2 due to <Mark2>P. acnes</Mark2> <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. In addition, the following bacteria were identified in one patient only: <Mark2>A. turicensis</Mark2> <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <Mark2>G. terrae</Mark2> <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <Mark2>P. melanogenica</Mark2> <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <Mark2>P. intermedia</Mark2> <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <Mark2>P. anaerobius</Mark2> <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <Mark2>Nocardia</Mark2> sp. <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <Mark2>M. chelonei</Mark2> <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <Mark2>P. harei</Mark2> <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <Mark2>M. abscessus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <Mark2>M. holsaticum</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <Mark2>M. agri</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <Mark2>M. brumae</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <Mark2>Actinomyces</Mark2> <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <Mark2>P. acnes</Mark2> <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <Mark2>C. amycolatum</Mark2> <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <Mark2>H. parainfluenzae</Mark2> <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, group A beta-hemolytic <Mark2>Streptococcus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, a &#8220;green microaerophilic <Mark2>Streptococcus&#8221;</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, and a rare gram-positive coccus not otherwise specified <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. On the other hand, some cases corresponded to co-infections, for example: <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> was reported as coinfection in two cases, in one of them with <Mark2>P. melanogenica</Mark2> <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink> and in the other case with <Mark2>Nocardia</Mark2> sp. <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>; <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> was also reported as coinfection in two cases, in one of them with <Mark2>M. chelonei</Mark2> <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink> and in the other case with <Mark2>Actinomyces</Mark2> and <Mark2>P. harei</Mark2> <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>; also, one of the <Mark2>S. agalactiae</Mark2> cases was actually a co-infection with coagulase-negative <Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>; moreover, <Mark2>P. intermedia</Mark2> was reported with <Mark2>P. anaerobius</Mark2> <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>; finally, there was a co-infection of <Mark2>C. amycolatum</Mark2>, <Mark2>P. acnes</Mark2> and <Mark2>H. parainfluenzae</Mark2> <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. Isolated bacteria, as well as treatments for each patient are summarized in Table 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion">
      <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Cases of breast abscess in non-lactating patients usually present a combined flora of <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2>, <Mark2>Streptococcus</Mark2>, and anaerobic bacteria <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>. In this review, the most frequent bacterial genus was <Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> (n&#61;10); followed by <Mark2>Mycobacterium</Mark2> (n&#61;9), specifically coagulase-negative <Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> and NTMs, respectively; and the most commonly identified species were <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> (n&#61;6) and <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> (n&#61;4).</Pgraph><Pgraph>The fast-growing mycobacteria, or Runyon&#8217;s group IV, are the most common cause of soft tissue Mycobacterium infection and they are often related to trauma <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. According to the literature, infections by <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> (a fast-growing type of mycobacterium) appear to be unusual <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>. <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> usually causes skin and soft tissue infections after direct inoculation, such as in trauma, surgery or cosmetic procedures; although, according to literature, it seems to be less frequent in the latter <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>. However, <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> was the most frequently isolated bacterial species in this review. In addition, <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> has also been isolated in infections related to other cosmetic procedures besides piercings, such as pedicures <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>, tattooing <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, and mesotherapy <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Five of the six cases of infection by <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> reported fluid collection. This fact is corroborated in the literature, since in most cases this type of bacteria causes pustules, nodules with or without suppuration, granulomas with the presence of a central or necrotic caseous area and a sporotrichoid pattern, with susceptibility to certain antibiotics, such as amikacin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, erythromycin, cefoxitin, and doxycycline <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark2>Staphylococcus</Mark2> was the most frequent bacterial genus found in this review. <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> can cause localized inflammation, cellulitis, or even the formation of abscesses, which begin as a localized acute inflammatory response <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>. In fact, according to literature, most primary breast abscesses are associated with <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> infection, therefore empirical antibiotics are usually based on suspicion of this bacterium <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. However, in this review, <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> was reported less frequently than <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2>, which was isolated in 4 patients (although coagulase-negative <Mark2>staphylococcus</Mark2> was reported in 8 patients). Nevertheless, it should be noted that <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> was not the main cause of breast infection in two of these patients <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>. <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> is a harmless commensal of the skin and mucous membranes; however, this pathogen can also cause infection from exogenous sources, such as endocarditis from native and prosthetic valves <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, catheter surfaces <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, and medical implants <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. The latter has been reported in this review. One of the included articles reports a case of <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> infection in a patient with history of bilateral augmentation with silicone implants two years before placing the NP in both nipples <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>. In addition, there was a similar case with pectoral and calf implants; however, in this patient group, A beta-hemolytic <Mark2>streptococcus</Mark2> was isolated <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. Additionally, another of the reviewed cases reports a native valve endocarditis due to the spread of <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> from a previous mastitis <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Since <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> is a human commensal, all of the case reports suggest a contamination by the normal flora of the skin in which the access point is the hole created by the NP.