Carotid cavernous fistula masquerading as delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after trabeculectomy

oc000071 10.3205/oc000071 urn:nbn:de:0183-oc0000710 Case Report Carotid cavernous fistula masquerading as delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after trabeculectomy Jain Jain Mukesh M

Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India

author Alam Alam Md. Shahid MS

Department of Orbit Oculoplasty Reconstructive and aesthetic services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India

author Mukherjee Mukherjee Bipasha B

Department of Orbit Oculoplasty Reconstructive and aesthetic services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India

author Raman Raman Rajiv R MS, DNB

Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, 18 College Road, Chennai 600 006Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India

rajivpgraman@gmail.com author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

610 carotid cavernous fistula delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage trabeculectomy 20170825 engl This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). 2193-1496 7 GMS Ophthalmology Cases GMS Ophthalmol Cases 20 Objective: Carotid cavernous fistulae (CCFs) are abnormal communications between the cavernous sinus and the carotid arterial system. Based on the etiology, CCFs can be traumatic, spontaneous and rarely iatrogenic. We report an interesting case of new onset CCF associated with shallow choroidal detachment after trabeculectomy surgery. Method: Observational case reportResult: A 69-year-old male patient presented with complain of proptosis, congestion, and gross diminution of vision in the left eye following trabeculectomy elsewhere. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage was diagnosed by the primary physician and the patient was on oral steroids. On USG-B scan, choroidal detachment and a dilated superior ophthalmic vein were seen. A digital subtraction angiogram showed type D CCF. In view of nil visual prognosis, he was treated conservatively and was referred to a neuroradiologist for further management. Conclusion: CCFs have been rarely reported after intraocular surgeries. Till date, there is one case report of CCF complicating cataract surgery. Interestingly, CCFs has not been reported complicating trabeculectomy surgery. Dural CCFs although uncommon should be considered a close differential of hemorrhagic choroidal detachment, a relatively common complication following intraocular surgery. IntroductionA carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal connection between the carotid arterial system and the cavernous sinus. CCFs can be classified based on anatomy (direct or dural), etiology (traumatic or spontaneous) or blood flow velocity (high or low). Although relatively uncommon, CCFs have been reported following various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of head and neck. However, CCFs have been rarely reported after intraocular surgeries. Till date, there is one case report by Nagaki et al.</PlainText></TextGroup> of CCF complicating cataract surgery <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. We report an interesting case of new onset CCF associated with shallow choroidal detachment after trabeculectomy surgery.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Case description"> <MainHeadline>Case description</MainHeadline><Pgraph>A 69-year-old male patient presented with the chief complain of prominence of the left eye associated with periocular swelling, redness, and gross diminution of vision of 1 month duration.</Pgraph><Pgraph>He was a known case of primary open angle glaucoma on anti-glaucoma medication. Trabeculectomy in the left eye was performed, after which his symptoms developed on post-operative day 3. He was diagnosed to have hemorrhagic choroidal detachment and was treated with steroids with little benefit. He was a known case of diabetics and hypertension on regular medical therapy.</Pgraph><Pgraph>On examination, his best corrected visual acuity was 6/9 and N6 in the right eye and no light perception (PL negative) in the left eye. Extraocular movements were full and free in the right eye but were limited in all directions of gazes in the left eye. There was periorbital edema and near total ptosis in the left eye. Hertels exophthalmometry revealed reading of 21 mm in the right and 30 mm in the left eye, with a base reading of 110. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Slit lamp examination of the right eye was normal except for the early cataractous changes in the lens. In the left eye, there was conjunctival congestion, chemosis associated with dilated episcleral vessels. Anterior chamber was flat with total cataract. Intraocular pressure in OD was 24 mm of Hg and 30 mm of Hg in the left eye by Goldman Applanation Tonometry. Fundus examination revealed a vertical cup: disc ratio (C:D ratio) to be 0.7 with neuroretinal rim thinning in the right eye with the rest of the fundus being normal. No view of the fundus could be obtained in the left eye. USG-B scan was done which revealed thickened extraocular muscles with optic nerve head cupping, shallow 360 degree choroidal detachment with no evidence of mass lesion, and a dilated superior ophthalmic vein on the left side (Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Based on the clinical signs, symptoms, and initial investigations, carotid cavernous fistula was suspected and further investigated. A MRI was performed which showed prominent left cavernous sinus with abnormal flow with early opacification of the left superior ophthalmic vein on dynamic contrast and enhanced MR angiogram. A four vessel angiogram revealed type D CCF (Figure 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="figure"/>).