Practices of skin care among nurses in medical and surgical intensive care units: results of a self-administered questionnaire

dgkh000165 10.3205/dgkh000165 urn:nbn:de:0183-dgkh0001651 Research Article Practices of skin care among nurses in medical and surgical intensive care units: results of a self-administered questionnaire Handhabung des Hautschutzes unter Pflegepersonal innerer und chirurgischer Intensivstationen: Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Fragebogenerhebung Große-Schütte Große-Schütte Katja K

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

author Assadian Assadian Ojan O Univ.-Prof. Dr. DTMH (Lond.)

Clinical Institute for Hospital Hygiene, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Tel.: +43-1-40400-1904, Fax: +43-1-40400-1907Clinical Institute for Hospital Hygiene, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

ojan.assadian@meduniwien.ac.at author Hübner Hübner Nils-Olaf NO

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

author Löffler Löffler Harald H

SLK-Kliniken GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany

author Kramer Kramer Axel A

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

610 skin care skin protection intensive care nurses Hautpflege Hautschutz Pflegekräfte in der Intensivpflege 20111215 engl 1863-5245 6 1 GMS Krankenhaushygiene Interdisziplinär GMS Krankenhaushyg Interdiszip Prevention and therapy of nosocomial infections 08 Die sog. Abnutzungsdermatose ist ein Problem bei Pflegekräften. Mit Hilfe einer prospektiven Fragebogenerhebung sollten das Wissen zum Hautschutz und zur Hautpflege und die praktische Umsetzung bei in der Intensivpflege tätigen internistischen und chirurgischen Pflegekräften analysiert werden. Es wurden 250 Fragebögen verteilt. 49% der Antwortenden gaben an, Hautpflege mindestens 1–2 mal täglich durchzuführen. 40% der Befragten gingen davon aus, dass die Dauer zum Einziehen von Hautcreme weniger als 3 min beträgt.Es wurden deutliche Wissensdefizite zur richtigen Anwendung von Hautschutz- und Hautpflegepräparaten offenkundig. Dermatitis of hands is a problem among nurses. The aim of this prospective questionnaire based survey was to analyze practice and knowledge of skin care of medical and surgical nurses. 250 questionnaires were distributed. 49% of respondent stated that they perform skin care at least 1–2 times/day. After hand-wash 15% of participants perform skin protection, after hand-disinfection only 2%. 40% give skin care products less than 3 minutes to be applied. It was shown that this knowledge is lacking in many individuals, leading to wrong behavior at work and insufficient use of skin protection and skin care products. BackgroundDermatitis of hands is a common and serious problem among nurses with reported prevalence ranging between 18 and 86% , , , , , . The condition mostly is related to wet work, hand washing and wearing of gloves , . During professional training prevalence of hand dermatitis increased from 7% in the first year to 23% in the fourth year among Korean nursing students . Similar results were found in Australia among nursing students .Development and prevention of dermatitis are dependent on the knowledge of healthcare workers on dangers of skin damage and possibilities of skin care . Although the relevance and great effectiveness of target orientated teaching campaigns is of no doubt , also regular use of hand creams can reduce the risk for dermatitis by almost 50% , . Despite this encouraging result, the advantage of barrier creams compared to bland emollients for skin protection is not clearly demonstrated and only scant literature exists on this issue , , , , , .The aim of this prospective questionnaire based survey was to analyze the practice of skin protection and skin care of nurses in surgical and internal wards, their integration</PlainText></TextGroup> and differentiation of both measures within hand hygiene and the inquiry of motivation for skin care. </Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Material and methods"> <MainHeadline>Material and methods</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The study was conducted at the medical, surgical, medical intensive and surgical intensive care units of a 950-bedded tertiary care university teaching hospital in Germany. An 8-item multiple-choice questionnaire was developed. It included demographic questions (age, gender, type of medical setting) and structured questions on skin care and motivation for this procedure (Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed among nursing staff.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Skin protection products were defined as products used before the contact to irritating substances, skin care products were defined as products used to support skin recovery. </Pgraph><Pgraph>For statistical analysis, categorical (discrete) variables were expressed as numbers (percentages) and compared using chi-square test or by Fisher’s exact test, respectively. All tests of significance were 2-tailed; P values of ≤.05 were considered significant.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Results"> <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><Pgraph>A total of 204/205 (81.2%) questionnaires were correctly filled out and returned. 179 (87.7%) of the respondents were female, and 25 (12.3%) male. 69 partici<TextGroup><PlainText>pants</PlainText></TextGroup> (33.8%) were between 20–29 years, 64 (31.3%) between 30–39 years, 47 (23.0%) between 40–49 years, 20 (9.8%) between 50–59 years, and 3 older than 60 years. Significantly more respondents from surgical wards (n=137; 67.1%) submitted the questionnaire than particip<TextGroup><PlainText>ants</PlainText></TextGroup> from medical wards (n=67; 32.9%), P<0.001. 68 questionnaires (33.3%) were obtained from surgical wards, 69 (33.8%) from surgical intensive units, 37 (18.2%) from medical wards, and 30 (14.7%) from medical intensive units. There was, however, no difference between participants from normal wards (n=105; 51.5%) and intensive care units (n=99; 48.5%), P=0.552. </Pgraph><Pgraph>100/204 (49%) respondent stated that they perform skin care at least 1–2 times per day. 9% (n=19) never apply skin care to their hands (Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). Almost 1/3 of healthcare workers use a combination of these products.