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Two cases of <Mark2>N. gonorrhoeae</Mark2> infection were also identified. These two patients reported recent sexual contact involving the NP, one with the partner&#8217;s penis <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, and the other with the mouth <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. <Mark2>N. gonorrhoeae</Mark2> can be easily transmitted from men to their sexual partners, since it can adhere to sperm, causing high bacterial concentrations in this fluid <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. In one of these patients <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, penis-nipple contact was doubtful, but mouth-nipple contact was reported; in the same way in the other one <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, in which all types of contact with ejaculatory fluid were denied, but vigorous contact of mouth-mouth and mouth-nipple type was confirmed. Although the main transmission mechanism is through direct penile-vaginal contact or vice versa, representing approximately 70&#37; of the cases according to literature <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>, saliva could represent the transmission path in the cases presented in this review, since the presence of <Mark2>N. gonorrhoeae</Mark2> in saliva and pharyngeal secretions has been previously demonstrated <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>A large number of patients were women. This seems to be related to the fact that the use of NP is more common in women, but actually literature suggests that NP is more common in men <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink>. However, NP could cause more problems in women than in men, since women have more adjacent subcutaneous tissue in the breast region, which represents an entry route for pathogenic organisms <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>. Obesity <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink> and smoking <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink> were the main antecedents reported in this review. In fact, these two variables were previously identified as risk factors for the development of breast abscess <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>. Moreover, it is advisable to ask the patient about the history of NP, even when this is not evident in the clinical presentation, since the patient could have removed it before <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>It is suggested to start antibiotic treatment as soon as a bacterial skin infection is suspected, after taking a culture, then maintaining or changing the antibiotic according to the results of the antibiogram, depending on the individual case. Additionally, if the case corresponds to a breast abscess, it will be necessary to drain or aspirate the fluid. On the other hand, culture results sometimes could be negative, but because of clinical features and the casuistry found in this review, the clinician will have to assess whether to continue or suspend the antibiotic treatment. Most of the patients &#8211; 22 out of 27 total to be precise &#8211; presented fluid collection in the mammary region. The therapeutic approach guides for breast abscesses recommend accompanying the drainage with targeted antibiotics for the suspicion of <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Although etiology in patients with NP seems to be diverse, the suspicion of infection by <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> could be taken into account. However, we suggest larger studies (i.e., case control studies) to confirm, based on evidence, a possible association between NP and <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> infection. Despite having considered thorough exclusion criteria and a critical appraisal checklist, the results of the case reports and case series by their nature are not representative for the entire population. However, as it constitutes the only evidence available about the etiology of bacterial infections in patients with NP, this systematic review provides an important first step in determining the etiology of infections among different bacterial species in patients with nipple piercings, especially if the infection persists despite the initial treatment.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Conclusions">
      <MainHeadline>Conclusions</MainHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">The bacterial species with the highest frequency in the case reports and case series of patients with infections and NP was <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Despite the limitations of this review, the suspicion of infection by <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> could be taken into account, especially if the infection persists despite the initial treatment.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Larger studies are needed to determine an association between NP and <Mark2>M. fortuitum</Mark2> infection.</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes">
      <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Acknowledgments</SubHeadline><Pgraph>We would like to thank Dr. Mar&#237;a Soledad Ayala Ravelo for her supervision and guidance throughout the preparation of this manuscript.</Pgraph><Pgraph>We would also like to thank Dr. William Aguilar Urbina for guiding us with his methodological and clinical expertise in the process of drafting the discussion of results.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Authors&#8217; ORCIDs</SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Luis M. Acu&#241;a-Ch&#225;vez: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0003-3953-6446">0000-0003-3953-6446</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Christian A. Alva-Alayo: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-7056-7219">0000-0002-7056-7219</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Giamfranco A. Aguilar-Villanueva: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-5880-056X">0000-0001-5880-056X</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Kevin A. Zavala-Alvarado: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-8084-4582">0000-0002-8084-4582</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Cristhian A. Alverca-Meza: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-5473-4198">0000-0001-5473-4198</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Mar&#237;a M. Aguirre-S&#225;nchez: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-5584-3350">0000-0002-5584-3350</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Anyelo A. Amaya-Castro: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0003-1010-2599">0000-0003-1010-2599</Hyperlink></ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Armstrong ML</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Koch JR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Saunders JC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roberts AE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Owen DC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The hole picture: risks, decision making, purpose, regulations, and the future of body piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Dermatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>398-406</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Armstrong ML, Koch JR, Saunders JC, Roberts AE, Owen DC. The hole picture: risks, decision making, purpose, regulations, and the future of body piercing. Clin Dermatol. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):398-406. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.clindermatol.2007.05.019</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.clindermatol.2007.05.019</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Laumann AE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Derick AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: a national data set</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Am Acad Dermatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>413-21</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Laumann AE, Derick AJ. Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Sep;55(3):413-21. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jaad.2006.03.026</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jaad.2006.03.026</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Kluger N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Misery L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Seit&#233; S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Taieb C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Body Piercing: A National Survey in France</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Dermatology</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>71-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kluger N, Misery L, Seit&#233; S, Taieb C. Body Piercing: A National Survey in France. Dermatology. 2019;235(1):71-8. DOI: 10.1159&#47;000494350</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1159&#47;000494350</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Caliendo C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Armstrong ML</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roberts AE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Self-reported characteristics of women and men with intimate body piercings</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Adv Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>474-84</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Caliendo C, Armstrong ML, Roberts AE. Self-reported characteristics of women and men with intimate body piercings. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):474-84. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2648.2004.03320.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2648.2004.03320.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Holbrook J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Minocha J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Laumann A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Body piercing: complications and prevention of health risks</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Am J Clin Dermatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1-17</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Holbrook J, Minocha J, Laumann A. Body piercing: complications and prevention of health risks. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012 Feb;13(1):1-17. DOI: 10.2165&#47;11593220-000000000-00000</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.2165&#47;11593220-000000000-00000</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Stirn A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Body piercing: medical consequences and psychological motivations</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Lancet</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1205-15</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Stirn A. Body piercing: medical consequences and psychological motivations. Lancet. 2003 Apr;361(9364):1205-15. DOI: 10.1016&#47;S0140-6736(03)12955-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;S0140-6736(03)12955-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Dixon J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Primary breast abscess</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>UpToDate</RefJournal>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dixon J. Primary breast abscess. UpToDate. 2017. Available from: https:&#47;&#47;www.uptodate.com&#47;contents&#47;primary-breast-abscess&#47;</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;www.uptodate.com&#47;contents&#47;primary-breast-abscess&#47;</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Sosin M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Weissler JM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pulcrano M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rodriguez ED</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Transcartilaginous ear piercing and infectious complications: a systematic review and critical analysis of outcomes</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Laryngoscope</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1827-34</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sosin M, Weissler JM, Pulcrano M, Rodriguez ED. Transcartilaginous ear piercing and infectious complications: a systematic review and critical analysis of outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug;125(8):1827-34. DOI: 10.1002&#47;lary.25238</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;lary.25238</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Slot DE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Van der Weijden GA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The incidence of complications associated with lip and&#47;or tongue piercings: a systematic review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Dent Hyg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>62-73</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. The incidence of complications associated with lip and&#47;or tongue piercings: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Feb;14(1):62-73. DOI: 10.1111&#47;idh.12118</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;idh.12118</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Mayers LB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Judelson DA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moriarty BW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rundell KW</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Prevalence of body art (body piercing and tattooing) in university undergraduates and incidence of medical complications</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Mayo Clin Proc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>29-34</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Mayers LB, Judelson DA, Moriarty BW, Rundell KW. Prevalence of body art (body piercing and tattooing) in university undergraduates and incidence of medical complications. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Jan;77(1):29-34. DOI: 10.4065&#47;77.1.29</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.4065&#47;77.1.29</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Gollapalli V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Liao J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dudakovic A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sugg SL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scott-Conner CE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Weigel RJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Risk factors for development and recurrence of primary breast abscesses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Am Coll Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>41-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gollapalli V, Liao J, Dudakovic A, Sugg SL, Scott-Conner CE, Weigel RJ. Risk factors for development and recurrence of primary breast abscesses. