<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE GmsArticle SYSTEM "http://www.egms.de/dtd/2.0.34/GmsArticle.dtd">
<GmsArticle xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>iprs000135</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/iprs000135</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-iprs0001351</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType>Case Report</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Severe complications after mesh migration following abdominal hernial repair: report of two cases and review of literature</Title>
      <TitleTranslated language="de">Schwere Komplikationen durch Netzwanderung nach abdomineller Hernienversorgung: zwei Fallberichte und &#220;bersicht der aktuellen Literatur</TitleTranslated>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Manzini</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Manzini</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Giulia</Firstname>
          <Initials>G</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>giulia.manzini&#64;uniklinik-ulm.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Henne-Bruns</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Henne-Bruns</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Doris</Firstname>
          <Initials>D</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Prof. Dr. med.</AcademicTitle>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany, Phone: &#43;49-731-500-53501, Fax: &#43;49-731-500-53503<Affiliation>Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>doris.henne-bruns&#64;uniklinik-ulm.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Kremer</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Kremer</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Michael</Firstname>
          <Initials>M</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address>
          <Affiliation>Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany</Affiliation>
          <Affiliation>Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">ventral hernia</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">incisional hernia</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">mesh migration</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">mesh erosion</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">ventrale Hernie</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Narbenhernie</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Netzwanderung</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Netzerosion</Keyword>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20190517</DatePublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <License license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
      <AltText language="en">This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</AltText>
      <AltText language="de">Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).</AltText>
    </License>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>2193-8091</ISSN>
        <Volume>8</Volume>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>09</ArticleNo>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="de" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Hintergrund:</Mark1> Netzwanderung nach chirurgischer Versorgung von ventralen- oder Narbenhernien ist eine seltene, aber gut beschriebene Komplikation. Ziel der hier vorliegenden Arbeit ist die Pr&#228;sentation von zwei F&#228;llen und eine &#220;bersicht der aktuellen Literatur. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methoden:</Mark1> Zun&#228;chst beschreiben wir zwei F&#228;lle von Netzwanderung in unserer Abteilung. Zus&#228;tzlich f&#252;hrten wir eine systematische Literaturrecherche durch.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ergebnisse:</Mark1> In beiden F&#228;llen von Netzwanderung ging die Komplikation mit Ausbildung einer entero-kutanen Fistel einher, so dass eine erneute chirurgische Therapie notwendig wurde. Im Rahmen der Literaturrecherche fanden wir insgesamt 16 Publikationen &#252;ber Netzwanderung nach Narbenhernien- (n&#61;14) und ventraler Hernienversorgung (n&#61;2) in Erwachsenen (15 Einzelfallberichte und eine retrospektive Studie). Bei <TextGroup><PlainText>9 von 15 Patienten</PlainText></TextGroup> (54&#37;) mit Netzwanderung oder Erosion war ein Polypropylene-Netz f&#252;r die Ausbildung der Komplikation verantwortlich.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Schlussfolgerung:</Mark1> Netzwanderung nach abdomineller Hernienversorgung ist selten, die einzig vorliegende retrospektive Studie beschreibt eine Rate von 2.7&#37;. Die M&#246;glichkeit der Wanderung von Polypropylen-Netzen in Hohlorgane ist bekannt und sowohl durch unsere Fallberichte als auch die Literaturrecherche best&#228;tigt. Da die Inzidenz von Netzwanderung und Erosion signifikant niedriger als das Auftreten von Rezidiven nach Hernienverschluss ohne Netz ist, existieren bisher keine besseren Alternativen f&#252;r die Behandlung von Bauchdeckenhernien als die Netzverst&#228;rkung.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Background:</Mark1> Migration of mesh after ventral and incisional hernia repair is a rare but well described complication. The aim of our work is to present two cases of mesh migration after incisional hernia repair and to review the current literature. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methods:</Mark1> We describe the two cases of mesh migration that occurred at our department. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature search. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Results:</Mark1> In both cases we observed a mesh migration with formation of an entero-cutaneous fistula that required surgical therapy. In the literature search we found a total of 16 publications dealing with mesh migration after incisional (n&#61;14) and ventral hernia (n&#61;2) repair in adult patients (15 case reports and one retrospective study). In 9 out of <TextGroup><PlainText>15 patients</PlainText></TextGroup> (54&#37;) who presented with mesh migration or erosion, a polypropylene mesh was responsible for this complication.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Conclusions:</Mark1> Mesh migration after abdominal hernia repair is rare, the only available retrospective study reports a rate of 2.7&#37;. The ability of polypropylene mesh to migrate into hollow viscera is well known and confirmed both by our data and the results of the literature review. As the incidence of mesh erosion&#47;migration is significantly lower than the recurrence rate after hernia repair without mesh, up to now, no better alternative exists for the treatment of abdominal wall hernia than mesh augmentation.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Introduction">
