<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE GmsArticle SYSTEM "http://www.egms.de/dtd/2.0.34/GmsArticle.dtd">
<GmsArticle xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>zma001759</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/zma001759</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0017596</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType language="en">review article</ArticleType>
    <ArticleType language="de">&#220;bersichtsarbeit</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Drivers and barriers to career entry and retention of nurses with initial higher education: A scoping review</Title>
      <TitleTranslated language="de">Treiber und H&#252;rden des Berufseinstieges und Verbleibs hochschulisch qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen: Ein Scoping Review</TitleTranslated>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>M&#252;ller</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>M&#252;ller</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Julia</Firstname>
          <Initials>J</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Working Group on Health Service Research, Nursing in Hospital, Magdeburger Str. 12, D-06112 Halle (Saale), Germany, Phone: &#43;49 (0)345&#47;557-4286<Affiliation>Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Working Group on Health Service Research, Nursing in Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany</Affiliation></Address>
        <Address language="de">Martin-Luther-Universit&#228;t Halle-Wittenberg, Medizinische Fakult&#228;t, Department f&#252;r Innere Medizin, AG Versorgungsforschung, Pflege im Krankenhaus, Magdeburger Str. 12, 06112 Halle (Saale), Deutschland, Tel.: &#43;49 (0)345&#47;557-4286<Affiliation>Martin-Luther-Universit&#228;t Halle-Wittenberg, Medizinische Fakult&#228;t, Department f&#252;r Innere Medizin, AG Versorgungsforschung, Pflege im Krankenhaus, Halle (Saale), Deutschland</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>julia.mueller&#64;uk-halle.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Breitinger</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Breitinger</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Florian</Firstname>
          <Initials>F</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training, N&#252;rnberg and Potsdam, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Forschungsinstitut Betriebliche Bildung gGmbH (f-bb), N&#252;rnberg und Potsdam, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Br&#228;uer</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Br&#228;uer</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Patricia</Firstname>
          <Initials>P</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training, N&#252;rnberg and Potsdam, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Forschungsinstitut Betriebliche Bildung gGmbH (f-bb), N&#252;rnberg und Potsdam, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Dauer</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Dauer</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Bettina</Firstname>
          <Initials>B</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (VET), Bonn, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Bundesinstitut f&#252;r Berufsbildung (BIBB), Bonn, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Zilezinski</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Zilezinski</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Max</Firstname>
          <Initials>M</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Charit&#233;-University Medicine Berlin, Institute for Clinical Nursing Science  Charit&#233; Centre 1 for Human and Health Sciences &#8211; Campus Charit&#232; Mitte, Berlin, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Charit&#233;-Universit&#228;tsmedizin, Institut f&#252;r klinische Pflegewissenschaft, Berlin, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Paulicke</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Paulicke</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Denny</Firstname>
          <Initials>D</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Working Group on Health Service Research, Nursing in Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany</Affiliation>
          <Affiliation>Akkon University of Human Sciences, Department of Medical Education, Berlin, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Martin-Luther-Universit&#228;t Halle-Wittenberg, Medizinische Fakult&#228;t, Department f&#252;r Innere Medizin, AG Versorgungsforschung, Pflege im Krankenhaus,</Affiliation>
          <Affiliation>Akkon Hochschule f&#252;r Humanwissenschaften, Fachbereich Medizinp&#228;dagogik, Berlin, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Jahn</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Jahn</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Patrick</Firstname>
          <Initials>P</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Working Group on Health Service Research, Nursing in Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Martin-Luther-Universit&#228;t Halle-Wittenberg, Medizinische Fakult&#228;t, Department f&#252;r Innere Medizin, AG Versorgungsforschung, Pflege im Krankenhaus, Halle (Saale), Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">initial higher education</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">staff development</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">nursing</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">barriers</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">drivers</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">scoping review</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">prim&#228;rqualifizierende Pflegeausbildung</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Personalentwicklung</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Pflege</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Barrieren</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Treiber</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Scoping Review</Keyword>
      <SectionHeading language="en">nurses</SectionHeading>
      <SectionHeading language="de">Pflegekr&#228;fte</SectionHeading>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DateReceived>20241025</DateReceived>
    <DateRevised>20250118</DateRevised>
    <DateAccepted>20250327</DateAccepted>
    <DatePublishedList>
      <DatePublished>20250616</DatePublished>
    </DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <LanguageTranslation>germ</LanguageTranslation>
    <License license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
      <AltText language="en">This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</AltText>
      <AltText language="de">Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).</AltText>
    </License>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>2366-5017</ISSN>
        <Volume>42</Volume>
        <Issue>3</Issue>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Journal for Medical Education</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS J Med Educ</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>35</ArticleNo>
    <Fundings>
      <Funding fundId="9510160237">Bundesinstitut f&#252;r Berufsbildung (BIBB)</Funding>
    </Fundings>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="de" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Hintergrund: </Mark1>Bisherige &#220;bersichtsarbeiten beleuchten einzelne Aspekte der fr&#252;hen Berufslaufbahn Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen &#8211; etwa Anpassungsstrategien, Herausforderungen im Arbeitsalltag oder Unterst&#252;tzungsprogramme. Ein integrativer &#220;berblick &#252;ber das Zusammenspiel dieser Faktoren fehlt bislang.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Dieser Beitrag zeigt systematisch Treiber und Barrieren auf, die den Berufseinstieg, die Rollenentwicklung sowie den langfristigen Verbleib von Pflegefachpersonen mit prim&#228;rqualifizierendem Hochschulabschluss beeinflussen.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methodik:</Mark1> Ein Scoping Review wurde nach den Richtlinien des Joanna Briggs Institute durchgef&#252;hrt. Die systematische Literaturrecherche erfolgte in den Datenbanken MEDLINE (via PubMed) und CINAHL (via EBSCO) im Februar, Mai 2022 sowie im August 2024. Die Studienmerkmale wurden narrativ zusammengefasst. Die Analyse erfolgte induktiv und wurde thematisch in die Bereiche Berufseinstieg, Rollenentwicklung und Verbleib gegliedert.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ergebnisse: </Mark1>31 Studien aus 13 L&#228;ndern wurden eingeschlossen. Davon befassten sich 18 mit Faktoren zum Berufseinstieg, 10 mit der Rollenentwicklung und 3 mit dem Verbleib. Zentrale Barrieren waren mangelnde Teamunterst&#252;tzung, Angst vor Fehlern und hohe Arbeitsbelastung. F&#246;rderlich wirkten sich die Unterst&#252;tzung durch Mentor:innen, Peer-Netzwerke und strukturierte &#220;bergangsphasen aus.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Schlussfolgerung: </Mark1>F&#252;r die nachhaltige Integration von Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen in der Pflegepraxis sind mehrstufige strukturelle Rahmenbedingungen erforderlich, die sowohl hemmende als auch f&#246;rderliche Einflussfaktoren adressieren.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Background: </Mark1>While previous systematic reviews have examined specific aspects of the career trajectories of bachelor-qualified nurses, including adjustment strategies, workplace challenges, and support programmes, no comprehensive synthesis exists addressing how these factors interact across the broader early career pathway.</Pgraph><Pgraph>This article examines the drivers and barriers influencing entry, role transition, and retention of graduate nurses, providing insights that complement existing research.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methods: </Mark1>A systematic literature search following the principles of a scoping review was conducted in the professional databases MEDLINE via PubMed and CINAHL via EBSCO in February and May 2022, as well as in August 2024. The characteristics of the included studies were summarised narratively in a pre-consented data extraction table. The synthesis of information was performed inductively and organised into three emergent themes: Career Entry, Role Development, and Retention.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Results: </Mark1>31 publications from 13 countries were included in the synthesis and presentation of results. Among these, 18 studies examined factors inhibiting career entry, 10 studies explored role transition, and 3 studies investigated factors influencing retention. Barriers included insufficient team support, fear of making mistakes, and increased workload. Facilitators included support structures, such as mentors and peer networks, as well as designated transition periods.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Conclusion: </Mark1>To promote the academic professionalisation of nursing in Germany and integrate of bachelor-qualified nurses into practice, structural frameworks embedded within the nursing process and oriented across multiple levels are essential. These frameworks should address both the barriers and facilitators identified in this review.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock name="Background" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Background</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Nurses in Germany are qualified to provide independent, process-oriented care through either vocational training (a three-year apprenticeship) or university education (a three- to four-year bachelor&#8217;s degree) &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.buzer.de&#47;9&#95;Pflegeberufegesetz-PflBG.htm">https:&#47;&#47;www.buzer.de&#47;9&#95;Pflegeberufegesetz-PflBG.htm</Hyperlink>&#93;. The regulation of nursing education at universities and universities of applied sciences was only introduced by the Nursing Profession Act in 2020. (The term &#8220;nurse&#8221; used in this paper corresponds to the term &#8220;registered nurse&#8221;, which is commonly used in many countries.) In 2022, the German Council of Science and Humanities reiterated its 2012 recommendation for 10 to 20&#37; of nurses to be academically trained <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. This stands in stark contrast to the actual proportion of university-qualified nurses, which was just 1.75&#37; in 2021 <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. In inpatient long-term care, their share of the total workforce is less than 1&#37; <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>. Most bachelor-qualified nurses are employed in hospitals, often performing tasks similar to those of vocationally trained nurses, although some take on additional responsibilities or pursue advanced degrees <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The concepts of career entry, role transition, and retention are central to understanding the integration of bachelor-qualified nurses into professional practice. Career entry refers to the initial phase where newly qualified nurses adapt to the realities of clinical practice, navigate organisational structures, and begin applying their theoretical knowledge in real-world settings <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. In contrast, role transition involves the developmental process of assuming independent professional responsibilities and establishing a sense of professional identity within a team and organizational context <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. While career entry focuses on mastering foundational competencies and adjusting to the workplace environment, role transition emphasises deeper integration into professional roles and managing interpersonal and organizational dynamics. Retention, meanwhile, encompasses strategies and factors that ensure the long-term sustainability of nurses in the workforce, including job satisfaction, career advancement opportunities, and institutional support <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>This scoping review is embedded within a broader research project aimed at facilitating the successful and sustainable career entry of bachelor-qualified nurses. The project seeks to design tailored job profiles and develop concepts that healthcare and nursing organisations can use to systematically integrate bachelor-qualified nurses and create individualised career paths.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Existing theoretical frameworks provide valuable insights into distinct aspects of nurses&#8217; career development. For instance, Duchscher&#8217;s transition framework emphasizes the emotional and social challenges faced during role transitions in the early stages of a nursing career. Baharum et al. <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> categorise factors influencing adaptation, such as work environments, personal attributes, and educational preparation. Hakvoort et al. <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink> extend this perspective by exploring long-term factors that shape career development, such as continuing education and professional growth opportunities. However, these models primarily address individual phases or general nursing populations and do not integrate findings across the entire early career trajectory of bachelor-qualified nurses.