Cell-based influenza vaccines: An effective vaccine option for under 60-year-olds

dgkh000476 10.3205/dgkh000476 urn:nbn:de:0183-dgkh0004760 Review Article Cell-based influenza vaccines: An effective vaccine option for under 60-year-olds Zellkulturbasierte Influenzaimpfstoffe: Eine effektive Impfstoffoption für unter 60-Jährige Gärtner Gärtner Barbara C. BC

Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene – Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany

author Beier Beier Dietmar D

Saxon Committee on Vaccinations (SIKO), Chemnitz, Germany

author Gosch Gosch Gunther G

Kinderarztpraxis am Domplatz, Magdeburg, Germany

author Wahle Wahle Klaus K

Medical Faculty – University of Münster, Münster, Germany

author Wendt Wendt Luise L

ias-Gruppe, Leipzig, Germany

author Förster Förster Laura-Christin LC

CSL Seqirus GmbH, Munich, Germany

author Schmidt Schmidt Kim J. KJ

Xcenda GmbH, Hanover, Germany

author Schwarz Schwarz Tino F. TF Prof. Dr.

Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Vaccination Center, Klinikum Würzburg Mitte, Standort Juliusspital, Salvatorstraße 7, 97074 Würzburg, Phone: +49 931 393 2260Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Vaccination Center – Klinikum Würzburg Mitte, Standort Juliusspital, Würzburg, Germany

tino.schwarz@kwm-klinikum.de author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