      <MainHeadline>Introduction</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The use of meshes for the repair of ventral and incisional abdominal hernia is a common practice in order to provide tension-free repair of the fascial defect <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink> with a low rate of recurrence. However, mesh repair increases the risk of infection <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink> and can result in mesh erosion, fistula formation, <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink> and rarely, mesh migration <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. Migration of mesh after any hernia repair can be subdivided into primarily mechanical reasons or secondarily due to erosion of surrounding tissue <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Primary mechanical migrations are displacements of the mesh by either inadequate fixation or probably external displacing forces. Secondary migrations are slow and gradual movements of the mesh through trans-anatomical planes. They have been observed after foreign body reaction-induced erosion and are increasingly being recognised in the literature <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Mesh migrations seem to be independent to a great extent from the nature of mesh (bio) material and from the type of fixation of the mesh, if fixed at all. Thus, the mesh initially may get displaced but later erode into adjacent tissue <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Clinical presentation is therefore varying depending on the site of the migration <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> and comprise the occurrence of an enteric fistula <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, the erosion of small bowel <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink> or colon with chronic <TextGroup><PlainText>abd</PlainText></TextGroup>om<TextGroup><PlainText>inal</PlainText></TextGroup> pain <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink> or obstruction symptoms <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. The aim of our work is to report about two patients who presented with entero-cutaneous fistula caused by mesh migration after incisional hernia repair and to present an overview of the existing literature.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Case descriptions">
      <MainHeadline>Case descriptions</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Case 1 </SubHeadline><Pgraph>A 68-year-old female presented in 3&#47;2018 with a high output small bowel fistula after several laparotomies and incisional hernia repair.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>In 11&#47;2008, an en bloc resection of ovaries, adnexa and uterus combined with lymphadenectomy and anterior rectal resection with protective ileostomy was performed because of a stage four cervix carcinoma. The operation was followed by chemotherapy and abdominal radiation. The gastrointestinal continuity was reconstruction 4&#47;2009. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In 9&#47;2016 the patient presented with an acute abdomen due to a spontaneous ileum perforation. The emergency operation revealed massive adhesions and a perforation of the small bowel in the lower abdomen, necessitating a small bowel resection. The postoperative course was eventful leading to an open abdomen, repeated <TextGroup><PlainText>abd</PlainText></TextGroup>om<TextGroup><PlainText>inal</PlainText></TextGroup> lavage therapy and an ileostomy. 10&#47;2016 the abdomen could be closed by inlay mesh implantation (Symbotex composite mesh 25x20 cm). The high output ileostomy required parenteral feeding via a venous catheter. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In 9&#47;2017, the patient was readmitted for reconstruction of the small bowel continuity after continuous weight loss and signs of malnutrition. An end-to-end ileo-ileostomy was performed after extended adhesiolysis. However, the patient again developed a leakage at the anastomotic side and required several operative interventions. She was discharged with a high output small bowel fistula and a short bowel syndrome in 12&#47;2017 under complete parenteral nutrition.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In 3&#47;2018 the patient developed a second small bowel fistula and signs of infection at the midline incision and the abdominal wall. Parts of the mesh became visible. After antibiotic pretreatment, re-laparotomy with <TextGroup><PlainText>exti</PlainText></TextGroup>rp<TextGroup><PlainText>ation</PlainText></TextGroup> of the mesh, adhesiolysis, spare resection of the small bowel including the fistulas, ileo-ileostomy and reconstruction of the abdominal wall was performed in 4&#47;18 (Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>, Figure 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="figure"/>, Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/>) . From the intraoperative findings it was clear that the mesh eroded the small bowel and caused the fistulas.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The postoperative course was again eventful and resulted in fistula formation, but fortunately only a small low-output fistula developed. After 3 months of intensive wound-therapy, the patient was able to handle the low-output fistula like a small stoma and presented in 10&#47;2018 with complete oral intake and a secretion of less than 5cc per day (Figure 4 <ImgLink imgNo="4" imgType="figure"/>). </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Case 2 </SubHeadline><Pgraph>A 90-year-old male patient presented in 5&#47;2018 with a high output small bowel fistula secreting through a <TextGroup><PlainText>4x4 cm</PlainText></TextGroup> perforation of the skin and through the underlying mesh (Figure 5 <ImgLink imgNo="5" imgType="figure"/>). </Pgraph><Pgraph>The patient had a history of transverse colon resection in 12&#47;2008 (colon carcinoma T3, N0, MO), insufficiency of the anastomosis with repeated operative interventions and creation of a terminal ileostomy. In 7&#47;2009 a hernia of the abdominal wall was repaired using a Proceed mesh. 10&#47;2010 he underwent resection of liver metastasis (segment 2 and 3). The patient showed several comorbidities like hypertension, Parkinson&#8217;s disease and nephropathy that required hemodialysis.</Pgraph><Pgraph>An exploratory laparotomy with removal of the mesh and en bloc resection of two segments of the small bowel was performed (Figure 6 <ImgLink imgNo="6" imgType="figure"/>, Figure 7 <ImgLink imgNo="7" imgType="figure"/>, Figure 8 <ImgLink imgNo="8" imgType="figure"/>). The closure of the abdominal wall without alloplastic material could only be achieved by doubling of the dermis after removal of the epithelium. He experienced a complicated clinical course with several re-explorations because of insufficiency of the small bowel anastomoses. Finally, again, an enterocutaneous fistula developed. The general condition of the patient decreased continuously and the patient died one month after the operation.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Review of the literature">