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In addition, existing systematic reviews have addressed related aspects: Baharum et al. <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> identified adaptation strategies, Hawkins et al. <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink> explored negative workplace behaviors, and Reebals et al. <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink> examined support programs for new nurses. While valuable, these reviews lack a comprehensive perspective on the career trajectory of bachelor-qualified nurses across the phases of career entry, role transition, and retention.</Pgraph><Pgraph>This scoping review systematically identifies drivers and barriers across these three phases. By synthesising international findings and employing an inductive approach, it complements existing reviews and frameworks, offering actionable insights for healthcare systems integrating bachelor-qualified nurses, particularly in contexts like Germany, where academic nursing roles are still evolving.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Hintergrund" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Hintergrund</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Pflegefachpersonen in Deutschland qualifizieren sich entweder &#252;ber eine berufliche Ausbildung (drei Jahre im dualen System) oder ein prim&#228;rqualifizierendes duales Hochschulstudium (drei- bis vierj&#228;hriger Bachelorabschluss) f&#252;r die eigenverantwortliche, prozessorientierte Versorgung &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.buzer.de&#47;9&#95;Pflegeberufegesetz-PflBG.htm">https:&#47;&#47;www.buzer.de&#47;9&#95;Pflegeberufegesetz-PflBG.htm</Hyperlink>&#93;. Die hochschulische Pflegeausbildung an Universit&#228;ten und Fachhochschulen wurde erst mit dem Inkrafttreten des Pflegeberufegesetzes im Jahr 2020 gesetzlich geregelt. (Der Begriff &#8222;Pflegefachperson&#8220; entspricht dem international verbreiteten Begriff &#8222;Registered Nurse&#8220;.)</Pgraph><Pgraph>Im Jahr 2022 erneuerte der Wissenschaftsrat seine Empfehlung aus dem Jahr 2012, wonach 20&#37; der Pflegefachpersonen &#252;ber eine akademische Qualifikation verf&#252;gen sollten <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. Dies steht im deutlichen Widerspruch zur Realit&#228;t: Im Jahr 2021 lag der Anteil akademisch qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen bei lediglich 1,75&#37; <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. In der station&#228;ren Langzeitpflege betr&#228;gt ihr Anteil sogar weniger als 1&#37; <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>. Die Mehrheit der Bachelor-qualifizierten Pflegefachpersonen arbeitet in Krankenh&#228;usern, h&#228;ufig in Aufgabenfeldern, die denen beruflich ausgebildeter KollegInnen entsprechend. Einzelne &#252;bernehmen jedoch erweiterte Aufgaben oder streben weiterf&#252;hrende Qualifikationen an <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Konzepte Berufseinstieg, Rollenentwicklung und Verbleib sind zentral f&#252;r das Verst&#228;ndnis der Integration von Bachelor-qualifizierten Pflegefachpersonen in die Berufspraxis: </Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Der Berufseinstieg beschreibt die Phase, in der neu graduierte Pflegefachpersonen erstmals klinische Verantwortung &#252;bernehmen, sich in organisatorischen Strukturen orientieren und ihr theoretisches Wissen praktisch anwenden <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. </ListItem><ListItem level="1">Die Rollenentwicklung umfasst den Prozess der &#220;bernahme professioneller Eigenverantwortung sowie der Herausbildung einer beruflichen Identit&#228;t im Team- und Organisationskontext <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. </ListItem><ListItem level="1">Der Verbleib bezieht sich auf Faktoren und Strategien, die eine langfristige Bindung an den Beruf f&#246;rdern &#8211; etwa Arbeitszufriedenheit, Entwicklungsm&#246;glichkeiten und institutionelle Unterst&#252;tzung <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>.</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Das vorliegende Scoping Review ist Teil eines gr&#246;&#223;eren Forschungsprojekts, welche die erfolgreiche und nachhaltige Integration von Bachelor-qualifizierten Pflegefachpersonen f&#246;rdern m&#246;chte. Ziel ist die Entwicklung passgenauer Aufgabenprofile und Konzepte, mit denen Einrichtungen akademisierte Pflegefachpersonen systematisch integrieren und individuelle Karrierewege gestalten k&#246;nnen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Zwar liefern bestehende theoretische Modelle wichtige Erkenntnisse zu einzelnen Aspekten der beruflichen Entwicklung &#8211; etwa das Transition Framework von Duchscher <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink> oder die Kategorisierungen von Baharum et al. <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> &#8211;, doch konzentrieren sich diese zumeist auf bestimmte Phasen oder allgemeine Pflegepopulationen. Eine systematische, phasen&#252;bergreifende Perspektive speziell f&#252;r Bachelor-qualifizierte Pflegefachpersonen fehlt bislang.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Erg&#228;nzend existieren systematische Reviews zu verwandten Themen: Baharum et al. <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> beschrieben Anpassungsstrategien, Hawkins et al. <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink> analysierten negative Verhaltensweisen am Arbeitsplatz, und Reebals et al. <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink> untersuchten Unterst&#252;tzungsprogramme f&#252;r Berufseinsteiger&#42;innen <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>. Diese Beitr&#228;ge liefern wertvolle Einblicke, adressieren jedoch nicht den gesamten Verlauf der fr&#252;hen Berufskarriere von akademisch ausgebildeten Pflegefachpersonen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Das vorliegende Scoping Review zielt daher auf die systematische Identifikation von Treibern und Barrieren &#252;ber die Phasen Berufseinstieg, Rollenentwicklung und Verbleib hinweg. Es erg&#228;nzt bestehende Modelle um eine phasen&#252;bergreifende Perspektive und liefert praxisrelevante Erkenntnisse &#8211; insbesondere f&#252;r Kontexte wie Deutschland, in denen sich hochschulische Pflegequalifikationen erst im Aufbau befinden.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Objective" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Objective</MainHeadline><Pgraph>This scoping review aims to systematically explore and analyse the drivers and barriers influencing bachelor-qualified nurses during the early stages of their careers. While existing literature provides insights into topics such as workplace adaptation, negative workplace behaviors, and transition programs, it does not offer a comprehensive understanding of the specific challenges and opportunities encountered by this group.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Furthermore, the review complements the broader research project by supporting other surveys and laying the groundwork for developing strategies to effectively integrate university-educated nurses into the care sector.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Zielsetzung" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Zielsetzung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Dieses Scoping Review hat das Ziel, systematisch die Treiber und Barrieren zu untersuchen und zu analysieren, die Bachelor-qualifizierte Pflegefachpersonen in den fr&#252;hen Phasen ihrer beruflichen Laufbahn beeinflussen. Zwar liefert die bestehende Literatur Erkenntnisse zu Themen wie beruflicher Anpassung, negativen Verhaltensweisen am Arbeitsplatz oder &#220;bergangsprogrammen, doch fehlt ein umfassendes Verst&#228;ndnis der spezifischen Herausforderungen und Chancen, mit denen diese Zielgruppe konfrontiert ist.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Dar&#252;ber hinaus erg&#228;nzt das Review ein &#252;bergeordnetes Forschungsprojekt, indem er andere Erhebungen unterst&#252;tzt und eine Grundlage f&#252;r die Entwicklung von Strategien zur effektiven Integration akademisch ausgebildeter Pflegefachpersonen in den Versorgungsbereich schafft.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Method" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Method</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The scoping review was conducted according to the methodological guidelines of the Johanna Briggs Institute <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink> and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink> . No protocol was developed a priori for this scoping review.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Eligibility criteria</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of studies are shown in table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table" />. Only primary studies were included. Studies were included if they focused on identifying factors that influenced the implementation or integration process of bachelor-qualified nurses into health care practice, and studies that described influencing factors related to nursing management strategy. Only studies published between 2000 and 2024 in English or German with abstracts were included. Studies were excluded if they focused on nursing students, long-term staff or masters graduates. Studies focusing exclusively on Associate of Science in Nursing (ASN) graduates were also excluded. Book chapters, conference papers, and qualifying or doctoral theses were not included. Studies that did not focus exclusively on baccalaureate graduates were not excluded.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Information sources</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The literature databases MEDLINE via PubMed and CINAHL via EBSCO were searched systematically and independently by two persons (MZ &#38; PL) in February, May 2022 and August 2024. In addition, the reference lists of the included full texts were searched for further references (JM). Grey literature was not included. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Search</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The search term was developed (MZ), discussed and expanded by the entire research team, and the search terms adapted for each database are listed in the online supplement to this article (see attachment 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1" />).</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Selection of sources of evidence</SubHeadline><Pgraph>All articles were screened using the tool &#8220;rayyan&#8221; <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>. To increase consistency between reviewers, both authors (JM &#38; PL) double-blindly reviewed the same publications for the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria and discussed the results. Both reviewers (JM &#38; PL) assessed the titles, abstracts and full texts of all publications identified in the search for potentially relevant publications for consistency with the research question. 11 Conflicts were resolved by consensus and by the decision of a third reviewer (PJ).</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Data charting</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A data charting form was developed jointly by two reviewers to determine which variables to extract. The two reviewers (JM &#38; PL) independently charted the data, discussed the results, and continually updated the data charting form in an iterative process. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Data items</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The characteristics of the studies were narratively summarised in a pre-prepared data table (JM) and included information on authors, year, study size and population, country of origin, study design, study objectives and results. The extracted results data were inductively analysed according to the specified focus (JM), i.e. the studies were not discussed, but structured thematically and reported as an evidence synthesis. The results of the analysis were reviewed and critically discussed by the research team.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Methodik" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Methodik</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Das Scoping Review wurde gem&#228;&#223; den methodischen Leitlinien des Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink> durchgef&#252;hrt und nach den Empfehlungen der PRISMA-Erweiterung f&#252;r Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. Ein Protokoll wurde im Vorfeld nicht erstellt.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien sind in Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table" /> dargestellt. Eingeschlossen wurden ausschlie&#223;lich Prim&#228;rstudien, die Faktoren untersuchten, welche den Implementierungs- oder Integrationsprozess Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen in der Versorgungspraxis beeinflussen &#8211; einschlie&#223;lich strategischer Ans&#228;tze im Pflegemanagement. Studien mussten zwischen 2000 und 2024 in deutscher oder englischer Sprache mit Abstract ver&#246;ffentlicht worden sein.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Ausgeschlossen wurden Studien, die sich ausschlie&#223;lich auf Pflegestudierende, langj&#228;hrig t&#228;tige Pflegefachpersonen oder Masterabsolvent&#42;innen konzentrierten. Ebenso ausgeschlossen wurden Studien, die sich ausschlie&#223;lich auf Abschl&#252;sse als Associate of Science in Nursing (ASN) bezogen. Buchkapitel, Konferenzbeitr&#228;ge sowie Qualifikations- oder Promotionsarbeiten wurden nicht ber&#252;cksichtigt. Studien, die sich nicht ausschlie&#223;lich auf Bachelorabsolvent&#42;innen fokussierten, wurden nicht ausgeschlossen.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Informationsquellen</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die Literaturrecherche erfolgte in den Fachdatenbanken MEDLINE (via PubMed) und CINAHL (via EBSCO) durch zwei unabh&#228;ngige Personen (MZ &#38; PL) im Februar, Mai 2022 sowie im August 2024. Zus&#228;tzlich wurde die Referenzliste der eingeschlossenen Volltexte durchsucht (JM). Graue Literatur wurde nicht ber&#252;cksichtigt.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Suchstrategie</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Der Suchbegriff wurde von MZ entwickelt, im Team diskutiert und f&#252;r jede Datenbank angepasst. Die vollst&#228;ndige Suchstrategie ist im Online-Anhang (siehe Anhang 1 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="1" />) dargestellt.