610 influenza egg adaptation enhanced influenza vaccine real-world data vaccination recommendation Influenza Ei-Adaptation weiterentwickelter Influenzaimpfstoff Real-World-Daten Impfempfehlung 20240430 engl This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). 2196-5226 19 GMS Hygiene and Infection Control GMS Hyg Infect Control 21 Zielsetzung: Die saisonale Influenza verursacht nicht nur bei älteren Erwachsenen, sondern auch in der Bevölkerung <60 Jahre eine signifikante Krankheitslast. Diese geht mit einer hohen wirtschaftlichen Belastung einher, insbesondere bedingt durch Influenza-assoziierte Produktivitätsverluste der arbeitenden Gesellschaft. Konventionelle eibasierte Influenzaimpfstoffe können aufgrund von Ei-Adaptation eine beeinträchtigte Impfeffektivität aufweisen, während zellkulturbasierte Influenzaimpfstoffe seltener von Antigenanpassungen betroffen sind. Ziel dieses Reviews war die Darstellung von „Real-World“-Daten (RWD) zur Effektivität von quadrivalenten zellkulturbasierten (QIVc) vs. eibasierten (QIVe) Influenzaimpfstoffen über drei konsekutive Saisons.Methoden: Es wurde ein narrativer Review von RWD aus retrospektiven Kohorten- und Fall-Kontroll-Studien zur relativen Impfeffektivität (rVE) von QIVc vs. QIVe in den Saisons 2017/18–2019/20 durchgeführt. Ergebnisse: Es wurden sechs retrospektive Kohortenstudien und eine Fall-Kontroll-Studie eingeschlossen, die rund 29 Mio. Teilnehmer umfassten. Eine Kohortenstudie der Saison 2017/18 bei Personen ≥4 J</PlainText></TextGroup>ahre ergab eine statistisch signifikante rVE von QIVc vs. QIVe von 36,2% bei der Prävention Influenza-ähnlicher Erkrankung. QIVc war statistisch signifikant effektiver vs. QIVe bei der Prävention ambulanter und stationärer medizinischer Behandlungen in zwei Kohortenstudien der Saisons 2018/19 bzw. 2019/20 mit rVEs von 7,6% bei ≥4-Jährigen bzw. 9,5% bei ≥18-Jährigen. Drei weitere Kohortenstudien der Saisons 2017/18–2019/20 ergaben eine statistisch signifikant höhere rVE von QIVc vs. QIVe bei der Prävention Influenza-bedingter Hospitalisierungen/Besuchen der Notaufnahme bei 4–64-Jährigen (5,3–14,4%). Auch bei der Prävention testbestätigter Influenza war QIVc in einer Fall-Kontroll-Studie über alle drei Saisons statistisch signifikant effektiver mit rVEs von 10,0–14,8%.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Schlussfolgerungen:</Mark1> RWD der Saisons 2017/18–2019/20 zeigten eine bessere Impfeffektivität von QIVc vs. QIVe bei der Prävention Influenza-bedingter Endpunkte bei Personen im Alter von 4–64 Jahren. Der präferenzielle Einsatz von zellkulturbasierten vs. konventionellen Influenzaimpfstoffen könnte zu einer Verringerung der Influenza-bedingten Krankheitslast und wirtschaftlichen Belastung in der deutschen Bevölkerung <60 Jahre führen.</Pgraph></Abstract> <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Aim:</Mark1> Seasonal influenza poses a significant burden of disease, affecting not only older adults but also individuals under the age of 60. It carries a high economic burden, mainly driven by influenza-associated productivity losses in the working population. Conventional egg-based influenza vaccines may have reduced effectiveness due to antigen adaptation in eggs. In contrast, cell-based influenza vaccines are less likely to be affected by such antigen adaptation. This review aims to present real-world data (RWD) comparing the effectiveness of quadrivalent cell-based (QIVc) and egg-based (QIVe) influenza vaccines over three consecutive seasons.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methods:</Mark1> A comprehensive review was conducted, analyzing RWD from retrospective cohort and case-control studies on the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc versus QIVe during the 2017/18–2019/20 seasons.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Results:</Mark1> This study included six retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study, with a combined total of approximately 29 million participants. A cohort study involving people aged ≥4 years during the 2017/18 season showed a statistically significant rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-like illness, with a value of 36.2%. QIVc demonstrated statistically significant superiority over QIVe in preventing outpatient and inpatient medical encounters as observed in two cohort studies conducted during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons. The rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe was found to be 7.6% in individuals aged ≥<TextGroup><PlainText>4 y</PlainText></TextGroup>ears and 9.5% in individuals aged ≥18 years. Three additional cohort studies conducted between 2017/18–2019/20 reported a statistically significant improvement in rVE (5.3–14.4%) of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits due to influenza in individuals aged 4–64 years. In a case-control study across all three seasons, QIVc showed statistically significantly higher effectiveness compared to QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza, with rVEs of 10.0–14.8%.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Conclusions:</Mark1> RWD from the 2017/18–2019/20 seasons demonstrated that QIVc is more effective than QIVe in preventing influenza-related outcomes in individuals aged 4–64 years. Preferential use of cell-based influenza vaccines, as opposed to conventional egg-based vaccines, could reduce the burden of influenza-related symptoms on individuals and alleviate the economic impact on the German population under 60 years of age.</Pgraph></Abstract> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Introduction"> <MainHeadline>Introduction</MainHeadline><Pgraph>In the 2022/23 season, influenza emerged as one of the most prevalent laboratory-confirmed respiratory diseases in Germany. This followed a relatively low number of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the 2020/21 season, primarily due to the measures implemented to control the COVID-19 pandemic <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. The 2022/23 season was characterized by an early onset and early peak in calendar week (CW) 50/2022 <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. A total o<TextGroup><PlainText>f 2</PlainText></TextGroup>92,625 laboratory-confirmed influenza cases, 42,56<TextGroup><PlainText>2 h</PlainText></TextGroup>ospitalizations, and 1,028 deaths associated with influenza infection were reported to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) from CW 40/2022 to 21/2023. This magnitude of the influenza outbreak was comparable to severe seasons before the COVID-19 pandemic.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The relatively low number of deaths attributed to laboratory-confirmed influenza within the context of the COVI<TextGroup><PlainText>D-1</PlainText></TextGroup>9 pandemic does not accurately reflect the true impact of influenza morbidity and mortality. A more comprehensive assessment of mortality is provided by the excess mortality figures calculated by the RKI, with estimates reaching as high as 25,100 deaths during the severe 2017/18 season (conservative estimate), representing the highest number in the past 30 years <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Annually, around 5–20% of the population becomes infected during the seasonal influenza wave <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. While individuals aged ≥60 years are particularly vulnerable to influenza-related hospitalizations and deaths due to chronic illness and immune senescence <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, a significant proportion of infections and associated physician visits are also recorded in people aged <60 years <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. Notably, children experience a high morbidity rate and substantial mortality <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Burden of disease in adults <60 years</SubHeadline><Pgraph>During the 2016/17–2018/19 seasons, individuals aged 35 to 59 years represented a large proportion (30–38%) of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases reported to the RKI <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Adults <60 years significantly contribute to the economic burden through work incapacity related to influenza <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>: Work absences of adult patients with clinically diagnosed influenza account for the majority of total societal costs in Germany <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. In addition, the high burden of illness in children can lead to lost working hours for caring parents <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> and significantly increase absenteeism and the associated costs of lost productivity.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Burden of disease in children and adolescents</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Children and adolescents have a high infection rate and, unlike COVID-19, are the primary carriers of the virus to adults and the elderly <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. In particular, young children are at an increased risk of severe illness. Alongside the elderly population, they also experience a higher frequency of influenza-related hospitalizations. These hospitalizations are primarily caused by secondary complications (e.g., secondary bacterial pneumonia, acute otitis media, and sinusitis) <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, which can lead to fatal outcomes. However, there is limited data on influenza mortality rates among children in Germany. In contrast to adults <60 years of age, the majority of the total societal costs associated with influenza in children and adolescents stem from direct costs related to physician visits and hospitalizations <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Costs resulting from work absenteeism of parents caring for sick children are not considered.