000038 Research Article Hochdosistherapie mit autologer Stammzelltransplantation bei Patienten mit diffus großzelligem Non-Hodgkin-Lymphom Mey Mey Ulrich J.M. U Dr.

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I des Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Deutschland, Tel.: +49/228/287-15507, Fax: +49/228/287-14466Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Ulrich.Mey@ukb.uni-bonn.de author Jha Jha Vandana V

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

JhaPinky@aol.com author Strehl Strehl John W. JW

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

John.Strehl@ukb.uni-bonn.de author Gorschlueter Gorschlueter Marcus M

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Marcus.Gorschlueter@ukb.uni-bonn.de author Rabe Rabe Christian C

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Christian.Rabe@ukb.uni-bonn.de author Hoebert Hoebert Eckfried E

Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Eckfried.Hoebert@ukb.uni-bonn.de author Popp Popp Henning H

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Henning.Popp@ukb.uni-bonn.de author Schmidt-Wolf Schmidt-Wolf Ingo G.H. IG

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Ingo.Schmidt-Wolf@ukb.uni-bonn.de author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

LYMPHOMA, B-CELL drug therapy therapy LYMPHOMA, LARGE-CELL, DIFFUSE drug therapy therapy HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS administration & dosage ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS administration & dosage COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY PROGNOSIS HUMANS ADULT FOLLOW-UP STUDIES 610 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma high-dose chemotherapy autologous stem cell transplantation diffus großzelliges Non-Hodgkin-Lymphom Hochdosistherapie autologe Stammzelltransplantation 20070321 20070619 engl 1612-3174 5 GMS German Medical Science GMS Ger Med Sci 02 Hintergrund: Die Hochdosistherapie (HDT) mit autologer Stammzelltransplantation (SZT) spielt in der Behandlung aggressiver Non-Hodgkin-Lymphome (NHL) eine große Rolle. Wir präsentieren die Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven Analyse sämtlicher Patienten mit diffus großzelligem Non-Hodgkin-Lymphom (DLBCL), die im Zeitraum zwischen 1996 und 2004 an der Universitätsklinik Bonn mittels HDT und nachfolgender autologer SZT behandelt worden sind.Methoden: Insgesamt wurden 25 Patienten mit bioptisch gesichertem DLBCL transplantiert. Bei acht Patienten erfolgte die HDT als geplanter Bestandteil der Erstlinientherapie („up-front“), vier Patienten wurden wegen inkompletten Ansprechens und sechs wegen primärer Refraktärität auf die konventionelle Chemotherapie transplantiert. Sieben Patienten erhielten die HDT wegen eines Rezidivs des DLBCL. Ergebnisse: Eine komplette Remission wurde bei 14 der 25 Patienten (56%) erreicht. Die geschätzten 3-Jahres-Überlebensraten von Patienten, die die HDT als Teil der Erstlinientherapie erhielten, lag bei 87,5%; für chemosensitive Patienten mit inkomplettem Ansprechen auf die Erstlinientherapie und Patienten mit chemosensitiver rezidivierter Erkrankung lagen die entsprechenden Werte bei 50% bzw. 60%. Demgegenüber lebte in der Gruppe der primär refraktären bzw. rezidivierten Patienten ohne erhaltene Chemosensitivität kein Patient länger als 8 Monate. In der multivariaten Analyse prognostisch relevanter Faktoren für das Gesamtüberleben erwies sich Chemosensitivität als einzig signifikanter Parameter. Schlussfolgerung: Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die HDT mit nachfolgender SZT in der Behandlung von Patienten mit DLBCL eine hocheffektive Therapie darstellt, die bei einem Großteil der Patienten ein Langzeitüberleben ermöglicht. Patienten, die die HDT in Hochrisikosituationen als Teil der Erstlinientherapie erhalten oder wegen inkompletten Ansprechens auf konventionelle Chemotherapie bzw. im chemosensiblen Rezidiv transplantiert werden, haben eine gute Prognose. Im Gegensatz dazu profitieren Patienten mit primär refraktärer Erkrankung und Patienten mit chemoresistentem Rezidiv nicht von einer HDT. Background: High-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) plays an important role in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). We report on a retrospective analysis of all patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were consecutively treated with HDT followed by ASCT at the University Hospital of Bonn, Germany, between 1996 and 2004.Methods: A total of 25 patients were transplanted for biopsy-proven diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Eight patients received up-front HDT as first-line therapy, four patients received HDT due to incomplete response to conventional induction chemotherapy, and six patients were treated for primary refractory disease. Seven patients had recurrent lymphoma. Results: A complete remission (CR) was achieved in 14 of 25 patients (56%). Estimated 3-year survival for patients treated with upfront HDT, chemosensitive patients with incomplete response to first line therapy, and patients with chemosensitive relapsed disease was 87.5%, 50.0% and 60.0%, respectively. In contrast, no patient with primary refractory disease or relapsed disease lacking chemosensitivity lived longer than 8 months. Chemosensitivity was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis.Conclusions: Our results confirm that HDT and ASCT is a highly effective therapy in patients with DLBCL leading to long-term survival in a substantial proportion of patients. Patients treated upfront for high-risk disease, incomplete response to conventional first-line therapy, or for chemosensitive relapse have a good prognosis. In contrast, patients with primary chemorefractory disease and patients with relapsed disease lacking chemosensitivity do not benefit from HDT with ASCT. IntroductionHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an established treatment approach for certain subgroups of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). For patients with relapsed aggressive NHL sensitive to second-line salvage chemotherapy, prolonged event-free survival has been demonstrated in the well-known Parma trial . As a result of this single randomised trial, HDT with ASCT is widely accepted as standard treatment in this patient population. Although some phase I/II trials have reported favourable results for HDT with ASCT as first-line therapy for patients considered to be at high risk for relapse, results of larger, prospective randomised trials have been contradictory , , , , , , , , . In some trials applying the international prognostic index (IPI) retrospectively, patients with high-intermediate and high-risk profiles had significantly better results with HDT followed by ASCT than those treated