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jul;211(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.007</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.007</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Huam&#225;n-Guerrero M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pichardo-Rodr&#237;guez R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>De La Cruz-Vargas JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Como hacer un reporte de caso, principios metodol&#243;gicos</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Rev Fac Med Hum</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>47-52</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Huam&#225;n-Guerrero M, Pichardo-Rodr&#237;guez R, De La Cruz-Vargas JA. Como hacer un reporte de caso, principios metodol&#243;gicos. Rev Fac Med Hum. 2016;16(2):47-52. DOI: 10.25176&#47;RFMH.v16.n2.668</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.25176&#47;RFMH.v16.n2.668</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Liberati A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Altman DG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tetzlaff J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mulrow C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>G&#248;tzsche PC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ioannidis JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Clarke M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Devereaux PJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kleijnen J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moher D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>PLoS Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e1000100</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, G&#248;tzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul;6(7):e1000100. DOI: 10.1371&#47;journal.pmed.1000100</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1371&#47;journal.pmed.1000100</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Moola S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Munn Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tufanaru C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aromataris E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sears K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sfetcu R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Currie M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Qureshi R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mattis P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lisy K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mu P-F</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, Currie M, Qureshi R, Mattis P, Lisy K, Mu P-F. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020. Available from: https:&#47;&#47;jbi.global&#47;critical-appraisal-tools</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;jbi.global&#47;critical-appraisal-tools</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Munn Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Barker TH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moola S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tufanaru C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stern C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McArthur A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stephenson M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aromataris E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JBI Evid Synth</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2127-33</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, Tufanaru C, Stern C, McArthur A, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2127-33. DOI: 10.11124&#47;JBISRIR-D-19-00099</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.11124&#47;JBISRIR-D-19-00099</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Son H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Song HJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Seo HJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lee H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Choi SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lee S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The safety and effectiveness of self-administered coffee enema: A systematic review of case reports</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Medicine (Baltimore)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Son H, Song HJ, Seo HJ, Lee H, Choi SM, Lee S. The safety and effectiveness of self-administered coffee enema: A systematic review of case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e21998. DOI: 10.1097&#47;MD.0000000000021998</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;MD.0000000000021998</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Brook I</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from 3 patients with infection at a pierced body site</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Infect Dis</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e12-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Brook I. Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from 3 patients with infection at a pierced body site. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;33(1):e12-3. DOI: 10.1086&#47;320891</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1086&#47;320891</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>de Kleer N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cohen M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Semple J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Simor A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Antonyshyn O</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Nipple piercing may be contraindicated in male patients with chest implants</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Plast Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>188-90</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>de Kleer N, Cohen M, Semple J, Simor A, Antonyshyn O. Nipple piercing may be contraindicated in male patients with chest implants. Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Aug;47(2):188-90. DOI: 10.1097&#47;00000637-200108000-00014</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;00000637-200108000-00014</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Jacobs VR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Golombeck K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jonat W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kiechle M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Drei Fallbeispiele von Brustabszess nach Brustwarzenpiercing: Untersch&#228;tzte Gesundheitsprobleme eines Modeph&#228;nomens</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Zentralbl Gynakol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>378-85</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Jacobs VR, Golombeck K, Jonat W, Kiechle M. Drei Fallbeispiele von Brustabszess nach Brustwarzenpiercing: Untersch&#228;tzte Gesundheitsprobleme eines Modeph&#228;nomens &#91;Three case reports of breast abscess after nipple piercing: underestimated health problems of a fashion phenomenon&#93;. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2002 Jul;124(7):378-85. DOI: 10.1055&#47;s-2002-35545</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1055&#47;s-2002-35545</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Zardawi IM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jones F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Clark DA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Holland J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gordonia terrae-induced suppurative granulomatous mastitis following nipple piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pathology</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>275-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Zardawi IM, Jones F, Clark DA, Holland J. Gordonia terrae-induced suppurative granulomatous mastitis following nipple piercing. Pathology. 2004 Jun;36(3):275-8. DOI: 10.1080&#47;00313020410001692639</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;00313020410001692639</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>Pendle S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Barnes T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from an unexpected site</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Sex Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>593-4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Pendle S, Barnes T. Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from an unexpected site. Sex Health. 2016 Nov;13(6):593-4. DOI: 10.1071&#47;SH16124</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1071&#47;SH16124</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="22">
