<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<GmsArticle>
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>oc000016</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/oc000016</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-oc0000165</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType>Case Report</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Neovascular glaucoma in a child: an unusual presentation of medulloepithelioma</Title>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Kassa</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Kassa</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Enoch</Firstname>
          <Initials>E</Initials>
          <AcademicTitleSuffix>MD</AcademicTitleSuffix>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Glick Eye Institute, Indianapolis, USA</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Li</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Li</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Helen</Firstname>
          <Initials>H</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Glick Eye Institute, Indianapolis, USA</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Sun</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Sun</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Yang</Firstname>
          <Initials>Y</Initials>
          <AcademicTitleSuffix>MD</AcademicTitleSuffix>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>Department of Ophthalmology, Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1160 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA, Phone: &#43;1 317 274 2020, Fax: &#43;1 317 278 1007<Affiliation>Glick Eye Institute, Indianapolis, USA</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>sunyo&#64;iupui.edu</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">ciliary body</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">medulloepithelioma</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">neovascular glaucoma</Keyword>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20140417</DatePublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>2193-1496</ISSN>
        <Volume>4</Volume>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Ophthalmology Cases</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS Ophthalmol Cases</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>03</ArticleNo>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph>A healthy 12 month old infant without significant medical history presented with left eye redness for one week.  Ophthalmic examination showed elevated intraocular pressure with iris neovascularization in the affected eye with increased optic nerve cupping.   Scleral depression revealed a ciliary body mass in the supratemporal quadrant. A large, non-pigmented, vascular mass was noted; biopsy results showed multilayered cords, tubules, and sheets resembling primitive medullary epithelium arising from the ciliary body.  The patient was diagnosed with medulloepithelioma.  The patient underwent enucleation of the affected eye.  Medulloepithelioma is a rare but important cause of neovascular glaucoma in the pediatric population.  This case will focus on the characteristics of medulloepthelioma and the differential diagnosis for a non-pigmented ciliary body mass in a child.  </Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Case">
      <MainHeadline>Case</MainHeadline><Pgraph>A previously healthy 12 month old infant without a significant past medical history presented with left eye redness for one week.  The mother denied recent trauma, sick contact, or fever.  Review of systems was negative.  No past medical history and surgical history were reported.  The patient did not take any medications.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>On physical examination, the patient was a well appearing child.  She fixed and followed, was orthophoric in primary gaze.  Intraocular pressures were 12 and 36 in the right and left eye, respectively.  Gross examination of the left eye was positive for conjunctival injection and poorly reactive pupil.  Examination under anesthesia showed left eye with mild corneal edema and shallow anterior chamber (Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>).  Iris neovascularization was observed, along with a ciliary body mass in the supratemporal quadrant on scleral depression.  Gonioscopy showed angle neovascularization and diffuse PAS.  The right eye was unremarkable.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>The patient underwent MRI to examine the extent of the lesion, which showed a gadolinium enhancing lesion that corresponded to the ciliary body mass.  No extraocular or intracranial lesions were noted.   Systemic blood tests were performed to rule out inflammatory or infectious causes of ciliary body mass; Lyme, treponemal Ab, RPR, toxoplasmosmosis antibody, toxocara antibody were all negative.  CBC showed mild microcytic anemia without eosinophilia.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The patient underwent a biopsy of the lesion.  The pathology reported neuroepithelial lesion with cords, tubules, and sheets arising from the medullary epithelium with mitotic activity most consistent with malignant medulloepithelioma (Figure 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="figure"/>).  Due to the large size and vascularity of the lesion, an enucleation was performed. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Questions">
      <MainHeadline>Questions</MainHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">What is medulloepithelioma&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">What is the differential diagnosis for a non-pigmented ciliary body mass in a child&#63;</ListItem><ListItem level="1">What is the management for medulloepithelioma&#63;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline>What is medulloepithelioma&#63;</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Ciliary body medulloepithelioma is an intraocular neoplasm derived from the primitive ciliary body medullary epithelium, which forms the non-pigmented ciliary body epithelium.  First described in histologic detail by Verhoeff in 1904, this unusual lesion was named &#8220;teratoneuroma&#8221; <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>.  Fuchs in 1908 coined the term of &#8220;diktyoma&#8221; <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. However, Grinker later on identified the cellular origin of the tumor by naming it &#8220;medullopithelioma&#8221;  in 1931 <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>Without any hereditary or racial predisposition, this childhood tumor is the second most common intraocular primary malignancy, following primary intraocular retinoblastoma <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Its exact population based incidence is undetermined because it is a very rare neoplasm <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. Based on the incidence of retinoblastoma, which has been reported to be around 4.1 per million in the United States, we can infer that the incidence of medulloepithelioma is significantly lower <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>.  