with conventional chemotherapy , , , , . As a consequence, more recently designed trials prospectively evaluated the effect of HDT with ASCT in consideration of the IPI. In a meta-analysis of eleven randomised trials comparing HDT with ASCT to conventional chemotherapy, HDT/ASCT was superior in terms of OS in high and high-intermediate risk patients when this strategy is used after maximum tumour reduction has been achieved . However, combined analysis of the different available trials is hampered - if not impossible - due to considerable heterogeneity between the trials in terms of patient selection as well as study design. As superiority of HDT followed by ASCT in first line therapy of aggressive NHL has still not been conclusively demonstrated, this treatment approach has still to be considered experimental and is a source of ongoing controversial discussions.The answer to the question whether HDT is appropriate in patients with chemorefractory first or subsequent relapse or primary refractory disease is controversial and made difficult due to the lack of uniform criteria to define chemorefractoriness disease in different clinical trials. Jury members of an “International Consensus Conference on High-Dose Therapy with Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Aggressive NHL” held in April 1998 agreed that HDT was not indicated for chemorefractory first or subsequent relapse . On the other hand, a small subset of patients with primary refractory disease might benefit from HDT , , , . Therefore, some patients with induction failure can have long-term disease-free survival with HDT and ASCT. In an attempt to contribute to the available information regarding the role of HDT with ASCT in NHL treatment, we here report on a detailed retrospective analysis of all consecutively treated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were treated with HDT and ASCT at the University Hospital of Bonn, Germany, between 1996 and 2004. Subgroup analysis and univariate as well as multivariate analysis with regard to factors predicting outcome are presented. Results are discussed against the background of the existing body of evidence. MethodsPatientsBetween 1996 and 2004, a total of 52 patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for malignant lymphoma at the University hospital of Bonn, Germany. To ensure homogeneity of the analysed population and to exclude selection bias due to different histologies, this retrospective analysis includes 25 patients with biopsy-proven diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) only. All patients had adequate organ function as defined by a creatinine clearance more than 60 ml/min; adequate cardiac function (ejection fraction ≥50%), serum transaminases less than three times the normal value; bilirubin less than 3 mg/dl; adequate haematopoietic sufficiency (leukocyte count ≥3.0 G/l and platelet count ≥80 G/l), no active uncontrolled infection or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive serology, and an performance status of ≥2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification scale. Determination of disease status pre-transplantFor operative purposes, pre-transplant disease status as well as indication for HDT followed by ASCT was categorised as follows: All patients who received HDT with ASCT as upfront induction therapy in form of a “high-dose sequential therapy” and patients undergoing consolidative HDT with ASCT after achieving a complete remission (CR) with conventional induction therapy were grouped together. Patients failing to achieve a CR to anthracycline-based 1st-line chemotherapy were separated in two groups: Patients with only incomplete response to conventional induction chemotherapy achieving at least a partial remission (PR) after subsequent pre-transplant salvage chemotherapy were considered to have primary refractory, chemosensitive disease. In contrast, patients with either progressive disease (PD) during first-line chemotherapy or only stable disease (SD) or PD after completion of induction therapy or failing to respond to subsequent pre-transplant salvage chemotherapy were defined to have primary refractory, chemoresistant disease. Similarly, patients with relapsed disease were separated according to their response to salvage chemotherapy: Chemorefractory relapse was defined as SD or PD after two courses of an aggressive salvage regimen, whereas achievement of at least a PR after two cycles of aggressive salvage therapy was regarded as chemosensitive relapsed disease. Staging, follow-up and response criteriaInitial staging procedures at first diagnosis or time of relapse followed standard guidelines. Physical examination, complete blood counts, serum chemistry, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, and radiological studies were performed in all cases. Restaging examinations were performed after every two courses of conventional therapy, immediately pre-transplant and four weeks after HDT/ASCT. During the first two years of follow-up, physical examination, laboratory examinations and CT scans or ultrasonography of involved regions were repeated every three months. During the third and fourth year post-transplant, follow-up visits were scheduled every six months and annually thereafter.Response was assessed according to standardised criteria following the recommendations of a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored international working group . Patients were classified according to the international prognostic index (IPI) at diagnosis or at time of relapse according to the original publication . Stem cell harvest and cryopreservationThe source of haematopoietic progenitors was peripheral blood in all patients. Harvested peripheral stem cells were processed on a COBE®SpectraTM separator and the mononuclear cells were cryopreserved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) with 20% autologous plasma and kept in liquid nitrogen. Quality testing included viability testing and assessment of the colony forming unit (CFU) capacity. Maximum period of stem cell storage has been limited by internal standards to 5 years.Transplantation procedurePatients received one of the following conditioning regimens: Mega-CHOEP (cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2, adriamycin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, etoposide 800 mg/m2, and prednisone 500 mg (1st course), cyclophosphamide 2250 mg/m2, adriamycin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, etoposide 960 mg/m2, and prednisone 500 mg (2nd and 3rd course), and cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m2, adriamycin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, etoposide 1480 mg/m2, and prednisone 500 mg (4th course): 11 patients; BEAM (BCNU 300 mg/m², etoposide 