        <RefAuthor>Ochsenfahrt C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Friedl R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hannekum A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schumacher BA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Endocarditis after nipple piercing in a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Thorac Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1365-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ochsenfahrt C, Friedl R, Hannekum A, Schumacher BA. Endocarditis after nipple piercing in a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Apr;71(4):1365-6. DOI: 10.1016&#47;s0003-4975(00)02273-6</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;s0003-4975(00)02273-6</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="23">
        <RefAuthor>Bader MS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hamodat M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hutchinson J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A fatal case of Staphylococcus aureus: associated toxic shock syndrome following nipple piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Scand J Infect Dis</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>741-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bader MS, Hamodat M, Hutchinson J. A fatal case of Staphylococcus aureus: associated toxic shock syndrome following nipple piercing. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(8):741-3. DOI: 10.1080&#47;00365540701199881</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;00365540701199881</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="24">
        <RefAuthor>Maroun E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cakrabarti A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sandin R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Greene J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium fortuitum Breast Infection After Nipple Ring Placement &#8211; Case Presentation and Review of the Literature</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Infect Dis Clin Pr</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>309-11</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Maroun E, Cakrabarti A, Sandin R, Greene J. Mycobacterium fortuitum Breast Infection After Nipple Ring Placement &#8211; Case Presentation and Review of the Literature. Infect Dis Clin Pr. 2012 Sep;20(5):309-11. DOI: 10.1097&#47;IPC.0b013e318255d530</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;IPC.0b013e318255d530</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="25">
        <RefAuthor>Bengualid V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Singh V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Singh H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Berger J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium fortuitum and anaerobic breast abscess following nipple piercing: case presentation and review of the literature</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Adolesc Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>530-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bengualid V, Singh V, Singh H, Berger J. Mycobacterium fortuitum and anaerobic breast abscess following nipple piercing: case presentation and review of the literature. J Adolesc Health. 2008 May;42(5):530-2. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jadohealth.2007.10.016</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jadohealth.2007.10.016</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="26">
        <RefAuthor>Drifmeyer E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Batts K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Breast Abscess After Nipple Piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Consultant</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>481-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Drifmeyer E, Batts K. Breast Abscess After Nipple Piercing. Consultant. 2007 Apr;47(5):481-2.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="27">
        <RefAuthor>Leibman AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Misra M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Castaldi M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Breast abscess after nipple piercing: sonographic findings with clinical correlation</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Ultrasound Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1303-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Leibman AJ, Misra M, Castaldi M. Breast abscess after nipple piercing: sonographic findings with clinical correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Sep;30(9):1303-8. DOI: 10.7863&#47;jum.2011.30.9.1303</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.7863&#47;jum.2011.30.9.1303</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="28">
        <RefAuthor>Shoyele O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vidhun R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dodge J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cheng Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Margules R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nee P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sieber S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: A clinicopathologic study of a distinct entity with supporting evidence of a role for Corynebacterium-targeted therapy</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Diagn Pathol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>51-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shoyele O, Vidhun R, Dodge J, Cheng Z, Margules R, Nee P, Sieber S. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: A clinicopathologic study of a distinct entity with supporting evidence of a role for Corynebacterium-targeted therapy. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2018 Dec;37:51-6. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.anndiagpath.2018.08.005</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.anndiagpath.2018.08.005</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="29">
        <RefAuthor>Siddique N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roy M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ahmad S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium fortuitum abscess following breast nipple piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>IDCases</RefJournal>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Siddique N, Roy M, Ahmad S.  Mycobacterium fortuitum abscess following breast nipple piercing. IDCases. 2020 May 28;21. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.idcr.2020.e00847</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.idcr.2020.e00847</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="30">
        <RefAuthor>Baker G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Nipple Piercing-Associated Infections: Case Series with Review of the Literature and an Association with Granulomatous Mastitis &#8211; Abstracts from USCAP 2019: Breast Pathology (100-298)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Lab Invest</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>14-5</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Baker G. Nipple Piercing-Associated Infections: Case Series with Review of the Literature and an Association with Granulomatous Mastitis &#8211; Abstracts from USCAP 2019: Breast Pathology (100-298). Lab Invest. 2019;99(S1):14-5. DOI: 10.1038&#47;s41374-019-0234-9</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1038&#47;s41374-019-0234-9</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="31">
        <RefAuthor>Ceniceros A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Galen B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Madaline T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gonococcal breast abscess</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>IDCases</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e00620</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ceniceros A, Galen B, Madaline T. Gonococcal breast abscess. IDCases. 2019;18:e00620. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.idcr.2019.e00620</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.idcr.2019.e00620</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="32">