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Auswahl der Quellen</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Alle Artikel wurden mithilfe des Tools &#8222;rayyan&#8220; <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink> gescreent. Um die Konsistenz zu erh&#246;hen, sichteten zwei Autor&#42;innen (JM &#38; PL) die gleichen Publikationen zun&#228;chst mithilfe der Doppelverblindung auf Grundlage der Einschluss- und Ausschlusskriterien. Titel, Abstracts und Volltexte aller identifizierten Artikel wurden von beiden hinsichtlich ihrer Relevanz f&#252;r die Fragestellung bewertet. Konflikte (n&#61;11) wurden im Konsens und ggf. durch eine dritte Person (PJ) entschieden.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Datenerhebung</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Ein Erhebungsraster wurde gemeinsam von zwei Autor&#42;innen entwickelt, um festzulegen, welche Variablen extrahiert werden sollten. JM &#38; PL trugen die Daten unabh&#228;ngig voneinander ein, diskutierten Ergebnisse und passten das Erhebungsraster iterativ an.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Datenitems</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die Studienmerkmale wurden narrativ in einer vorbereiteten Tabelle zusammengefasst (JM), darunter Autor&#42;innenschaft, Jahr, Studiendesign, Stichprobengr&#246;&#223;e und -population, Herkunftsland, Zielsetzung und zentrale Ergebnisse. Die extrahierten Daten wurden induktiv gem&#228;&#223; dem thematischen Fokus analysiert (JM). Die Ergebnisse wurden thematisch strukturiert und als Evidenzsynthese dargestellt. Die Analyse wurde im Team kritisch diskutiert.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Results" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Selection of sources of evidence</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The systematic database search yielded 6453 studies, which were adjusted for 1433 duplicates. 5020 studies were reduced to 97 full texts after title and abstract screening. A further 14 studies were identified by screening the reference lists of eligible publications. After screening the 97 full texts for eligibility 31 studies were finally included. The literature search was conducted using the PRISMA ScR <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>, see figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure" />. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Characteristics of the included studies</SubHeadline><Pgraph>All studies were written in English, except for one German paper. The studies were conducted in a total of 13 countries. Of these, three countries belonged to the European Union, which was represented by eight publications. There was one study from Germany. North America is represented by five studies from the USA and four publications from Canada. There are six studies from Australia, one from Africa and seven from Asia. Qualitative studies represent the majority, accounting for 25 studies, followed by three mixed-methods studies, one observational study, one observational study utilising multilevel statistical analysis and one quasi-experimental study. After reviewing the studies, they were grouped into three themes. Thus nine studies <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink> identified factors that inhibit or promote career entry, nine studies <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink> identified factors that inhibit or facilitate career entry in transition programmes, ten studies <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink> identified factors that inhibit or promote role transition from graduate to established nurse, three studies <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink> and identified factors that inhibit or promote graduate retention and career development. </Pgraph><Pgraph>A total of 2724 bachelor-qualified nurses were included in the 31 studies. In addition, care managers were included in two studies <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>,<TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, and experienced nurses in one study <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink> and mentors in two other studies <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The length of time a nurse was considered &#8220;newly qualified&#8221; varied between studies from less than 4 months to 2 years.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The characteristics of each study are listed in the online supplement (see attachment 2 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="2" />).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Attachment 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" /> provide an overview of the barriers and drivers identified in each study, categorised according to the three thematic areas. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Career entry </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Nine studies investigated the career entry of bachelor-qualified nurses <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Four studies identified factors that either facilitated or inhibited the transition of newly qualified Bachelor nurses <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>. One study focused on the challenges faced by new nurses during this transition phase <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, while another explored the provision of transition support for early-career nurses <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>. Three studies delved into the experiences of newly qualified nurses as they navigated the transition process <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Three studies assessed the impact of transition programmes on bachelor-qualified nurses <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Two additional studies examined the challenges and opportunities associated with such programmes <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Three studies identified strategies and key components for designing effective transition programmes <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>. Finally, one study analysed the learning processes of nurses participating in a transition programme, emphasising the importance of newly qualified Bachelor nurses recognising and embracing their professional roles <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Role transition</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Ten studies were categorised under the theme of role transition. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Eight studies focused on the experiences of bachelor-qualified nurses transitioning from new nurse to professional practice <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>One study examined the needs of new graduates during role transitions <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, while another study investigated organisational stressors affecting professional commitment during this phase <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Retention and career development </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Three studies were allocated to the theme of retention and career development. One study explored nurses&#8217; motivations for leaving the nursing profession <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. The authors interviewed 17 former nurses who had left the nursing profession after 2 years were interviewed. Another study identified factors that may contribute to sustainable retention of staff in hospital wards <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The only German study aimed to collect data on the career paths, job satisfaction and future prospects of academically trained nurses <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. 77.6&#37; of respondents reported that they were working in direct care. These respondents reported higher levels of dissatisfaction with their professional situation, with 81.3&#37; seeing opportunities for further development. 31.1&#37; of participants engaged in postgraduate study, with 39.6&#37; were planning to do so. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Cross-theme insights</SubHeadline><Pgraph>An analysis across the three themes revealed significant interconnectedness. Barriers such as lack of team support and high workloads frequently emerged across all phases, indicating that these challenges are not isolated to specific career stages but rather systemic issues. Similarly, enablers such as mentorship and structured feedback consistently facilitated positive outcomes throughout the career trajectory.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The cross-tabulation (see attachment 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" />) provides a comprehensive summary of these barriers and facilitators, demonstrating how they intersect across career entry, role transition, and retention.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Ergebnisse" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Ergebnisse</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Auswahl der Studien</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die systematische Literaturrecherche ergab insgesamt 6453 Treffer. Nach dem Entfernen von 1433 Duplikaten verblieben 5020 Studien. Durch Titel- und Abstract-Screening wurden 97 Volltexte zur weiteren Pr&#252;fung ausgew&#228;hlt. Zus&#228;tzlich wurden 14 Studien &#252;ber das Screening der Referenzlisten relevanter Beitr&#228;ge identifiziert. Nach Sichtung der Volltexte erf&#252;llten 31 Studien die Einschlusskriterien und wurden in die Analyse aufgenommen. Der Auswahlprozess orientierte sich an der PRISMA-ScR-Checkliste <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>; siehe Abbildung 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure" />. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Charakteristika der eingeschlossenen Studien</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Alle Studien wurden in englischer Sprache verfasst, mit Ausnahme einer deutschsprachigen Publikation. Die Studien wurden in insgesamt 13 L&#228;ndern durchgef&#252;hrt. Davon entfielen acht Publikationen auf drei Mitgliedstaaten der Europ&#228;ischen Union. Eine der Studien stammte aus Deutschland. Nordamerika war durch f&#252;nf Studien aus den USA und vier Studien aus Kanada vertreten. Zudem wurden sechs Studien aus Australien, eine aus Afrika und sieben aus Asien eingeschlossen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Mehrheit der Studien (n&#61;25) verfolgte einen qualitativen Forschungsansatz. Erg&#228;nzt wurde dies durch drei Mixed-Methods-Studien, eine Beobachtungsstudie, eine Beobachtungsstudie mit multivariater Mehrebenenanalyse sowie eine quasi-experimentelle Studie.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Nach Sichtung der Studien wurden diese drei thematischen Schwerpunkten zugeordnet: Neun Studien <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink> identifizierten f&#246;rderliche oder hemmende Faktoren f&#252;r den Berufseinstieg. Neun Studien <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink> untersuchten Faktoren, die den Berufseinstieg im Rahmen von &#220;bergangsprogrammen beg&#252;nstigen oder erschweren. Zehn Studien <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink> analysierten Einflussfaktoren auf den Rollen&#252;bergang von der Absolventin bzw. vom Absolventen zur etablierten Pflegefachperson. Drei Studien <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink> identifizierten Einflussfaktoren auf den Verbleib und die berufliche Weiterentwicklung von Pflegefachpersonen. Insgesamt wurden in den 31 eingeschlossenen Studien 2724 Bachelor-qualifizierte Pflegefachpersonen untersucht. Zus&#228;tzlich wurden in zwei Studien Pflegemanager&#42;innen <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink> in einer Studie erfahrene Pflegefachpersonen <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink> sowie in zwei weiteren Studien MentorInnen <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink> einbezogen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Dauer, in der eine Pflegefachperson als &#8222;berufseinsteigend&#8220; eingestuft wurde, variierte je nach Studie zwischen unter vier Monaten und bis zu zwei Jahren.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die detaillierten Charakteristika der einzelnen Studien sind im Online-Anhang (siehe Anhang 2 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="2" />) dargestellt.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Anhang 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" /> geben einen strukturierten &#220;berblick &#252;ber die jeweils identifizierten Barrieren und f&#246;rderlichen Faktoren, gegliedert nach den drei Themenbereichen.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Berufseinstieg</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Neun Studien befassten sich mit dem Berufseinstieg von Bachelor-qualifizierten Pflegefachpersonen <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Vier dieser Studien identifizierten f&#246;rderliche oder hemmende Faktoren beim &#220;bergang in die Berufspraxis <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>. Eine Studie fokussierte spezifisch auf Herausforderungen, denen neu eingestiegene Pflegefachpersonen in dieser Phase begegneten <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink> w&#228;hrend eine weitere die vorhandenen Unterst&#252;tzungsangebote in &#220;bergangsphasen untersuchte <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>. Drei Studien widmeten sich den Erfahrungen von Berufseinsteiger&#42;nnen w&#228;hrend des Eingliederungsprozesses <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Drei Studien evaluierten die Wirksamkeit von &#220;bergangsprogrammen auf Bachelor-qualifizierte Pflegefachpersonen <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Zwei weitere untersuchten Herausforderungen und Potenziale solcher Programme <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Drei Studien ermittelten zentrale Gestaltungsmerkmale erfolgreicher &#220;bergangsprogramme <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>. Eine zus&#228;tzliche Studie analysierte Lernprozesse im Rahmen eines &#220;bergangsprogramms und hob dabei die Bedeutung der Entwicklung einer professionellen Identit&#228;t neu graduierter Pflegefachpersonen hervor <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Rollen&#252;bergang</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Zehn Studien wurden dem Themenbereich Rollenentwicklung zugeordnet. Acht Studien fokussierten auf die Erfahrungen Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen beim &#220;bergang von der Ausbildung in die professionelle Berufsaus&#252;bung <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>. Eine Studie untersuchte die Unterst&#252;tzungsbedarfe von BerufseinsteigerInnen w&#228;hrend dieses &#220;bergangs <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, eine weitere analysierte organisationale Stressoren, die das berufliche Commitment beeinflussen <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Verbleib und berufliche Weiterentwicklung</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Drei Studien befassten sich mit dem Themenfeld Verbleib und Karriereentwicklung. Eine Studie untersuchte die Motive von Pflegefachpersonen, den Beruf nach zwei Jahren zu verlassen <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. Die Autor&#42;nnen befragten 17 ehemalige Pflegefachpersonen. Eine weitere Studie identifizierte Faktoren, die zur langfristigen Bindung von Pflegefachpersonen auf Krankenhausstationen beitragen k&#246;nnten <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die einzige deutsche Studie hatte das Ziel, Daten zu beruflichen Verl&#228;ufen, zur Arbeitszufriedenheit und zu Zukunftsperspektiven akademisch qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen zu erheben <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. 