1200 mg/m², cytosine arabinoside 1600 mg/m², and melphalan 140 mg/m²): 6 patients; CEI (carboplatin 1500 mg/m², etoposide 2400 mg/m² and ifosfamide 10 g/m²): 5 patients; CEIAP (carboplatin 1000 mg/m², etoposide 1200 mg/m², ifosfamide 7500 mg/m², adriamycin 50 mg/m², dexamethasone 60 mg): 2 patients; and the IC regimen (thiotepa 750 mg/m2, busulfan 10 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg) in one patient. Stem cells were infused on day 0.Supportive care during neutropenic phaseAll patients were treated in single- or two-bed rooms. Patients received a diet low in bacterial and fungal content. Antimicrobical, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis consisted of oral co-trimoxazole, itraconazole, amphotericin suspension, and acyclovir, respectively. Parenteral antibiotics were started if fever ≥38°C occurred during neutropenia and maintained until defervescence for at least three consecutive days. In the absence of significant bleeding, platelet transfusions were administered as required to maintain a platelet count of greater than 10 x 109/L. Transfusions of packed red blood cells were given on an individual basis. In most patients, a target haemoglobin concentration of >8 g/dl was aimed at. A decision on the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) was made on an individual basis. Parenteral nutrition and analgetic treatment for mucositis was used as clinically indicated. ToxicityToxicity was assessed according to the common toxicity criteria of the National Cancer Institute.Statistical analysisDemographics and disease characteristics were summarised using descriptive statistics. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and by applying the log rank test. Overall survival was measured from entry onto trial until death from any cause. Progression-free survival was measured from the time of entry onto study until disease progression or death from NHL. Survival was analysed using the method of Kaplan and Meier and was compared between groups using the log-rank test.To determine prognostic factors for overall survival, patient characteristics were subjected to univariate analysis for each of the following variables: age (≤50 vs. >50 years), sex, disease stage (I or II versus III or IV according to Ann Arbor), performance status (ECOG 0 vs. ECOG 1 or 2), baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, number of involved extranodal sites (≤1 vs. >1), number of prior chemotherapy regimens (≤1 vs. >1), IPI (low or low-intermediate vs. high-intermediate or high), presence of bulky disease, presence of bone marrow involvement, number of HDT courses applicated, chemosensitivity prior to transplantation, and pre-transplantation disease status (CR vs. not in CR). All tests were two-sided and the level of significance was set to 0.05. Multivariate analysis with those variables of at least borderline significance in univariate analysis (p-value <0.08) was performed according to the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS software (version 11.0.1). ResultsEfficacy and toxicity as well as long-term follow-up data were available for all but one patient, who was lost to follow-up due to non-European residency.Patient characteristicsBaseline clinical features of all patients are shown in Table 1 . Eight patients received up-front HDT/ASCT or consolidative HDT followed by ASCT after achievement of a CR to conventional first-line therapy, ten patients received HDT/ASCT for induction failure. Four of these patients had an incomplete response to conventional induction chemotherapy still responsive to salvage chemotherapy while six patients were categorised to have primary refractory, chemoresistant disease. Seven patients had recurrent lymphoma. Chemosensitive relapse was present in five patients whereas two patients were treated for chemoresistant disease. Thirteen of 25 (52%) patients had high-intermediate or high risk disease according to the IPI. Bulky disease was present in 40% of patients and 3 of 25 (12%) had bone marrow involvement. The baseline LDH level at time of diagnosis or time of relapse was elevated in 23 of 25 (92%) patients. Two patients were in CR prior to transplantation.EfficacyResponse rates and survival data are summarised in Table 2 . After HDT followed by ASCT, a CR rate of 56% was achieved. Patients treated with up-front HDT/ASCT had the best outcome with 87.5% patients achieving a CR or CRu. Six of eight patients in this group had at least an IPI score ≥3 and all had elevated LDH levels at diagnosis. CR and overall remission rates (ORR) did not differ significantly between patients with chemosensitive relapse or patients with only incomplete response to 1st-line therapy but chemosensitive disease. In contrast, none of the primary refractory, chemoresistant patients, and only one patient in the relapsed chemorefractory patient group, achieved a CR. Survival curves for patients with different pre-transplantation disease status are shown in Figure 1 . According to the log-rank test, a highly significant difference with regard to overall survival was observed. Whereas median survival in patients treated with upfront HDT/ASCT or patients with chemosensitive disease has not been reached, none of the ten patients with chemorefractory disease pre-transplant achieved long-term disease free survival after transplantation. In contrast, neither disease stage (Ann Arbor stage I or II versus III or IV) nor IPI score (low or low-intermediate versus high-intermediate or high) had a significant impact on overall survival.At a median follow-up of 42 months (10-110), 12 patients (48%) are alive. Causes of death were PD in ten patients (40%) and three patients 12% died of infectious complications, all of whom were directly related to the immunosuppression during the transplantation-procedure. No secondary malignancies or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have been recorded to date.Analysis of pre-transplant prognostic factors for OSPerformance status, presence of chemosensitivity and LDH baseline levels were of prognostic importance with regard to OS in univariate analysis and were entered into multivariate Cox regression analysis. Only chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy pre-transplant remained predictive of OS (p=0.001). Table 3 lists the p-values for OS. ToxicityHDT with ASCT was associated with substantial haematologic as well as non-haematologic toxicities. All 25 patients achieved complete haematologic engraftment with absolute neutrophil counts >0.5 × G/l after a median of 10 days (range, 4 to 30 days) and a self-sustaining platelet count >50 × G/l after a median of 9 days (range, 3 to 25 days). 