        <RefAuthor>Cornelissen AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Solberg L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Qiu SS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tuinder S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van der Hulst R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Breast Implant Infection After Nipple Piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Aesthet Surg J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>NP3-NP4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Cornelissen AJ, Solberg L, Qiu SS, Tuinder S, van der Hulst R. Breast Implant Infection After Nipple Piercing. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jan;37(1):NP3-NP4. DOI: 10.1093&#47;asj&#47;sjw193</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1093&#47;asj&#47;sjw193</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="33">
        <RefAuthor>Abbass K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Adnan MK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Markert RJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Emig M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Khan NA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium fortuitum breast abscess after nipple piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Can Fam Physician</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>51-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Abbass K, Adnan MK, Markert RJ, Emig M, Khan NA. Mycobacterium fortuitum breast abscess after nipple piercing. Can Fam Physician. 2014 Jan;60(1):51-2.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="34">
        <RefAuthor>Pearlman MD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium chelonei breast abscess associated with nipple piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1995</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>116-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Pearlman MD. Mycobacterium chelonei breast abscess associated with nipple piercing. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1995;3(3):116-8. DOI: 10.1155&#47;S1064744995000433</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1155&#47;S1064744995000433</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="35">
        <RefAuthor>Abdulrahman GO Jr</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gateley CA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Primary actinomycosis of the breast caused by Actinomyces turicensis with associated Peptoniphilus harei</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Breast Dis</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>45-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Abdulrahman GO Jr, Gateley CA. Primary actinomycosis of the breast caused by Actinomyces turicensis with associated Peptoniphilus harei. Breast Dis. 2015 Jan;35(1):45-7. DOI: 10.3233&#47;BD-140381</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3233&#47;BD-140381</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="36">
        <RefAuthor>Trupiano JK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sebek BA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Goldfarb J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Levy LR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hall GS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Procop GW</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mastitis due to Mycobacterium abscessus after body piercing</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Infect Dis</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>131-4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Trupiano JK, Sebek BA, Goldfarb J, Levy LR, Hall GS, Procop GW. Mastitis due to Mycobacterium abscessus after body piercing. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;33(1):131-4. DOI: 10.1086&#47;320885</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1086&#47;320885</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="37">
        <RefAuthor>Lewis CG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wells MK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jennings WC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium fortuitum breast infection following nipple-piercing, mimicking carcinoma</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Breast J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>363-5</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Lewis CG, Wells MK, Jennings WC. Mycobacterium fortuitum breast infection following nipple-piercing, mimicking carcinoma. Breast J. 2004 Jul-Aug;10(4):363-5. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1075-122X.2004.21393.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1075-122X.2004.21393.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="38">
        <RefAuthor>Toomey A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Le JK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Breast Abscess</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Toomey A, Le JK. Breast Abscess. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="39">
        <RefAuthor>Ferringer T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pride H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tyler W</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Body Piercing Complicated by Atypical Mycobacterial Infections</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pediatr Dermatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>219-22</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ferringer T, Pride H, Tyler W. Body Piercing Complicated by Atypical Mycobacterial Infections. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 Mar-Apr;25(2):219-22. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1525-1470.2008.00638.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1525-1470.2008.00638.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="40">
        <RefAuthor>Patel T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scroggins-Markle L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kelly B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A Dermal Piercing Complicated by Mycobacterium fortuitum</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Case Rep Dermatol Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>149829</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Patel T, Scroggins-Markle L, Kelly B. A Dermal Piercing Complicated by Mycobacterium fortuitum. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2013 Aug;2013:149829. DOI: 10.1155&#47;2013&#47;149829</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1155&#47;2013&#47;149829</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="41">
        <RefAuthor>Zurita-Cruz JN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#225;rquez-Gonz&#225;lez H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Miranda-Novales G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Villas&#237;s-Keever M&#193;</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Estudios experimentales: dise&#241;os de investigaci&#243;n para la evaluaci&#243;n de intervenciones en la cl&#237;nica</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Rev Alerg Mex</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>178-86</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Zurita-Cruz JN, M&#225;rquez-Gonz&#225;lez H, Miranda-Novales G, Villas&#237;s-Keever M&#193;. Estudios experimentales: dise&#241;os de investigaci&#243;n para la evaluaci&#243;n de intervenciones en la cl&#237;nica &#91;Experimental studies: research designs for the evaluation of interventions in clinical settings&#93;. Rev Alerg Mex. 2018 Apr-Jun;65(2):178-86. DOI: 10.29262&#47;ram.v65i2.376</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.29262&#47;ram.v65i2.376</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="42">