77,6&#37; der Befragten gaben an, in der direkten Versorgung t&#228;tig zu sein. Diese Gruppe berichtete &#252;ber ein vergleichsweise hohes Ma&#223; an beruflicher Unzufriedenheit; 81,3&#37; sahen Entwicklungsm&#246;glichkeiten. 31,1&#37; der Teilnehmenden hatten ein weiterf&#252;hrendes Studium begonnen, 39,6&#37; planten dies.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Themen&#252;bergreifende Erkenntnisse</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die Analyse &#252;ber alle drei Themenfelder hinweg zeigte deutliche inhaltliche &#220;berschneidungen. Barrieren wie unzureichende Teamunterst&#252;tzung oder hohe Arbeitsbelastung traten wiederholt in allen Phasen auf, was auf &#252;bergeordnete strukturelle Probleme hinweist. Gleichzeitig erwiesen sich f&#246;rderliche Faktoren wie Mentoring und strukturierte R&#252;ckmeldungen durchg&#228;ngig als wirksam zur Unterst&#252;tzung Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen &#252;ber alle Phasen hinweg.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Kreuztabelle (siehe Anhang 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" /> inkl. Quellen) bietet eine strukturierte &#220;bersicht &#252;ber Barrieren und f&#246;rderliche Faktoren und zeigt, wie sich diese &#252;ber Berufseinstieg, Rollenentwicklung und Verbleib hinweg &#252;berlappen.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Discussion" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>As a foundational systematic synthesis of evidence, this scoping review analysed 31 studies investigating the barriers and drivers associated with integrating bachelor-qualified nurses into healthcare practice. The findings were organised into three emergent themes: &#8220;career entry&#8221;, &#8220;role transition&#8221;, and &#8220;retention and career progression&#8221;. For each theme, specific facilitators and potential interventions to address identified challenges were highlighted. Additionally, it was observed that the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of transition programmes closely resembled those identified in contexts without such programmes. To synthesise and clearly present the findings, a cross-tabulation was developed, providing a structured overview of the results (see attachment 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" />). </Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, organisations should prioritise good teamwork, collaboration with line managers, career prospects, and support services. While extensive international evidence exists in this area, future research should focus on the specific characteristics of the German context. In Germany, only 1.74&#37; of a training cohort attains an academic nursing degree, compared to 45-100&#37; in the countries analysed <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. Despite long-standing recommendations <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>, the importance of higher education frameworks for nursing remains under-recognised by policymakers. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The benefits of employing academically qualified nurses &#8211; such as improved care quality and increased job and career satisfaction &#8211; are well documented (e.g., <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. This satisfaction is closely linked to longer retention in the profession <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>. However, Bachelor programmes in Germany are still in their infancy and often fail to equip students with essential competencies such as advanced clinical decision-making, interprofessional collaboration, and leadership <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. A notable gap exists between the competencies taught in academic programmes and the expectations of clinical practice <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. Additionally, the absence of clearly defined job profiles complicates the alignment of curricula with professional requirements <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>International evidence, as reviewed in this scoping study, highlights the importance of structured clinical placements, mentoring systems, and training in soft skills such as teamwork and resilience to facilitate the transition from education to practice (see attachment 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" />).</Pgraph><Pgraph>This scoping review extends beyond existing systematic reviews by identifying critical similarities and differences between transition programmes and contexts without such programmes. The findings highlight that barriers such as insufficient team support, fear of making mistakes, and high workloads occur both with and without programmes <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>. Furthermore, the cross-tabulation developed in this scoping review systematically organises barriers and facilitators, highlighting the duality of factors such as mentorship and team support, which can act as both enablers and significant barriers when absent. This duality has not been comprehensively addressed in prior reviews and provides actionable insights for designing targeted interventions <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The scoping review methodology provided a comprehensive overview of the research field. The database search string was developed systematically, using relevant keywords and search terms informed by the research objectives and preliminary literature analysis. This ensured the search strategy was robust and well-documented. The selection of studies was conducted in a double-blind manner, with conflicts resolved by a neutral reviewer (PJ), minimising potential bias.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Only one study conducted in Germany (2000-2024) was identified, raising questions about the transferability of the results. Given the relatively recent introduction of academic nursing degrees in Germany, a review of German grey literature could provide further insights. A systematic assessment of the validity of the included studies was not undertaken, as it was beyond the scope of this review.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Diskussion" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Diskussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Als systematische Grundlagensynthese evidenzbasierter Erkenntnisse analysierte dieses Scoping Review 31 Studien, die sich mit hemmenden und f&#246;rderlichen Faktoren im Zusammenhang mit der Integration von Bachelor-qualifizierten Pflegefachpersonen in die Versorgungspraxis befassten. Die Ergebnisse wurden drei thematischen Schwerpunkten zugeordnet: Berufseinstieg, Rollenentwicklung und Verbleib mit beruflicher Weiterentwicklung. F&#252;r jede dieser Phasen wurden spezifische unterst&#252;tzende Ma&#223;nahmen und potenzielle Interventionen zur Bew&#228;ltigung identifizierter Herausforderungen aufgezeigt. Dar&#252;ber hinaus zeigte sich, dass sich die Barrieren und unterst&#252;tzenden Faktoren im Zusammenhang mit der Umsetzung von &#220;bergangsprogrammen stark &#228;hnelten mit jenen in Kontexten ohne strukturierte Programme. Zur strukturierten Darstellung der Befunde wurde eine Kreuztabelle entwickelt, die die Ergebnisse systematisch zusammenfasst (siehe Anhang 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" />).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Zusammenfassend sollten Organisationen insbesondere Aspekte wie funktionierendes Teamwork, Zusammenarbeit mit F&#252;hrungskr&#228;ften, Entwicklungsperspektiven und Unterst&#252;tzungsangebote priorisieren. Obwohl zu diesem Themenfeld umfangreiche internationale Evidenz vorliegt, sollte zuk&#252;nftige Forschung verst&#228;rkt die Besonderheiten des deutschen Kontexts in den Fokus r&#252;cken. In Deutschland erlangen lediglich 1,74&#37; eines Ausbildungsjahrgangs einen prim&#228;rqualifizierenden Hochschulabschluss in der Pflege &#8211; verglichen mit 45 bis 100&#37; in den analysierten L&#228;ndern <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. Trotz langj&#228;hriger Empfehlungen <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink> wird der hochschulischen Qualifikation in der Pflege bislang von politischer Seite nur unzureichende Bedeutung beigemessen. Die Vorteile des Einsatzes akademisch qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen &#8211; etwa verbesserte Versorgungsqualit&#228;t sowie h&#246;here Arbeits- und Berufszufriedenheit &#8211; sind gut belegt <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. Diese Zufriedenheit steht nachweislich im Zusammenhang mit einer erh&#246;hten beruflichen Verweildauer <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>. Dennoch befinden sich die Bachelorstudieng&#228;nge in Deutschland noch in einer fr&#252;hen Entwicklungsphase und vermitteln h&#228;ufig nicht alle erforderlichen Kompetenzen, etwa in den Bereichen klinische Entscheidungsfindung, interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit oder F&#252;hrungskompetenz <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Es besteht eine deutliche L&#252;cke zwischen den im Studium vermittelten Inhalten und den Anforderungen der klinischen Praxis <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. Zus&#228;tzlich erschwert das Fehlen klar definierter Aufgabenprofile die curricular-inhaltliche Ausrichtung auf berufliche Anforderungen <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Internationale Evidenz, wie sie in diesem Scoping Review zusammengetragen wurde, unterstreicht die Bedeutung von strukturierten Praxiseins&#228;tzen, Mentoring-Systemen sowie Trainings in sogenannten &#8222;Soft Skills&#8220; wie Teamarbeit und Resilienz, um den &#220;bergang von der Ausbildung in die Praxis zu erleichtern (siehe Anhang 3 <AttachmentLink attachmentNo="3" />).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Dieses Scoping Review geht &#252;ber bestehende systematische &#220;bersichtsarbeiten hinaus, indem er zentrale Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede zwischen &#220;bergangsprogrammen und Kontexten ohne solche Programme identifiziert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Barrieren wie unzureichende Teamunterst&#252;tzung, Angst vor Fehlern und hohe Arbeitsbelastung sowohl in Programmen als auch in deren Abwesenheit auftreten <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>. Die entwickelte Kreuztabelle strukturiert diese Barrieren und f&#246;rderlichen Faktoren systematisch und zeigt die Doppelfunktion zentraler Elemente wie Mentoring und Teamunterst&#252;tzung auf &#8211; diese k&#246;nnen sowohl als Ressourcen als auch, bei Abwesenheit, als signifikante Barrieren wirken. Diese Dualit&#228;t wurde in fr&#252;heren Reviews nicht ausreichend thematisiert und bietet konkrete Ansatzpunkte f&#252;r gezielte Interventionen <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die gew&#228;hlte Scoping-Review-Methodik erm&#246;glichte eine umfassende &#220;bersicht &#252;ber das Forschungsfeld. Die Suchstrategie wurde systematisch auf Basis der Forschungsziele und einer Voranalyse relevanter Literatur entwickelt und dokumentiert. Die Auswahl der Studien erfolgte durch Doppelverblindung, Konflikte wurden durch eine neutrale Drittperson (PJ) gel&#246;st, wodurch potenzielle Verzerrungen minimiert wurden.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Lediglich eine der eingeschlossenen Studien wurde in Deutschland durchgef&#252;hrt (Zeitraum: 2000-2024), was Fragen zur &#220;bertragbarkeit der Ergebnisse aufwirft. Angesichts der noch jungen hochschulischen Pflegeausbildung in Deutschland k&#246;nnten erg&#228;nzende Analysen der deutschsprachigen Grauen Literatur zus&#228;tzliche Erkenntnisse liefern. Eine systematische Qualit&#228;tsbewertung der eingeschlossenen Studien wurde im Rahmen dieses Scoping Reviews nicht vorgenommen, da dies nicht Ziel der gew&#228;hlten Methodik war.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Conclusion and implications for practice" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Conclusion and implications for practice</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The existing research on the integration of bachelor-qualified nurses offers a wide range of international findings. However, from a German perspective, the predominance of international studies requires critical evaluation due to differences in healthcare systems, educational structures, and professional expectations. For instance, the lack of standardised national guidelines for nursing curricula and varying employer expectations in Germany may present unique barriers.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Future research should explore these specific challenges in the German context. Key questions include:</Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">How do employer and team expectations differ from the competencies taught in bachelor programmes&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">To what extent do continuing education and career development programmes impact job satisfaction and retention&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">What support measures (e.g., mentoring, transition programmes) can ease the transition from education to practice&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">How do experiences of bachelor-qualified nurses differ across care settings (e.g., hospitals, long-term care)&#63;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Addressing these questions requires methodological diversity, combining qualitative stakeholder insights (e.g., focus groups, interviews) with quantitative data (e.g., surveys, workforce analytics). This mixed-methods approach provides a comprehensive understanding of Germany&#8217;s unique challenges.</Pgraph><Pgraph>This review highlights the need to develop and evaluate implementation concepts for integrating Bachelor-qualified nurses into Germany&#8217;s healthcare system. These efforts should include pilot projects, longitudinal studies, and comparative analyses to identify best practices and measure outcomes.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, targeted and methodologically diverse research is needed to bridge the gap between international findings and Germany&#8217;s specific requirements, facilitating the effective integration of Bachelor-qualified nurses.