19 patients (76%) received G-CSF for a median of 10 (2–15) days. Twenty patients (80%) required packed red cell transfusions (median 4 units). Platelet transfusions were given to 23 (92%) of patients (median 2 units). There were three deaths, all of whom were infection-related. Detailed information on severe non-haematologic toxicities is provided in Table 4 . No cases of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MDS were documented. DiscussionIn this paper, we present outcome data of all patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have been treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between 1995 and 2004 at the University Hospital of Bonn, Germany. The main purpose was to describe long-term results and to provide prognostic factors for outcome with long-term overall survival as the primary endpoint. In our analysis, median survival for the whole patient group was 17.1 months. However, large differences were seen between subgroups: For patients treated with upfront or consolidative HDT after achievement of a CR with conventional induction therapy as well as for patients with chemosensitive relapse, median OS has not been reached yet. OS for patients with an incomplete response to first-line chemotherapy still chemosensitive to salvage chemotherapy was 13.4 months. In contrast, patients with either chemoresistant relapse or primary refractory chemoresistant disease had no benefit from treatment with HDT followed by ASCT, achieving a median OS of less than 5 months.Several groups have focused on the development of prognostic models capable of predicting outcome in patients with recurrent or refractory aggressive lymphoma. The most widely accepted prognostic factor is chemosensitivity to conventional dose second-line chemotherapy , . Several additional factors like presence of bulky disease, three or more chemotherapy regimens prior to HDT, elevated LDH levels, short time to relapse, and high disease burden may also have some prognostic value , , , . However, as a result of the inhomogeneous patient populations used to generate these models, no single prognostic model has achieved widespread acceptance in the setting of relapsed or refractory disease.In our evaluation, only performance status and chemosensitivity were correlated with OS in univariate analysis with LDH baseline level reaching merely borderline significance. In multivariate analysis, only chemosensitivity remained to be of prognostic value. The small sample size of our trial limits the power of the statistical analysis. Prince et al. tested the hypothesis that the amount of tumour burden - reflected by the remission status immediately prior to transplant - is an important prognostic indicator of survival for patients with aggressive lymphoma undergoing autologous transplantation for relapsed or refractory disease . Patients with incomplete response to induction therapy or relapsed disease who achieved only a partial remission (PR) with conventional dose salvage chemotherapy had a markedly inferior outcome after subsequent HDT with ASCT than patients who were transplanted in complete remission (CR) state. In fact, remission status at transplant was the only factor predictive of outcome in this analysis. This finding is of particular importance, since it suggests the hypothesis that increasing the CR rate prior to transplant with improved conventional salvage therapies might translate into superior outcomes after HDT with ASCT for relapsed or refractory patients with aggressive NHL. In this regard, we and others have recently reported on improved CR rates with the addition of the monoclonal antibody rituximab to conventional salvage regimens for relapsed or refractory NHL patients , , . However, whether increasing the CR rate pre-transplant will finally translate into a significant survival advantage remains a critical question to be resolved in larger prospective trials with longer follow-up . Special attention should be given to those patients with primary refractory disease or chemorefractory relapse. The role of HDT followed by ASCT for these patients has not been defined because there have been no randomised trials in this group of patients to date. Furthermore, the prognostic importance of chemosensitivity in the existing studies is biased by the inclusion of patients with various histologic diagnoses, the lack of chemosensitivity determination and - in particular - the different applied definitions for “refractory disease”. Thus, notwithstanding the limitations of our evaluation due to its small number of patients, a strength of this analysis might be the differentiated categorization of patients in terms of their disease status and grade of chemosensitivity.Studies on HDT with ASCT for patients with induction failure – i.e. non-achievement of a CR to conventional induction chemotherapy – have reported progression-free-survival rates of 27%-69% , , , , . The largest available data set of patients with diffuse aggressive NHL undergoing autologous transplantation after not achieving CR with induction chemotherapy was published by Vose et al. in 2001 . Retrospective evaluation of the 184 records from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry demonstrated 5-year probabilities of PFS and OS of 31% and 37%, respectively. Patients who remained chemotherapy-sensitive, had a good performance status, were younger than 55 years of age, had received only one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, and had received either pre- or post-transplant involved-field irradiation, did benefit most from this approach. Consequently, HDT has been accepted by many physicians for the treatment of patients with primary refractory disease provided that chemotherapy sensitivity is documented after salvage chemotherapy. These results have been confirmed in a Spanish retrospective analysis of 114 patients who failed to achieve a CR with 1st-line induction chemotherapy and received HDT/ASCT as part of their salvage treatment . The 60% 3 year OS rate in patients with chemosensitive relapsed disease in our series is well in line with the results reported by the above mentioned trials with 45%-60% of patients achieving long-term survival.In contrast, the outcome of patients with “truly” chemorefractory disease is very poor. Five-year survival rates are only about 10% in almost all published reports , , , , . In the PARMA trial, 18 patients not responding to two courses of dexamethasone/high-dose ara-C/cisplatin (DHAP) received HDT followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Of note, at least for patients with a low risk IPI score, a significant survival benefit was found in transplanted patients compared to the 70 remaining patients not undergoing HDT/ASCT . Very recently, Glossmann et al. reported on their experiences with tandem transplantation in patients with primary progressive or relapsed