        <RefAuthor>Winthrop KL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Abrams M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yakrus M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schwartz I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ely J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gillies D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vugia DJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>An outbreak of mycobacterial furunculosis associated with footbaths at a nail salon</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>N Engl J Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1366-71</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Winthrop KL, Abrams M, Yakrus M, Schwartz I, Ely J, Gillies D, Vugia DJ. An outbreak of mycobacterial furunculosis associated with footbaths at a nail salon. N Engl J Med. 2002 May;346(18):1366-71. DOI: 10.1056&#47;NEJMoa012643</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1056&#47;NEJMoa012643</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="43">
        <RefAuthor>Redbord KP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shearer DA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gloster H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Younger B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Connelly BL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kindel SE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lucky AW</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Atypical Mycobacterium furunculosis occurring after pedicures</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Am Acad Dermatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>520-4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Redbord KP, Shearer DA, Gloster H, Younger B, Connelly BL, Kindel SE, Lucky AW. Atypical Mycobacterium furunculosis occurring after pedicures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Mar;54(3):520-4. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jaad.2005.10.018</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jaad.2005.10.018</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="44">
        <RefAuthor>Suvanasuthi S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wongpraparut C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pattanaprichakul P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bunyaratavej S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mycobacterium fortuitum cutaneous infection from amateur tattoo</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Med Assoc Thai</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>834-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Suvanasuthi S, Wongpraparut C, Pattanaprichakul P, Bunyaratavej S. Mycobacterium fortuitum cutaneous infection from amateur tattoo. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Jun;95(6):834-7.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="45">
        <RefAuthor>Qui&#241;ones C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ramalle-G&#243;mara E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Perucha M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lezaun ME</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fern&#225;ndez-Vilari&#241;o E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Garc&#237;a-Morr&#225;s P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Simal G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>An outbreak of Mycobacterium fortuitum cutaneous infection associated with mesotherapy</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>604-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Qui&#241;ones C, Ramalle-G&#243;mara E, Perucha M, Lezaun ME, Fern&#225;ndez-Vilari&#241;o E, Garc&#237;a-Morr&#225;s P, Simal G. An outbreak of Mycobacterium fortuitum cutaneous infection associated with mesotherapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 May;24(5):604-6. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1468-3083.2009.03461.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1468-3083.2009.03461.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="46">
        <RefAuthor>Kullavanijaya P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Atypical mycobacterial cutaneous infection</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Dermatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>153-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kullavanijaya P. Atypical mycobacterial cutaneous infection. Clin Dermatol. 1999 Mar-Apr;17(2):153-8. DOI: 10.1016&#47;s0738-081x(99)00008-5</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;s0738-081x(99)00008-5</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="47">
        <RefAuthor>Kobayashi SD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Malachowa N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>DeLeo FR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Am J Pathol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1518-27</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses. Am J Pathol. 2015 Jun;185(6):1518-27. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ajpath.2014.11.030</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ajpath.2014.11.030</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="48">
        <RefAuthor>Chu VH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Miro JM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hoen B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cabell CH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pappas PA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jones P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stryjewski ME</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Anguera I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Braun S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mu&#241;oz P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Commerford P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tornos P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Francis J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Oyonarte M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Selton-Suty C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Morris AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Habib G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Almirante B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sexton DJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Corey GR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fowler VG Jr</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor> International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study Group</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Coagulase-negative staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis &#8211; a contemporary update based on the International Collaboration on Endocarditis: prospective cohort study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Heart</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>570-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Chu VH, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Pappas PA, Jones P, Stryjewski ME, Anguera I, Braun S, Mu&#241;oz P, Commerford P, Tornos P, Francis J, Oyonarte M, Selton-Suty C, Morris AJ, Habib G, Almirante B, Sexton DJ, Corey GR, Fowler VG Jr; International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study Group. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis &#8211; a contemporary update based on the International Collaboration on Endocarditis: prospective cohort study. Heart. 2009 Apr;95(7):570-6. DOI: 10.1136&#47;hrt.2008.152975</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;hrt.2008.152975</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="49">
