<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE GmsArticle SYSTEM "http://www.egms.de/dtd/2.0.34/GmsArticle.dtd">
<GmsArticle xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>zma001663</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/zma001663</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0016634</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType language="en">article</ArticleType>
    <ArticleType language="de">Artikel</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">On the correlation between gratitude and resilience in medical students</Title>
      <TitleTranslated language="de">&#220;ber den Zusammenhang von Dankbarkeit und Resilienz bei Medizinstudierenden</TitleTranslated>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Hahn</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Hahn</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Nicolai</Firstname>
          <Initials>N</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Witten&#47;Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Witten, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke, Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Gesundheit, Lehrstuhl f&#252;r die Ausbildung personaler und interpersonaler Kompetenzen im Gesundheitswesen, Witten, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>nicolai.hahn&#64;uni-wh.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Brzoska</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Brzoska</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Patrick</Firstname>
          <Initials>P</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Prof. Dr.</AcademicTitle>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Witten&#47;Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Health Services Research, Witten, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke, Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Gesundheit, Lehrstuhl f&#252;r Versorgungsforschung, Witten, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>patrick.brzoska&#64;uni-wh.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Kiessling</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Kiessling</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Claudia</Firstname>
          <Initials>C</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Prof. Dr.</AcademicTitle>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">Witten&#47;Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany<Affiliation>Witten&#47;Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Witten, Germany</Affiliation></Address>
        <Address language="de">Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke, Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Gesundheit, Lehrstuhl f&#252;r die Ausbildung personaler und interpersonaler Kompetenzen im Gesundheitswesen, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448 Witten, Deutschland<Affiliation>Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke, Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Gesundheit, Lehrstuhl f&#252;r die Ausbildung personaler und interpersonaler Kompetenzen im Gesundheitswesen, Witten, Deutschland</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>claudia.kiessling&#64;uni-wh.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">gratitude</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">resilience</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">optimism</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">resilience factors</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">medical studies</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">mental health</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Dankbarkeit</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Resilienz</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Optimismus</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Resilienzfaktoren</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Medizinstudium</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">mentale Gesundheit</Keyword>
      <SectionHeading language="en">gratitude and resilience</SectionHeading>
      <SectionHeading language="de">Dankbarkeit und Resilienz</SectionHeading>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DateReceived>20230503</DateReceived>
    <DateRevised>20230820</DateRevised>
    <DateAccepted>20231114</DateAccepted>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20240215</DatePublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <LanguageTranslation>germ</LanguageTranslation>
    <License license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
      <AltText language="en">This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</AltText>
      <AltText language="de">Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).</AltText>
    </License>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>2366-5017</ISSN>
        <Volume>41</Volume>