      <MainHeadline>Review of the literature</MainHeadline><Pgraph>We performed a systematic literature search with the key words &#8220;mesh migration after hernia repair&#8221; and &#8220;enteric fistula after hernia repair&#8221; and &#8220;bowel perforation after mesh migration&#8221; on October 7th 2018. We screened the database Medline, Cochrane and Pub Med. Inclusion criteria were each type of publication in English describing the migration of mesh after ventral or incisional hernia repair. All publications dealing with inguinal hernia repair were excluded. We identified a total of 21 abstracts <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink> which could be assessed for further analysis, 5 of them were available only in abstract form and were therefore not considered <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>. A total of 16 publications were included, one retrospective study <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink> and 15 case reports <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. One case report included a literature review <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/> shows the 16 included publications.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion">
      <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Mesh migration after hernia repair is a rare compli<TextGroup><PlainText>ca</PlainText></TextGroup>tion. Tollens et al. <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink> performed a retrospective analysis of the Ventralex hernia patch used for incisional and ventral hernia repair in 176 patients aiming to evaluate <TextGroup><PlainText>compl</PlainText></TextGroup>ic<TextGroup><PlainText>ations.</PlainText></TextGroup> No migrations and&#47;or erosions were observed in the cohort after a mean follow-up of 49 months (<TextGroup><PlainText>range 13&#8211;70</PlainText></TextGroup> months). Recurrence of herniation was observed in 12 patients (8.9&#37;) <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. In the retrospective study of Ratajczak et al. <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink> a total of 77 patients underwent abdominal hernia surgery with mesh implantation. Migration was observed in two patients (2.6&#37;), both after implantation of a polypropylene mesh. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Meshes evoke similar inflammatory reaction <TextGroup><PlainText>simult</PlainText></TextGroup>an<TextGroup><PlainText>eously</PlainText></TextGroup> in both gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary tracts close to hernia repairs <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, possibly resulting in isolated enteric fistulas or entero-vesical fistulas. According to Yolen <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, intra-abdominal foreign bodies like meshes transmigrate into the bowel by initiating an inflammatory reaction. The foreign body is then encapsulated by omentum, and along with the inflammatory reaction may create an opening into a hollow organ assisted by the peristaltic movement of the bowel <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Investigations have shown that in incisional hernia repair direct exposure of the intestines to absorbable and non-absorbable biomaterials could result in their adhesion to the bowel <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>. Similarly, in inguinal hernia repairs, cases of small bowel obstruction secondary to mesh plug migration <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink> and intra-peritoneal mesh migration <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink> have been reported. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The method of fixation may affect migration rates by altering the tensile strenght and degree of movement of the mesh. The size, shape and positioning of the mesh may also be an important factor, as well as the nature of the biomaterial, as it affects the extent and degree of interaction with the surrounding tissue <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. In particular, the nature of the mesh material may induce erosion. Polypropylene meshes offer long-term stability, but can induce acute inflammation with infiltration by granulocytes and macrophages. Polyglactin mesh causes less inflammation than other meshes. Composite meshes, which are made of multifilament polypropylene and polyglactin, are manufactured with different materials on each surface, strategically positioning the different surfaces to selectively impede or promote tissue ingrowth. The more inert mesh material is intended to prevent adhesions with the underlying viscera, and multiple studies have demonstrated its effectiveness <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Our patients had an abdominal wall reconstruction with either a composite or proceed mesh.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The removal of the mesh and closure of the high output fistulas was in both cases without any alternatives. <TextGroup><PlainText>Patient 1</PlainText></TextGroup> suffered from malnutrition under complete parenteral nutrition and experienced several septic episodes with removal and reimplantion of the venous catheter system. Furthermore, she developed a phlegmone of the abdominal wall close to the perforation sites.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Patient 2 developed an enterocutaneous fistula close to the ileostomy. The high output fistula caused problems regarding the oral intake of his medication. Furthermore, a save cover of this second stoma was impossible, leading to a constant exposure of the skin to small bowel secretions.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The ability of polypropylene mesh to migrate into hollow viscera is well known and confirmed both by the results of the literature review of Picchio et al. <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink> and by our work. In 9 out of 15 patients (54&#37;) who showed a mesh migration or erosion, a polypropylene mesh was respon<TextGroup><PlainText>sible</PlainText></TextGroup> for this complication. 5 patients had a composite mesh and one patient a polyester mesh. For the 2 remaining patients the mesh material was not reported. The question if biodegradable&#47;complete dissolving meshes are better remains open. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The risk of migration is much higher if the mesh is placed intraperitoneally in direct contact to the viscera. The adjunct of barriers, such as expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), does not avoid visceral adhesions and consequent possible erosion <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Our review of literatur revealed that meshes causing erosions were placed either intraperitoneally (n&#61;4), as an inlay (n&#61;1), in onlay (n&#61;1) and underlay (n&#61;1) position. In one case, the mesh was placed supraperitoneally, not described in any more detail. In 8 cases, the position could not be determined exactly by the description.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>Beside the position of mesh, probably more factors which increase the risk of wound infection (comorbidities like smoking or diabetes, chronic inflammatory disease) can increase the risk of mesh erosion&#47;migration because of the inflammatory response. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Conclusion">