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Influenza prevention in the population <60 years of age</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) in Germany recommends an annual standard vaccination against influenza for all persons aged ≥60 years <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>. For individuals aged ≥6 months to <60 years, vaccination is recommended for pregnant women, those with an increased health risk due to an underlying disease, residents of retirement and nursing homes, caregivers of people at risk, and people with an occupational risk (e.g., medical staff, facilities with extensive public traffic).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Unlike the STIKO, the Saxon Committee on Vaccinations (SIKO) has been recommending the annual standard vaccination against influenza for children from the age of 6 months, adolescents, and adults since 2010 <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. The SIKO recommendation specifically applies to the federal state of Saxony. Additionally, the highest health authorities in all federal states recommend influenza vaccinations beyond the STIKO recommendation, irrespective of age <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Vaccination rates in individuals <60 years with vaccination recommendation</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Based on billing data from the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KV), which covers 85% of the population, and surveys of hospital staff during the 2020/21 season, it was found that only 39% of adults with vaccine-relevant underlying diseases, 23% of pregnant women and around 58% of medical staff were vaccinated in Germany <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Vaccination options for individuals <60 years of age</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The available conventional influenza vaccines in Germany are quadrivalent inactivated, non-adjuvanted egg-based vaccines (QIVe) in standard doses, which are approved for individuals aged ≥6 months of age <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. A nasal, egg-based live-attenuated vaccine (LAIV) is also available specifically for children and adolescents (2–17 years). The STIKO recommends LAIV as an equivalent option to conventional vaccines for this age group and specifically for individuals for whom an injection of conventional vaccines could lead to complications (e.g., coagulation disorders or injection phobia) <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>. Since November 2017, the STIKO has exclusively recommended quadrivalent vaccines that contain antigens for each of the following influenza strains: A(H1N1), A(H3N2), B(Victoria), and B(Yamagata) <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In Germany, a quadrivalent cell-based vaccine (QIVc) is also approved for individuals aged ≥2 years <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. To address the persistent challenge of low effectiveness of conventional vaccines, influenza vaccines have been enhanced <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. This enhancement is achieved through “stronger activation of humoral and cellular immunity” and/or “more constant antigenicity”, among other things. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza vaccines</SubHeadline><Pgraph>RKI estimates of VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza in Germany during the seasons 2012/13–2019/20 showed considerable fluctuations between the seasons, particularly for the A(H3N2) strain <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. Furthermore, a global meta-analysis encompassing seasons 2004 to 2015 and consisting of 56 studies revealed that VE against A(H3N2) was considerably lower compared to VE against A(H1N1) and the B lineages. Specifically, in pediatric cohorts, VE against A(H3N2) was 43%, while in adult cohorts (≤60 and >60 years), it was 35% and 24%, respectively. In contrast, VE against A(H1N1) and the B lineages ranged between 62–73% and 54–63% across cohorts, respectively <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Interim data from six European studies of the 2022/23 season showed a variable VE against different influenza strains. The VE of available influenza vaccines ranged from 2–44% against A(H3N2), 28–46% against A(H1N1), and 64–85% against influenza B <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>It is important to note that the VE of seasonal influenza vaccines depends on multiple factors, including the level of the match between vaccine and circulating viruses, the age and immunocompetence of the individual receiving the vaccine, their history of previous infections or vaccinations, the type of vaccine administered and the pathogenicity of the (dominant) circulating virus <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Disadvantages of egg-based influenza vaccines</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Egg-based vaccine production has disadvantages, including limited production capacity, prolonged production time and the rare occurrence of allergic reactions to egg-derived proteins <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>. Furthermore, influenza viruses have a high mutation rate, resulting in the selection of various variants best adapted to the avian host system when propagated in hen’s egg (a process known as egg adaptation). This egg adaptation leads to genetic differences between seed viruses used and vaccine viruses produced in eggs due to mutations at the receptor binding site of hemagglutinin (HA). Consequently, antigenic mismatch can occur between the vaccine viruses and circulating viruses, potentially impairing the effectiveness of egg-based influenza vaccines <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Egg adaptation is observed in both influenza A and B viruses but is most often seen with A(H3N2) viruses <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. Particularly egg adaptation in vaccine viruses of strain A(H3N2) show negative effects on VE <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Cell-based influenza vaccines</SubHeadline><Pgraph>To prevent egg adaptation of the viruses, cell-based vaccines are produced in mammalian cell cultures (Madin Darby Canine Kidney [MDCK] cells) <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. While antigen adaptions to the host system can still occur with cell-based production, mutations in the HA antigen are observed less frequently compared to propagation in chicken eggs <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. This can result in improved VE compared to egg-based vaccines.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Since being approved, trivalent cell-based vaccines have been used in Germany for over 10 years. The quadrivalent formulation was approved in December 2018 <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink> and has been administered in Germany starting from the 2019/20 season. In Europe, the use of QIVc is approved for individuals aged 2 years and older (Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). Currently, there is an ongoing multicenter, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial (NCT03932682) examining the efficacy o<TextGroup><PlainText>f Q</PlainText></TextGroup>IVc versus non-influenza vaccine in infants (6–4<TextGroup><PlainText>7 m</PlainText></TextGroup>onths) across multiple seasons. Immunogenicity and safety data from the 2019/20 season comparing QIVc with QIVe demonstrated that the QIVc was well tolerated in infants and not inferior to QIVe <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. A study conducted using a 3-season (2017–2020) US exposure registry found no safety concerns associated with the use of QIVc in pregnant women aged 18-46 years, including those in their first trimester (n=665) <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Results"> <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Effectiveness of the seasonal cell-based vaccine vs. conventional egg-based vaccines</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Observational studies provide valuable insights, since VE is measured under real conditions (real-world data [RWD]). RWD are particularly relevant for influenza vaccines, as they allow measurement of VE fluctuations across multiple seasons and in various subgroups affected by virus and host factors (e.g., antigen drift, egg adaptation, age [immune senescence], comorbidities, vaccination status) <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. RWD also enable the detection of rare side effects. Therefore, the inclusion of RWD serves as a valuable supplement to data from pivotal randomized controlled trials.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Below, we present RWD from retrospective cohort and case-control studies on the VE of QIVc versus QIVe during the US seasons 2017/18–2019/20. The dominant strains in each season were as follows: A(H3N2) in the 2017/18 season, co-circulation of A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) in the 2018/19 season, and A(H1N1) along with B(Victoria) in the 2019/20 season <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Effectiveness of QIVc versus QIVe in preventing influenza-related outcomes in individuals ≥4 years of age over multiple consecutive seasons</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A cohort study during the 2017/18 season, which involved individuals aged ≥4 years (n=1,353,862), demonstrated an overall relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of 36.