The average onset of this disease is 4 years of age, with diagnosis typically in the first decade of life.  In adults, ciliary body medulloepithelioma has only been reported in 12 cases <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. The tumor often presents as a solitary nonpigmented lesion that occurs most commonly in the ciliary body, but can also rarely involve the iris, retina, or optic nerve. It also tends to be locally aggressive toward neighboring intraocular structures, but it rarely metastasizes <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Most cases of medulloepithelioma are diagnosed after the lesion has enlarged to cause anatomic displacement on neighboring structures.  As in this patient, unilateral neovascular glaucoma secondary to neoplasmic proliferation is a common feature.  Other presentations include lens subluxation, eye pain, conjunctival injection, ectopia lentic, secondary angle closure, uveitis, ectropion uvea, vision loss or vitreous hemorrhage <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>Gross examinations often reveal a grey flesh colored, vascular, amelanotic lesion.  Cysts can be seen on ultrasound, which are most suggestive of medulloepithelioma but biopsy is required for diagnosis <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>.  Pathologic features of medulloepithelioma can be generally divided into teratoma and non-teratoma and can be further distinguished as either benign or malignant <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.  Teratoid medulloepithelioma contains heteroplastic elements such as hyaline cartilage, skeletal muscle or neuroglial tissue.  On the other hand, non-teratoid medulloepithelioma is a pure proliferation of the medullary epithelium <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>What is the differential diagnosis for ciliary body mass in a child&#63;</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A ciliary body mass in a child can include various neoplastic, infectious, or inflammatory processes.   The lesion identified in this patient, which is associated with neovascularization of iris, suggests neoplastic cause.  However, non-neoplasmic etiologies must be ruled out.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The presence of the ciliary mass may be secondary to chronic inflammatory lesion.  Granuloma forming infection like ocular toxocariasis must be considered.  Ocular toxocariasis, estimated to cause about 1 to 2&#37; of uveitis in children, resembles retinoblastoma, coats&#8217; disease, toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis and other intraocular abnormalities <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>. Other less likely infections in this case include syphilis.  Several case reports have identified masquerades of medulloepithelioma including trauma and staphyloma <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. Therefore, neoplastic growth must be considered high in the differential especially if symptoms do not resolve after institution of treatment.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Neoplastic lesions include retinoblastoma, medulloepithelioma, as well as Fuch&#8217;s adenoma <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. Other possibilities are more aggressive tumors like adenocarcinoma, metastatic carcinoma and amelanotic melanoma <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>.  Histologic differentiation between retinoblastoma and medulloepithelioma is the presence of calcifications.  Clinical and pathologic features that suggest retinoblastoma are bilaterallity (70&#37;), calcification on pathology, genetics (40&#37;).  Medulloepithelioma is almost exclusively unilateral and generally not genetically inherited <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.  Fuchs adenoma is a reactive proliferation of the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium (NPCE) that is associated with aging and is found in the pars placate of the ciliary body <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>.  It does not present in the pediatric population.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>What is the treatment&#63;</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Medulloepithelioma can be treated with local excision, enucleation, and&#47;or radiation depending on the size of the tumor <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>.  Attempts to treat locally have been complicated by a high rate of recurrences.  Previous studies have published up to 83&#37; recurrence in eyes with local conservative management <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>.  Case studies have also reported  no recurrence for 7 years and counting after local resection followed by iodine 125 brachytherapy <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. In general, if neovascular glaucoma is noted with medulloepithelioma, then localized iridocyclectomy may not be sufficient.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion">
      <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Early diagnosis of medulloepithelioma is challenging because of the difficulty of direct visualization, the rarity of the neoplasm and early age of presentation.  As a result, high proportions of cases are misdiagnosed and management is delayed.   Kaliki et al report that 88&#37; of cases were initially misdiagnosed and 39 &#37; had an additional history of treatment for erroneous diagnosis.  Ultrasonographic biomicroscopy can be useful for diagnosis; the heterogenic consistency of medulloepithelioma can be detected by UBM and be used to correctly differentiate it from other solid tumors <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>.  Furthermore, UBM can adequately demarcate the borders of the neoplasm to aid in resection during iridocyclectomy. Biopsy and histologic studies are critical to proper diagnosis and management.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>After the diagnosis of medulloepithelioma, vision sparing management is possible but requires close follow up.  Recurrence of lesion may be secondary to incomplete excision.  While small tumors can be locally excised and&#47;or radiated, enucleation maybe required for large tumors and recurrent lesions.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>In conclusion, medulloepithelioma is the second most common intra-ocular tumor in pediatric patients and a common presentation for neovascular glaucoma and requires a high index of suspicion to reduce the delay in diagnosis.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Final diagnosis:</Mark1> Ciliary body medulloepithelioma</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes">
