000273
10.3205/000273
urn:nbn:de:0183-0002730
Research Article
Prevention of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia – Guideline compliance in German hospitals
Verhinderung von perioperativer Hypothermie – Leitlinien-Compliance in deutschen Krankenhäusern
Gabriel
Gabriel
Philip
P
Dr.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, Fahltskamp 74, 25421 Pinneberg, Germany, Phone: +49 4104 217 8644Department of Anaesthesiology, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, Germany
Philip.Gabriel@Sana.de
author
Höcker
Höcker
Jan
J
Department of Anaesthesiology, Klinikum Neumünster, Germany
author
Steinfath
Steinfath
Markus
M
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
author
Kutschick
Kutschick
Kevin R.
KR
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
author
Lubinska
Lubinska
Jana
J
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
author
Horn
Horn
Ernst-Peter
EP
Department of Anaesthesiology, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, Germany
author
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
Düsseldorf
610
pre-warming
hypothermia
sublingual temperature measurement
Vorwärmung
Hypothermie
sublinguale Temperaturmessung
Anaesthesiology
20181113
20190314
20190726
engl
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).
1612-3174
17
GMS German Medical Science
GMS Ger Med Sci
07
Die 2014 publizierte AWMF S3-Leitlinie „Vermeidung von perioperativer Hypothermie“ beinhaltet verschiedene Empfehlungen und Maßnahmen, die die Inzidenz perioperativer Hypothermie (Abfall der Körperkerntemperatur unter 36°C) deutlich senken können. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war, die tatsächliche Umsetzung dieser Empfehlungen in der klinischen Praxis zu evaluieren. Im Detail wurde untersucht, ob die Patienten präoperativ und intraoperativ gewärmt wurden und ob Temperatur-Messungen erfolgten. Der postoperative Verlauf der Körperkerntemperatur und die Häufigkeit perioperativer Hypothermien wurden bei vorgewärmten versus nicht-vorgewärmten Patienten verglichen. Zusammenfassend zeigte sich ein hohes Maß an Variationen bezüglich der durchgeführten perioperativen wärmeerhaltenden Maßnahmen. Dennoch erwies sich in den untersuchten Krankenhäusern die jeweilige Strategie zur Verhinderung der perioperativen Hypothermie als mehr oder weniger erfolgreich. Unsere Daten zeigten keine wesentlichen Unterschiede bezüglich der Umsetzungsrate bezogen auf die Krankenhausgröße. Somit legen unsere Ergebnisse nahe, dass eine weitverbreitete Akzeptanz der S3-Leitlinie vorliegt, da bei 431 untersuchten Patienten in 26 Krankenhäusern in Schleswig-Holstein keine Hypothermie auftrat.
Patients undergoing elective surgery are at risk for inadvertent posto<![CDATA[pe</PlainText></TextGroup>rative hypothermia, defined as a core body temperature below 36°C. This study was conducted to investigate the acceptance of the recommendations of the German S3 Guideline, in particular with respect to the concept of pre-warming and sublingual temperature measurement. The main focus was to gather data concerning the postoperative core temperature and the frequency of perioperative hypothermia in patients receiving a pre-warming regime and those without. The study team investigated the local concept and measures employed to avoid inadvertent perioperative hypothermia with respect to defined outcome parameters following a specific protocol. In summary, the study hospitals vary greatly in their perioperative processes to prevent postoperative hypothermia. However, each hospital has a strategy to prevent hypothermia and was more or less successful in keeping its patients normothermic during the perioperative process. Our data could not demonstrate major differences between hospitals in the implementation strategy to prevent perioperative hypothermia in regard to the hospital size. The results of our study suggest a wide-spread acceptance, as no postoperative hypothermia was detected in a cohort of 431 patients.</Pgraph></Abstract>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Introduction">
<MainHeadline>Introduction</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Patients undergoing elective surgery are at risk for inadvertent postoperative hypothermia, defined as a core body temperature below 36°C <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. This is associated with an increased risk for wound infections, cardiac complications, and blood transfusions <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Patients suffering from this condition experience discomfort and shivering <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The German S3 Guideline for the prevention of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia was developed in accordance with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and published in 2014 <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. It is largely based on recommendations from British, American, and Canadian guidelines <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. A major difference in the German S3 Guideline is the recommendation to pre-warm surgical patients prior to administering anaesthesia <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. This recommendation is based on recent scientific findings, which highlight the effectiveness of even brief periods of pre-warming <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Such recommendations, however, must be evaluated in regard to their practical implementation and acceptance, and a revision of the German S3 Guideline based on such findings is pending for 2019.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Another essential aspect of the German S3 Guideline is the recommendation to use sublingual temperature devices to assess core temperature. However, the optimal temperature measurement device is still under debate <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. In order to be practical for regular use, the device must combine usefulness and accuracy. Furthermore, it must be possible to use it for the entire duration of the perioperative period, i.e., pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. </Pgraph><Pgraph>This study was conducted to investigate the acceptance of the recommendations of the German S3 Guideline, in particular with respect to the concept of pre-warming and sublingual temperature measurement. The main focus was to gather data concerning the postoperative core temperature and the frequency of perioperative hypothermia in patients receiving a pre-warming regime and those without. In addition, the recommendation of sublingual temperature measurement was assessed. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Until now, no systematically gathered data for the implementation of the guideline’s recommendations into daily practice has been available. There is some evidence that perioperative thermal management in Germany varies depending on the hospital size <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. To this end, we analysed all German hospitals located within a circumscribed region of Northern Germany, ranging from small regional hospitals to large university clinics.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Materials and methods">