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.1–44.9) for QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-like illness (ILI) <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>. Two cohort studies conducted during the 2018/19 (n=10,126,333) and 2019/20 (n=5,625,478) seasons compared the rVE of QIVc versus QIVe in the prevention of outpatient and inpatient medical encounters <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. The results showed a rVE of 7.6% (95% CI: 6.5–8.6) in individuals aged ≥4 years and 9.5% (95% CI: 7.9–11.1) in individuals aged ≥18 years, respectively. Notably, all studies showed a statistically significantly higher rVE in individuals under the age of 65. Furthermore, the rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe for the prevention of influenza-related hospitalizations/emergency department visits in individuals aged 4–64 years was analyzed in three cohorts during the 2017/18 (n=3,080,510), 2018/19 (n=3,727,890), and 2019/20 (n=5,065,326) seasons <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. All three studies showed a statistically significantly higher rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe (2017/18: 14.4% [95% CI: 8.8–19.6], 2018/19: 6.5% [95% CI: 0.1–12.5], 2019/20: 5.3% [95% CI: 0.5–9.9]).</Pgraph><Pgraph>The rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza was assessed in a case-control study that spanned the 2017/18–2019/20 seasons among individuals aged 4–64 years (n=99,610) <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>. Across all three seasons, QIVc demonstrated statistically significantly higher effectiveness with rVEs of 14.8% (95% CI: 7.0–22.0) in the 2017/18 season, 12.5% (95% CI: 4.7–19.6) in the 2018/19 season, and 10.0% (95% CI: 2.7–16.7) in the 2019/20 season.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Influenza vaccination recommendations and options in selected countries</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Some countries, such as Austria and the USA, recommend influenza vaccination for all individuals aged ≥6 months <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>. In contrast, countries such as Germany, England, Italy, and Spain have specific recommendations for certain groups of people aged ≥6 months <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>. Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/> provides an overview of the current availability and preferred recommendations for influenza vaccines in selected countries.</Pgraph><Pgraph>QIVc is currently approved and available in all analyzed countries for individuals aged ≥2 years or ≥6 months, including the USA and the United Kingdom (since October 2023). In England, QIVc has received a preferential recommendation for individuals aged 18–64 years with a defined indication. In Germany, QIVc is recommended for individuals with an indication for vaccination that is equivalent to the egg-based vaccines available for the corresponding age groups. </Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion"> <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Vaccination recommendations</SubHeadline><Pgraph>In Germany, influenza is a prevalent respiratory disease that poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden on the population. Given the significant direct and indirect costs associated with high morbidity rates among individuals below 60 years of age with influenza, it would be reasonable to consider expanding the STIKO vaccination recommendation to include healthy adults, children, and adolescents. This approach has already been implemented by the SIKO, the highest health authorities at the German state level, and in other countries, such as Austria and the USA. Currently, there are ongoing discussions within the STIKO regarding standard vaccination for children and preferential vaccine recommendations for specific indication groups <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Egg adaptation</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A significant drawback of egg-based influenza vaccine production is the occurrence of egg adaptation, which can result in reduced VE, especially against influenza A(H3N2). According to a consensus report, egg adaptation can lower vaccine matching by 7–21% and decrease VE by 4–16% <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Currently, the cell-based and recombinant vaccines are the only licensed influenza vaccines that are not produced in chicken eggs. However, it should be noted that the recombinant vaccine is currently unavailable in Germany (Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Effectiveness and health economic data on the seasonal cell-based vaccine</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Retrospective cohort studies during the US seasons 2017/18–2019/20, which included around 29 million participants, demonstrated a higher VE of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-related outcomes among individuals aged 4–64 years <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. A limitation of these cohort studies is that the influenza cases were not laboratory-confirmed. However, the studies utilized influenza-specific ICD codes which have a high predictive value for laboratory-confirmed influenza. Some studies also conducted sensitivity analyses by focusing on the weeks with the highest influenza circulation and laboratory-confirmed cases. Additionally, according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines, all hospitalized patients with influenza-like symptoms should be tested for influenza, indicating a high reliability of diagnostic codes <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. Moreover, a case-controlled study of approximately 100,000 individuals aged 4–64 years during the same influenza seasons in the US showed that QIVc was also more effective than QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Lastly, a health economic evaluation demonstrated that using QIVc instead of QIVe in Germany could result in a reduction of influenza cases and complications and thereby generate cost savings from a societal perspective, making it a potentially cost-effective option <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Conclusion"> <MainHeadline>Conclusion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>RWD of the US seasons 2017/18–2019/20 showed that QIVc demonstrated greater effectiveness compared to QIVe among individuals under the age of 65. The preferential use of QIVc could lead to a reduction in the influenza-related burden of disease and associated direct and indirect costs among the population under the age of 60 in Germany. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Key messages </SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">The population under the age of 60 contributes significantly to the disease burden and economic impact of seasonal influenza in Germany. Children are particularly vulnerable to severe cases of influenza and serve as carriers, transmitting the virus to adults and the elderly. Additionally, illness or caring for sick children leads to high productivity losses among the working population.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Low influenza vaccination rates in Germany, combined with fluctuating effectiveness of available vaccines between seasons, result in suboptimal protection of the population against infections and severe illness.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Conventional egg-based influenza vaccines can be affected by antigen adaptation, leading to mismatches between vaccine viruses and circulating strains, thus reducing vaccine effectiveness.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Cell-based influenza vaccines are less susceptible to antigen adaptation and have shown significantly better effectiveness than conventional egg-based vaccines in the prevention of (test-confirmed) influenza infections and influenza-associated medical encounters under real-world conditions.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Expanding vaccination recommendations to include all age groups and prioritizing cell-based over conventional egg-based influenza vaccines could reduce the burden of influenza-related illness and associated costs among the German population under the age of 60.</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes"> <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Acknowledgments</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Mareike Konstanski from Xcenda GmbH provided background research and editorial support in preparing this manuscript, which was funded by CSL Seqirus GmbH.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Annotation</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The review has been published in German with the following bibliography:</Pgraph><Pgraph>Gärtner BC, Beier D, Gosch G, Wahle K, Wendt L, Förster LC, Schmidt KJ, Schwarz TF. Zellkulturbasierte Influenzaimpfstoffe: eine effektive Impfstoffoption für unter 60-Jährige. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Feb;136(Suppl 2):35-42. DOI: <Hyperlink href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02327-3">10.1007/s00508-024-02327-3</Hyperlink></Pgraph><SubHeadline>Authors’ ORCID</SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Barbara C. Gärtner: <Hyperlink href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-7634">0000-0002-5234-7634</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Klaus Wahle: <Hyperlink href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-7150">0000-0002-2811-7150</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Laura-Christin Förster: <Hyperlink href="https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8557-9591">0009-0003-8557-9591</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Kim J. Schmidt: <Hyperlink href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8069-9103">0000-0001-8069-9103</Hyperlink></ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">CSL Seqirus GmbH funded the publication.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Dr. Dietmar Beier: Advisory Board for CSL Seqirus.