      <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Funding statement</SubHeadline><Pgraph>This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Contributorship statement</SubHeadline><Pgraph>All 3 authors were involved in preparing the manuscript.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Zimmerman LE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Verhoeff&#39;s &#8220;terato-neuroma&#8221; a critical reappraisal in light of new observations and current concepts of embryonic tumors</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1971</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>210-36</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Zimmerman LE. Verhoeff&#39;s &#8220;terato-neuroma&#8221; a critical reappraisal in light of new observations and current concepts of embryonic tumors. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1971;69:210-36.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Chua J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Muen WJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Reddy A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brookes J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The masquerades of a childhood ciliary body medulloepithelioma: a case of chronic uveitis, cataract, and secondary glaucoma</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Case Rep Ophthalmol Med</RefJournal>
        <RefArticleNo>493493</RefArticleNo>
        <RefTotal>Chua J, Muen WJ, Reddy A, Brookes J.  The masquerades of a childhood ciliary body medulloepithelioma: a case of chronic uveitis, cataract, and secondary glaucoma. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2012;2012:493493. DOI: 10.1155&#47;2012&#47;493493</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1155&#47;2012&#47;493493</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Ayres B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brasil OM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Klejnberg C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moura LR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fernandes BF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Burnier MN Jr</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: clinical, ultrasound biomicroscopic and histopathologic correlation</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Experiment Ophthalmol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>695-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ayres B, Brasil OM, Klejnberg C, Moura LR, Fernandes BF, Burnier MN Jr. Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: clinical, ultrasound biomicroscopic and histopathologic correlation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep-Oct;34(7):695-8. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1442-9071.2006.01321.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1442-9071.2006.01321.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Saunders T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Margo CE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Intraocular medulloepithelioma</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Arch Pathol Lab Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>212-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Saunders T, Margo CE. Intraocular medulloepithelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Feb;136(2):212-6. DOI: 10.5858&#47;arpa.2010-0669-RS</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.5858&#47;arpa.2010-0669-RS</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Anonym</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Age-adjusted and age-specific SEER cancer incidence rates, 2005-2009 by international classification of childhood cancer (ICCC)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear></RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Age-adjusted and age-specific SEER cancer incidence rates, 2005-2009 by international classification of childhood cancer (ICCC). In: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009. Available from: http:&#47;&#47;seer.cancer.gov&#47;csr&#47;1975&#95;2009&#95;pops09&#47;results&#95;merged&#47;sect&#95;29&#95;childhood&#95;cancer&#95;iccc.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;seer.cancer.gov&#47;csr&#47;1975&#95;2009&#95;pops09&#47;results&#95;merged&#47;sect&#95;29&#95;childhood&#95;cancer&#95;iccc.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Al-Salam S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Algawi K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Alashari M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Malignant non-teratoid medulloepithelioma of ciliary body with retinoblastic differentiation: a case report and review of literature</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Neuropathology</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>551-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Al-Salam S, Algawi K, Alashari M.  Malignant non-teratoid medulloepithelioma of ciliary body with retinoblastic differentiation: a case report and review of literature. Neuropathology. 2008 Oct;28(5):551-6. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1440-1789.2008.00886.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1440-1789.2008.00886.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Garc&#237;a-Feijo&#243; J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Encinas JL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#233;ndez-Hern&#225;ndez C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ronco IS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mart&#237;nez de la Casa JM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Garc&#237;a S&#225;nchez J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body: ultrasonographic biomicroscopic findings</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Ultrasound Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>247-50</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Garc&#237;a-Feijo&#243; J, Encinas JL, M&#233;ndez-Hern&#225;ndez C, Ronco IS, Mart&#237;nez de la Casa JM, Garc&#237;a S&#225;nchez J. Medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body: ultrasonographic biomicroscopic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Feb;24(2):247-50.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Zhou M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Xu G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bojanowski CM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Song Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chen R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sun X</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wang W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chan CC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Differential diagnosis of anterior chamber cysts with ultrasound biomicroscopy: ciliary body medulloepithelioma</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acta Ophthalmol Scand</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>137-9</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Zhou M, Xu G, Bojanowski CM, Song Y, Chen R, Sun X, Wang W, Chan CC. Differential diagnosis of anterior chamber cysts with ultrasound biomicroscopy: ciliary body medulloepithelioma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Feb;84(1):137-9. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1600-0420.2005.00542.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1600-0420.2005.00542.