        <Issue>1</Issue>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Journal for Medical Education</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS J Med Educ</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>8</ArticleNo>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="de" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Zielsetzung:</Mark1> Die Gesundheit und Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden sind seit einigen Jahren zunehmend Gegenstand der aktuellen Forschung. Zur St&#228;rkung der Resilienz oder ihrer bekannten oder vermuteten Einflussfaktoren werden eine Vielzahl von Interventionen empfohlen, wobei die Literatur zeigt, dass die Evidenzlage zur Wirksamkeit der Interventionen uneindeutig ist. Die vorliegende Studie untersuchte, ob Dankbarkeit ein direkter Schutzfaktor f&#252;r Resilienz bei Medizinstudierenden ist oder ob Resilienzfaktoren (Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeit, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung) sowie Stress Effekte von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz vermitteln.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methodik: </Mark1>An der Studie nahmen 90 Medizinstudierende der Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke teil, deren Dankbarkeit, Resilienz, Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeit, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung und Stresslevel mit Hilfe von validierten Frageb&#246;gen (GQ-6, RS-25, LOT-R, SWE, F-SozU, PSS) ermittelt wurden. Korrelationen wurden mittels Pearson-Korrelationskoeffizienten analysiert. Zus&#228;tzlich wurden eine multivariate Regressionsanalyse und eine Pfadanalyse berechnet, um direkte und indirekte Auswirkungen von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz zu ermitteln.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ergebnisse: </Mark1>Die multivariate Regressionsanalyse zeigte, dass lediglich Optimismus, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung und Stress signifikant mit Resilienz assoziiert sind (B&#61;0,48, 95&#37;-KI: 0,31-0,66; B&#61;0,23, 95&#37;-KI: 0,01; 0,44 bzw. B&#61;-0,02, 95&#37;-KI: -0,03; -0,001). Der direkte Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz war in der Pfadanalyse minimal und nicht signifikant. Es zeigte sich allerdings ein indirekter Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz (B&#61;0,321; p&#60;0,05). F&#252;r diesen Effekt war haupts&#228;chlich die Mediation &#252;ber die Variable Optimismus verantwortlich (indirekter Effekt B&#61;0,197; p&#60;0,05).</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Schlussfolgerung: </Mark1>Die vorliegende Studie zeigt, dass Dankbarkeit nur einen minimalen direkten Einfluss auf Resilienz hat. Die Ergebnisse weisen allerdings darauf hin, dass Optimismus als vermittelnder Faktor die Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden st&#228;rkt. Vor diesem Hintergrund k&#246;nnte es sinnvoll sein, Interventionen, die eine optimistische Grundhaltung f&#246;rdern, ins Medizinstudium zu integrieren, um damit die mentale Gesundheit zuk&#252;nftiger &#196;rzt&#42;innen langfristig zu st&#228;rken. </Pgraph></Abstract>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Objective: </Mark1>Medical students&#8217; health and resilience have increasingly been the subject of current research in recent years. A variety of interventions are recommended to strengthen resilience or its known or suspected influencing factors, although the literature shows that the evidence on the effectiveness of the interventions is inconsistent. The present study investigated whether gratitude is a direct protective factor for resilience in medical students or whether resilience factors (optimism, self-efficacy, social support) and stress mediate the effects of gratitude on resilience.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methods:</Mark1> 90 medical students at Witten&#47;Herdecke University took part in the study that determined their gratitude, resilience, optimism, self-efficacy, social support and stress levels using validated questionnaires (GQ-6, RS-25, LOT-R, SWE, F-SozU, PSS). Correlations were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients. In addition, a multivariate regression analysis and a path analysis were calculated to determine the direct and indirect effects of gratitude on resilience.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Results: </Mark1>Multivariate regression analysis showed that only optimism, social support and stress were significantly associated with resilience (B&#61;0.48, 95&#37; CI: 0.31, 0.66; B&#61;0.23, 95&#37; CI: 0.01, 0.44 and B&#61;-0.02, 95&#37; CI: -0.03, -0.001, respectively). The direct effect of gratitude on resilience was minimal and not significant in the path analysis. However, there was an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience (B&#61;0.321; p&#60;0.05). Mediation via the optimism variable was mainly responsible for this effect (indirect effect B&#61;0.197; p&#60;0.05).</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Conclusion:</Mark1> This study shows that gratitude has only a minimal direct influence on resilience. However, results indicate that optimism as a mediating factor strengthens the resilience of medical students. Against this background, it may be useful to integrate interventions that promote an optimistic attitude into medical studies in order to strengthen the mental health of future doctors in the long term. </Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="1. Introduction and objectives">