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Prof. Dr. Barbara C. Gärtner: Advisory Board and honoraria for lectures for CSL Seqirus, Sanofi, GSK, Mo<TextGroup><PlainText>der</PlainText></TextGroup>na, BioNTech, Pfizer, Viatris.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Dr. Gunther Gosch: Lecturing activities and participation in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, CLS Seqirus, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis. </ListItem><ListItem level="1">Prof. Dr. Klaus Wahle: Lectures and participation in advisory boards on behalf of or for SPMSD, CSL S<TextGroup><PlainText>eqi</PlainText></TextGroup>rus, Pfizer, GSK, BioNTech. </ListItem><ListItem level="1">Dr. Luise Wendt: -</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Dr. Laura-Christin Förster is employed by CSL Seqirus GmbH.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Kim J. Schmidt is employed by Xcenda GmbH, which received funding from CSL Seqirus GmbH for the preparation of this manuscript.</ListItem><ListItem level="1">Prof. Dr. Tino F. Schwarz: Honoraria for consulting and lectures for Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Biogen, BioNTech, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Merck-Serono, Moderna, MSD, Novavax, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, CSL Seqirus, Synlab, Takeda and va-Q-tec.</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock> <References linked="yes"> <Reference refNo="1"> <RefAuthor>Buda S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dürrwald R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Biere B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Reiche J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Buchholz U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tolksdorf K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schilling J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Goerlitz L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Streib V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Preuß U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Prahm K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Krupka S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Haas W</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>ARE-Wochenbericht KW 21/2023</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Buda S, Dürrwald R, Biere B, Reiche J, Buchholz U, Tolksdorf K, Schilling J, Goerlitz L, Streib V, Preuß U, Prahm K, Krupka S, Haas W. ARE-Wochenbericht KW 21/2023. Berlin: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Influenza–Robert Koch-Institut; 2023. DOI: 10.25646/11488</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.25646/11488</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="2"> <RefAuthor>Frühwein M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schelling J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wahle K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Beier D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kwetkat A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schwarz TF</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Weiterentwickelte zielgruppenorientierte Influenzaimpfstoffe – Neue Evidenz zeigt höhere Effektivität bei älteren Erwachsenen</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>Dtsch Med Wochenschr</RefJournal> <RefPage>556-62</RefPage> <RefTotal>Frühwein M, Schelling J, Wahle K, Beier D, Kwetkat A, Schwarz TF. Weiterentwickelte zielgruppenorientierte Influenzaimpfstoffe – Neue Evidenz zeigt höhere Effektivität bei älteren Erwachsenen [Enhanced targeted influenza vaccines - New evidence shows higher effectiveness in older adults]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023 Apr;148(9):556-62. German. DOI: 10.1055/a-2032-1368</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2032-1368</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="3"> <RefAuthor>Robert Koch-Institut</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2019</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Bericht zur Epidemiologie der Influenza in Deutschland, Saison 2018/19</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Robert Koch-Institut. Bericht zur Epidemiologie der Influenza in Deutschland, Saison 2018/19. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut; 2019. DOI: 10.25646/6232</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.25646/6232</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="4"> <RefAuthor>Robert Koch-Institut</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2018</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Influenza (Teil 1): Erkrankungen durch saisonale Influenzaviren</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Robert Koch-Institut. Influenza (Teil 1): Erkrankungen durch saisonale Influenzaviren. 2018 [updated 2018 Jan 19; cited 2023 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Merkblaetter/Ratgeber_Influenza_saisonal.html</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Merkblaetter/Ratgeber_Influenza_saisonal.html</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="5"> <RefAuthor>Nayak J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hoy G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gordon A</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Influenza in Children</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med</RefJournal> <RefPage>a038430</RefPage> <RefTotal>Nayak J, Hoy G, Gordon A. Influenza in Children. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):a038430. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038430</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a038430</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="6"> <RefAuthor>Blanchet Zumofen MH</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Frimpter J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hansen SA</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Impact of Influenza and Influenza-Like Illness on Work Productivity Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>Pharmacoeconomics</RefJournal> <RefPage>253-73</RefPage> <RefTotal>Blanchet Zumofen MH, Frimpter J, Hansen SA. Impact of Influenza and Influenza-Like Illness on Work Productivity Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Mar;41(3):253-73. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01224-9</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01224-9</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="7"> <RefAuthor>Ehlken B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Anastassopoulou A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hain J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schröder C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wahle K</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Cost for physician-diagnosed influenza and influenza-like illnesses on primary care level in Germany--results of a database analysis from May 2010 to April 2012</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>BMC Public Health</RefJournal> <RefPage>578</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ehlken B, Anastassopoulou A, Hain J, Schröder C, Wahle K. Cost for physician-diagnosed influenza and influenza-like illnesses on primary care level in Germany--results of a database analysis from May 2010 to April 2012. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 21;15:578. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1885-0</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1885-0</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="8"> <RefAuthor>Hoy G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kuan G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>López R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sánchez N</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>López B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ojeda S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Maier H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Patel M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wraith S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Meyers A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Campredon L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Balmaseda A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gordon A</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>The Spectrum of Influenza in Children</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>Clin Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>e1012-e1020</RefPage> <RefTotal>Hoy G, Kuan G, López R, Sánchez N, López B, Ojeda S, Maier H, Patel M, Wraith S, Meyers A, Campredon L, Balmaseda A, Gordon A. The Spectrum of Influenza in Children. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e1012-e1020. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac734</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac734</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="9"> <RefAuthor>Ständige Impfkommission</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) beim Robert Koch-Institut 2023</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>Epid Bull</RefJournal> <RefPage>3-68</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ständige Impfkommission. Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) beim Robert Koch-Institut 2023. Epid Bull. 2023;4:3-68. DOI: 10.25646/10829.3</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.25646/10829.3</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="10"> <RefAuthor>Sächsische Impfkommission (SIKO)</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2024</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Empfehlungen zur Durchführung von Schutzimpfungen im Freistaat Sachsen. Impfempfehlung E 1 vom 02.09.1993</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Sächsische Impfkommission (SIKO). Empfehlungen zur Durchführung von Schutzimpfungen im Freistaat Sachsen. Impfempfehlung E 1 vom 02.09.1993. 