        <RefAuthor>Khardori N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yassien M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wilson K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Tolerance of Staphylococcus epidermidis grown from indwelling vascular catheters to antimicrobial agents</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1995</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Ind Microbiol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>148-51</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Khardori N, Yassien M, Wilson K. Tolerance of Staphylococcus epidermidis grown from indwelling vascular catheters to antimicrobial agents. J Ind Microbiol. 1995 Sep;15(3):148-51. DOI: 10.1007&#47;BF01569818</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;BF01569818</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="50">
        <RefAuthor>Rubino C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brongo S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pagliara D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cuomo R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Abbinante G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Campitiello N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Santanelli F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chessa D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Infections in breast implants: a review with a focus on developing countries</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Infect Dev Ctries</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1089-95</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rubino C, Brongo S, Pagliara D, Cuomo R, Abbinante G, Campitiello N, Santanelli F, Chessa D. Infections in breast implants: a review with a focus on developing countries. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Sep;8(9):1089-95. DOI: 10.3855&#47;jidc.3898</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3855&#47;jidc.3898</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="51">
        <RefAuthor>James-Holmquest AN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Swanson J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Buchanan TM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wende RD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Williams RP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Differential attachment by piliated and nonpiliated Neisseria gonorrhoeae to human sperm</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1974</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Infect Immun</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>897-902</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>James-Holmquest AN, Swanson J, Buchanan TM, Wende RD, Williams RP. Differential attachment by piliated and nonpiliated Neisseria gonorrhoeae to human sperm. Infect Immun. 1974 May;9(5):897-902. DOI: 10.1128&#47;iai.9.5.897-902.1974</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1128&#47;iai.9.5.897-902.1974</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="52">
        <RefAuthor>Kirkcaldy RD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Weston E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Segurado AC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hughes G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: a global perspective</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Sex Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>401-11</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kirkcaldy RD, Weston E, Segurado AC, Hughes G. Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: a global perspective. Sex Health. 2019 Sep;16(5):401-11. DOI: 10.1071&#47;SH19061</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1071&#47;SH19061</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="53">
        <RefAuthor>Chow EP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lee D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tabrizi SN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Phillips S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Snow A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cook S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Howden BP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Petalotis I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bradshaw CS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chen MY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fairley CK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the pharynx and saliva: implications for gonorrhoea transmission</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Sex Transm Infect</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>347-9</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Chow EP, Lee D, Tabrizi SN, Phillips S, Snow A, Cook S, Howden BP, Petalotis I, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Fairley CK. Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the pharynx and saliva: implications for gonorrhoea transmission. Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Aug;92(5):347-9. DOI: 10.1136&#47;sextrans-2015-052399</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;sextrans-2015-052399</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="54">
        <RefAuthor>Bone A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ncube F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nichols T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Noah ND</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Body piercing in England: a survey of piercing at sites other than earlobe</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMJ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1426-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bone A, Ncube F, Nichols T, Noah ND. Body piercing in England: a survey of piercing at sites other than earlobe. BMJ. 2008 Jun;336(7658):1426-8. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bmj.39580.497176.25</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bmj.39580.497176.25</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="55">
        <RefAuthor>Bharat A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gao F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aft RL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gillanders WE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Eberlein TJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Margenthaler JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Predictors of primary breast abscesses and recurrence</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>World J Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2582-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bharat A, Gao F, Aft RL, Gillanders WE, Eberlein TJ, Margenthaler JA. Predictors of primary breast abscesses and recurrence. World J Surg. 2009 Dec;33(12):2582-6. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s00268-009-0170-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s00268-009-0170-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>1</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Characteristics of the included studies</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>2</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 2: Antecedents and clinical presentation</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>3</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 3: Isolated bacteria and treatment</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <NoOfTables>3</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <Figure format="png" height="600" width="680">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>1</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: PRISMA flowchart</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <NoOfPictures>1</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <Attachment>
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID filename="id000080.a1.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf" origFilename="Attachment1&#95;id000080.pdf" size="120011" url="">1</MediaID>
          <AttachmentTitle>Supplementary Material</AttachmentTitle>
        </Attachment>
        <NoOfAttachments>1</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>