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Fazit und Implikationen f&#252;r die Praxis" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Fazit und Implikationen f&#252;r die Praxis</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die vorliegende Forschung zur Integration Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen bietet ein breites Spektrum internationaler Erkenntnisse. Aus deutscher Perspektive bedarf diese Evidenz jedoch einer kritischen Einordnung, da sich Gesundheits- und Bildungssysteme sowie berufliche Erwartungshaltungen teils erheblich unterscheiden. Beispielsweise k&#246;nnen das Fehlen national einheitlicher Curricula sowie divergierende Arbeitgebererwartungen spezifische Barrieren darstellen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Zuk&#252;nftige Forschung sollte gezielt auf diese Besonderheiten des deutschen Kontextes eingehen. Zentrale Forschungsfragen sind u.a.:</Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Wie unterscheiden sich Arbeitgeber- und Teamerwartungen von den im Studium vermittelten Kompetenzen&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">In welchem Ma&#223;e beeinflussen Fort- und Weiterbildungsangebote die Arbeitszufriedenheit und den beruflichen Verbleib&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Welche Unterst&#252;tzungsma&#223;nahmen (z.B. Mentoring, &#220;bergangsprogramme) erleichtern den Einstieg in die Berufspraxis&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Wie unterscheiden sich die Erfahrungen Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen je nach Versorgungsbereich (z.B. Krankenhaus, Langzeitpflege)&#63;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Zur Beantwortung dieser Fragen ist ein methodenpluraler Ansatz erforderlich, der qualitative Perspektiven (z.B. Fokusgruppen, Interviews) mit quantitativen Daten (z.B. Befragungen, Arbeitsmarktdaten) kombiniert. Nur so l&#228;sst sich ein umfassendes Verst&#228;ndnis der spezifischen Herausforderungen im deutschen Kontext gewinnen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Dieser Review verdeutlicht die Notwendigkeit, Implementierungskonzepte zur Integration akademisch qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen in das deutsche Gesundheitssystem zu entwickeln und zu evaluieren. Dazu z&#228;hlen Pilotprojekte, L&#228;ngsschnittstudien sowie vergleichende Analysen, um Best-Practice-Ans&#228;tze zu identifizieren und Ergebnisse messbar zu machen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Abschlie&#223;end ist zielgerichtete und methodisch vielf&#228;ltige Forschung erforderlich, um die L&#252;cke zwischen internationaler Evidenz und den spezifischen Anforderungen des deutschen Pflegekontextes zu schlie&#223;en und die wirksame Integration Bachelor-qualifizierter Pflegefachpersonen zu f&#246;rdern.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Notes" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Author contributions</SubHeadline><Pgraph>All authors have agreed on the final version and fulfil at least one of the following criteria (according to ICMJE &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.icmje.org&#47;recommendations&#47;">https:&#47;&#47;www.icmje.org&#47;recommendations&#47;</Hyperlink>&#93;): </Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Significant contributions to conception and design, data collection or data ana-lysis and interpretation.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Article writing or critical revision for important intellectual content.</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>The authors Denny Paulicke and Patrick Jahn share the last authorship.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Authors&#8217; ORCIDs</SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Julia M&#252;ller: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0009-0003-6395-168X">0009-0003-6395-168X</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Florian Breitinger: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-8750-6271">0000-0001-8750-6271</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Patricia Br&#228;uer: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0003-2979-824X">0000-0003-2979-824X</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Bettina Dauer: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-9436-2605">0000-0002-9436-2605</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Max Zilezinski: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-9225-1672">0000-0001-9225-1672</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Denny Paulicke: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-9808-215X">0000-0002-9808-215X</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Patrick Jahn: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-1533-6717">0000-0002-1533-6717</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline>Funding</SubHeadline><Pgraph>This study was funded by the Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB) from contract research funds. Order number: 9510160237.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Approval by the Ethics Committee</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Advice from the Ethics Committee was obtained. No ethics committee approval is required due to the study design.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Availability of data and materials</SubHeadline><Pgraph>All studies and materials analysed during this research are included in this published article and its supplementary appendices.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Anmerkungen" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Anmerkungen</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Autor&#42;innenbeitrag</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Alle Autor&#42;nnen haben der finalen Version des Manuskripts zugestimmt und erf&#252;llen mindestens eines der folgenden Kriterien (gem&#228;&#223; ICMJE &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.icmje.org&#47;recommendations&#47;">https:&#47;&#47;www.icmje.org&#47;recommendations&#47;</Hyperlink>&#93;):</Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Wesentlicher Beitrag zur Konzeption und zum Design der Studie, zur Datenerhebung bzw. -analyse und -interpretation.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Verfassen des Manuskripts oder kritische inhaltliche &#220;berarbeitung mit bedeutendem intellektuellem Mehrwert.</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Autoren Denny Paulicke und Patrick Jahn teilen sich die Letztautorenschaft.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>ORCIDs der Autor&#42;innen</SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Julia M&#252;ller: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0009-0003-6395-168X">0009-0003-6395-168X</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Florian Breitinger: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-8750-6271">0000-0001-8750-6271</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Patricia Br&#228;uer: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0003-2979-824X">0000-0003-2979-824X</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Bettina Dauer: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-9436-2605">0000-0002-9436-2605</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Max Zilezinski: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-9225-1672">0000-0001-9225-1672</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Denny Paulicke: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-9808-215X">0000-0002-9808-215X</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Patrick Jahn: &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0002-1533-6717">0000-0002-1533-6717</Hyperlink>&#93;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline>F&#246;rderung</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Diese Studie wurde vom Bundesinstitut f&#252;r Berufsbildung (BIBB) aus Mitteln der Auftragsforschung gef&#246;rdert. Auftragsnummer: 9510160237.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Ethikvotum</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die Ethikkommission wurde konsultiert. Aufgrund des Studiendesigns war keine formelle ethische Genehmigung erforderlich.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Verf&#252;gbarkeit von Daten und Materialien</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Alle im Rahmen dieser Studie analysierten Quellen und Materialien sind in diesem ver&#246;ffentlichten Artikel und den erg&#228;nzenden Anh&#228;ngen enthalten.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Acknowledgements" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Acknowledgements</MainHeadline><Pgraph>We would like to thank the participating institutions and other project collaborators for their cooperation. We would also like to thank Dr. Anne-Marie Lachmund who was responsible for proof-reading and stylistic adjustments. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Danksagung" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Danksagung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Wir danken den beteiligten Institutionen und weiteren Projektpartner&#42;innen f&#252;r ihre konstruktive Zusammenarbeit. Unser besonderer Dank gilt Dr. Anne-Marie Lachmund f&#252;r das Korrektorat und die stilistische &#220;berarbeitung des Manuskripts.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Competing interests" linked="yes" language="en">
      <MainHeadline>Competing interests</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock name="Interessenkonflikt" linked="yes" language="de">
      <MainHeadline>Interessenkonflikt</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Autor&#42;innen erkl&#228;ren, dass sie keinen Interessenkonflikt im Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel haben.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>AbuAlRub RF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Abu Alhaija&#39;a MG</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Perceived benefits and barriers of implementing nursing residency programs in Jordan</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int Nurs Rev</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>43-51</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>AbuAlRub RF, Abu Alhaija&#39;a MG. Perceived benefits and barriers of implementing nursing residency programs in Jordan. Int Nurs Rev. 2019;66(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1111&#47;inr.12452</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;inr.12452</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Adams D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Miller BK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Professionalism in nursing behaviors of nurse practitioners</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Prof Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>203-210</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Adams D, Miller BK. Professionalism in nursing behaviors of nurse practitioners. J Prof Nurs. 2001;17(4):203-210. DOI: 10.1053&#47;jpnu.2001.25913</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1053&#47;jpnu.2001.25913</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Aiken LH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sloane D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Griffiths P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rafferty AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bruyneel L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McHugh M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Maier CB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moreno-Casbas T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ball JE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ausserhofer D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sermeus W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor> RN4CAST Consortium</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Nursing skill mix in European hospitals: cross-sectional study of the association with mortality, patient ratings, and quality of care</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMJ Qual Saf</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>559-568</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Aiken LH, Sloane D, Griffiths P, Rafferty AM, Bruyneel L, McHugh M, Maier CB, Moreno-Casbas T, Ball JE, Ausserhofer D, Sermeus W; RN4CAST Consortium. Nursing skill mix in European hospitals: cross-sectional study of the association with mortality, patient ratings, and quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(7):559-568. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bmjqs-2016-005567</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bmjqs-2016-005567</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Aiken LH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sloane DM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bruyneel L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Van den Heede K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sermeus W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor> RN4Cast Constorium</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Nurses&#39; reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Nurs Stud</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>143-153</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Sermeus W; RN4Cast Constorium. Nurses&#39; reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(2):143-153. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Baharum H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ismail A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McKenna L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mohamed Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ibrahim R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hassan NH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Success factors in adaptation of newly graduated nurses: a scoping review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2023</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>125</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Baharum H, Ismail A, McKenna L, Mohamed Z, Ibrahim R, Hassan NH. Success factors in adaptation of newly graduated nurses: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):125. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12912-023-01300-1</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12912-023-01300-1</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Baldwin K M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sleutel M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Urban RW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wells JN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Behan D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Walsh J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Newcomb P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>An Exploration of New Graduate Nurses&#39; Transition to Specialty Practice</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurses Prof Dev</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>93-100</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Baldwin K M, Sleutel M, Urban RW, Wells JN, Behan D, Walsh J, Newcomb P. An Exploration of New Graduate Nurses&#39; Transition to Specialty Practice. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2021;37(2):93-100. DOI: 10.1097&#47;NND.0000000000000695</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;NND.0000000000000695</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Baumann AL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kugler C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Berufsperspektiven von Absolventinnen und Absolventen grundst&#228;ndig qualifizierender Pflegestudieng&#228;nge &#8722; Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Verbleibstudie</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pflege</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>7-16</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Baumann AL, Kugler C. Berufsperspektiven von Absolventinnen und Absolventen grundst&#228;ndig qualifizierender Pflegestudieng&#228;nge &#8722; Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Verbleibstudie &#91;Career prospects of graduate Bachelor nursing degree programs - Results of a nationwide study in Germany&#93;. Pflege. 2019;32(1):7-16. DOI: 10.1024&#47;1012-5302&#47;a000651</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1024&#47;1012-5302&#47;a000651</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Bisholt BK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The learning process of recently graduated nurses in professional situations--experiences of an introduction program</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Today</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>289-293</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bisholt BK. The learning process of recently graduated nurses in professional situations--experiences of an introduction program. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(3):289-293. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2011.04.0088.</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2011.04.0088.</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Bisholt BK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The professional socialization of recently graduated nurses--experiences of an introduction program</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Today</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>278-282</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bisholt BK. The professional socialization of recently graduated nurses--experiences of an introduction program. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(3):278-282. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2011.04.001</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2011.04.001</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Brandt CL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boellaard MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wilberding KM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Accelerated Second-Degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing Graduates&#39; Transition to Professional Practice</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Contin Educ Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>14-19</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Brandt CL, Boellaard MR, Wilberding KM. Accelerated Second-Degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing Graduates&#39; Transition to Professional Practice. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2017;48(1):14-19. DOI: 10.3928&#47;00220124-20170110-05</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3928&#47;00220124-20170110-05</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Cho E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sloane DM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kim EY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kim S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Choi M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yoo IY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lee HS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aiken LH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Effects of nurse staffing, work environments, and education on patient mortality: an observational study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Nurs Stud</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>535-542</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Cho E, Sloane DM, Kim EY, Kim S, Choi M, Yoo IY, Lee HS, Aiken LH. Effects of nurse staffing, work environments, and education on patient mortality: an observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(2):535-542. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ijnurstu.2014.08.006</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ijnurstu.2014.08.006</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Cox R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Robinson T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rossiter R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Collison L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hills D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Nurses Transitioning to Primary Health Care in Australia: A Practice Improvement Initiative</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2023</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>SAGE Open Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>23779608231165695</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Cox R, Robinson T, Rossiter R, Collison L, Hills D. Nurses Transitioning to Primary Health Care in Australia: A Practice Improvement Initiative. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023;9:23779608231165695. DOI: 10.1177&#47;23779608231165695</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1177&#47;23779608231165695</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Dames S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Thriveable work environments: A study of interplaying factors that enable novice nurses to thrive</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurs Manag</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>567-574</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dames S. Thriveable work environments: A study of interplaying factors that enable novice nurses to thrive. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(3):567-574. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jonm.12712</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jonm.12712</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Darmann-Finck I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>H&#252;lsmann L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Kompetenzziele von prim&#228;rqualifizierenden Pflegestudieng&#228;ngen und intendierte Aufgabenprofile</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2024</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>80-89</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Darmann-Finck I, H&#252;lsmann L. Kompetenzziele von prim&#228;rqualifizierenden Pflegestudieng&#228;ngen und intendierte Aufgabenprofile &#91;Competency-based learning objectives of primary qualifying nursing studies and intended task profiles&#93;. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024;184:80-89. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.zefq.2023.10.006</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.zefq.2023.10.006</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Dieterich S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Verbleibstudie der Absolventinnen und Absolventen der Modellstudieng&#228;nge in Nordrhein-Westfalen (VAMOS): Abschlussbericht duch das Forschungskonsortium VAMOS</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dieterich S, editor. Verbleibstudie der Absolventinnen und Absolventen der Modellstudieng&#228;nge in Nordrhein-Westfalen (VAMOS): Abschlussbericht duch das Forschungskonsortium VAMOS. Bochum: HSG Bochum; 2019.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Duchscher Boychuk JE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Transition shock: The initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated registered nurses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Adv Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1103-1113</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Duchscher Boychuk JE. Transition shock: The initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated registered nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(5):1103-1113. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2648.2008.04898.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2648.2008.04898.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Eklund A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Billett S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Skyvell Nilsson M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A bridge over troubled water&#63; - Exploring learning processes in a transition program with newly graduated nurses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>102982</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Eklund A, Billett S, Skyvell Nilsson M. A bridge over troubled water&#63; - Exploring learning processes in a transition program with newly graduated nurses. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;51:102982. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2021.10298217</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2021.10298217</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>Feng RF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tsai YF</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Socialisation of new graduate nurses to practising nurses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Clin Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2064-2071</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Feng RF, Tsai YF. Socialisation of new graduate nurses to practising nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(13-14):2064-2071. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2702.2011.03992.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2702.2011.03992.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Gautam S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Poudel A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Paudyal K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Prajapati MM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Transition to professional practice: Perspectives of new nursing graduates of Nepal</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2023</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>273</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gautam S, Poudel A, Paudyal K, Prajapati MM. Transition to professional practice: Perspectives of new nursing graduates of Nepal. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):273. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12912-023-01418-2</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12912-023-01418-2</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="51">
        <RefAuthor>Wissenschaftsrat</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>HQGplus-Studie zu Hochschulischen Qualifikationen f&#252;r das Gesundheitssystem - Update</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>Drs. 9541-22</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wissenschaftsrat. HQGplus-Studie zu Hochschulischen Qualifikationen f&#252;r das Gesundheitssystem - Update. Drs. 9541-22. K&#246;ln: Wissenschaftsrat; 2022. DOI: 10.57674&#47;v8gx-db45</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.57674&#47;v8gx-db45</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Hakvoort L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dikken J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cramer-Kruit J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Molendijk-van Nieuwenhuyzen K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van der Schaaf M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schuurmans M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Factors that influence continuing professional development over a nursing career: A scoping review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>103481</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hakvoort L, Dikken J, Cramer-Kruit J, Molendijk-van Nieuwenhuyzen K, van der Schaaf M, Schuurmans M. Factors that influence continuing professional development over a nursing career: A scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;65:103481. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2022.103481</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2022.103481</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>Hawkins N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jeong S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Smith T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Coming ready or not&#33; An integrative review examining new graduate nurses&#39; transition in acute care</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Nurs Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e12714</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hawkins N, Jeong S, Smith T. Coming ready or not&#33; An integrative review examining new graduate nurses&#39; transition in acute care. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019;25(3):e12714. DOI: 10.1111&#47;ijn.12714</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;ijn.12714</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="22">
        <RefAuthor>Hayton Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Botma Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Heyns T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Development of a conceptual framework for a Person-centred Nurse Residency Programme</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Today</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>104992</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hayton Y, Botma Y, Heyns T. Development of a conceptual framework for a Person-centred Nurse Residency Programme. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;104:104992. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2021.104992</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2021.104992</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="23">
        <RefAuthor>Henderson A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ossenberg C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tyler S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>&#39;What matters to graduates&#39;: An evaluation of a structured clinical support program for newly graduated nurses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>225-231</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Henderson A, Ossenberg C, Tyler S. &#39;What matters to graduates&#39;: An evaluation of a structured clinical support program for newly graduated nurses. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15(3):225-231. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2015.01.009</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2015.01.009</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="24">