      <MainHeadline>1. Introduction and objectives</MainHeadline><Pgraph>It has been known for decades that stress and strain during medical studies can lead to states of exhaustion and serious illnesses <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Medical students worldwide are, for example, more than twice as likely to suffer from depression or depressive symptoms compared to the general population <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. This also applies to medical students in Germany <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Research findings also indicate that medical students are exposed to higher levels of psychological stress than students of other disciplines <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. Further data shows that mental health deteriorates during medical studies and continues to decline on average when students enter professional life <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. Physicians&#8217; mental health usually does not stabilize with increasing professional experience, so that the prevalence of depression, stress and suicide is also higher in this group than in the general population <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. It is also known that medical doctors&#8217; mental health has a direct impact on patients&#8217; health <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. Therefore, it seems sensible to find ways to positively influence students&#8217; mental health as early as during medical school. The concept of resilience could play a key role here. Resilience refers to the ability to successfully adapt to acute stress, trauma or chronic stress and to remain healthy despite negative stressors, such as stressful events <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Studies have shown that people with a high level of resilience are less depressed, fall ill less often and also recover more quickly after illness than people with a low level of resilience <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>. Resilience is considered to be something that can be learned, changed and trained throughout life <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, based on the neuroplasticity of the human brain <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Against this background, interventions that can strengthen resilience are of particular interest, as they can make a lasting contribution to maintaining health. However, according to a Cochrane Review, interventions that aim to strengthen resilience show inconsistent evidence regarding their effectiveness <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. On the other hand, promoting so-called resilience factors can have an effective influence on resilience <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. These are psychological and social resources that have a positive effect on resilience <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. They include, for example, the experience of positive emotions <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, optimism <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, hope <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, a sense of coherence <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, self-efficacy <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, and social support <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. Resilience factors in medical students have also been investigated in a number of studies <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>. These resilience factors are closely related to the concept of gratitude, as gratitude can have a positive influence on resilience factors <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>. Gratitude has only been systematically investigated in medical-psychological research for around 20 years, and there are various definitions of gratitude <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>. For example, gratitude is conceptualized as an emotion, attitude, virtue or character trait <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>. One of the most widely used definitions and conceptualizations of gratitude comes from the American psychologists Michael McCullough and Robert A. Emmons. According to them, gratitude means perceiving the benevolence of another person or the environment and reacting to the resulting experience with positive emotions <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Assuming that resilience factors have a protective effect on resilience and that gratitude in turn has positive effects on these resilience factors, the present study aims to test the hypothesis that gratitude acts as a predictor of resilience in medical students and that the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy expectation and social support mediate indirect effects of gratitude on resilience. These resilience factors were selected because they are considered to be very well researched and also cover the spectrum of personal and interpersonal protective factors <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>. Although individual studies show that gratitude is a predictor of resilience <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>, it remains unclear whether the results are also transferable to other populations or whether the effect is mediated by other variables.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="1. Einleitung und Zielsetzung">