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Visual evoked potential was done which revealed normal P100 amplitude and latency in OD and grossly diminished P100 amplitude and latency in OS (Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>). Perimetry was performed in OD to document the visual field loss.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In view of nil visual prognosis in OS, he was advised conservative management and for OD was prescribed anti-glaucoma medication and regular follow-up in the glaucoma clinic. He was referred to an interventional radiologist for opinion and further management as required. The patient subsequently was lost to follow-up.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion"> <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>We report an interesting case of a 69-year-old male patient who developed proptosis, congestion and gross diminution of vision with shallow choroidal detachment following trabeculectomy. Interestingly, he was misdiagnosed as hemorrhagic choroidal detachment and treated conservatively with steroids. We carefully re-evaluated him and he was found to have type D CCF. Dural CCF and non-appositional hemorrhagic choroidal detachment have quite similar clinical profiles. It can be quite challenging to differentiate the two in the postoperative period especially when the latter is a well known complication and the former has not been reported in the literature.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after intraocular surgery is characterized by acute onset severe pain, diminution of vision, shallow anterior chamber, and raised intraocular pressure. The reported incidence of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtration surgery varies from 1.6% to 6.2%, depending on the type of surgery performed <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>. <TextGroup><PlainText>Tuli et al.</PlainText></TextGroup> reported an incidence of 1.5% and 2.4% after trabeculectomy without antimetabolites and trabeculectomy with anti-metabolites, respectively <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. Old age, myopia, aphakia, hypertension, high pre-operative intraocular pressure, vitrectomy, postoperative hypotony has been suggested as risk factors <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>CCF can present with varied presentations: conjunctival chemosis, congestion, proptosis, ophthalmoplegia, double vision, orbital pain, bruit and diminution of vision. Because of the diverse clinical presentation with a long list of differentials, CCFs are misdiagnosed in many, leading to significant morbidity and mortality, including visual loss. Sutoh et al. described the significant remodeling of choroid in patients with CCFs <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. Choroidal detachment and retinal detachment have been described in CCF patients in the literature <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. Choroidal detachment in CCFs result from severe choroidal vascular congestion, stasis, and increased fluid transudation secondary to raised venous pressure.</Pgraph><Pgraph>History of hypertension, proptosis, dilated episcleral vessels, shallow serous choroidal detachment, dilated superior ophthalmic vein, and refractory to steroid therapy helped us to suspect CCF in this patient. Ordering appropriate investigations, MRI followed by angiography confirmed the diagnosis of type D in this patient.</Pgraph><Pgraph>It might be possible that the CCF was present before surgery and worsened following trabeculectomy. But this seems less likely in the absence of any history of proptosis, redness or diplopia prior to surgery. Even if so, it presented itself following glaucoma surgery and posed a diagnostic challenge. Wether it was a mere coincidence that CCF appeared following trabeculectomy or if trabeculectomy surgery contributed in any way to the occurrence, remains unanswered.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Conclusions"> <MainHeadline>Conclusions</MainHeadline><Pgraph>In conclusion, it can be difficult to differentiate the two, delayed hemorrhagic choroidal detachment and new onset dural CCF, in postoperative period especially when the former is a well known complication. Nevertheless, a good history taking and meticulous clinical examination is necessary. Early diagnosis and appropriate specific treatment could have prevented the blindness in this case.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes"> <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Acknowledgement</SubHeadline><Pgraph>We would like to thank our colleagues in Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, for their support.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <References linked="yes"> <Reference refNo="1"> <RefAuthor>Nagaki Y</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hayasaka S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kadoi C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Matsumoto M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kubo M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Okamoto T</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Carotid artery fistula after cataract surgery</RefTitle> <RefYear>1999</RefYear> <RefJournal>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers</RefJournal> <RefPage>160-2</RefPage> <RefTotal>Nagaki Y, Hayasaka S, Kadoi C, Matsumoto M, Kubo M, Okamoto T. Carotid artery fistula after cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999 Feb;30(2):160-2.