</Pgraph><Pgraph>204 respondents gave a total of 276 answers to the question why they crème their hands. Almost 20% of respondents’ consider protective effects of skin care as the main objective for their action. 39% state that hands of healthcare workers are at risk of damage and therefore need additional care. 41% justify skin care because of dry and rough hands.</Pgraph><Pgraph>At the beginning of daily work, 28% of respondents perform skin care and protection. After hand washing 15% perform skin protection, while after hand disinfection only 2%. The main reason for using skin care or skin protection products was the feeling of dry and rough skin. Less than half of participants gave any answer to performance of skin care and skin protection at beginning of the working day and during the day. Of those, only 28% applied skin protection products. At the end of work, 1/3 did not use any product. Less than 10% always applied a skin care product before they work ends.</Pgraph><Pgraph>172 answered the question on the sequence of hand hygiene and hand protection measures. 65% practiced the sequence “hand washing – hand disinfection – using skin care products”. All others use skin care products before hand disinfection (35%). 40% of 128 respondents gave skin care products less than 3 minutes to be applied; almost 1/3 gave 3–6 minutes, and 1/4 more than <TextGroup><PlainText>6 minutes</PlainText></TextGroup> time.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Discussion"> <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Because the survey was anonymous, biased answers were minimized. This was confirmed by the fact that responses to different but similar questions were correct. When asked “How often do you cream your hands” (question no. 3) 9% stated that they never do. Consequently, also 9% responded they never cream their hands when asked about the timing (question no. 4). Our results indicate shortcomings to both, motivation for skin protection and skin care as well as on practical implementation. The finding of almost 10% of healthcare workers never using products for hand protection and care is alarming. Also, the frequency of 49% for hand care 1–2 times/day can not be considered sufficient. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Different reasons were stated for the application of skin care or skin protection products. The main reason was subjective feeling of dry and rough hands, which is plausible. This however, is not sufficient to achieve relev<TextGroup><PlainText>ant</PlainText></TextGroup> skin protection, as almost 20% of respondents did not state that protection of their skin is the main objective. Only 51% of the participants used a skin protection product, and only 28% did so at the beginning of work. The others used only skin care emollients.</Pgraph><Pgraph>One main reason for the high prevalence of occupational hand dermatitis is primarily the lack of knowledge. This includes knowledge on risk factors but also being able to identify early signs of dermatitis. Many light to moderate initial changes of the skin condition like dryness or discrete interdigitale eczema are often not taken seriously or are overlooked due to lack of knowledge <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. If the nursing staff recognized that eczematous skin condition of the hands are linked to their clinical work, then often it is not unusual to blame alcohol based hand disinfect<TextGroup><PlainText>ants</PlainText></TextGroup> as the triggering factor. Several studies, however, show clearly that alcohol based hand disinfectants are changing the physiological condition of the skin only in a minute fraction, yet by hand washing using detergents the skin condition is changed significantly <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Since in most hands disinfectants also include emollients, they additionally prevent drying and skin irritation simultaneously.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In addition to the importance of knowledge of the etiology of dermatitis <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, implementing measures to allow staff a correct skin protection and care during their clinical routine work is of great importance and must not be neglected <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>. Aside of including skin care and skin protection into hand hygiene standard operating procedures (SOPs), provision of an informative leaflet might be supporting this task. The main contents of such a leaflet could be information on the risk factors and the resulting consequences of dermatitis in healthcare settings.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, this study has shown that knowledge on healthcare related dermatitis is lacking at many individu<TextGroup><PlainText>als</PlainText></TextGroup>, possibly leading to wrong behavior at work and insufficient use of skin protection and skin care products. Regular teaching and better information might decrease the prevalence of dermatitis in nurses.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock linked="yes" name="Notes"> <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Conflicts of interest</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <References linked="yes"> <Reference refNo="1"> <RefAuthor>Larson E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Friedman C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cohran J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Treston-Aurand J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Green S</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on the hands of nurses</RefTitle> <RefYear>1997</RefYear> <RefJournal>Heart Lung</RefJournal> <RefPage>404-12</RefPage> <RefTotal>Larson E, Friedman C, Cohran J, Treston-Aurand J, Green S. Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on the hands of nurses. Heart Lung. 1997;26(5):404-12. DOI: 10.1016/S0147-9563(97)90027-3</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9563(97)90027-3</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="2"> <RefAuthor>Smit HA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Coenraads PJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lavrijsen AP</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nater JP</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire on hand dermatitis</RefTitle> <RefYear>1992</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>11-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Smit HA, Coenraads PJ, Lavrijsen AP, Nater JP. Evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire on hand dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00861.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00861.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="3"> <RefAuthor>Szepietowski JC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Salomon J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Hand dermatitis among nurses: the reasons and consequencies</RefTitle> <RefYear>2006</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>129-30</RefPage> <RefTotal>Szepietowski JC, Salomon J. Hand dermatitis among nurses: the reasons and consequencies. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;54(2):129-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00568.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00568.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="4"> <RefAuthor>Lampel HP</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Patel N</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Boyse K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>O'Brien SH</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zirwas MJ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevalence of hand dermatitis in inpatient nurses at a United States hospital</RefTitle> <RefYear>2007</RefYear> <RefJournal>Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>140-2</RefPage> <RefTotal>Lampel HP, Patel N, Boyse K, O'Brien SH, Zirwas MJ. Prevalence of hand dermatitis in inpatient nurses at a United States hospital. Dermatitis. 2007;18(3):140-2. DOI: 10.2310/6620.2007.06024</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.2310/6620.2007.06024</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="5"> <RefAuthor>Schürer NY</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Klippel U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schwanitz HJ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Secondary individual prevention of hand dermatitis in geriatric nurses</RefTitle> <RefYear>2005</RefYear> <RefJournal>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</RefJournal> <RefPage>149-57</RefPage> <RefTotal>Schürer NY, Klippel U, Schwanitz HJ. Secondary individual prevention of hand dermatitis in geriatric nurses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(2):149-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-004-0588-0</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0588-0</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="6"> <RefAuthor>Stingeni L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lapomarda V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lisi P</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Occupational hand dermatitis in hospital environments</RefTitle> <RefYear>1995</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>172-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P. Occupational hand dermatitis in hospital environments. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33(3):172-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00540.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00540.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="7"> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Effendy I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Happle R</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Die irritative Kontaktdermatitis</RefTitle> <RefYear>2000</RefYear> <RefJournal>Hautarzt</RefJournal> <RefPage>203-15</RefPage> <RefTotal>Löffler H, Effendy I, Happle R. Die irritative Kontaktdermatitis [Irritant contact dermatitis]. Hautarzt. 2000;51(3):203-15. DOI: 10.1007/s001050051023</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001050051023</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="8"> <RefAuthor>Smith DR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Choe MA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jeong JS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>An GJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chae YR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jeon MY</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Hand dermatitis among Korean nursing students</RefTitle> <RefYear>2006</RefYear> <RefJournal>Int J Nurs Pract</RefJournal> <RefPage>160-5</RefPage> <RefTotal>Smith DR, Choe MA, Jeong JS, An GJ, Chae YR, Jeon MY. Hand dermatitis among Korean nursing students. Int J Nurs Pract. 2006;12(3):160-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00564.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00564.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="9"> <RefAuthor>Smith DR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Leggat PA</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Hand dermatitis among female nursing students in tropical Australia</RefTitle> <RefYear>2004</RefYear> <RefJournal>Nurs Health Sci</RefJournal> <RefPage>109-13</RefPage> <RefTotal>Smith DR, Leggat PA. Hand dermatitis among female nursing students in tropical Australia. Nurs Health Sci. 2004;6(2):109-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00181.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00181.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="10"> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Effendy I</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevention of irritant contact dermatitis</RefTitle> <RefYear>2002</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eur J Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>4-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Löffler H, Effendy I. Prevention of irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2002;12(1):4-9.