      <MainHeadline>1. Einleitung und Zielsetzung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Seit Jahrzehnten ist bekannt, dass Stress und Belastungen im Medizinstudium zu Ersch&#246;pfungszust&#228;nden und ernsthaften Erkrankungen f&#252;hren k&#246;nnen <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Medizinstudierende weltweit leiden beispielsweise mehr als doppelt so h&#228;ufig an Depressionen oder depressiver Symptomatik im Vergleich zur Allgemeinbev&#246;lkerung <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Dies gilt auch f&#252;r Medizinstudierende in Deutschland <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Auch im Vergleich zu Studierenden anderer Fachrichtungen, deuten Forschungsergebnisse darauf hin, dass Medizinstudierende einer h&#246;heren psychischen Belastung ausgesetzt sind <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. Weitere Daten zeigen, dass sich die psychische Gesundheit w&#228;hrend des Medizinstudiums verschlechtert und im Durchschnitt weiter abnimmt, wenn Studierende ins Berufsleben eintreten <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. Eine Stabilisierung der mentalen Gesundheit von &#196;rzt&#42;innen mit zunehmender Berufserfahrung ist nicht abzusehen, sodass auch in dieser Gruppe die Pr&#228;valenz von Depression, Stress und Suizid im Vergleich zur Allgemeinbev&#246;lkerung erh&#246;ht ist <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. Es ist au&#223;erdem bekannt, dass die mentale Gesundheit von &#196;rzt&#42;innen einen unmittelbaren Einfluss auf die Gesundheit der Patient&#42;innen hat <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. Daher erscheint es sinnvoll, schon im Medizinstudium Wege zu finden, pr&#228;ventiv die mentale Gesundheit von Studierenden positiv zu beeinflussen. Das Konzept der Resilienz k&#246;nnte hier eine Schl&#252;sselrolle spielen. Resilienz bezeichnet die F&#228;higkeit, sich erfolgreich an akuten Stress, Traumata oder chronische Belastung anzupassen und trotz negativer Stressoren, wie belastenden Ereignissen, gesund zu bleiben <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Studien zeigen, dass Menschen mit einer hohen Resilienz weniger depressiv sind, seltener erkranken und sich auch nach Krankheiten schneller erholen als Menschen mit geringer Auspr&#228;gung <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>. Resilienz gilt als lebenslang erlernbar, ver&#228;nderbar und trainierbar <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>. Dies wird mit der Neuroplastizit&#228;t des menschlichen Gehirns begr&#252;ndet <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Vor diesem Hintergrund sind Ma&#223;nahmen, die die Resilienz st&#228;rken k&#246;nnen, von besonderem Interesse, da sie nachhaltig zur Gesunderhaltung beitragen k&#246;nnen. Interventionen, die darauf abzielen, die Resilienz zu st&#228;rken, zeigen laut eines Cochrane Reviews allerdings eine uneinheitliche Evidenz hinsichtlich ihrer Wirksamkeit <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. Die Resilienz wirksam beeinflussen kann hingegen die F&#246;rderung sogenannter Resilienzfaktoren <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. Darunter versteht man psychische und soziale Ressourcen, die sich positiv auf die Resilienz auswirken <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. Zu ihnen geh&#246;ren beispielsweise das Erleben positiver Emotionen <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, Optimismus <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, Hoffnung <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, das Koh&#228;renzgef&#252;hl <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink> und soziale Unterst&#252;tzung <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. Resilienzfaktoren wurden ebenfalls bei Medizinstudierenden in einer Reihe von Studien untersucht <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>. Diese Resilienzfaktoren stehen in engem Zusammenhang mit dem Konzept der Dankbarkeit, da Dankbarkeit einen positiven Einfluss auf die Resilienzfaktoren haben kann <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>. Dankbarkeit wird in der medizinisch-psychologischen Forschung erst seit etwa 20 Jahren systematisch erforscht, und es existieren verschiedene Dankbarkeitsdefinitionen <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>. So wird Dankbarkeit u.a. als Emotion, Haltung, Tugend oder Charakterzug konzeptualisiert <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>. Eine der meistverwendeten Definitionen und Konzeptualisierungen von Dankbarkeit stammt von den amerikanischen Psychologen Michael McCullough und Robert A. Emmons. Dankbarkeit bedeutet demnach, das Wohlwollen eines