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Pivetti-Pezzi P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Ocular toxocariasis</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Med Sci</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>129-30</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Pivetti-Pezzi P. Ocular toxocariasis. Int J Med Sci. 2009;6(3):129-30. DOI: 10.7150&#47;ijms.6.129</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.7150&#47;ijms.6.129</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Kamal MM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Intraoperative cytodiagnosis of ciliary body medulloepithelioma masquerading as anterior ciliary staphyloma</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acta Cytol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>726-30</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kamal MM.  Intraoperative cytodiagnosis of ciliary body medulloepithelioma masquerading as anterior ciliary staphyloma. Acta Cytol. 2010 Sep-Oct;54(5):726-30.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Virji MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medulloepithelioma (diktyoma) presenting as a perforated, infected eye</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1977</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Br J Ophthalmol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>229-32</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Virji MA. Medulloepithelioma (diktyoma) presenting as a perforated, infected eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Mar;61(3):229-32. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bjo.61.3.229</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bjo.61.3.229</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Kaliki S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shields CL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Eagle RC Jr</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vemuganti GK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Almeida A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Manjandavida FP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mulay K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Honavar SG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shields JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: analysis of 41 cases</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ophthalmology</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2552-9</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kaliki S, Shields CL, Eagle RC Jr,Vemuganti GK, Almeida A, Manjandavida FP, Mulay K, Honavar SG, Shields JA.  Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: analysis of 41 cases. Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2552-9. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ophtha.2013.05.015</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ophtha.2013.05.015</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Correa ZM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Buffe F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Odashiro AN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Burnier MN</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Tumor intraocular diagnosticado dos a&#241;os despu&#233;s de un trauma perforante</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>469-72</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Correa ZM, Buffe F, Odashiro AN, Burnier MN. Tumor intraocular diagnosticado dos a&#241;os despu&#233;s de un trauma perforante &#91;Intraocular tumor diagnosed two years after perforating trauma&#93;. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2009 Sep;84(9):469-72.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Razzaq L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Marinkovic M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Swart W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van Duinen SG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Keunen JE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Luyten GP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Fuchs&#39; adenoma of the choroid simulating a choroidal hemangioma</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Case Rep Ophthalmol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>83-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Razzaq L, Marinkovic M, Swart W, van Duinen SG, Keunen JE, Luyten GP.  Fuchs&#39; adenoma of the choroid simulating a choroidal hemangioma. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;3(1):83-6. DOI: 000336989</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;000336989</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Zhao HS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wei WB</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Dilemma in management of ocular medulloepithelioma in a child</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Chin Med J (Engl)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>392-5</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Zhao HS, Wei WB. Dilemma in management of ocular medulloepithelioma in a child. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jan;125(2):392-5.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Cassoux N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Charlotte F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sastre X</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Orbach D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lehoang P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Desjardins L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Conservative surgical treatment of medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Arch Ophthalmol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>380-1</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Cassoux N, Charlotte F, Sastre X, Orbach D, Lehoang P, Desjardins L.  Conservative surgical treatment of medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;128(3):380-1. DOI: 10.1001&#47;archophthalmol.2009.404</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;archophthalmol.2009.404</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <NoOfTables>0</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <Figure format="png" height="305" width="790">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>1</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: (A) A large vascular non-pigmented mass of the ciliary body, (B) optic nerve cupping and vascular attenuation are noted.</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="323" width="715">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>2</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 2: (A) H&#38;E staining of tumor showing Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes; many mitotic figures can be seen.  (B) Cellular mass extends from ciliary epithelium with multilayered cords, tubules, and sheets resembling primitive medullary epithelium. </Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <NoOfPictures>2</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>