      <MainHeadline>Conclusion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>In conclusion, although mesh migration presents a potentially life threatening long term complication, we have to reflect that the incidence of mesh erosion&#47;migration is significantly lower than the recurrence rate after hernia repair without mesh. Actually no better alternative exists for the treatment of incisional and ventral hernia than mesh augmentation.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes">
      <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Norton C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Culver A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mostafa G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Intraluminal Mesh Migration After Ventral Hernia Repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Gastrointest Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1920-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Norton C, Culver A, Mostafa G. Intraluminal Mesh Migration After Ventral Hernia Repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 11;20(11):1920-2. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s11605-016-3178-z</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s11605-016-3178-z</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>den Hartog D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dur AH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tuinebreijer WE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kreis RW</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>CD006438</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD006438. DOI: 10.1002&#47;14651858.CD006438.pub2</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;14651858.CD006438.pub2</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Leber GE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Garb JL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Alexander AI</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Reed WP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1998</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Arch Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>378-82</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998 Apr;133(4):378-82. DOI: 10.1001&#47;archsurg.133.4.378</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;archsurg.133.4.378</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Yilmaz I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Karaka&#351; DO</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sucullu I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ozdemir Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yucel E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A rare cause of mechanical bowel obstruction: mesh migration</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>267-9</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Yilmaz I, Karaka&#351; DO, Sucullu I, Ozdemir Y, Yucel E. A rare cause of mechanical bowel obstruction: mesh migration. Hernia. 2013 Apr;17(2):267-9. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-011-0867-0</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-011-0867-0</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Agrawal A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Avill R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mesh migration following repair of inguinal hernia: a case report and review of literature</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>79-82</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Agrawal A, Avill R. Mesh migration following repair of inguinal hernia: a case report and review of literature. Hernia. 2006 Mar;10(1):79-82. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-005-0024-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-005-0024-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Bostanci O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Idiz UO</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yazar M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mihmanli M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A Rare Complication of Composite Dual Mesh: Migration and Enterocutaneous Fistula Formation</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Case Rep Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>293659</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bostanci O, Idiz UO, Yazar M, Mihmanli M. A Rare Complication of Composite Dual Mesh: Migration and Enterocutaneous Fistula Formation. Case Rep Surg. 2015;2015:293659. DOI: 10.1155&#47;2015&#47;293659</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1155&#47;2015&#47;293659</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Losanoff JE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Richman BW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jones JW</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Entero-colocutaneous fistula: a late consequence of polypropylene mesh abdominal wall repair: case report and review of the literature</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>144-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Entero-colocutaneous fistula: a late consequence of polypropylene mesh abdominal wall repair: case report and review of the literature. Hernia. 2002 Sep;6(3):144-7. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-002-0067-z</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-002-0067-z</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Ott V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Groebli Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schneider R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Late intestinal fistula formation after incisional hernia using intraperitoneal mesh</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>103-4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ott V, Groebli Y, Schneider R. Late intestinal fistula formation after incisional hernia using intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia. 2005 Mar;9(1):103-4. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-004-0271-0</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-004-0271-0</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Nelson EC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vidovszky TJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Composite mesh migration into the sigmoid colon following ventral hernia repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>101-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Nelson EC, Vidovszky TJ. Composite mesh migration into the sigmoid colon following ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2011 Feb;15(1):101-3. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-009-0623-x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-009-0623-x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Ratajczak A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ko&#347;ci&#324;ski T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Banasiewicz T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lange-Ratajczak M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hermann J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bobkiewicz A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Drews M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Migration of biomaterials used in gastroenterological surgery</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pol Przegl Chir</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>377-80</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ratajczak A, Ko&#347;ci&#324;ski T, Banasiewicz T, Lange-Ratajczak M, Hermann J, Bobkiewicz A, Drews M. Migration of biomaterials used in gastroenterological surgery. Pol Przegl Chir. 2013 Jul;85(7):377-80. DOI: 10.2478&#47;pjs-2013-0057</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.2478&#47;pjs-2013-0057</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Voisard G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Feldman LS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>An unusual cause of chronic anemia and abdominal pain caused by transmural mesh migration in the small bowel after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>673-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Voisard G, Feldman LS. An unusual cause of chronic anemia and abdominal pain caused by transmural mesh migration in the small bowel after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):673-7. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-013-1127-2</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-013-1127-2</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Gandhi D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Marcin S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Xin Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Asha B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kaswala D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zamir B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Chronic abdominal pain secondary to mesh erosion into cecum following incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Gastroenterol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>321-4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gandhi D, Marcin S, Xin Z, Asha B, Kaswala D, Zamir B. Chronic abdominal pain secondary to mesh erosion into cecum following incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review. Ann Gastroenterol. 2011;24(4):321-4.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Aziz F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zaeem M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Chronic abdominal pain secondary to mesh erosion into ceacum following incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Clin Med Res</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>153-5</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Aziz F, Zaeem M. Chronic abdominal pain secondary to mesh erosion into ceacum following incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review. J Clin Med Res. 2014 Apr;6(2):153-5. DOI: 10.14740&#47;jocmr1730w</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.14740&#47;jocmr1730w</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Falk GA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Means JR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pryor AD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A case of ventral hernia mesh migration with splenosis mimicking a gastric mass</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMJ Case Rep</RefJournal>
        <RefArticleNo>bcr06.2009</RefArticleNo>
        <RefTotal>Falk GA, Means JR, Pryor AD. A case of ventral hernia mesh migration with splenosis mimicking a gastric mass. BMJ Case Rep. 2009;2009. pii: bcr06.2009.2033. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bcr.06.2009.2033</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bcr.06.2009.2033</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Horzic M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vergles D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cupurdija K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kopljar M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zidak M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lackovic Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Spontaneous mesh evacuation per rectum after incisional ventral hernia repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>351-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Horzic M, Vergles D, Cupurdija K, Kopljar M, Zidak M, Lackovic Z. Spontaneous mesh evacuation per rectum after incisional ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):351-2. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-010-0655-2</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-010-0655-2</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Su YR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chan PH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mesh migration into urinary bladder after open ventral herniorrhaphy with mesh: a case report</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>410-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Su YR, Chan PH. Mesh migration into urinary bladder after open ventral herniorrhaphy with mesh: a case report. Int Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;99(4):410-3. DOI: 10.9738&#47;INTSURG-D-13-00037.1</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.9738&#47;INTSURG-D-13-00037.1</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Millas SG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mesar T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Patel RJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Chronic abdominal pain after ventral hernia due to mesh migration and erosion into the sigmoid colon from a distant site: a case report and review of literature</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>849-52</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Millas SG, Mesar T, Patel RJ. Chronic abdominal pain after ventral hernia due to mesh migration and erosion into the sigmoid colon from a distant site: a case report and review of literature. Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):849-52. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-013-1182-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-013-1182-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>Picchio M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Muggianu A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mancini F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tintisona O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Spaziani E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Complete mesh migration into the small bowel after incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acta Chir Belg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>118-121</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Picchio M, Muggianu A, Mancini F, Tintisona O, Spaziani E. Complete mesh migration into the small bowel after incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review. Acta Chir Belg. 2017 Apr;117(2):118-121. DOI: 10.1080&#47;00015458.2016.1229399</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;00015458.2016.1229399</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Kok ASY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cheung TSH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lam DCT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chan WHC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chan SWW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chow TL</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mesh erosion to urinary bladder causing fistulation to abdominal wall resulting in necrotizing fasciitis: A case report of late complication of incisional hernia</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Surg Case Rep</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>185-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kok ASY, Cheung TSH, Lam DCT, Chan WHC, Chan SWW, Chow TL. Mesh erosion to urinary bladder causing fistulation to abdominal wall resulting in necrotizing fasciitis: A case report of late complication of incisional hernia. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;39:185-7. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ijscr.2017.08.019</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ijscr.2017.08.019</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Raghavendran M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kumar KG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Prasad S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Venkatesh HA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Post Incisional Hernia Meshplasty Vesicocutaneous Fistula - A Rare Complication</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Urol Case Rep</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>149-51</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Raghavendran M, Kumar KG, Prasad S, Venkatesh HA. Post Incisional Hernia Meshplasty Vesicocutaneous Fistula - A Rare Complication. Urol Case Rep. 2017 Jul;13:149-51. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.eucr.2017.04.016</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.eucr.2017.04.016</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>Di Muria A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Formisano V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Di Carlo F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aveta A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Giglio D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Small bowel obstruction by mesh migration after umbilical hernia repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Ital Chir</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>59-60</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Di Muria A, Formisano V, Di Carlo F, Aveta A, Giglio D. Small bowel obstruction by mesh migration after umbilical hernia repair. Ann Ital Chir. 2007 Jan-Feb;78(1):59-60.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="22">
        <RefAuthor>Endlich M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schiller W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mellert F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Probst C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Implantation of a total abdominal mesh plastic ending up in multiple, lethal right heart injuries</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>135-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Endlich M, Schiller W, Mellert F, Probst C. Implantation of a total abdominal mesh plastic ending up in multiple, lethal right heart injuries. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jul;21(1):135-6. DOI: 10.1093&#47;icvts&#47;ivv083</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1093&#47;icvts&#47;ivv083</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="23">
        <RefAuthor>Malik AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Intra-intestinal mesh migration presenting with faecal fistula after incisional hernia repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Pak Med Assoc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>322-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Malik AM. Intra-intestinal mesh migration presenting with faecal fistula after incisional hernia repair. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Mar;65(3):322-3.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="24">
        <RefAuthor>Olmi S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Uccelli M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cesana GO</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ciccarese F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Carrieri D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Castello G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Legnani G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Small bowel obstruction caused by mesh migration. Case report</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>G Chir</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>70-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Olmi S, Uccelli M, Cesana GO, Ciccarese F, Carrieri D, Castello G, Legnani G. Small bowel obstruction caused by mesh migration. Case report. G Chir. 2013 Mar;34(3):70-3.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="25">
        <RefAuthor>Majeski J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Migration of wire mesh into the intestinal lumen causing an intestinal obstruction 30 years after repair of a ventral hernia</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1998</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>South Med J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>496-8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Majeski J. Migration of wire mesh into the intestinal lumen causing an intestinal obstruction 30 years after repair of a ventral hernia. South Med J. 1998 May;91(5):496-8. DOI: 10.1097&#47;00007611-199805000-00020</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;00007611-199805000-00020</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="26">
        <RefAuthor>Tollens T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Den Hondt M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Devroe K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Terry C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Speybroeck S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aelvoet C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vanrykel JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex&#8482; hernia patch</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>531-40</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tollens T, Den Hondt M, Devroe K, Terry C, Speybroeck S, Aelvoet C, Vanrykel JP. Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex&#8482; hernia patch. Hernia. 2011 Oct;15(5):531-40. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-011-0816-y</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-011-0816-y</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="27">