anderen Menschen oder der Umwelt wahrzunehmen und auf die daraus entstandene Erfahrung mit positiven Emotionen zu reagieren <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Unter der Annahme, dass Resilienzfaktoren eine protektive Wirkung auf Resilienz haben und Dankbarkeit wiederum positive Effekte auf diese Resilienzfaktoren hat, soll im Rahmen der vorliegenden Studie die Hypothese gepr&#252;ft werden, dass Dankbarkeit als Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz bei Medizinstudierenden fungiert und dass die Resilienzfaktoren Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und soziale Unterst&#252;tzung indirekte Effekte von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz vermitteln. Diese Resilienzfaktoren wurden ausgew&#228;hlt, da sie zum einen als sehr gut erforscht gelten und zum anderen das Spektrum personaler und interpersonaler Schutzfaktoren gut abdecken <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>. Obwohl einzelne Studien zeigen, dass Dankbarkeit ein Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz ist <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>, bleibt unklar, ob die Ergebnisse auch auf andere Populationen &#252;bertragbar sind oder ob der Effekt nicht durch andere Drittvariablen mediiert wird.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="2. Methodology">
      <MainHeadline>2. Methodology</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>2.1. Setting </SubHeadline><Pgraph>We conducted a cross-sectional survey with medical students at Witten&#47;Herdecke University (UW&#47;H) in the preclinical phase of their studies (semesters 2-4). They were approached personally in seminars and asked to participate voluntarily via the internal e-mail distribution list. Of 176 possible participants, 94 took part in the study (response rate&#61;53.4&#37;). The survey took place in December 2019 and June 2020. The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Witten&#47;Herdecke University (application number: 187&#47;2019).  </Pgraph><SubHeadline>2.2. Instruments </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Gratitude was measured using the German version of the Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-6) <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>, one of the most frequently used questionnaires to survey this construct <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>. It consists of six items, each with a seven-point response format ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Mean values were calculated (values between 1 and 7). The original scale has a high internal consistency, with a Cronbach&#8217;s alpha of 0.82 <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The German translation of the RS-25 resilience scale by Wagnild &#38; Young <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink> was used to measure resilience <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>. The scale has shown to be a valid instrument for measuring resilience <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink> and is the most widely used scale to assess resilience <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. The instrument comprises 25 items, which are rated from 1 (No, I disagree) to 7 (Yes, I completely agree). The resilience scale is divided into two subscales: &#8220;personal competence&#8221; (17 items) and &#8220;acceptance of self and life&#8221; (8 items) <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. The total scale was used in this study (mean values between 1 and 7). The internal consistency of the German Resilience Scale (RS-25) is high, with a Cronbach&#8217;s &#945;&#61;0.94 <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The German revised version of the Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) was used to measure the tendency towards dispositional optimism <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>. The Life Orientation Test contains a total of ten items: three positively formulated items in terms of optimism; three negatively formulated items in terms of pessimism and four filler items; all items have a seven-point response format ranging from &#8220;strongly disagree&#8221; (1) to &#8220;strongly agree&#8221; (7). In the present study, mean values were calculated for the assessment of optimism (values between 1 and 7). The internal consistency of the German version of the Life Orientation Test is &#945;&#61;0.59 for the overall scale <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Self-efficacy expectations were measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>. The questionnaire comprises ten items, which are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Mean values were calculated (values between 1 and 4). The scale for measuring SES shows an acceptable internal consistency of Cronbach&#8217;s &#945;&#61;0.78 <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The questionnaire on social support (F-SozU; <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink>) was used to determine the level of social support. The short form of the questionnaire was used (K14; <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>), which