<MainHeadline>Materials and methods</MainHeadline><Pgraph>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kiel University (Chair: Prof. M. H. Mehdorn) and is registered with AZ: D 543/15. </Pgraph><Pgraph>All hospitals in Schleswig-Holstein with 100 or more surgical procedures per year (28 of 36 hospitals) were asked to participate in the study. Therefore, the heads of the 28 anaesthesiology departments were informed about the study protocol and asked for their consent to participate. After informed consent, each hospital was visited by two members of the study team for one day within the study period of five months between January and May 2016, two years following the publication of the German S3 Guideline. The study team investigated the local concept and the measures employed to avoid inadvertent perioperative hypothermia with respect to defined outcome parameters following a specific protocol. Members of the study team were trained to properly assess subli<TextGroup><PlainText>ng</PlainText></TextGroup>ual temperature in postoperative patients using sublingual thermometers (Sure Temp Plus 690, Welch Allyn Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY). </Pgraph><Pgraph>We chose 28 visitation days within the study period. Each of these appointments was drawn by lot and randomly matched to one hospital. One day prior to investigation, each head of the anaesthesiology department was informed with the instructions to notify no one but the o<TextGroup><PlainText>pe</PlainText></TextGroup>rating theater manager.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Study protocol</SubHeadline><Pgraph>On the morning of each investigation day, the members of the study team were introduced to the respective anaesthesiology team by the head of the department. They were shown to the recovery room of the hospital and were instructed to follow the specified routine workflow. The head of the department was interviewed in regard to the implementation of the German S3 Guideline to prevent perioperative hypothermia.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The members of the study team collected specific data from all patients following elective surgery, such as morphometrics, demographics, warming devices, temperature measurement, anaesthesia regimens, and surgical disciplines. The data were obtained from routine anaesthesiology protocols and by interviewing the involved anaesthesiologists. In addition to the routine procedures of the hospitals, the members of the study team measured sublingual temperature of all patients within the first 1<TextGroup><PlainText>5 m</PlainText></TextGroup>inutes following transfer to the recovery room. Collected data were entered to an Excel database. Each investigation period ended at 5 pm, without exception.</Pgraph><Pgraph>For data analysis, the hospitals were divided into three groups according to the number of hospital beds: less than 250, more than 250, or more than 450 beds.</Pgraph><Pgraph>A temperature lower than 36°C, as determined by subli<TextGroup><PlainText>ng</PlainText></TextGroup>ual temperature measurement, was rated as “hypothermic”, in accordance with the German S3 Guideline.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Statistical analysis was performed with the statistics software GraphPad Prism 5.0<Superscript>®</Superscript> (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and R 2.11.0 (R<Superscript>®</Superscript> Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous, normally distributed variables were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffé’s F test <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Results">
<MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><Pgraph>All 28 hospitals were visited by the study team during the study period. In two hospitals, there were none or only five surgical procedures scheduled at the day of visit. As a result, these hospitals were excluded from the study. </Pgraph><Pgraph>From the remaining 26 hospitals, data from 431 patients were collected. We had a total of 8 drop-outs due to refusal of sublingual temperature measurement or to a delay more than 15 minutes after transfer to the recovery room. Demographic and morphometric data of the patient collectives are shown in Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>. Patients were between 3 and 96 years old, and the duration of surgery varied between 2 and 488 minutes. Within the hospital groups, no statistical differences were found.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Surgical disciplines and anaesthesiological procedures are listed in Table 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>. There was a wide variation of nearly all standard surgical procedures. Minimal invasive surgery was found in 151 (35%) of the procedures. General anaesthesia was performed in 361 (84%), and regional anaesthesia in 62 (14%) of the 431 investigated patients.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The frequency of employed pre-, intra-, and postoperative forced-air warming devices and warming blankets is given in Table 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>. Preoperatively, active convective warming was used in 87 of the 431 patients (20%) and in 9 of the participating 26 hospitals (35%). Preoperative warming blankets were applied in 317 (74%) of the patients in all hospitals. Intraoperative forced-air warming was used in 231 (54%) of the patients. Postoperatively, 39 (9%) of the patients were actively warmed by forced-air warming.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Temperature measurement was assessed preoperatively in 31 (7%) and intraoperatively in 179 (41%) of the patients (Table 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>). From these measurements, intraoperative hypothermia was detected in 54 (13%) of the patients.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The results of the measurements of sublingual temperature assessed by the study team are given in Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>. The mean core temperature of the patients was nearly 36.5°C upon arrival in the recovery room, and did not vary significantly between the hospital groups. The lowest sublingual temperature was measured at 36.0°C. Therefore, postoperative hypothermia was detected in none of the investigated patients.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion">
<MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>We investigated the clinical application of the 2014-published German S3 Guideline to prevent perioperative hypothermia in 26 German hospitals in a circumscribed region. Our results show that none of the patients experienced postoperative hypothermia. Therefore, it can be assumed that the German S3 Guideline to prevent perioperative hypothermia has been both highly accepted and implemented in Northern German hospitals at the time of the study, two years after the Guideline’s publication.</Pgraph><Pgraph>However, preoperative active warming of the patients, one of the main recommendations in the German S3 Guideline, was used in only 20% of the patients. Our results are therefore surprising. The low rate of pre-warmed patients may be responsible for the fact that 13% of the patients suffered from intraoperative hypothermia. Furthermore, this result may have been underestimated, because temperature was measured in only 42% of the patients. Adjustment of the perioperative processes to implement pre-warming surgical patients is complicated and may be the reason for the low acceptance in the hospitals investigated. When using pre-warming, patients must arrive approximately 30 minutes earlier to the perioperative region and nurses have to start active warming devices.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In 74% of the cases, the hospitals used warming blankets to cover their patients just prior to initiation of anaesthesia. This is a well-known method to optimize patient comfort and reduce preoperative stress, although it does not appear to majorly influence the rate of perioperative hypothermia <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. The combination of employing warming blankets, pre-warming, as well as the high frequency of intraoperative (54%) and postoperative (9%) active warming of the patients could explain the very low incidence of postoperative hypothermia we observed in our investigation.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, the study hospitals vary greatly in their perioperative processes, including their implementation of different strategies to prevent postoperative hypothermia. However, each hospital has a strategy to prevent hypothermia and was more or less successful in keeping its patients normothermic during the perioperative process. Our data could not demonstrate major differences between hospitals in the implementation strategy to prevent perioperative hypothermia in regard to the hospital size. This observation contradicts a study which demonstrates that the availability of temperature-conserving devices increases with hospital size <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The acceptance of the German S3 Guideline recommendations to measure preoperative patient temperature and to continue temperature assessment during the surgical process was low. In only 7% of the patients, core temperature was measured preoperatively. This was a surprising result, because preoperative hypothermia of the patients should be prevented in elective surgery to avoid worse outcomes <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Without preoperative temperature assessment, patients are at a greater risk for hypothermia. In addition, temperature was measured intrao<TextGroup><PlainText>pe</PlainText></TextGroup>ratively in 42% of the patients. Today, it is inexpensive and easy to measure core temperature intraoperatively using a sublingual thermometer, a urinary bladder catheter temperature device, or other available devices. In our study, we employed a standard sublingual temperature device to assess postoperative core temperature, as recommended in the German S3 Guideline. This device demonstrates high accuracy and precision and presents results within seconds, even in patients ventilated by laryngeal masks <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. However, sublingual temperature measurement was not used routinely in any of the investigated hospitals.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The low incidence of intraoperative temperature measurement may be the result of the high number of short surgical processes and the lack of anaesthesiologists’ knowledge of the necessity to assess core temperature during surgery. However, we found a low incidence of perioperative hypothermia even without consequent perioperative temperature assessment.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The pre-warming concept revised in the German S3 Guideline, as well as the recommendations for temperature assessment, must be critically weighed in respect to their practical acceptance and its effect on postoperative hypothermia.</Pgraph><Pgraph>According to Karalapillai et al., inadvertent hypothermia following surgical procedures is a relevant clinical problem reported in up to 46% of cases <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. Guidelines have been published to aid in the prevention of this clinical problem. Implementation of these clinical recommendations should help in the maintenance of perioperative normothermia of the patients.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Despite the fact that the guideline recommendations o<TextGroup><PlainText>f i</PlainText></TextGroup>ntraoperative temperature measurement and pre-warming were reported to have been only partially integrated into clinical practice in the participating Northern German clinics, no case of postoperative hypothermia was detected in our sample size of 431 patients. These positive results of partial implementation of the German S3 Guideline are very promising. Nevertheless, intraoperative hypothermia remains a problem, potentially solved by strict adherence to the German S3 Guideline.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Limitations of our study design include the reliance on a questionnaire and single-person interview with the head of the department for assessment of guideline implementation. Indeed, due to lacking implementation of guideline recommendations into daily practice, we would have expected to detect rates of hypothermia that are consistent with those in the current literature. By only informing the anaesthesiologists about the screening for the implementation of the German S3 Guideline by an external team on the day of investigation, we attempted to minimize bias. Clinical procedures could nevertheless have been influenced by knowledge of the study investigation. Furthermore, temperature measurements were taken on a single day, and the number of investigated patients was limited.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, the justification of a pre-warming regimen is logical and persuasive. However, 70% of the included patients were normothermic postoperatively, without pre-warming. Therefore, at least in our study population, this strategy seems to be redundant for prevention of hypothermia. Yet in regard to the limitations of our study, further prospective trials are needed to clarify whether it is justified to resign from pre-warming as a measure of a prevention-of-hypothermia bundle.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes">
<MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Acknowledgement</SubHeadline><Pgraph>We would like to thank Rosalie McDonough for her critical reading and correction of the paper.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
<References linked="yes">
<Reference refNo="1">
<RefAuthor>Emmert A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Franke R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Brandes IF</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hinterthaner M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Danner BC</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bauer M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bräuer A</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Comparison of Conductive and Convective Warming in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2017</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</RefJournal>
<RefPage>362-36</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Emmert A, Franke R, Brandes IF, Hinterthaner M, Danner BC, Bauer M, Bräuer A. Comparison of Conductive and Convective Warming in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;65(5):362-36. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583766</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583766</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="2">
<RefAuthor>Torossian A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Van Gerven E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Geertsen K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Horn B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Van de Velde M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Raeder J</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Active perioperative patient warming using a self-warming blanket (BARRIER EasyWarm) is superior to passive thermal insulation: a multinational, multicenter, randomized trial</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2016</RefYear>
<RefJournal>J Clin Anesth</RefJournal>
<RefPage>547-54</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Torossian A, Van Gerven E, Geertsen K, Horn B, Van de Velde M, Raeder J. Active perioperative patient warming using a self-warming blanket (BARRIER EasyWarm) is superior to passive thermal insulation: a multinational, multicenter, randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:547-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.030</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.030</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="3">
<RefAuthor>National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Hypothermia: prevention and management in adults having surgery. Clinical guideline CG65</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2008</RefYear>
<RefTotal>National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Hypothermia: prevention and management in adults having surgery. Clinical guideline CG65. 2008 [cited 2008 Jun 14]. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG65</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG65</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="4">
<RefAuthor>Connelly L</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Cramer E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>DeMott Q</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Piperno J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Coyne B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Winfield C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Swanberg M</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>The Optimal Time and Method for Surgical Prewarming: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2017</RefYear>
<RefJournal>J Perianesth Nurs</RefJournal>
<RefPage>199-209</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Connelly L, Cramer E, DeMott Q, Piperno J, Coyne B, Winfield C, Swanberg M. The Optimal Time and Method for Surgical Prewarming: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. J Perianesth Nurs. 2017 Jun;32(3):199-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.11.010</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2015.11.010</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="5">
<RefAuthor>Torossian A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bräuer A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Höcker J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bein B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Wulf H</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Horn EP</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2015</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Dtsch Arztebl Int</RefJournal>
<RefPage>166-72</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Torossian A, Bräuer A, Höcker J, Bein B, Wulf H, Horn EP. Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Mar 6;112(10):166-72. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0166</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0166</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="6">
<RefAuthor>Hooper VD</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Chard R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Clifford T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Fetzer S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Fossum S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Godden B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Martinez EA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Noble KA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>O’Brien D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Odom-Forren J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Peterson C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Ross J</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>ASPAN’s evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the promotion of perioperative normothermia</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2009</RefYear>
