Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates

dgkh000267 10.3205/dgkh000267 urn:nbn:de:0183-dgkh0002674 Research Article Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates Detektion verschiedener in die Biofilmbildung involvierter Gene von Staphylococcus aureus Nourbakhsh Nourbakhsh Fahimeh F

Department of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord branch, Shahrekord, Iran

author Namvar Namvar Amirmorteza Ebrahimzadeh AE

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Ganjafrooz Street, Babol, IranDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

amirmorteza.namvar@gmail.com author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

610 Staphylococcus aureus MRSA biofilm ica gene antibiotic resistance Staphylococcus aureus MRSA biofilm ica-Gene Antibiotikaresistenz 20160322 engl This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). 2196-5226 11 GMS Hygiene and Infection Control GMS Hyg Infect Control 07 Staphylococcus aureus ist ein Gram-positiver Erreger, der für eine Vielzahl nosokomialer Infektionen verantwortlich ist. In der vorliegenden Studie wird der Versuch eines genotypischen und phänotypischen Screenings biofilmbildender MRSA-Stämme, isoliert von Patienten mit nosokomialen Infektionen in Isfahan, unternommen. Bei 110 S. aureus-Stämmen, die aus den drei größten Krankenhäusern in Isfahan stammten, wurden das antibiotische Resistenzmuster sowie phänotypische und genotypische Gene für die Biofilmbildung mittels Congorot-Agar (CRA) und multiplex PCR (M-PCR) untersucht. Bei 103 von 110 Isolaten (93,6%) handelte es sich um MRSA. Die höchste Resistenzrate wurde gegen Methicillin gefunden (93,6%), gefolgt von Erythromycin (86,1%), Ciprofloxacin (87,4%) und Penicillin (89%). Phenotypisch waren 53,5% starke, 33,3% mittlere und 13,2% schwache Biofilmbilder. Im Vergleich zu anderen Intercellular adhesion (ica)-Genen kam icaC (69,3%) am häufigsten vor, gefolgt von icaD (54,8%).Damit sind die Adhärenz oder das Attachment und die Biofilmbildung wichtige Virulenzfaktoren bei S. aureus-Stämmen. Staphylococcus aureus is one of the Gram-positive pathogens causing a wide range of nosocomial infections. The present study investigates genotypic and phenotypic aspects involved in biofilm formation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections in Isfahan. A total of 110 S. aureus strains were collected from three major hospitals in Isfahan, the center of Iran. The antibiotic resistance pattern, phenotypes, and biofilm formation genes were studied using Congo red agar (CRA) and multiplex PCR (M-PCR). We found that 103 out of 110 samples (93.6%) were MRSA. The highest frequency of resistance was found to penicillin (89%), ciprofloxacin (87.4%), and erythromycin (86.1%). Phenotypic results showed that 53.5% were high biofilm producers, while 33.3% and 13.2% were intermediate and low biofilm producers, respectively. icaC (69.3%) had the highest frequency in comparison to other intercellular adhesion (ica) genes, icaD (54.8%) was second most common.The results show that the adherence or attachment ability and biofilm production are important for enhancing virulence factors among isolates of S. aureus strains. IntroductionStaphylococcus aureus is a prevalent human pathogen causing serious infections in hospitals all around the world. However, the molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis are increasing every day . Under defined conditions, biofilm formation enhances the severity of S. aureus related infections and leads to an increased tolerance to antimicrobial agents and antibiotic resistance patterns. Biofilm formation in or on medical equipment’s and devices such as implants, increases the number and severity of nosocomial infections; thus, it is important that attempts be undertaken to remove these antibiotic resistance factors . Adhesion to surfaces is the first step in producing biofilm; it is facilitated by the expression of different microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs), which can bind to different extracellular matrix factors such as elastin, fibronectin A and B, laminin, collagen, fibrinogen and clumping factors. These proteins can share common signal sequences for attaching to the cell wall or various surfaces , . In a bacterial matrix, they can coat medical devices and initialize the protein production such as biofilm matrix proteins. This is followed by protein attachment to the bacterial surfaces, which plays an important role in S. aureus pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance patterns , . In S. aureus, interactions with abiotic hydrophilic surfaces are controlled by polysaccharide intracellular adhesion (PIA), which is encoded by the ica operon (icaABCD). The products are also involved in the synthesis of an extracellular polysaccharide matrix which can be destroyed by available antibiofilm enzymes . Polysaccharide intracellular adhesion is composed of β-1-6-linked N-acetyl glucosamine with partially deacetylated residues that surrounds human cells or medical tools and protects the microorganism against both host immune system and antibiotic treatments , , , , . In this study, we evaluated the effective genes in biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates. Materials and methodsBacterial isolates and culture conditionsStaphylococcus aureus isolates were collected over a one-year period from three hospitals of Isfahan, Iran (Alzahra, Shareati and Kashani). A total of 110 S. aureus strains were recovered from different types of infections, including blood (n=17), decubitus ulcers (n=6), wounds (n=49), abscesses (n=3), tracheal secretions (n=25), catheters (n=4), synovial fluid (n=3) and CSF (n=3). All isolates were cultured on blood agar (Merck, Germany) and then incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h. After that, dubious colonies were examined using techniques for identifying Staphylococcus spp., such as morphology identification, catalase and coagulase production, growth on mannitol salt agar and DNase testing (Merck, Germany). Subsequently, the API-20-Staph system kit (bioMérieux, France) was used for final confirmation.Antibiotic resistance patterns were examined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar. S. aureus isolates were tested with methicillin (5 µg/disk), penicillin (10 ug/disk), imipenem (10 µg/disk), cefazoline (30 µg/disk),</PlainText></TextGroup> cefalotin (30 µg/disk), ceftriaxone <TextGroup><PlainText>(30 µg/disk),</PlainText></TextGroup> gentamicin (10 µg/disk), ciprofloxacin <TextGroup><PlainText>(5 µg/disk)</PlainText></TextGroup>, clindamycin (2 µg/disk), azithromycin <TextGroup><PlainText>(15 µg/disk),</PlainText></TextGroup> erythromycin (15 µg/disk), mupirocin <TextGroup><PlainText>(30 µg/disk),</PlainText></TextGroup> rifampicin (5 µg/disk), tetracycline <TextGroup><PlainText>(30 µg/disk),</PlainText></TextGroup> trimethoprim (5 