consist of 14 items with a five-point response format from 1 (Does not apply) to 5 (Applies exactly) (mean values between 1 and 5). The short form (K14) of the questionnaire on social support shows very good internal consistency with a Cronbach&#8217;s alpha of 0.94 <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Stress was measured using the German translation of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>. The questionnaire comprises ten questions, which are assessed by means of a five-point response format from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). The stress scale is divided into two subscales, the &#8220;helplessness&#8221; scale on the one hand and the &#8220;self-efficacy&#8221; scale on the other. In the present study, total values were calculated (values between 10 and 50). The internal consistency of the stress scale is high and lies between &#945;&#61;0.79 and 0.89 <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>2.3. Data analysis</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Individual questionnaires were first analyzed descriptively at the level of the overall scales. In addition, the internal consistency (Cronbach&#8217;s alpha) for the study population was determined for each scale (see table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). To answer the research questions, a bivariate correlation (Pearson&#8217;s correlation coefficients) and a multivariate regression were calculated <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>. A path analysis was carried out to examine the indirect effects of gratitude on resilience <TextLink reference="59"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="60"></TextLink>. The significance level was set at &#945;&#61;0.05 for all analyses. Data analysis was performed using the IBM Statistics SPSS program version 26 and R&#47;lavaan 0.6-3 <TextLink reference="61"></TextLink>. Four questionnaires were incomplete or incorrectly filled in. These values were not included in the data analysis. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="2. Methodik">
      <MainHeadline>2. Methodik</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>2.1. Setting </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Bei der durchgef&#252;hrten Studie handelt es sich um eine Querschnittserhebung. Untersucht wurden Medizinstudierende der Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke (UW&#47;H) im vorklinischen Studienabschnitt (Semester 2-4). Diese wurden durch pers&#246;nliche Ansprache in Seminaren sowie einen Aufruf &#252;ber den internen E-Mail-Verteiler zur freiwilligen Teilnahme gebeten. Von 176 m&#246;glichen Proband&#42;innen nahmen 94 an der Studie teil (R&#252;cklaufquote&#61;53,4&#37;). Die Erhebung fand im Dezember 2019 und Juni 2020 statt. Die Studie wurde durch die Ethikkommission der Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke gepr&#252;ft (Antragsnummer: 187&#47;2019).  </Pgraph><SubHeadline>2.2. Instrumente </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Dankbarkeit wurde mit dem Dankbarkeitsfragebogen GQ-6 <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink> in der deutschen &#220;bersetzung <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink> gemessen, einem der am h&#228;ufigsten genutzten Frageb&#246;gen zur Erhebung dieses Konstrukts <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>. Er besteht aus sechs Items mit einem jeweils siebenstufigen Antwortformat von 1 (lehne stark ab) bis 7 (stimme stark zu). Es wurden Mittelwerte gebildet (Werte zwischen 1 und 7). Die Original-Skala hat eine hohe interne Konsistenz, mit Cronbachs Alpha von &#945;&#61;0,82 <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Zur Erfassung der Resilienz wurde die Resilienzskala RS-25 von Wagnild &#38; Young <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink> in der deutschen &#220;bersetzung verwendet <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>. Die Skala hat sich als valides Instrument zur Messung der Resilienz etabliert <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink> und ist die weltweit meistverwendete Resilienzskala <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. Das Instrument umfasst 25 Items, die von 1 (Nein, ich stimme nicht zu) bis 7 (Ja, ich stimme v&#246;llig zu) bewertet werden. Die Resilienzskala ist in zwei Subskalen unterteilt: &#8222;Pers&#246;nliche Kompetenz&#8220; (17 Items) und &#8222;Akzeptanz des Selbst und des Lebens&#8220; (8 Items) <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. In dieser Arbeit wurde die Gesamtskala verwendet (Mittelwerte zwischen 1 und 7). Die interne Konsistenz der deutschen Resilienzskala (RS-25) ist mit einem Cronbachs &#945;&#61;0,94 als sehr gut einzusch&#228;tzen <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die deutsche revidierte Version des Life-Orientation-Tests (LOT-R) wurde eingesetzt, um die Neigung zum dispositionellen Optimismus zu messen <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>. Der Life-Orientation-Test enth&#228;lt insgesamt zehn Items: drei positiv formulierte im Sinne von Optimismus; drei negativ formulierte im Sinne von Pessimismus