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="11"> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bruckner T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Diepgen T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Effendy I</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Primary prevention in health care employees: a prospective intervention study with a 3-year training period</RefTitle> <RefYear>2006</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>202-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Löffler H, Bruckner T, Diepgen T, Effendy I. Primary prevention in health care employees: a prospective intervention study with a 3-year training period. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;54(4):202-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00825.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00825.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="12"> <RefAuthor>Berndt U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wigger-Alberti W</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gabard B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Elsner P</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis</RefTitle> <RefYear>2000</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>77-80</RefPage> <RefTotal>Berndt U, Wigger-Alberti W, Gabard B, Elsner P. Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42(2):77-80. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042002077.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042002077.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="13"> <RefAuthor>Cormick RD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Buchman TL</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Maki DG</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Double-blind, randomized trial of scheduled use of a novel barrier cream and an oil-containing lotion for protecting the hands of health care workers</RefTitle> <RefYear>2000</RefYear> <RefJournal>Am J Infect Control</RefJournal> <RefPage>302-10</RefPage> <RefTotal>Cormick RD, Buchman TL, Maki DG. Double-blind, randomized trial of scheduled use of a novel barrier cream and an oil-containing lotion for protecting the hands of health care workers. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(4):302-10. DOI: 10.1067/mic.2000.107425</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mic.2000.107425</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="14"> <RefAuthor>Lewis-Byers K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Thayer D</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>An evaluation of two incontinence skin care protocols in a long-term care setting</RefTitle> <RefYear>2002</RefYear> <RefJournal>Ostomy Wound Manage</RefJournal> <RefPage>44-51</RefPage> <RefTotal>Lewis-Byers K, Thayer D. An evaluation of two incontinence skin care protocols in a long-term care setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48(12):44-51.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="15"> <RefAuthor>zur Mühlen A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Klotz A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Allef P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Weimans S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Veeger M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Thörner B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Eichler JO</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Using skin models to assess the effects of a pre-work cream. Methodological aspects and perspective of the industry</RefTitle> <RefYear>2007</RefYear> <RefJournal>Curr Probl Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>19-32</RefPage> <RefTotal>zur Mühlen A, Klotz A, Allef P, Weimans S, Veeger M, Thörner B, Eichler JO. Using skin models to assess the effects of a pre-work cream. Methodological aspects and perspective of the industry. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2007;34:19-32. DOI: 10.1159/000099601</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000099601</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="16"> <RefAuthor>Teichmann A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jacobi U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Waibler E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sterry W</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lademann J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>An in vivo model to evaluate the efficacy of barrier creams on the level of skin penetration of chemicals</RefTitle> <RefYear>2006</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>5-13</RefPage> <RefTotal>Teichmann A, Jacobi U, Waibler E, Sterry W, Lademann J. An in vivo model to evaluate the efficacy of barrier creams on the level of skin penetration of chemicals. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;54(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00749.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00749.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="17"> <RefAuthor>Zhai H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Maibach HI</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Barrier creams – skin protectants: can you protect skin?</RefTitle> <RefYear>2002</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Cosmet Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>20-3</RefPage> <RefTotal>Zhai H, Maibach HI. Barrier creams – skin protectants: can you protect skin? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2002;1(1):20-3.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="25"> <RefAuthor>Hübner NO</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Große-Schütte K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Assadian O</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kramer A</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>The effects of skin protection cream on the effectiveness of hygienic hand disinfection and the implications for practicing hand disinfection</RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefJournal>BMC Inf Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Hübner NO, Große-Schütte K, Assadian O, Löffler H, Kramer A. The effects of skin protection cream on the effectiveness of hygienic hand disinfection and the implications for practicing hand disinfection. BMC Inf Dis. (submitted).