µg/disk), vancomycin <TextGroup><PlainText>(30 µg/disk)</PlainText></TextGroup> and nitrofurantoin (300 µg/disk) by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (MAST, Merseyside, England), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2011. S. aureus ATCC25923 was used as the control strain. MRSA isolates were selected to undergo biofilm formation analysis <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Biofilm formation (microtiter plate and CRA culture)</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The biofilm production analysis was performed by cultivating the <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> strains detected in nosocomial infections on Congo Red Agar (CRA) plates, as employed and described elsewhere <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. The CRA plates were incubated at 37°C in aerobic conditions for 24 h, and then stored at room temperature for 48 h <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The formation of reddish black colonies on CRA plates was considered as slime production. Non-slime producing strains produced smooth, pinkish-red colonies with a darkening at the center. As an alternative to the microtiter plate assay method, polystyrene plates were used, in which 20 microliters of isolates were added and incubated for 48 h at 37°C, followed by washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Finally, safranin and ethanol were used to determine biofilm-producing isolates. The absorbance was evaluated at 490 nm with an ELISA reader. These biofilm-producing isolates were selected for biofilm gene determination with molecular PCR method <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>DNA extraction and multiplex (M)-PCR amplification</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A typical colony was cultivated in 1 ml TSB for 24 h at 37°C. The bacterial genomic DNA was extracted with a QIAGEN plasmid Minikit (Fermentas, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. Biofilm genes determined by previously described specific primers as listed in Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/> <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. </Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Results"> <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><Pgraph>We found that 103 MRSA isolates from 110 collected specimens were resistant to methicillin (MRSA). These isolates were selected for biofilm-producing evaluation with CRA medium culture and microplate titration. </Pgraph><Pgraph>All of the 103 isolates produced biofilm in different degrees. The most frequent resistance observed was to penicillin (89%), ciprofloxacin (87.4%), and erythromycin (86.1%). The least common resistance was belonged to nitrofurantoin (7%). The phenotypic method showed that (53.5%) of isolates were highly capable for biofilm production, while (33.3%) were intermediate biofilm producers and (13.2%) of isolates were low biofilm producers. This study demonstrated that the highest frequency of biofilm formation was found in decubitis ulcers (85%), wounds (78.2%), and tracheal secretion isolates (65.4%). The frequency of biofilm production by <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> isolates is illustrated in Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The prevalence of the 12 genes involved in biofilm production was: <Mark2>icaA</Mark2> (34.2%), <Mark2>icaB</Mark2> (29.7%), <Mark2>icaC</Mark2> (69.3%), <Mark2>icaD</Mark2> (54.8%), <Mark2>fnbA</Mark2> (38.1%), <Mark2>fnbB</Mark2> (46.6%), <Mark2>fib</Mark2> (39.9%), <Mark2>clfA</Mark2> (41.4%), <Mark2>clfB</Mark2> (44.1%), <Mark2>ebps</Mark2> (26.5%), <Mark2>cna</Mark2> (18.3%), and <Mark2>eno</Mark2> (29.6%).</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion"> <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The mechanism of biofilm formation in <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> is not well understood, and only a limited number of studies on the expression profiles of genes involved in biofilm production exist. To understand the molecular mechanism of biofilm formation, we sought to define the detection of 12 effective selected genes in biofilm formation, including the <Mark2>icaABCD</Mark2> and other related genes <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. Because the <Mark2>icaA</Mark2> and <Mark2>icaD</Mark2> genes are regarded as necessary factors for intercellular adhesion, it could be assumed that these genes are only important for the formation of the bacterial multilayer in biofilm production. However, these genes are in fact associated with both slime and biofilm formation <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Similar to our study, several other researchers have shown that formation of slime and biofilm in <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> and <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> is associated with the presence of <Mark2>icaA</Mark2> and <Mark2>icaD</Mark2> genes <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Production of intercellular adhesion molecules, e.g., by <Mark2>icaABCD</Mark2> and other genes, plays an important role in staphylococcal biofilm. Biofilm production may be the fundamental reason for the increasing antibiotic resistance of <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> strains. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In recent investigations comparing biofilm cells with planktonic cells, the results showed that the <Mark2>ica</Mark2> gene can be considered necessary for the initiation of biofilm development <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>. Comparable to our observation the <Mark2>icaC</Mark2> gene was detected in a high number of isolates and also expressed from the <Mark2>icaABCD</Mark2> operon in the study by Beenken <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink> and Vandecasteele <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>However, in the present study, all of the strains harbored <Mark2>ica</Mark2> gene and produced slime, as detected by CRA, microplate titration, and molecular method. Slime formation as detected with CRA and microplate titration was also reported by Rohde et al. <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. The prevalence of<Mark2> clfA, clfB, cna </Mark2>and<Mark2> eno</Mark2> genes was compared with those found in <TextGroup><Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2></TextGroup> strains isolated from different clinical specimens in various studies <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Due to our study, the percentage of <Mark2>clfA</Mark2> was (41.4%), as similar as Ythier study in 2012 <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>According to the importance of this issue, related studies have been conducted in different regions of Iran. For example biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance pattern in MRSA isolated from nosocomial infections and also burn patients, have been examined previously <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>. A high prevalence of antibiotic resistant <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> strains was observed in this study. Thus, knowledge of the characteristics of MRSA isolates and definition of their antibiotic resistance patterns would be helpful for therapeutic decisions and useful for antibiotic therapy in infected patients. In addition to studies of <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2>, the incidence of virulence genes of biofilm-producing strains of <Mark2>S. epidermidis</Mark2> isolates from clinical samples was studied in various provinces of Iran <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. As opposed to previous works, the current study investigated 12 different genes from biofilm-producing MRSA strains isolated from nosocomial infections. In conclusion, the adherence or attachment ability and biofilm production of MRSA strains plays an important role in enhancing virulence factors of clinical isolates.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The prevalence of twelve genes involved in biofilm formation explains that numerous factors may be effective in different steps of biofilm production because all of the strains had capability to form biofilm in various levels but the incidence of genes was different. Further researches are considered necessary to elucidate the expression of these genes in <Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2> strains.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes"> <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <References linked="yes"> <Reference refNo="1"> <RefAuthor>Jarraud S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mougel C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Thioulouse J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lina G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Meugnier H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Forey F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nesme X</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Etienne J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Vandenesch F</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease</RefTitle> <RefYear>2002</RefYear> <RefJournal>Infect Immun</RefJournal> <RefPage>631-41</RefPage> <RefTotal>Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, Nesme X, Etienne J, Vandenesch F. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002 Feb;70(2):631-41. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.631-641.2002</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.2.631-641.2002</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="2"> <RefAuthor>Yarwood JM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bartels DJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Volper EM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Greenberg EP</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms</RefTitle> <RefYear>2004</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Bacteriol</RefJournal> <RefPage>1838-50</RefPage> <RefTotal>Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ, Volper EM, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004 Mar;186(6):1838-50. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.6.1838-1850.2004</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.6.1838-1850.2004</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="3"> <RefAuthor>Stepanović S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Vuković D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jezek P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pavlović M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Svabic-Vlahović M</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Influence of dynamic conditions on biofilm formation by staphylococci</RefTitle> <RefYear>2001</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>502-4</RefPage> <RefTotal>Stepanović S, Vuković D, Jezek P, Pavlović M, Svabic-Vlahović M. Influence of dynamic conditions on biofilm formation by staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;20(7):502-4. DOI: 10.1007/s100960100534</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100960100534</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="4"> <RefAuthor>Boles BR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Horswill AR</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms</RefTitle> <RefYear>2008</RefYear> <RefJournal>PLoS Pathog</RefJournal> <RefPage>e1000052</RefPage> <RefTotal>Boles BR, Horswill AR. Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008 Apr;4(4):e1000052. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="5"> <RefAuthor>Atshan SS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nor Shamsudin M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sekawi Z</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lung LT</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hamat RA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Karunanidhi A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mateg Ali A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ghaznavi-Rad E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ghasemzadeh-Moghaddam H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chong Seng JS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nathan JJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pei CP</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevalence of adhesion and regulation of biofilm-related genes in different clones of Staphylococcus aureus</RefTitle> <RefYear>2012</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Biomed Biotechnol</RefJournal> <RefPage>976972</RefPage> <RefTotal>Atshan SS, Nor Shamsudin M, Sekawi Z, Lung LT, Hamat RA, Karunanidhi A, Mateg Ali A, Ghaznavi-Rad E, Ghasemzadeh-Moghaddam H, Chong Seng JS, Nathan JJ, Pei CP. Prevalence of adhesion and regulation of biofilm-related genes in different clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:976972. DOI: 10.1155/2012/976972</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/976972</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="6"> <RefAuthor>Archer NK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mazaitis MJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Costerton JW</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Leid JG</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Powers ME</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Shirtliff ME</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease</RefTitle> <RefYear>2011</RefYear> <RefJournal>Virulence</RefJournal> <RefPage>445-59</RefPage> <RefTotal>Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff ME. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence. 2011 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-59. DOI: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.2.5.17724</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="7"> <RefAuthor>Chung PY</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Toh YS</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Anti-biofilm agents: recent breakthrough against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus</RefTitle> <RefYear>2014</RefYear> <RefJournal>Pathog Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>231-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Chung PY, Toh YS. Anti-biofilm agents: recent breakthrough against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathog Dis. 2014 Apr;70(3):231-9. DOI: 10.1111/2049-632X.12141</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2049-632X.12141</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="8"> <RefAuthor>Vuong C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Saenz HL</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Götz F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Otto M</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus</RefTitle> <RefYear>2000</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>1688-93</RefPage> <RefTotal>Vuong C, Saenz HL, Götz F, Otto M. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2000 Dec;182(6):1688-93. DOI: 10.1086/317606</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317606</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="9"> <RefAuthor>Christensen GD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Simpson WA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Younger JJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Baddour LM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Barrett FF</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Melton DM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Beachey EH</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices</RefTitle> <RefYear>1985</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Clin Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>996-1006</RefPage> <RefTotal>Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):996-1006.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="10"> <RefAuthor>Ikonomidis A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Vasdeki A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kristo I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Maniatis AN</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tsakris A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Malizos KN</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pournaras S</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Association of biofilm formation and methicillin-resistance with accessory gene regulator (agr) loci in Greek Staphylococcus aureus clones</RefTitle> <RefYear>2009</RefYear> <RefJournal>Microb Pathog</RefJournal> <RefPage>341-4</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ikonomidis A, Vasdeki A, Kristo I, Maniatis AN, Tsakris A, Malizos KN, Pournaras S. Association of biofilm formation and methicillin-resistance with accessory gene regulator (agr) loci in Greek Staphylococcus aureus clones. Microb Pathog. 2009 Dec;47(6):341-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.09.011</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2009.09.011</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="11"> <RefAuthor>Cucarella C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tormo MA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Knecht E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Amorena B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lasa I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Foster TJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Penadés JR</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Expression of the biofilm-associated protein interferes with host protein receptors of Staphylococcus aureus and alters the infective process</RefTitle> <RefYear>2002</RefYear> <RefJournal>Infect Immun</RefJournal> <RefPage>3180-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Cucarella C, Tormo MA, Knecht E, Amorena B, Lasa I, Foster TJ, Penadés JR. Expression of the biofilm-associated protein interferes with host protein receptors of Staphylococcus aureus and alters the infective process. Infect Immun. 2002 Jun;70(6):3180-6. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.3180-3186.2002</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.6.3180-3186.2002</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="12"> <RefAuthor>Vancraeynest D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hermans K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Haesebrouck F</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs</RefTitle> <RefYear>2004</RefYear> <RefJournal>Vet Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>241-7</RefPage> <RefTotal>Vancraeynest D, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F. Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs. Vet Microbiol. 2004 Nov;103(3-4):241-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.09.002</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.09.002</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="13"> <RefAuthor>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>M02-A12: Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests – Approved standard</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M02-A12: Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests – Approved standard. 12th ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2015.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="14"> <RefAuthor>Dziewanowska K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Patti JM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Deobald CF</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bayles KW</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Trumble WR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bohach GA</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Fibronectin binding protein and host cell tyrosine kinase are required for internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by epithelial cells</RefTitle> <RefYear>1999</RefYear> <RefJournal>Infect Immun</RefJournal> <RefPage>4673-8</RefPage> <RefTotal>Dziewanowska K, Patti JM, Deobald CF, Bayles KW, Trumble WR, Bohach GA. Fibronectin binding protein and host cell tyrosine kinase are required for internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999 Sep;67(9):4673-8.