lymphoma refractory to salvage treatment . Tandem HDT followed by ASCT offered a small chance for cure at least for some patients in their series, leading the authors to conclude that patients lacking chemosensitivity should not a priori be excluded from transplant procedures. This is in particular true for younger patients, who are often willing to take the high risk of treatment failure as there might be a small chance for long-term survival. The results of a very recently published retrospective analysis of 57 out of 425 relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients (17 Hodgkin’s disease, 26 aggressive NHL, 14 indolent NHL) who received a second salvage regimen after failure of the first salvage regimen are helpful to more precisely assess the relevance of chemosensitivity in the treatment of aggressive NHL: From 15 patients with SD following first salvage therapy, five patients (33%) achieved a response to second salvage chemotherapy as opposed to only one of 24 (4%) patients with PD after first salvage treatment . The 3-year estimated survival was 25% in the former group as opposed to only 4% in the latter group (the only patient who survived longer than 3 years in this group had indolent lymphoma). These observations are well in line with our experiences: All patients with PD to salvage chemotherapy died in less than eight months after HDT/ASCT. Thus, our results support the view that patients who undoubtedly show PD after conventional salvage therapy should generally not be offered HDT with ASCT since these patients do not benefit from this treatment approach. ConclusionsIn summary, our results confirm that HDT and ASCT is a highly effective therapy leading to long-term survival in a substantial proportion of non-selected patients with DLBCL. In our series, high-risk patients receiving HDT followed by ASCT as part of their 1st-line therapy, patients with incomplete response to conventional first-line therapy but chemosensitive disease as well as patients with chemosensitive relapse achieve high remission rates with the majority having a good long-term prognosis. In contrast, patients with primary refractory chemoresistant disease and patients with relapsed disease lacking chemosensitivity do not benefit from HDT with ASCT and should be candidates for either treatments with palliative intent or experimental approaches. NotesConflicts of interestNone declared.AcknowledgementsWe thank Prof. Dr. T. Sauerbruch, Bonn for carefully reading the manuscript. Philip T Guglielmi C Hagenbeek A Somers R Van der Lelie H Bron D Sonneveld P Gisselbrecht C Cahn JY Harousseau JL Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 1995 N Engl J Med 1540-5 Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Van der Lelie H, Bron D, Sonneveld P, Gisselbrecht C, Cahn JY, Harousseau JL, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(23):1540-5. Gianni AM Bregni M Siena S Brambilla C Di Nicola M Lombardi F Gandola L Tarella C Pileri A Ravagnani F Valagussa P Bonadonna G High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation compared with MACOP-B in aggressive B-cell lymphoma 1997 N Engl J Med 1290-7 Gianni AM, Bregni M, Siena S, Brambilla C, Di Nicola M, Lombardi F, Gandola L, Tarella C, Pileri A, Ravagnani F, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation compared with MACOP-B in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(18):1290-7. Milpied N Deconinck E Gaillard F Delwail V Foussard C Berthou C Gressin R Lucas V Colombat P Harousseau JL Groupe Ouest-Est des Leucemies et des Autres Maladies du Sang Initial treatment of aggressive lymphoma with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell support 2004 N Engl J Med 1287-95 Milpied N, Deconinck E, Gaillard F, Delwail V, Foussard C, Berthou C, Gressin R, Lucas V, Colombat P, Harousseau JL; Groupe Ouest-Est des Leucemies et des Autres Maladies du Sang. Initial treatment of aggressive lymphoma with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell support. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(13):1287-95. Martelli M Vignetti M Zinzani PL Gherlinzoni F Meloni G Fiacchini M De Sanctis V Papa G Martelli MF Calabresi F Tura S Mandelli F High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized italian multicenter study 1996 J Clin Oncol 534-42 Martelli M, Vignetti M, Zinzani PL, Gherlinzoni F, Meloni G, Fiacchini M, De Sanctis V, Papa G, Martelli MF, Calabresi F, Tura S, Mandelli F. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized italian multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(2):534-42. Haioun C Lepage E Gisselbrecht C Bastion Y Coiffier B Brice P Bosly A Dupriez B Nouvel C Tilly H Lederlin P Biron P Briere J Gaulard P Reyes F Benefit of autologous bone marrow transplantation over sequential chemotherapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: updated results of the prospective study LNH87-2. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte 1997 J Clin Oncol 1131-7 Haioun C, Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, Bastion Y, Coiffier B, Brice P, Bosly A, Dupriez B, Nouvel C, Tilly H, Lederlin P, Biron P, Briere J, Gaulard P, Reyes F. Benefit of autologous bone marrow transplantation over sequential chemotherapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: updated results of the prospective study LNH87-2. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):1131-7. Santini G Salvagno L Leoni P Chisesi T De Souza C Sertoli MR Rubagotti A Congiu AM Centurioni R Olivieri A Tedeschi L Vespignani M Nati S Soracco M Porcellini A Contu A Guarnaccia C Pescosta N Majolino I Spriano M Vimercati R Rossi E Zambaldi G Mangoni L Rizzoli V VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group 1998 J Clin Oncol 2796-802 Santini G, Salvagno L, Leoni P, Chisesi T, De Souza C, Sertoli MR, Rubagotti A, Congiu AM, Centurioni R, Olivieri A, Tedeschi L, Vespignani M, Nati S, Soracco M, Porcellini A, Contu A, Guarnaccia C, Pescosta N, Majolino I, Spriano M, Vimercati R, Rossi E, Zambaldi G, Mangoni L, Rizzoli V, et al. VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8):2796-802. Kaiser U Uebelacker I Abel U Birkmann J Trumper L Schmalenberg H Karakas T Metzner B Hossfeld DK Bischoff HG Franke A Reiser M Muller P Mantovani L Grundeis M Rothmann F von Seydewitz CU Mesters RM Steinhauer EU Krahl D Schumacher K Kneba M Baudis M Schmitz N Pfab R Koppler H Parwaresch R Pfreundschuh M Havemann K Randomized study to evaluate the use of high-dose therapy as part of primary treatment for "aggressive" lymphoma 2002 J Clin Oncol 4413-9 Kaiser U, Uebelacker I, Abel U, Birkmann J, Trumper L, Schmalenberg H, Karakas T, Metzner B, Hossfeld DK, Bischoff HG, Franke A, Reiser M, Muller P, Mantovani L, Grundeis M, Rothmann F, von Seydewitz CU, Mesters