</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="18"> <RefAuthor>Schwanitz HJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Uter W</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Interdigital dermatitis: sentinel skin damage in hairdressers</RefTitle> <RefYear>2000</RefYear> <RefJournal>Br J Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>1011-2</RefPage> <RefTotal>Schwanitz HJ, Uter W. Interdigital dermatitis: sentinel skin damage in hairdressers. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(5):1011-2. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03487.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03487.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="19"> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kampf G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schmermund D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Maibach HI</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>How irritant is alcohol?</RefTitle> <RefYear>2007</RefYear> <RefJournal>Br J Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>74-81</RefPage> <RefTotal>Löffler H, Kampf G, Schmermund D, Maibach HI. How irritant is alcohol? Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(1):74-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07944.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07944.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="20"> <RefAuthor>Slotosch CM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kampf G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation</RefTitle> <RefYear>2007</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>235-41</RefPage> <RefTotal>Slotosch CM, Kampf G, Löffler H. Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(4):235-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01200.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01200.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="21"> <RefAuthor>Pedersen LK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Held E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Johansen JD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Agner T</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Short-term effects of alcohol-based disinfectant and detergent on skin irritation</RefTitle> <RefYear>2005</RefYear> <RefJournal>Contact Dermatitis</RefJournal> <RefPage>82-7</RefPage> <RefTotal>Pedersen LK, Held E, Johansen JD, Agner T. Short-term effects of alcohol-based disinfectant and detergent on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;52(2):82-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00504.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00504.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="22"> <RefAuthor>Pedersen LK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Held E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Johansen JD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Agner T</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection</RefTitle> <RefYear>2005</RefYear> <RefJournal>Br J Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>1142-6</RefPage> <RefTotal>Pedersen LK, Held E, Johansen JD, Agner T. Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(6):1142-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06875.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06875.x</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="23"> <RefAuthor>Löffler H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dickel H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bruckner T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Effendy I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Happle R</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Skin changes in geriatric nurses prior to training heralding a particular risk of hand dermatitis</RefTitle> <RefYear>2002</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eur J Dermatol</RefJournal> <RefPage>452-4</RefPage> <RefTotal>Löffler H, Dickel H, Bruckner T, Effendy I, Happle R. Skin changes in geriatric nurses prior to training heralding a particular risk of hand dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2002;12(5):452-4.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="24"> <RefAuthor>Weisshaar E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Radulescu M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bock M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Albrecht U</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zimmermann E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Diepgen TL</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Hautschutzseminare zur sekundaren Individual- prävention bei Beschäftigten in Gesundheitsberufen: erste Ergebnisse nach über 2-jahriger Durchführung</RefTitle> <RefYear>2005</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Dtsch Dermatol Ges</RefJournal> <RefPage>33-8</RefPage> <RefTotal>Weisshaar E, Radulescu M, Bock M, Albrecht U, Zimmermann E, Diepgen TL. Hautschutzseminare zur sekundaren Individual- prävention bei Beschäftigten in Gesundheitsberufen: erste Ergebnisse nach über 2-jähriger Durchführung [Skin protection and skin disease prevention courses for secondary prevention in health care workers: first results after two years of implementation]. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005;3(1):33-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0353.2005.04798.x</RefTotal> <RefLink>http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0353.2005.04798.x</RefLink> </Reference> </References> <Media> <Tables> <Table format="png"> <MediaNo>1</MediaNo> <MediaID>1</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Structured questions of the 8-item multiple choice questionnaire together with responses</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Table> <NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables> </Tables> <Figures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </Figures> <InlineFigures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </InlineFigures> <Attachments> <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments> </Attachments> </Media> </OrigData> </GmsArticle>