        <RefAuthor>Hirt J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nordhausen T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Digitale Anwendungen f&#252;r die Studienauswahl im Rahmen von systematischen Evidenzsynthesen</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pflege</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>277-278</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hirt J, Nordhausen T. Digitale Anwendungen f&#252;r die Studienauswahl im Rahmen von systematischen Evidenzsynthesen. Pflege. 2019;32(5):277-278. DOI: 10.1024&#47;1012-5302&#47;a000690</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1024&#47;1012-5302&#47;a000690</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="47">
        <RefAuthor>Ten Hoeve Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brouwer J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kunnen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Turnover prevention: The direct and indirect association between organizational job stressors, negative emotions and professional commitment in novice nurses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Adv Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>836-845</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ten Hoeve Y, Brouwer J, Kunnen S. Turnover prevention: The direct and indirect association between organizational job stressors, negative emotions and professional commitment in novice nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(3):836-845. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jan.14281</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jan.14281</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="48">
        <RefAuthor>Ten Hoeve Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brouwer J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roodbol PF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kunnen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The importance of contextual, relational and cognitive factors for novice nurses&#39; emotional state and affective commitment to the profession. A multilevel study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Adv Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2082-2093</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ten Hoeve Y, Brouwer J, Roodbol PF, Kunnen S. The importance of contextual, relational and cognitive factors for novice nurses&#39; emotional state and affective commitment to the profession. A multilevel study. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(9):2082-2093. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jan.13709</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jan.13709</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="49">
        <RefAuthor>Ten Hoeve Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kunnen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brouwer J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roodbol PF</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The voice of nurses: Novice nurses&#39; first experiences in a clinical setting. A longitudinal diary study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Clin Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e1612-e1626</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ten Hoeve Y, Kunnen S, Brouwer J, Roodbol PF. The voice of nurses: Novice nurses&#39; first experiences in a clinical setting. A longitudinal diary study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(7-8):e1612-e1626. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jocn.14307</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jocn.14307</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="25">
        <RefAuthor>Hu Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zhang Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shen N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wu J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wu J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Malmedal WK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Stressors of newly graduated nurses in Shanghai paediatric hospital: A qualitative study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurs Manag</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>184-193</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hu Y, Zhang Y, Shen N, Wu J, Wu J, Malmedal WK. Stressors of newly graduated nurses in Shanghai paediatric hospital: A qualitative study. J Nurs Manag. 2017;25(3):184-193. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jonm.12454</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jonm.12454</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="26">
        <RefAuthor>Hussein R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Everett B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ramjan LM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hu W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Salamonson Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>New graduate nurses&#39; experiences in a clinical specialty: A follow up study of newcomer perceptions of transitional support</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>42</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hussein R, Everett B, Ramjan LM, Hu W, Salamonson Y. New graduate nurses&#39; experiences in a clinical specialty: A follow up study of newcomer perceptions of transitional support. BMC Nurs. 2017;16:42. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12912-017-0236-0</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12912-017-0236-0</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="27">
        <RefAuthor>Kim JH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shin HS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Exploring barriers and facilitators for successful transition in new graduate nurses: A mixed methods study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Prof Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>560-568</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kim JH, Shin HS. Exploring barriers and facilitators for successful transition in new graduate nurses: A mixed methods study. J Prof Nurs. 2020;36(6):560-568. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.profnurs.2020.08.006</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.profnurs.2020.08.006</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="28">
        <RefAuthor>Koskinen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brugnolli A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fuster-Linares P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hourican S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Istomina N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Leino-Kilip H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>L&#246;yttyniemi E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nemcov&#225; J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Meyer G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sim&#227;o De Oliveira C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Palese A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rua M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Salminen L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sveinsd&#243;ttir H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Visiers-Jim&#233;nez L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zelen&#237;kov&#225; R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kajander-Unkuri S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor> ProCompNurse Consortium and the COMPEUnurse Consortium</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A successful nursing education promotes newly graduated nurses&#39; job satisfaction one year after graduation: a cross-sectional multi-country study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2023</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>269</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Koskinen S, Brugnolli A, Fuster-Linares P, Hourican S, Istomina N, Leino-Kilip H, L&#246;yttyniemi E, Nemcov&#225; J, Meyer G, Sim&#227;o De Oliveira C, Palese A, Rua M, Salminen L, Sveinsd&#243;ttir H, Visiers-Jim&#233;nez L, Zelen&#237;kov&#225; R, Kajander-Unkuri S; ProCompNurse Consortium and the COMPEUnurse Consortium. A successful nursing education promotes newly graduated nurses&#39; job satisfaction one year after graduation: a cross-sectional multi-country study. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):269. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12912-023-01438-y</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12912-023-01438-y</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="29">
        <RefAuthor>Kovner CT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Djukic M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fatehi FK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fletcher J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jun J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brewer C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chacko T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Estimating and preventing hospital internal turnover of newly licensed nurses: A panel survey</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Nurs Stud</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>251-262</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kovner CT, Djukic M, Fatehi FK, Fletcher J, Jun J, Brewer C, Chacko T. Estimating and preventing hospital internal turnover of newly licensed nurses: A panel survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;60:251-262. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ijnurstu.2016.05.003</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ijnurstu.2016.05.003</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="30">
        <RefAuthor>Kox JH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Groenewoud JH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bakker EJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bierma-Zeinstra SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Runhaar J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Miedema HS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roelofs PD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Reasons why Dutch novice nurses leave nursing: A qualitative approach</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>102848</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kox JH, Groenewoud JH, Bakker EJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Runhaar J, Miedema HS, Roelofs PD. Reasons why Dutch novice nurses leave nursing: A qualitative approach. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;47:102848. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2020.102848</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2020.102848</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="31">
        <RefAuthor>Leong K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fong P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kuok C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Meng L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Cross-Sectional Association and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction and Burnout Among Nurses in Macao</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Sage Open</RefJournal>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Leong K, Fong P, Kuok C, Meng L. Cross-Sectional Association and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction and Burnout Among Nurses in Macao. Sage Open. 2022;12(2). DOI: 10.1177&#47;21582440221104811</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1177&#47;21582440221104811</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="32">
        <RefAuthor>Leong YM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Crossman J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>New nurse transition: Success through aligning multiple identities</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Health Organ Manag</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1098-1114</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Leong YM, Crossman J. New nurse transition: Success through aligning multiple identities. J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):1098-1114. DOI: 10.1108&#47;jhom-02-2014-0038</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1108&#47;jhom-02-2014-0038</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="33">
        <RefAuthor>Lima S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jordan HL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kinney S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hamilton B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Newall F</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Empirical evolution of a framework that supports the development of nursing competence</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Adv Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>889-899</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Lima S, Jordan HL, Kinney S, Hamilton B, Newall F. Empirical evolution of a framework that supports the development of nursing competence. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(4):889-899. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jan.12872</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jan.12872</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="34">
        <RefAuthor>Lyman B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gunn MM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mendon CR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>New graduate registered nurses&#39; experiences with psychological safety</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurs Manag</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>831-839</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Lyman B, Gunn MM, Mendon CR. New graduate registered nurses&#39; experiences with psychological safety. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(4):831-839. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jonm.13006</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jonm.13006</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="35">
        <RefAuthor>Maddalena V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kearney AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Adams L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Quality of work life of novice nurses: A qualitative exploration</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurses Staff Dev</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>74-79</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Maddalena V, Kearney AJ, Adams L. Quality of work life of novice nurses: A qualitative exploration. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2014;28(2):74-79. DOI: 10.1097&#47;nnd.0b013e31824b41a1</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;nnd.0b013e31824b41a1</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="36">