<RefJournal>J Perianesth Nurs</RefJournal>
<RefPage>271-87</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Hooper VD, Chard R, Clifford T, Fetzer S, Fossum S, Godden B, Martinez EA, Noble KA, O’Brien D, Odom-Forren J, Peterson C, Ross J. ASPAN’s evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the promotion of perioperative normothermia. J Perianesth Nurs. 2009 Oct;24(5):271-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2009.09.001</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2009.09.001</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="7">
<RefAuthor>Forbes SS</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Eskicioglu C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Nathens AB</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Fenech DS</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Laflamme C</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>McLean RF</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>McLeod RS</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor> Best Practice in General Surgery Committee</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>University of Toronto</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Evidence-based guidelines for prevention of perioperative hypothermia</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2009</RefYear>
<RefJournal>J Am Coll Surg</RefJournal>
<RefPage>492-503</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, Nathens AB, Fenech DS, Laflamme C, McLean RF, McLeod RS; Best Practice in General Surgery Committee, University of Toronto. Evidence-based guidelines for prevention of perioperative hypothermia. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Oct;209(4):492-503.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.002</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.002</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="8">
<RefAuthor>de Brito Poveda V</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Clark AM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Galvão CM</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>A systematic review on the effectiveness of prewarming to prevent perioperative hypothermia</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2013</RefYear>
<RefJournal>J Clin Nurs</RefJournal>
<RefPage>906-18</RefPage>
<RefTotal>de Brito Poveda V, Clark AM, Galvão CM. A systematic review on the effectiveness of prewarming to prevent perioperative hypothermia. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Apr;22(7-8):906-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04287.x</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04287.x</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="9">
<RefAuthor>Horn EP</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bein B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Böhm R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Steinfath M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sahili N</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Höcker J</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>The effect of short time periods of pre-operative warming in the prevention of peri-operative hypothermia</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2012</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Anaesthesia</RefJournal>
<RefPage>612-7</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Horn EP, Bein B, Böhm R, Steinfath M, Sahili N, Höcker J. The effect of short time periods of pre-operative warming in the prevention of peri-operative hypothermia. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):612-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07073.x</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07073.x</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="10">
<RefAuthor>Chan TN</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Venus J</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>The effect of 30 to 60 minutes of forced-air pre-warming on maintaining intraoperative core temperatures during the first hour post-anesthesia induction in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review protocol</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2016</RefYear>
<RefJournal>JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep</RefJournal>
<RefPage>41-8</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Chan TN, Venus J. The effect of 30 to 60 minutes of forced-air pre-warming on maintaining intraoperative core temperatures during the first hour post-anesthesia induction in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):41-8. DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2520</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2520</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="11">
<RefAuthor>Jo YY</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Chang YJ</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kim YB</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Lee S</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Kwak HJ</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Effect of Preoperative Forced-Air Warming on Hypothermia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2015</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Urol J</RefJournal>
<RefPage>2366-70</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Jo YY, Chang YJ, Kim YB, Lee S, Kwak HJ. Effect of Preoperative Forced-Air Warming on Hypothermia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. Urol J. 2015 Nov 14;12(5):2366-70.</RefTotal>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="12">
<RefAuthor>Perl T</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Peichl LH</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Reyntjens K</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Deblaere I</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Zaballos JM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bräuer A</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Efficacy of a novel prewarming system in the prevention of perioperative hypothermia. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2014</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Minerva Anestesiol</RefJournal>
<RefPage>436-43</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Perl T, Peichl LH, Reyntjens K, Deblaere I, Zaballos JM, Bräuer A. Efficacy of a novel prewarming system in the prevention of perioperative hypothermia. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Apr;80(4):436-43.</RefTotal>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="13">