RM, Steinhauer EU, Krahl D, Schumacher K, Kneba M, Baudis M, Schmitz N, Pfab R, Koppler H, Parwaresch R, Pfreundschuh M, Havemann K. Randomized study to evaluate the use of high-dose therapy as part of primary treatment for "aggressive" lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(22):4413-9. Martelli M Gherlinzoni F De Renzo A Zinzani PL De Vivo A Cantonetti M Falini B Storti S Meloni G Rizzo M Molinari AL Lauria F Moretti L Lauta VM Mazza P Guardigni L Pescarmona E Pileri SA Mandelli F Tura S Early autologous stem-cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy as front-line therapy in high-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an Italian multicenter randomized trial 2003 J Clin Oncol 1255-62 Martelli M, Gherlinzoni F, De Renzo A, Zinzani PL, De Vivo A, Cantonetti M, Falini B, Storti S, Meloni G, Rizzo M, Molinari AL, Lauria F, Moretti L, Lauta VM, Mazza P, Guardigni L, Pescarmona E, Pileri SA, Mandelli F, Tura S. Early autologous stem-cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy as front-line therapy in high-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an Italian multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(7):1255-62. Gisselbrecht C Lepage E Molina T Quesnel B Fillet G Lederlin P Coiffier B Tilly H Gabarre J Guilmin F Hermine O Reyes F Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte Shortened first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma 2002 J Clin Oncol 2472-9 Gisselbrecht C, Lepage E, Molina T, Quesnel B, Fillet G, Lederlin P, Coiffier B, Tilly H, Gabarre J, Guilmin F, Hermine O, Reyes F; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Shortened first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(10):2472-9. Verdonck LF van Putten WL Hagenbeek A Schouten HC Sonneveld P van Imhoff GW Kluin-Nelemans HC Raemaekers JM van Oers RH Haak HL Comparison of CHOP chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for slowly responding patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 1995 N Engl J Med 1045-51 Verdonck LF, van Putten WL, Hagenbeek A, Schouten HC, Sonneveld P, van Imhoff GW, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Raemaekers JM, van Oers RH, Haak HL, et al. Comparison of CHOP chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for slowly responding patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(16):1045-51. Haioun C Lepage E Gisselbrecht C Salles G Coiffier B Brice P Bosly A Morel P Nouvel C Tilly H Lederlin P Sebban C Briere J Gaulard P Reyes F Survival benefit of high-dose therapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: final analysis of the prospective LNH87-2 protocol--a groupe d'Etude des lymphomes de l'Adulte study 2000 J Clin Oncol 3025-30 Haioun C, Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, Salles G, Coiffier B, Brice P, Bosly A, Morel P, Nouvel C, Tilly H, Lederlin P, Sebban C, Briere J, Gaulard P, Reyes F. Survival benefit of high-dose therapy in poor-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: final analysis of the prospective LNH87-2 protocol--a groupe d'Etude des lymphomes de l'Adulte study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(16):3025-30. Kluin-Nelemans HC Zagonel V Anastasopoulou A Bron D Roozendaal KJ Noordijk EM Musson H Teodorovic I Maes B Carbone A Carde P Thomas J Standard chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: randomized phase III EORTC study 2001 J Natl Cancer Inst 22-30 Kluin-Nelemans HC, Zagonel V, Anastasopoulou A, Bron D, Roozendaal KJ, Noordijk EM, Musson H, Teodorovic I, Maes B, Carbone A, Carde P, Thomas J. Standard chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: randomized phase III EORTC study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(1):22-30. Cortelazzo S Rossi A Bellavita P Oldani E Viero P Buelli M Rambaldi A Barbui T Clinical outcome after autologous transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with high international prognostic index (IPI) 1999 Ann Oncol 427-32 Cortelazzo S, Rossi A, Bellavita P, Oldani E, Viero P, Buelli M, Rambaldi A, Barbui T. Clinical outcome after autologous transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with high international prognostic index (IPI). Ann Oncol. 1999;10(4):427-32. Fanin R Sperotto A Ruiz De Elvira C Zaja F Stocchi R Geromin A Cerno M Patriarca F Fanni Canelles M Damiani D Baccarani M A retrospective analysis of 144 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: impact of autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission on outcome 2000 Haematologica 943-51 Fanin R, Sperotto A, Ruiz De Elvira C, Zaja F, Stocchi R, Geromin A, Cerno M, Patriarca F, Fanni Canelles M, Damiani D, Baccarani M. A retrospective analysis of 144 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: impact of autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission on outcome. Haematologica. 2000;85(9):943-51. Pettengell R Radford JA Morgenstern GR Scarffe JH Harris M Woll PJ Deakin DP Ryder D Wilkinson PM Crowther D Survival benefit from high-dose therapy with autologous blood progenitor-cell transplantation in poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 1996 J Clin Oncol 586-92 Pettengell R, Radford JA, Morgenstern GR, Scarffe JH, Harris M, Woll PJ, Deakin DP, Ryder D, Wilkinson PM, Crowther D. Survival benefit from high-dose therapy with autologous blood progenitor-cell transplantation in poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(2):586-92. Strehl J Mey U Glasmacher A Djulbegovic B Mayr C Gorschluter M Ziske C Schmidt-Wolf IG High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a meta-analysis 2003 Haematologica 1304-15 Strehl J, Mey U, Glasmacher A, Djulbegovic B, Mayr C, Gorschluter M, Ziske C, Schmidt-Wolf IG. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a meta-analysis. Haematologica. 2003;88(11):1304-15. Shipp MA Abeloff MD Antman KH Carroll G Hagenbeek A Loeffler M Montserrat E Radford JA Salles G Schmitz N Symann M Armitage JO Philip T Coiffier B International Consensus Conference on High-Dose Therapy with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: report of the jury 1999 J Clin Oncol 423-9 Shipp MA, Abeloff MD, Antman KH, Carroll G, Hagenbeek A, Loeffler M, Montserrat E, Radford JA, Salles G, Schmitz N, Symann M, Armitage JO, Philip T, Coiffier B. International Consensus Conference on High-Dose Therapy with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: report of the jury. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(1):423-9. Vose JM Zhang MJ Rowlings PA Lazarus HM Bolwell BJ Freytes CO Pavlovsky S Keating A Yanes B van Besien K Armitage JO Horowitz MM Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry Lymphoma Working Committee Autologous transplantation for diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients never achieving remission: a report from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry 2001 J Clin Oncol 406-13 Vose JM, Zhang MJ, Rowlings PA, Lazarus HM, Bolwell BJ, Freytes CO, Pavlovsky S, Keating A, Yanes B, van Besien K, Armitage JO, Horowitz MM; Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry Lymphoma Working Committee. Autologous transplantation for diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients never achieving remission: a report from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):406-13. Josting A Reiser M Rueffer U Salzberger B Diehl V Engert A Treatment of primary progressive Hodgkin's and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is there a chance for cure? 2000 J Clin Oncol 332-9 Josting A, Reiser M, Rueffer U, Salzberger B, Diehl V, Engert A. Treatment of primary progressive Hodgkin's and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is there a chance for cure? J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(2):332-9. Josting A Sieniawski M Glossmann JP Staak O Nogova L Peters N Mapara M Dorken B Ko Y Metzner B Kisro J Diehl V Engert A High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study 2005 Ann Oncol 1359-65 Josting A, Sieniawski M, Glossmann JP, Staak O, Nogova L, Peters N, Mapara M, Dorken B, Ko Y, Metzner B, Kisro J, Diehl V, Engert A. High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(8):1359-65. Ardeshna KM Kakouros N Qian W Powell MG Saini N D'Sa S Mackinnon S Hoskin PJ Goldstone AH Linch DC Conventional second-line salvage chemotherapy regimens are not warranted in patients with malignant lymphomas who have progressive disease after first-line salvage therapy regimens 2005 Br J Haematol 363-72 Ardeshna KM, Kakouros N, Qian W, Powell MG, Saini N, D'Sa S, Mackinnon S, Hoskin PJ, Goldstone AH, Linch DC. Conventional second-line salvage chemotherapy regimens are not warranted in patients with malignant lymphomas who have progressive disease after first-line salvage therapy regimens. Br J Haematol. 2005;130(3):363-72. Cheson BD Horning SJ Coiffier B Shipp MA Fisher RI Connors JM Lister TA Vose J Grillo-Lopez A Hagenbeek A Cabanillas F Klippensten D Hiddemann W Castellino R Harris NL Armitage JO Carter W Hoppe R Canellos GP Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria fornon-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group 1999 J Clin Oncol 1244 Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Shipp MA, Fisher RI, Connors JM, Lister TA, Vose J, Grillo-Lopez A, Hagenbeek A, Cabanillas F, Klippensten D, Hiddemann W, Castellino R, Harris NL, Armitage JO, Carter W, Hoppe R, Canellos GP. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria fornon-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(4):1244. anonym A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project 1993 N Engl J Med 987-94 A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):987-94. Hamlin PA Zelenetz AD Kewalramani T Qin J Satagopan JM Verbel D Noy A Portlock CS Straus DJ Yahalom J Nimer SD Moskowitz CH Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 2003 Blood 1989-96 Hamlin PA, Zelenetz AD, Kewalramani T, Qin J, Satagopan JM, Verbel D, Noy A, Portlock CS, Straus DJ, Yahalom J, Nimer SD, Moskowitz CH. Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index predicts autologous stem cell transplantation outcome for patients with relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2003;102(6):1989-96. Shim BY Lee MA Byun JH Roh SY Song CW Park JN Lee JW Min WS Hong YS Kim CC High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for poor risk and recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single-center experience of 50 patients 2004 Korean J Intern Med 114-20 Shim BY, Lee MA, Byun JH, Roh SY, Song CW, Park JN, Lee JW, Min WS, Hong YS, Kim CC. High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for poor risk and recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single-center experience of 50 patients. Korean J Intern Med. 2004;19(2):114-20. Guglielmi C Gomez F Philip T Hagenbeek A Martelli M Sebban C Milpied N Bron D Cahn JY Somers R Sonneveld P Gisselbrecht C Van Der Lelie H Chauvin F Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto the Parma trial 1998 J Clin Oncol 3264-9 Guglielmi C, Gomez F, Philip T, Hagenbeek A, Martelli M, Sebban C, Milpied N, Bron D, Cahn JY, Somers R, Sonneveld P, Gisselbrecht C, Van Der Lelie H, Chauvin F. Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto the Parma trial. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(10):3264-9. Hoskins PJ Le N Gascoyne RD Klasa R Shenkier T O'Reilly S Connors JM Advanced diffuse large-cell lymphoma treated with 12-week combination chemotherapy: natural history of relapse after initial complete response and prognostic variables defining outcome after relapse 1997 Ann Oncol 1125-32 Hoskins PJ, Le N, Gascoyne RD, Klasa R, Shenkier T, O'Reilly S, Connors JM. Advanced diffuse large-cell lymphoma treated with 12-week combination chemotherapy: natural history of relapse after initial complete response and prognostic variables defining outcome after relapse. Ann Oncol. 1997;8(11):1125-32. Prince HM Imrie K Crump M Stewart AK Girouard C Colwill R Brandwein J Tsang RW Scott JG Sutton DM Pantalony D Carstairs K Sutcliffe SB Keating A The role of intensive therapy and autologous blood and marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed and primary refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: identification of major prognostic groups 1996 Br J Haematol 880-9 Prince HM, Imrie K, Crump M, Stewart AK, Girouard C, Colwill R, Brandwein J, Tsang RW, Scott JG, Sutton DM, Pantalony D, Carstairs K, Sutcliffe SB, Keating A. The role of intensive therapy and autologous blood and marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed and primary refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: identification of major prognostic groups.Br J Haematol. 1996;92(4):880-9. Vose JM Anderson JR Kessinger A Bierman PJ Coccia P Reed EC Gordon B Armitage JO High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 1993 J Clin Oncol 1846-51 Vose JM, Anderson JR, Kessinger A, Bierman PJ, Coccia P, Reed EC, Gordon B, Armitage JO. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(10):1846-51. Mey UJ Olivieri A Orlopp KS Rabe C Strehl JW Gorschlueter M Hensel M Flieger D Glasmacher AG Schmidt-Wolf IG DHAP in combination with rituximab vs DHAP alone as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a matched-pair analysis 2006 Leuk Lymphoma 2558-66 Mey UJ, Olivieri A, Orlopp KS, Rabe C, Strehl JW, Gorschlueter M, Hensel M, Flieger D, Glasmacher AG, Schmidt-Wolf IG. DHAP in combination with rituximab vs DHAP alone as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a matched-pair analysis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47(12):2558-66. Mey UJ Orlopp KS Flieger D Strehl JW Ho AD Hensel M Bopp C Gorschluter M Wilhelm M Birkmann J Kaiser U Neubauer A Florschutz A Rabe C Hahn C Glasmacher AG Schmidt-Wolf IG Dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin in combination with rituximab as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 2006 Cancer Invest 593-600 Mey UJ, Orlopp KS, Flieger D, Strehl JW, Ho AD, Hensel M, Bopp C, Gorschluter M, Wilhelm M, Birkmann J, Kaiser U, Neubauer A, Florschutz A, Rabe C, Hahn C, Glasmacher AG, Schmidt-Wolf IG. Dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin in combination with rituximab as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Invest. 2006;24(6):593-600. Kewalramani T Zelenetz AD Nimer SD Portlock C Straus D Noy A O'Connor O Filippa DA Teruya-Feldstein J Gencarelli A Qin J Waxman A Yahalom J Moskowitz CH Rituximab and ICE as second-line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 2004 Blood 3684-8 Kewalramani T, Zelenetz AD, Nimer SD, Portlock C, Straus D, Noy A, O'Connor O, Filippa DA, Teruya-Feldstein J, Gencarelli A, Qin J, Waxman A, Yahalom J, Moskowitz CH. Rituximab and ICE as second-line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2004;103(10):3684-8. Epub 2004 Jan 22. Hagemeister FB Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue 2002 Cancer Chemother Pharmacol S13-20 Hagemeister FB. Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. Epub 2002 Apr 12. Mills W Chopra R McMillan A Pearce R Linch DC Goldstone AH BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 1995 J Clin Oncol 588-95 Mills W, Chopra R, McMillan A, Pearce R, Linch DC, Goldstone AH. BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(3):588-95. Prince HM Crump M Imrie K Stewart AK Girouard C Brandwein JM Carstairs K Pantalony D Scott G Sutcliffe S Sutton DM Tsang R Keating A Intensive therapy and autotransplant for patients with an incomplete response to front-line therapy for lymphoma 1996 Ann Oncol 1043-9 Prince HM, Crump M, Imrie K, Stewart AK, Girouard C, Brandwein JM, Carstairs K, Pantalony D, Scott G, Sutcliffe S, Sutton DM, Tsang R, Keating A. Intensive therapy and autotransplant for patients with an incomplete response to front-line therapy for lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 1996;7(10):1043-9. Stiff PJ Dahlberg S Forman SJ McCall AR Horning SJ Nademanee AP Blume KG LeBlanc M Fisher RI Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: value of augmented preparative regimens--a Southwest Oncology Group trial 1998 J Clin Oncol 48-55 Stiff PJ, Dahlberg S, Forman SJ, McCall AR, Horning SJ, Nademanee AP, Blume KG, LeBlanc M, Fisher RI. Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: value of augmented preparative regimens--a Southwest Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(1):48-55. Rodriguez J Caballero MD Gutierrez A Solano C Arranz R Lahuerta JJ Sierra J Gandarillas M Perez-Simon JA Zuazu J Lopez-Guillermo A Sureda A Carreras E Garcia-Larana J Marin J Garcia JC Fernandez De Sevilla A Rifon J Varela R Jarque I Albo C Leon A SanMiguel J Conde E Autologous stem-cell transplantation in diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma not achieving complete response after induction chemotherapy: the GEL/TAMO experience 2004 Ann Oncol 1504-9 Rodriguez J, Caballero MD, Gutierrez A, Solano C, Arranz R, Lahuerta JJ, Sierra J, Gandarillas M, Perez-Simon JA, Zuazu J, Lopez-Guillermo A, Sureda A, Carreras E, Garcia-Larana J, Marin J, Garcia JC, Fernandez De Sevilla A, Rifon J, Varela R, Jarque I, Albo C, Leon A, SanMiguel J, Conde E. Autologous stem-cell transplantation in diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma not achieving complete response after induction chemotherapy: the GEL/TAMO experience. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(10):1504-9. Saez R Dahlberg S Appelbaum FR Hartsock RJ Lemaistre F Coltman CA Jr Fisher RI Autologous bone marrow transplantation in adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study 1994 Hematol Oncol 75-85 Saez R, Dahlberg S, Appelbaum FR, Hartsock RJ, Lemaistre F, Coltman CA Jr, Fisher RI. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Hematol Oncol. 1994;12(2):75-85. Freedman AS Nadler LM Which patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma benefit from high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation? 1993 J Clin Oncol 1841-3 Freedman AS, Nadler LM. Which patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma benefit from high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation? J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(10):1841-3. Rapoport AP Rowe JM Kouides PA Duerst RA Abboud CN Liesveld JL Packman CH Eberly S Sherman M Tanner MA One hundred autotransplants for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma: value of pretransplant disease status for predicting outcome 1993 J Clin Oncol 2351-61 Rapoport AP, Rowe JM, Kouides PA, Duerst RA, Abboud CN, Liesveld JL, Packman CH, Eberly S, Sherman M, Tanner MA, et al. One hundred autotransplants for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma: value of pretransplant disease status for predicting outcome. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(12):2351-61. Blay J Gomez F Sebban C Bachelot T Biron P Guglielmi C Hagenbeek A Somers R Chauvin F Philip T The International Prognostic Index correlates to survival in patients with aggressive lymphoma in relapse: analysis of the PARMA trial. Parma Group 1998 Blood 3562-8 Blay J, Gomez F, Sebban C, Bachelot T, Biron P, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Chauvin F, Philip T. The International Prognostic Index correlates to survival in patients with aggressive lymphoma in relapse: analysis of the PARMA trial. Parma Group. Blood. 1998;92(10):3562-8. Glossmann JP Staak JO Nogova L Diehl V Scheid C Kisro J Reis HE Peter N Engert A Josting A Autologous tandem transplantation in patients with primary progressive or relapsed/refractory lymphoma 2005 Ann Hematol 517-25 Glossmann JP, Staak JO, Nogova L, Diehl V, Scheid C, Kisro J, Reis HE, Peter N, Engert A, Josting A. Autologous tandem transplantation in patients with primary progressive or relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2005;84(8):517-25. 33

Table 3: Significant prognostic factors for OS in univariate and multivariate analysis

44

Table 4: Highest degree of treatment-related non-haematological toxicity observed in n=25 patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

11

Table 1: Patient characteristics

22

Table 2: Efficacy: Remission rates after HDT followed by ASCT and 3-year OS

4

1 1 Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival according to disease status pre-transplant

1 0 0