        <RefAuthor>Mellor P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Greenhill J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A patient safety focused registered nurse transition to practice program</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Contemp Nurse</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>51-60</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Mellor P, Greenhill J.  A patient safety focused registered nurse transition to practice program. Contemp Nurse. 2014;47(1-2):51-60. DOI: 10.5172&#47;conu.2014.47.1-2.51</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.5172&#47;conu.2014.47.1-2.51</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="37">
        <RefAuthor>Meng M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Peters M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dorin L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Erste Sondererhebung des BIBB-Pflegepanels: ein aktueller &#220;berblick zu berufsqualifizierenden Pflegestudieng&#228;ngen. BIBB Discussion Paper</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Meng M, Peters M, Dorin L. Erste Sondererhebung des BIBB-Pflegepanels: ein aktueller &#220;berblick zu berufsqualifizierenden Pflegestudieng&#228;ngen. BIBB Discussion Paper. Bonn: Bundesinstitut f&#252;r Berufsbildung; 2022. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: https:&#47;&#47;bibb-dspace.bibb.de&#47;rest&#47;bitstreams&#47;dafa6f83-dda0-4ab6-a260-7a3512368a7f&#47;retrieve</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;bibb-dspace.bibb.de&#47;rest&#47;bitstreams&#47;dafa6f83-dda0-4ab6-a260-7a3512368a7f&#47;retrieve</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="38">
        <RefAuthor>Nour V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Williams AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>&#34;Theory Becoming Alive&#34;: The Learning Transition Process of Newly Graduated Nurses in Canada</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Can J Nurs Res</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>6-13</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Nour V, Williams AM. &#34;Theory Becoming Alive&#34;: The Learning Transition Process of Newly Graduated Nurses in Canada. Can J Nurs Res. 2019;51(1):6-13. DOI: 10.1177&#47;0844562118771832</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1177&#47;0844562118771832</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="39">
        <RefAuthor>Ortiz J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>New graduate nurses&#39; experiences about lack of professional confidence</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>19-24</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ortiz J. New graduate nurses&#39; experiences about lack of professional confidence. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;19:19-24. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2016.04.001</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nepr.2016.04.001</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="40">
        <RefAuthor>Paech SE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Making the Transition from enrolled to registered nurse</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Collegian</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>35-40</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Paech SE. Making the Transition from enrolled to registered nurse. Collegian. 2002;9(3):35-40. DOI: 10.1016&#47;S1322-7696(08)60423-0</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;S1322-7696(08)60423-0</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="41">
        <RefAuthor>Peters MD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Godfrey CM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Khalil H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McInerney P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Parker D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Soares CB</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Evid Based Healthc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>141-146</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141-146. DOI: 10.1097&#47;xeb.0000000000000050</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;xeb.0000000000000050</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="42">
        <RefAuthor>Phillips C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Esterman A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kenny A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The theory of organisational socialisation and its potential for improving transition experiences for new graduate nurses</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Today</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>118-124</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Phillips C, Esterman A, Kenny A. The theory of organisational socialisation and its potential for improving transition experiences for new graduate nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(1):118-124. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2014.07.011</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2014.07.011</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="43">
        <RefAuthor>Reebals C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wood T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Markaki A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Transition to Practice for New Nurse Graduates: Barriers and Mitigating Strategies</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>West J Nurs Res</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>416-429</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Reebals C, Wood T, Markaki A. Transition to Practice for New Nurse Graduates: Barriers and Mitigating Strategies. West J Nurs Res. 2022;44(4):416-429. DOI: 10.1177&#47;0193945921997925</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1177&#47;0193945921997925</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="44">
        <RefAuthor>Regan S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wong C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Laschinger HK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cummings G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Leiter M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>MacPhee M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rh&#233;aume A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ritchie JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wolff AC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jeffs L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Young-Ritchie C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Grinspun D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gurnham ME</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Foster B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Huckstep S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ruffolo M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shamian J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Burkoski V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wood K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Read E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Starting Out: qualitative perspectives of new graduate nurses and nurse leaders on transition to practice</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurs Manag</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>246-255</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Regan S, Wong C, Laschinger HK, Cummings G, Leiter M, MacPhee M, Rh&#233;aume A, Ritchie JA, Wolff AC, Jeffs L, Young-Ritchie C, Grinspun D, Gurnham ME, Foster B, Huckstep S, Ruffolo M, Shamian J, Burkoski V, Wood K, Read E. Starting Out: qualitative perspectives of new graduate nurses and nurse leaders on transition to practice. J Nurs Manag. 2017;25(4):246-255. DOI: 10.1111&#47;jonm.12456</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;jonm.12456</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="45">
        <RefAuthor>Schrey&#246;gg J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Verbesserung der Personalallokation durch Strukturwandel</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2023</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Krankenhaus-Report 2023</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>197&#8211;211</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schrey&#246;gg J. Verbesserung der Personalallokation durch Strukturwandel. In: Klauber J, Wasem J, Beivers A, Mostert C, editors. Krankenhaus-Report 2023. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2023. p.197&#8211;211. DOI: 0.1007&#47;978-3-662-66881-8&#95;13</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;0.1007&#47;978-3-662-66881-8&#95;13</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="46">
        <RefAuthor>Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis)</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Pflegestatistik</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Pflegestatistik. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2022. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: https:&#47;&#47;www.statistischebibliothek.de&#47;mir&#47;receive&#47;DEHeft&#95;mods&#95;00148550</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;www.statistischebibliothek.de&#47;mir&#47;receive&#47;DEHeft&#95;mods&#95;00148550</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="50">
        <RefAuthor>Tricco AC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lillie E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zarin W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>O&#39;Brien KK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Colquhoun H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Levac D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moher D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Peters MDJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Horsley T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Weeks L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hempel S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Akl EA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chang C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McGowan J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stewart L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hartling L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aldcroft A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wilson MG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Garritty C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lewin S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Godfrey CM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Macdonald MT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Langlois EV</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Soares-Weiser K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moriarty J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Clifford T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tun&#231;alp &#214;</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Straus SE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Intern Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>467-473</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O&#39;Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tun&#231;alp &#214;, Straus SE. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326&#47;M18-0850</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.7326&#47;M18-0850</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="52">
        <RefAuthor>Yao X</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cheng G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shao J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wang Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lin Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zhang C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Development and implementation of a standardized training program for newly graduated mental health nurses: Process and preliminary outcomes</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Nurse Educ Today</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>104953</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Yao X, Cheng G, Shao J, Wang Y, Lin Y, Zhang C. Development and implementation of a standardized training program for newly graduated mental health nurses: Process and preliminary outcomes. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;104:104953. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2021.104953 </RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.nedt.2021.104953</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle1 : Einschluss- und Ausschlusskriterien</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <Figure width="1142" height="905" format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: PRISMA flowchart for literature selection (Tricco et al. &#91;50&#93;)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 1: PRISMA-Flussidiagramm zur Literaturauswahl (Tricco et al. &#91;50&#93;)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <NoOfPictures>1</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <Attachment>
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID mimeType="application/pdf" size="121868" filename="zma001759.a1en.pdf" url="" origFilename="Attachment&#95;1.pdf" language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID mimeType="application/pdf" size="122193" filename="zma001759.a1de.pdf" url="" origFilename="Anhang&#95;1.pdf" language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <AttachmentTitle language="en">Search strings of the literature search in the individual databases</AttachmentTitle>
          <AttachmentTitle language="de">Suchstrings der systematischen Literaturrecherche in den verschiedenen Datenbanken</AttachmentTitle>
        </Attachment>
        <Attachment>
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID mimeType="application/pdf" size="271579" filename="zma001759.a2en.pdf" url="" origFilename="Attachment&#95;2.pdf" language="en">2en</MediaID>
          <MediaID mimeType="application/pdf" size="284148" filename="zma001759.a2de.pdf" url="" origFilename="Anhang&#95;2.pdf" language="de">2de</MediaID>
          <AttachmentTitle language="en">Characteristics and results of the individual studies</AttachmentTitle>
          <AttachmentTitle language="de">Merkmale und Ergebnisse der eingeschlossenen Studien</AttachmentTitle>
        </Attachment>
        <Attachment>
          <MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
          <MediaID mimeType="application/pdf" size="165136" filename="zma001759.a3en.pdf" url="" origFilename="Attachment&#95;3.pdf" language="en">3en</MediaID>
          <MediaID mimeType="application/pdf" size="165934" filename="zma001759.a3de.pdf" url="" origFilename="Anhang&#95;3.pdf" language="de">3de</MediaID>
          <AttachmentTitle language="en">Cross-classification of barriers and drivers in the areas of careed entry, role transition and retention</AttachmentTitle>
          <AttachmentTitle language="de">Kreuztabelle zu H&#252;rden und Treibern in den Bereichen Karriereeinstieg, Rollen&#252;bergang und Verbleib</AttachmentTitle>
        </Attachment>
        <NoOfAttachments>3</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>