<RefAuthor>Erdling A</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Johansson A</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Core temperature – the intraoperative difference between esophageal versus nasopharyngeal temperatures and the impact of prewarming, age, and weight: a randomized clinical trial</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2015</RefYear>
<RefJournal>AANA J</RefJournal>
<RefPage>99-105</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Erdling A, Johansson A. Core temperature – the intraoperative difference between esophageal versus nasopharyngeal temperatures and the impact of prewarming, age, and weight: a randomized clinical trial. AANA J. 2015 Apr;83(2):99-105.</RefTotal>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="14">
<RefAuthor>Waeschle RM</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Russo SG</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Sliwa B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bleeker F</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Russo M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bauer M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bräuer A</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Perioperatives Wärmemanagement in Abhängigkeit von der Krankenhausgröße in Deutschland</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2015</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Anaesthesist</RefJournal>
<RefPage>612-22</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Waeschle RM, Russo SG, Sliwa B, Bleeker F, Russo M, Bauer M, Bräuer A. Perioperatives Wärmemanagement in Abhängigkeit von der Krankenhausgröße in Deutschland [Perioperative thermal management in Germany varies depending on the hospital size]. Anaesthesist. 2015 Aug;64(8):612-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-015-0057-z</RefTotal>
<RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-015-0057-z</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="15">
<RefAuthor>Pandit JJ</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>The analysis of variance in anaesthetic research: statistics, biography and history</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2010</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Anaesthesia</RefJournal>
<RefPage>1212-20</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Pandit JJ. The analysis of variance in anaesthetic research: statistics, biography and history. Anaesthesia. 2010 Dec;65(12):1212-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06542.x</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06542.x</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="16">
<RefAuthor>Höcker J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Bein B</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Böhm R</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Steinfath M</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Scholz J</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Horn EP</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Correlation, accuracy, precision and practicability of perioperative measurement of sublingual temperature in comparison with tympanic membrane temperature in awake and anaesthetised patients</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2012</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Eur J Anaesthesiol</RefJournal>
<RefPage>70-4</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Höcker J, Bein B, Böhm R, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Horn EP. Correlation, accuracy, precision and practicability of perioperative measurement of sublingual temperature in comparison with tympanic membrane temperature in awake and anaesthetised patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;29(2):70-4. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834cd6de</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834cd6de</RefLink>
</Reference>
<Reference refNo="17">
<RefAuthor>Karalapillai D</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Story DA</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Calzavacca P</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Licari E</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Liu YL</RefAuthor>
<RefAuthor>Hart GK</RefAuthor>
<RefTitle>Inadvertent hypothermia and mortality in postoperative intensive care patients: retrospective audit of 5050 patients</RefTitle>
<RefYear>2009</RefYear>
<RefJournal>Anaesthesia</RefJournal>
<RefPage>968-72</RefPage>
<RefTotal>Karalapillai D, Story DA, Calzavacca P, Licari E, Liu YL, Hart GK. Inadvertent hypothermia and mortality in postoperative intensive care patients: retrospective audit of 5050 patients. Anaesthesia. 2009 Sep;64(9):968-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05989.x</RefTotal>
<RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05989.x</RefLink>
</Reference>
</References>
<Media>
<Tables>
<Table format="png">
<MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
<MediaID>1</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Demographic and morphometric characteristics, duration of surgery</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Table>
<Table format="png">
<MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
<MediaID>2</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 2: Disciplines of surgery and type of anaesthesia</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Table>
<Table format="png">
<MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
<MediaID>3</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 3: Warming devices, temperature measurement, and the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia </Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
</Table>
<NoOfTables>3</NoOfTables>
</Tables>
<Figures>
<Figure format="png" height="274" width="517">
<MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
<MediaID>1</MediaID>
<Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: Results of the postoperative sublingual temperature (°C) measurement of the patients</Mark1><LineBreak></LineBreak>The lowest postoperative sublingual assessed temperature was 36°C. Therefore, none of the 431 patients were hypothermic.</Pgraph></Caption>
</Figure>
<NoOfPictures>1</NoOfPictures>
</Figures>
<InlineFigures>
<NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
</InlineFigures>
<Attachments>
<NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
</Attachments>
</Media>
</OrigData>
</GmsArticle>]]></plaintext></textgroup></pgraph></abstract></origdata></gmsarticle>