        <RefAuthor>Peiper C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Klinge U</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Junge K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schumpelick V</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Netze in der Leistenhernienchirurgie</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Zentralbl Chir</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>573-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Peiper C, Klinge U, Junge K, Schumpelick V. Netze in der Leistenhernienchirurgie &#91;Meshes in inguinal hernia repair&#93;. Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Jul;127(7):573-7. DOI: 10.1055&#47;s-2002-32842</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1055&#47;s-2002-32842</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="28">
        <RefAuthor>Yolen SR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Grossman ET</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Colonoscopic removal of a postoperative foreign body</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1989</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Clin Gastroenterol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>483</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Yolen SR, Grossman ET. Colonoscopic removal of a postoperative foreign body. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989 Aug;11(4):483.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="29">
        <RefAuthor>Amid K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shulman G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lichtenstein L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sostrin S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Young J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hakakha M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Evaluation pr&#233;liminaire de mat&#233;riels composites pour la r&#233;paration des &#233;ventrations</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1995</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Chir</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>539-42; discussion 542-3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Amid K, Shulman G, Lichtenstein L, Sostrin S, Young J, Hakakha M. Evaluation pr&#233;liminaire de mat&#233;riels composites pour la r&#233;paration des &#233;ventrations &#91;Preliminary evaluation of composite materials for the repair of incisional hernias&#93;. Ann Chir. 1995;49(6):539-42; discussion 542-3.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="30">
        <RefAuthor>Chuback JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Singh RS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sills C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dick LS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Small bowel obstruction resulting from mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2000</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Surgery</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>475-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Chuback JA, Singh RS, Sills C, Dick LS. Small bowel obstruction resulting from mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2000 Apr;127(4):475-6. DOI: 10.1067&#47;msy.2000.104122</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1067&#47;msy.2000.104122</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="31">
        <RefAuthor>Ferrone R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scarone PC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Natalini G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Late complication of open inguinal hernia repair: small bowel obstruction caused by intraperitoneal mesh migration</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>161-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ferrone R, Scarone PC, Natalini G. Late complication of open inguinal hernia repair: small bowel obstruction caused by intraperitoneal mesh migration. Hernia. 2003 Sep;7(3):161-2. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-003-0129-x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-003-0129-x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="32">
        <RefAuthor>Sikkink CJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vries de Reilingh TS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Malyar AW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jansen JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bleichrodt RP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van Goor H</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Adhesion formation and reherniation differ between meshes used for abdominal wall reconstruction</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Hernia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>218-22</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sikkink CJ, Vries de Reilingh TS, Malyar AW, Jansen JA, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H. Adhesion formation and reherniation differ between meshes used for abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia. 2006 Jun;10(3):218-22. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10029-006-0065-7</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10029-006-0065-7</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>1</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Literature on mesh migration&#47;erosion after ventral (n&#61;2) and incisional hernia repair (n&#61;15)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>1</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: First case. Intraoperative situs of the incised skin with the high output enterocutanous fistula</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>2</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 2: Implanted mesh with central enterocutanous fistula</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>3</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 3 : En-bloc exzised mesh with the enterocutanous fistula centrally</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="516" width="689">
          <MediaNo>4</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>4</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 4: Stable low output entero-cutaneous fistula 24 months after resection of the migrated mesh. No evidence of hernia-recurrence (with written consent of the patient)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>5</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>5</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 5: Second case. Enterocutanous fistula with migrated mesh</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>6</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>6</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 6: Intraoperative picture of excision of migrated mesh with fistula</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>7</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>7</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 7: Intraoperative picture of excision of migrated mesh with fistula</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="520" width="693">
          <MediaNo>8</MediaNo>
          <MediaID>8</MediaID>
          <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 8: Excised mesh with the enterocutanous fistula</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <NoOfPictures>8</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>