2024. Available from: https://www.slaek.de/media/dokumente/patient/gesundheitsinformationen/impfen/E1_Rev2024_final.pdf</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.slaek.de/media/dokumente/patient/gesundheitsinformationen/impfen/E1_Rev2024_final.pdf</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="11"> <RefAuthor>Nationale Lenkungsgruppe Impfen</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Impfempfehlungen - Öffentliche Impfempfehlungen der Länder</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Nationale Lenkungsgruppe Impfen. Impfempfehlungen - Öffentliche Impfempfehlungen der Länder. [updated 2023; cited 2023 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.nali-impfen.de/impfempfehlungen/oeffentliche-impfempfehlungen-der-laender/</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.nali-impfen.de/impfempfehlungen/oeffentliche-impfempfehlungen-der-laender/</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="12"> <RefAuthor>Robert Koch-Institut</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>OKaPII - Onlinebefragung von Klinikpersonal zur Influenza-Impfung: Ergebnisbericht 2023</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Robert Koch-Institut. OKaPII - Onlinebefragung von Klinikpersonal zur Influenza-Impfung: Ergebnisbericht 2023. 2023 Aug 22 [cited 2023 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/Impfen/Forschungsprojekte/OKaPII/Ergebnisbericht_2023.pdf?__blob=publicationFile</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/Impfen/Forschungsprojekte/OKaPII/Ergebnisbericht_2023.pdf?__blob=publicationFile</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="13"> <RefAuthor>Robert Koch-Institut</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Wie viele Menschen lassen sich gegen die saisonale Influenza impfen?</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Robert Koch-Institut. Wie viele Menschen lassen sich gegen die saisonale Influenza impfen? [updated 2022 Sep 16; cited 2023 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/SharedDocs/FAQ/Impfen/Influenza/FAQ_Uebersicht.html</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.rki.de/SharedDocs/FAQ/Impfen/Influenza/FAQ_Uebersicht.html</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="14"> <RefAuthor>Paul-Ehrlich-Institut</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Influenza-Impfstoffe (alle Zulassungen)</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. Influenza-Impfstoffe (alle Zulassungen). [updated 2023 May 23; cited 2023 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.pei.de/DE/arzneimittel/impfstoffe/influenza-grippe/influenza-node.html</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.pei.de/DE/arzneimittel/impfstoffe/influenza-grippe/influenza-node.html</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="15"> <RefAuthor>Michaelis K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Scholz S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Buda S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Garbe E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Harder T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ledig T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Terhardt M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wichmann O</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wicker S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zepp F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mertens T</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Beschluss und Wissenschaftliche Begründung der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) für die Aktualisierung der Influenza-Impfempfehlung für Personen im Alter von ≥ 60 Jahren</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Epid Bull</RefJournal> <RefPage>3-25</RefPage> <RefTotal>Michaelis K, Scholz S, Buda S, Garbe E, Harder T, Ledig T, Terhardt M, Wichmann O, Wicker S, Zepp F, Mertens T. Beschluss und Wissenschaftliche Begründung der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) für die Aktualisierung der Influenza-Impfempfehlung für Personen im Alter von ≥ 60 Jahren. Epid Bull. 2021;1:3-25. DOI: 10.25646/7655</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.25646/7655</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="16"> <RefAuthor>Buda S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Preuß U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wedde M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dürrwald R</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Wirksamkeit der saisonalen Influenzaimpfung bei ambulant behandelten Patienten in der Saison 2019/20 in Deutschland</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>Epid Bull</RefJournal> <RefPage>3-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Buda S, Preuß U, Wedde M, Dürrwald R. Wirksamkeit der saisonalen Influenzaimpfung bei ambulant behandelten Patienten in der Saison 2019/20 in Deutschland. Epid Bull. 2020;45:3-6. DOI: 10.25646/7159</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.25646/7159</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="17"> <RefAuthor>Belongia EA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Simpson MD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>King JP</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sundaram ME</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kelley NS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Osterholm MT</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>McLean HQ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies</RefTitle> <RefYear>2016</RefYear> <RefJournal>Lancet Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>942-51</RefPage> <RefTotal>Belongia EA, Simpson MD, King JP, Sundaram ME, Kelley NS, Osterholm MT, McLean HQ. Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;16(8):942-51. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00129-8</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00129-8</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="18"> <RefAuthor>Kissling E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Maurel M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Emborg HD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Whitaker H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>McMenamin J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Howard J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Trebbien R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Watson C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Findlay B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pozo F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bolt Botnen A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Harvey C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rose A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor> European IVE group</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor> Members of the European IVE group</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Interim 2022/23 influenza vaccine effectiveness: six European studies, October 2022 to January 2023</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>Euro Surveill</RefJournal> <RefPage>2300116</RefPage> <RefTotal>Kissling E, Maurel M, Emborg HD, Whitaker H, McMenamin J, Howard J, Trebbien R, Watson C, Findlay B, Pozo F, Bolt Botnen A, Harvey C, Rose A; European IVE group; Members of the European IVE group. Interim 2022/23 influenza vaccine effectiveness: six European studies, October 2022 to January 2023. Euro Surveill. 2023 May;28(21):2300116. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.21.2300116</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.21.2300116</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="19"> <RefAuthor>Álvarez Aldeán J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Salamanca I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ocaña D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Barranco JL</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Walter S</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Effectiveness of cell culture-based influenza vaccines compared with egg-based vaccines: What does the literature say? Rev Esp Quimioter</RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefTotal>Álvarez Aldeán J, Salamanca I, Ocaña D, Barranco JL, Walter S. Effectiveness of cell culture-based influenza vaccines compared with egg-based vaccines: What does the literature say? Rev Esp Quimioter. 2022 Jun;35(3):241-8. DOI: 10.37201/req/117.2021</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.37201/req/117.2021</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="20"> <RefAuthor>Ortiz de Lejarazu-Leonardo R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Montomoli E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wojcik R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Christopher S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mosnier A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pariani E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Trilla Garcia A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fickenscher H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gärtner BC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jandhyala R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zambon M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Moore C</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Estimation of Reduction in Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Due to Egg-Adaptation Changes-Systematic Literature Review and Expert Consensus</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Vaccines (Basel)</RefJournal> <RefPage>1255</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ortiz de Lejarazu-Leonardo R, Montomoli E, Wojcik R, Christopher S, Mosnier A, Pariani E, Trilla Garcia A, Fickenscher H, Gärtner BC, Jandhyala R, Zambon M, Moore C. Estimation of Reduction in Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Due to Egg-Adaptation Changes-Systematic Literature Review and Expert Consensus. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;9(11):1255. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9111255</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111255</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="21"> <RefAuthor>Peck H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Laurie KL</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rockman S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Leung V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lau H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Soppe S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rynehart C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Baas C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Trusheim H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Barr IG</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Enhanced isolation of influenza viruses in qualified cells improves the probability of well-matched vaccines</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>NPJ Vaccines</RefJournal> <RefPage>149</RefPage> <RefTotal>Peck H, Laurie KL, Rockman S, Leung V, Lau H, Soppe S, Rynehart C, Baas C, Trusheim H, Barr IG. Enhanced isolation of influenza viruses in qualified cells improves the probability of well-matched vaccines. NPJ Vaccines. 2021 Dec 9;6(1):149. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-021-00415-3</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00415-3</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="22"> <RefAuthor>Essink BJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Heeringa M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jeanfreau RJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Finn D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Matassa V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Edelman J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hohenboken M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Molrine D</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Safety and Immunogenicity of Cell-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Trial</RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefJournal>Pediatrics</RefJournal> <RefPage>e2022057509</RefPage> <RefTotal>Essink BJ, Heeringa M, Jeanfreau RJ, Finn D, Matassa V, Edelman J, Hohenboken M, Molrine D. Safety and Immunogenicity of Cell-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2022 Nov 1;150(5):e2022057509. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-057509</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057509</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="23"> <RefAuthor>Robinson C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Van Boxmeer J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tilson H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Scialli A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Vanchiere JA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ides E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sawlwin D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Molrine D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hohenboken M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Edelman J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Albano JD</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Outcomes in Pregnant Persons Immunized with a Cell-Based Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study</RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefJournal>Vaccines (Basel)</RefJournal> <RefPage>1600</RefPage> <RefTotal>Robinson C, Van Boxmeer J, Tilson H, Scialli A, Vanchiere JA, Ides E, Sawlwin D, Molrine D, Hohenboken M, Edelman J, Albano JD. Outcomes in Pregnant Persons Immunized with a Cell-Based Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;10(10):1600. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101600</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101600</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="24"> <RefAuthor>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Past Weekly Surveillance Reports</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Past Weekly Surveillance Reports. [updated 2023 Jul 7; cited 2023 Jul 14]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/pastreports.htm</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/pastreports.htm</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="25"> <RefAuthor>Boikos C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sylvester GC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sampalis JS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mansi JA</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Relative Effectiveness of the Cell-Cultured Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard, Egg-derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-like Illness in 2017-2018</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>Clin Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>e665-e671</RefPage> <RefTotal>Boikos C, Sylvester GC, Sampalis JS, Mansi JA. Relative Effectiveness of the Cell-Cultured Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard, Egg-derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-like Illness in 2017-2018. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):e665-e671. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa371</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa371</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="26"> <RefAuthor>Boikos C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fischer L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>O'Brien D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Vasey J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sylvester GC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mansi JA</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Relative Effectiveness of the Cell-derived Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Versus Egg-derived Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-related Medical Encounters During the 2018-2019 Influenza Season in the United States</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Clin Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>e692-e698</RefPage> <RefTotal>Boikos C, Fischer L, O'Brien D, Vasey J, Sylvester GC, Mansi JA. Relative Effectiveness of the Cell-derived Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Versus Egg-derived Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-related Medical Encounters During the 2018-2019 Influenza Season in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):e692-e698. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1944</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1944</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="27"> <RefAuthor>Imran M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ortiz JR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>McLean HQ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fisher L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>O'Brien D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bonafede M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mansi JA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Boikos C</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Adults During the 2019-2020 Influenza Season in the United States</RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefJournal>Open Forum Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>ofac532</RefPage> <RefTotal>Imran M, Ortiz JR, McLean HQ, Fisher L, O'Brien D, Bonafede M, Mansi JA, Boikos C. Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines in Adults During the 2019-2020 Influenza Season in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 12;9(10):ofac532. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac532</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac532</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="28"> <RefAuthor>Divino V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Krishnarajah G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pelton SI</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mould-Quevedo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Anupindi VR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>DeKoven M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Postma MJ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>A real-world study evaluating the relative vaccine effectiveness of a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine compared to egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the US during the 2017-18 influenza season</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>Vaccine</RefJournal> <RefPage>6334-43</RefPage> <RefTotal>Divino V, Krishnarajah G, Pelton SI, Mould-Quevedo J, Anupindi VR, DeKoven M, Postma MJ. A real-world study evaluating the relative vaccine effectiveness of a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine compared to egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the US during the 2017-18 influenza season. Vaccine. 2020 Sep 11;38(40):6334-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.023</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.023</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="29"> <RefAuthor>Krishnarajah G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Divino V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Postma MJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pelton SI</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Anupindi VR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>DeKoven M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mould-Quevedo J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Cell-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines during the 2018-19 Influenza Season in the United States</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Vaccines (Basel)</RefJournal> <RefPage>80</RefPage> <RefTotal>Krishnarajah G, Divino V, Postma MJ, Pelton SI, Anupindi VR, DeKoven M, Mould-Quevedo J. Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Cell-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines during the 2018-19 Influenza Season in the United States. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;9(2):80. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020080</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020080</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="30"> <RefAuthor>Divino V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ruthwik Anupindi V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>DeKoven M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mould-Quevedo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pelton SI</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Postma MJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Levin MJ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>A Real-World Clinical and Economic Analysis of Cell-Derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard Egg-Derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines During the 2019-2020 Influenza Season in the United States</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Open Forum Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>ofab604</RefPage> <RefTotal>Divino V, Ruthwik Anupindi V, DeKoven M, Mould-Quevedo J, Pelton SI, Postma MJ, Levin MJ. A Real-World Clinical and Economic Analysis of Cell-Derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard Egg-Derived Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines During the 2019-2020 Influenza Season in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 4;9(1):ofab604. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab604</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab604</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="31"> <RefAuthor>Stein A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor></RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Superior Effectiveness of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Against Outpatient Test-Confirmed Influenza Over Three Consecutive Seasons in the United States</RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>9th ESWI Influenza Conference; 2023 Sep 17-20; Valencia</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Stein A, et al. Superior Effectiveness of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Against Outpatient Test-Confirmed Influenza Over Three Consecutive Seasons in the United States. In: 9th ESWI Influenza Conference; 2023 Sep 17-20; Valencia.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="32"> <RefAuthor>Grohskopf L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Blanton L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ferdinands J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chung J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Broder K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Talbot H</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2023–24 Influenza Season</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>MMWR Recomm Rep</RefJournal> <RefPage>1-25</RefPage> <RefTotal>Grohskopf L, Blanton L, Ferdinands J, Chung J, Broder K, Talbot H. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2023–24 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2023;72(2):1-25. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7202a1</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7202a1</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="33"> <RefAuthor>Bundesministerium für Soziales</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gesundheit</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pflege und Konsumentenschutz (BMSGPK)</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Influenza (Virusgrippe) - Empfehlung Saison 2023/24</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Bundesministerium für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz (BMSGPK). Influenza (Virusgrippe) - Empfehlung Saison 2023/24. 2023 [updated 2023 Apr 26; cited 2023 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Gesundheit/Impfen/Impfplan-%C3%96sterreich.html</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Gesundheit/Impfen/Impfplan-%C3%96sterreich.html</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="34"> <RefAuthor>Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Advice on influenza vaccines for 2023/2024</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. Advice on influenza vaccines for 2023/2024. 2022 [updated 2022 Nov; cited 2023 Jul 3]. Available from: https://app.box.com/s/t5ockz9bb6xw6t2mrrzb144njplimfo0/file/1079253178131</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://app.box.com/s/t5ockz9bb6xw6t2mrrzb144njplimfo0/file/1079253178131</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="35"> <RefAuthor>Ministero della Salute</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Prevenzione e controllo dell'influenza: raccomandazioni per la stagione 2023 - 2024</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Ministero della Salute. Prevenzione e controllo dell'influenza: raccomandazioni per la stagione 2023 - 2024. 2023 [updated 2023 Apr 21; cited 2023 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.trovanorme.salute.gov.it/norme/renderNormsanPdf?anno=2023&codLeg=93294&parte=1%20&serie=null</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.trovanorme.salute.gov.it/norme/renderNormsanPdf?anno=2023&codLeg=93294&parte=1%20&serie=null</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="36"> <RefAuthor>Ministerio de Sanidad</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Vacunas y Programa de Vacunación</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Ministerio de Sanidad. Vacunas y Programa de Vacunación. [updated 2023; cited 2023 Aug 2]. Available from: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/promocionPrevencion/vacunaciones/programasDeVacunacion/gripe/home.htm</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/promocionPrevencion/vacunaciones/programasDeVacunacion/gripe/home.htm</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="39"> <RefAuthor>Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über Schutzimpfungen nach § 20i Absatz 1 SGB V (Schutzimpfungs-Richtlinie/SI-RL)</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über Schutzimpfungen nach § 20i Absatz 1 SGB V (Schutzimpfungs-Richtlinie/SI-RL). [updated 2023 Sep 13; cited 2023 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-3239/SI-RL_2023-07-20_iK-2023-09-14.pdf</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-3239/SI-RL_2023-07-20_iK-2023-09-14.pdf</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="40"> <RefAuthor>Department of Health & Social Care</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Guidance: National flu immunisation programme 2023 to 2024 letter</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Department of Health & Social Care. Guidance: National flu immunisation programme 2023 to 2024 letter. [updated 2023 Jun 8; cited 2023 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-flu-immunisation-programme-plan/national-flu-immunisation-programme-2023-to-2024-letter#recommended-vaccines</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-flu-immunisation-programme-plan/national-flu-immunisation-programme-2023-to-2024-letter#recommended-vaccines</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="37"> <RefAuthor>Ständige Impfkommission</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Protokoll der 104. Sitzung der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO)</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Ständige Impfkommission. Protokoll der 104. Sitzung der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO). 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Kommissionen/STIKO/Protokolle/Sitzung_104.pdf?__blob=publicationFile</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Kommissionen/STIKO/Protokolle/Sitzung_104.pdf?__blob=publicationFile</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="38"> <RefAuthor>Cai R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gerlier L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Eichner M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schwehm M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rajaram S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mould-Quevedo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lamotte M</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Cost-effectiveness of the cell-based quadrivalent versus the standard egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in Germany</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Med Econ</RefJournal> <RefPage>490-501</RefPage> <RefTotal>Cai R, Gerlier L, Eichner M, Schwehm M, Rajaram S, Mould-Quevedo J, Lamotte M. Cost-effectiveness of the cell-based quadrivalent versus the standard egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in Germany. J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):490-501. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1908000</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2021.1908000</RefLink> </Reference> </References> <Media> <Tables> <Table format="png"> <MediaNo>1</MediaNo> <MediaID>1</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Availability and preferred recommendations of influenza vaccines in selected countries for persons ≥6 months in 2023/24 (modified based on [2])</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Table> <NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables> </Tables> <Figures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </Figures> <InlineFigures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </InlineFigures> <Attachments> <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments> </Attachments> </Media> </OrigData> </GmsArticle>