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="15"> <RefAuthor>Ammendolia MG</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Di Rosa R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Montanaro L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Arciola CR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Baldassarri L</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Slime production and expression of the slime-associated antigen by staphylococcal clinical isolates</RefTitle> <RefYear>1999</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Clin Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>3235-8</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ammendolia MG, Di Rosa R, Montanaro L, Arciola CR, Baldassarri L. Slime production and expression of the slime-associated antigen by staphylococcal clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct;37(10):3235-8.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="16"> <RefAuthor>Cucarella C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Solano C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Valle J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Amorena B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lasa I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Penadés JR</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation</RefTitle> <RefYear>2001</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Bacteriol</RefJournal> <RefPage>2888-96</RefPage> <RefTotal>Cucarella C, Solano C, Valle J, Amorena B, Lasa I, Penadés JR. Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2001 May;183(9):2888-96. DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.9.2888-2896.2001</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.9.2888-2896.2001</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="17"> <RefAuthor>Costerton JW</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Stewart PS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Greenberg EP</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections</RefTitle> <RefYear>1999</RefYear> <RefJournal>Science</RefJournal> <RefPage>1318-22</RefPage> <RefTotal>Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999 May;284(5418):1318-22. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="18"> <RefAuthor>Li T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wang G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Yin P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Li Z</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zhang L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Liu J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Li M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zhang L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Han L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tang P</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Effect of negative pressure on growth, secretion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</RefJournal> <RefPage>907-17</RefPage> <RefTotal>Li T, Wang G, Yin P, Li Z, Zhang L, Liu J, Li M, Zhang L, Han L, Tang P. Effect of negative pressure on growth, secretion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Oct;108(4):907-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-015-0545-9</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0545-9</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="19"> <RefAuthor>Mirzaee M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Najar-Peerayeh S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Behmanesh M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Moghadam MF</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Relationship between adhesin genes and biofilm formation in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>Curr Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>665-70</RefPage> <RefTotal>Mirzaee M, Najar-Peerayeh S, Behmanesh M, Moghadam MF. Relationship between adhesin genes and biofilm formation in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Curr Microbiol. 2015 May;70(5):665-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-014-0771-9</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0771-9</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="20"> <RefAuthor>Arciola CR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Baldassarri L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Montanaro L</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections</RefTitle> <RefYear>2001</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Clin Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>2151-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2151-6. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="21"> <RefAuthor>Cramton SE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gerke C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schnell NF</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nichols WW</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Götz F</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation</RefTitle> <RefYear>1999</RefYear> <RefJournal>Infect Immun</RefJournal> <RefPage>5427-33</RefPage> <RefTotal>Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Götz F. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 1999 Oct;67(10):5427-33.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="22"> <RefAuthor>Vasudevan P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nair MK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Annamalai T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Venkitanarayanan KS</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation</RefTitle> <RefYear>2003</RefYear> <RefJournal>Vet Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>179-85</RefPage> <RefTotal>Vasudevan P, Nair MK, Annamalai T, Venkitanarayanan KS. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet Microbiol. 2003 Mar;92(1-2):179-85. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00360-7</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00360-7</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="23"> <RefAuthor>Resch A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rosenstein R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nerz C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Götz F</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions</RefTitle> <RefYear>2005</RefYear> <RefJournal>Appl Environ Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>2663-76</RefPage> <RefTotal>Resch A, Rosenstein R, Nerz C, Götz F. Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2663-76. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2663-2676.2005</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.5.2663-2676.2005</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="24"> <RefAuthor>Beenken KE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dunman PM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>McAleese F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Macapagal D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Murphy E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Projan SJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Blevins JS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Smeltzer MS</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms</RefTitle> <RefYear>2004</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Bacteriol</RefJournal> <RefPage>4665-84</RefPage> <RefTotal>Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Macapagal D, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Blevins JS, Smeltzer MS. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(14):4665-84. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4665-4684.2004</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.14.4665-4684.2004</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="25"> <RefAuthor>Vandecasteele SJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Peetermans WE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>R Merckx R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rijnders BJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Van Eldere J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections</RefTitle> <RefYear>2003</RefYear> <RefJournal>Clin Microbiol Infect</RefJournal> <RefPage>114-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, R Merckx R, Rijnders BJ, Van Eldere J. Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Feb;9(2):114-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00544.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00544.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="26"> <RefAuthor>Rohde H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Knobloch JK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Horstkotte MA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mack D</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Correlation of Staphylococcus aureus icaADBC genotype and biofilm expression phenotype</RefTitle> <RefYear>2001</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Clin Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>4595-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Rohde H, Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Mack D. Correlation of Staphylococcus aureus icaADBC genotype and biofilm expression phenotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4595-6. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4595-4596.2001</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.12.4595-4596.2001</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="27"> <RefAuthor>Ythier M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Resch G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Waridel P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Panchaud A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gfeller A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Majcherczyk P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Quadroni M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Moreillon P</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of Staphylococcus aureus surface LPXTG-proteins: correlation with agr genotypes and adherence phenotypes</RefTitle> <RefYear>2012</RefYear> <RefJournal>Mol Cell Proteomics</RefJournal> <RefPage>1123-39</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ythier M, Resch G, Waridel P, Panchaud A, Gfeller A, Majcherczyk P, Quadroni M, Moreillon P. Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of Staphylococcus aureus surface LPXTG-proteins: correlation with agr genotypes and adherence phenotypes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Nov;11(11):1123-39. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.014191</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.014191</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="28"> <RefAuthor>Namvar AE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Asghari B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ezzatifar F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Azizi G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lari AR</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates</RefTitle> <RefYear>2013</RefYear> <RefJournal>GMS Hyg Infect Control</RefJournal> <RefPage>Doc03</RefPage> <RefTotal>Namvar AE, Asghari B, Ezzatifar F, Azizi G, Lari AR. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013;8(1):Doc03. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000203</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000203</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="29"> <RefAuthor>Namvar AE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Afshar M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Asghari B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rastegar Lari A</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Characterisation of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn patients</RefTitle> <RefYear>2014</RefYear> <RefJournal>Burns</RefJournal> <RefPage>708-12</RefPage> <RefTotal>Namvar AE, Afshar M, Asghari B, Rastegar Lari A. Characterisation of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn patients. Burns. 2014 Jun;40(4):708-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.010</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.010</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="30"> <RefAuthor>Ebrahimzadeh Namvar A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Havaei SA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Moghim SH</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Rastegar Lari A</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates from Hospitalized Patients in Isfahan and Tehran Teaching Hospitals</RefTitle> <RefYear>2014</RefYear> <RefJournal>Mol Genet Microbiol Virol</RefJournal> <RefPage>216-19</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ebrahimzadeh Namvar A, Havaei SA, Moghim SH, Rastegar Lari A. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates from Hospitalized Patients in Isfahan and Tehran Teaching Hospitals. Mol Genet Microbiol Virol. 2014;29(4):216-19. DOI: 10.3103/S0891416814040065</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S0891416814040065</RefLink> </Reference> </References> <Media> <Tables> <Table format="png"> <MediaNo>1</MediaNo> <MediaID>1</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: The biofilm gene primers</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Table> <NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables> </Tables> <Figures> <Figure format="png" height="439" width="716"> <MediaNo>1</MediaNo> <MediaID>1</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: Frequency of biofilm-producing in </Mark1><Mark1><Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2></Mark1><Mark1> isolates by site of infection</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Figure> <NoOfPictures>1</NoOfPictures> </Figures> <InlineFigures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </InlineFigures> <Attachments> <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments> </Attachments> </Media> </OrigData> </GmsArticle>