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="2"> <RefAuthor>Givens K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Shields MB</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtering surgery</RefTitle> <RefYear>1987</RefYear> <RefJournal>Am J Ophthalmol</RefJournal> <RefPage>689-94</RefPage> <RefTotal>Givens K, Shields MB. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtering surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987 May 15;103(5):689-94. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74331-4</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74331-4</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="3"> <RefAuthor>Ruderman JM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Harbin TS Jr</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Campbell DG</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Postoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage following filtration procedures</RefTitle> <RefYear>1986</RefYear> <RefJournal>Arch Ophthalmol</RefJournal> <RefPage>201-5</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ruderman JM, Harbin TS Jr, Campbell DG. Postoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage following filtration procedures. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Feb;104(2):201-5. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050140055019</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1986.01050140055019</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="4"> <RefAuthor>Canning CR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lavin M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>McCartney AC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hitchings RA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gregor ZJ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage after glaucoma operations</RefTitle> <RefYear>1989</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eye (Lond)</RefJournal> <RefPage>327-31</RefPage> <RefTotal>Canning CR, Lavin M, McCartney AC, Hitchings RA, Gregor ZJ. Delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage after glaucoma operations. Eye (Lond). 1989;3 ( Pt 3):327-31. DOI: 10.1038/eye.1989.47</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.1989.47</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="5"> <RefAuthor>Levkovitch-verbin H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Goldenfeld M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Melamed S</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Fornix-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C</RefTitle> <RefYear>1997</RefYear> <RefJournal>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers</RefJournal> <RefPage>818-22</RefPage> <RefTotal>Levkovitch-verbin H, Goldenfeld M, Melamed S. Fornix-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997 Oct;28(10):818-22.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="6"> <RefAuthor>Paysse E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lee PP</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lloyd MA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sidoti PA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fellenbaum PS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Baerveldt G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Minckler DS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Heuer DK</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Suprachoroidal hemorrhage after Molteno implantation</RefTitle> <RefYear>1996</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Glaucoma</RefJournal> <RefPage>170-5</RefPage> <RefTotal>Paysse E, Lee PP, Lloyd MA, Sidoti PA, Fellenbaum PS, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS, Heuer DK. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage after Molteno implantation. J Glaucoma. 1996 Jun;5(3):170-5. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-199606000-00004</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00061198-199606000-00004</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="7"> <RefAuthor>Risk factors for suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtering surgery</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group</RefTitle> <RefYear>1992</RefYear> <RefJournal>Am J Ophthalmol</RefJournal> <RefPage>501-7</RefPage> <RefTotal>Risk factors for suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtering surgery. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 May 15;113(5):501-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74720-8</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74720-8</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="8"> <RefAuthor>Chu TG</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Green RL</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Suprachoroidal hemorrhage</RefTitle> <RefYear>1999</RefYear> <RefJournal>Surv Ophthalmol</RefJournal> <RefPage>471-86</RefPage> <RefTotal>Chu TG, Green RL. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 May-Jun;43(6):471-86. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6257(99)00037-5</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(99)00037-5</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="9"> <RefAuthor>Frenkel RE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Shin DH</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevention and management of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtration surgery</RefTitle> <RefYear>1986</RefYear> <RefJournal>Arch Ophthalmol</RefJournal> <RefPage>1459-63</RefPage> <RefTotal>Frenkel RE, Shin DH. Prevention and management of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after filtration surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Oct;104(10):1459-63. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050220053025</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1986.01050220053025</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="10"> <RefAuthor>Tuli SS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>WuDunn D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ciulla TA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cantor LB</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtration procedures</RefTitle> <RefYear>2001</RefYear> <RefJournal>Ophthalmology</RefJournal> <RefPage>1808-11</RefPage> <RefTotal>Tuli SS, WuDunn D, Ciulla TA, Cantor LB. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtration procedures. Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1808-11. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00763-1</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00763-1</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="11"> <RefAuthor>Sutoh N</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Muraoka K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Takahashi K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ikeda F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Shimizu K</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Remodelling of choroidal circulation in carotid cavernous sinus fistula</RefTitle> <RefYear>1996</RefYear> <RefJournal>Retina (Philadelphia, Pa)</RefJournal> <RefPage>497-504</RefPage> <RefTotal>Sutoh N, Muraoka K, Takahashi K, Ikeda F, Shimizu K. Remodelling of choroidal circulation in carotid cavernous sinus fistula. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 1996;16(6):497-504. DOI: 10.1097/00006982-199616060-00005</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006982-199616060-00005</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="12"> <RefAuthor>Komiyama M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nishikawa M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Yasui T</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Choroidal detachment and dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistula--case report</RefTitle> <RefYear>1997</RefYear> <RefJournal>Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)</RefJournal> <RefPage>459-63</RefPage> <RefTotal>Komiyama M, Nishikawa M, Yasui T. Choroidal detachment and dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistula--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1997 Jun;37(6):459-63. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.37.459</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.37.459</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="13"> <RefAuthor>Berk AT</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ada E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kir E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Saatci AO</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Choroidal detachment associated with direct spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistula</RefTitle> <RefYear>1997</RefYear> <RefJournal>Ophthalmologica</RefJournal> <RefPage>53-5</RefPage> <RefTotal>Berk AT, Ada E, Kir E, Saatci AO. Choroidal detachment associated with direct spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistula. Ophthalmologica. 1997;211(1):53-5. DOI: 10.1159/000310875</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000310875</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="14"> <RefAuthor>Fujitani A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hayasaka S</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Concurrent acute angle-closure glaucoma, choroidal detachment and exudative retinal detachment in a patient with spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula</RefTitle> <RefYear>1995</RefYear> <RefJournal>Ophthalmologica</RefJournal> <RefPage>220-2</RefPage> <RefTotal>Fujitani A, Hayasaka S. Concurrent acute angle-closure glaucoma, choroidal detachment and exudative retinal detachment in a patient with spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula. Ophthalmologica. 1995;209(4):220-2. DOI: 10.1159/000310618</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000310618</RefLink> </Reference> </References> <Media> <Tables> <NoOfTables>0</NoOfTables> </Tables> <Figures> <Figure format="png" height="504" width="539"> <MediaNo>1</MediaNo> <MediaID>1</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: USG B-scan of the left eye showing shallow 360 degree of serous choroidal detachment. </Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Figure> <Figure format="png" height="486" width="795"> <MediaNo>3</MediaNo> <MediaID>3</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 3: Visual evoked potential with normal P100 amplitude and latency in the right eye and grossly diminished P100 amplitude and latency in the left eye.</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Figure> <Figure format="png" height="579" width="974"> <MediaNo>2</MediaNo> <MediaID>2</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 2: Digital subtraction angiogram confirming an indirect type D carotid cavernous fistula with communication between cavernous sinus and the dural branches of left (a) external carotid artery (b) and internal carotid artery.</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Figure> <NoOfPictures>3</NoOfPictures> </Figures> <InlineFigures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </InlineFigures> <Attachments> <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments> </Attachments> </Media> </OrigData> </GmsArticle>