und vier F&#252;llitems; alle Items haben jeweils ein siebenstufiges Antwortformat von &#8222;trifft &#252;berhaupt nicht zu&#8220; (1) bis &#8222;trifft ausgesprochen zu&#8220; (7). In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden zur Einsch&#228;tzung des Optimismus Mittelwerte gebildet (Werte zwischen 1 und 7). Die interne Konsistenz betr&#228;gt in der deutschen Version des Life-Orientation-Tests &#945;&#61;0,59 f&#252;r die Gesamtskala <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung wurde mit der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung gemessen (SWE; <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>). Der Fragebogen umfasst zehn Items, die von 1 (Stimmt nicht) bis 4 (Stimmt genau) bewertet werden. Es wurden Mittelwerte gebildet (Werte zwischen 1 und 4). Die Skala zur Messung der SWE zeigt eine akzeptable interne Konsistenz von Cronbachs Alpha&#61;0,78 <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Mit dem Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterst&#252;tzung (F-SozU; <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink>) wurde das Ma&#223; an sozialer Unterst&#252;tzung ermittelt. Bei dem Fragebogen handelt es sich um die Kurzform (K14; <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>) mit einer f&#252;nfstufigen Likert-Skala von 1 (Trifft nicht zu) bis 5 (Trifft genau zu) (Mittelwerte zwischen 1 und 5). Die Kurzform (K14) des Fragebogens zur sozialen Unterst&#252;tzung zeigt eine sehr gute interne Konsistenz mit einem Cronbachs Alpha von 0,94 <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Stress wurde mit der Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>) in der deutschen &#220;bersetzung gemessen <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>. Der Fragebogen umfasst zehn Fragen, die auf einem f&#252;nfstufigen Antwortformat von 1 (Nie) bis 5 (Sehr oft) eingesch&#228;tzt werden. Die Stressskala ist in zwei Subskalen unterteilt, zum einen in die Skala &#8222;Hilflosigkeit&#8220; und zum anderen in die Skala &#8222;Selbstwirksamkeit&#8220;. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden Summenwerte gebildet (Werte zwischen 10 und 50). Die interne Konsistenz der Stressskala ist hoch und liegt zwischen &#945;&#61;0,79 bis 0,89 <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>2.3. Datenanalyse</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die einzelnen Frageb&#246;gen wurden zun&#228;chst deskriptiv auf Ebene der Gesamtskalen ausgewertet. Zudem wurde f&#252;r jede Gesamtskala die interne Konsistenz (Cronbachs Alpha) f&#252;r die Studienpopulation bestimmt (vgl. Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). Zur Beantwortung der Fragestellungen wurden zun&#228;chst eine bivariate Korrelationsanalyse (Korrelationskoeffizienten nach Pearson) sowie eine multivariate Regressionsanalyse berechnet <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>. Um eine Aussage &#252;ber indirekte Effekte von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz zu erhalten, wurde eine Pfadanalyse durchgef&#252;hrt <TextLink reference="59"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="60"></TextLink>. Das Signifikanzniveau wurde bei allen Auswertungen auf &#945;&#61;0,05 festgelegt. Die Datenauswertung erfolgte mit dem Programm IBM Statistics SPSS in der Version 26 und R&#47;lavaan 0.6-3 <TextLink reference="61"></TextLink>. Vier Frageb&#246;gen waren unvollst&#228;ndig oder fehlerhaft ausgef&#252;llt. Diese Werte flossen nicht in die Datenanalyse ein. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="3. Results">
      <MainHeadline>3. Results</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>3.1. Sample and descriptive statistics</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The study included 90 medical students, of these 30 were male (33.3&#37;) and 60 were female (66.7&#37;). Descriptive statistics of the individual scales are shown in table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>. Internal consistencies (Cronbach&#8217;s &#945;) are high in each case and lie between 0.78 and 0.90. Only the &#8220;optimism&#8221; scale has an internal consistency of &#945;&#61;0.62, which can be considered comparatively low.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>3.2. Correlation analysis</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients of the scales are shown in table 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>. Both gratitude and resilience correlated weakly to moderately with all other scales included in the study. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>3.3. Multivariate regression analysis </SubHeadline><Pgraph>A multivariate regression was performed to examine how strongly the variables gratitude, optimism, self-efficacy expectation, social support, and stress predict resilience in the study population. The model statistically significantly predicted resilience (F(5.84)&#61;22.44, p&#60;0.001, R<Superscript>2</Superscript>&#61;0.572). The variables optimism, social support, and stress each contributed statistically significantly to the prediction (p&#60;0.05). Gratitude showed only a minimal and non-significant effect on resilience. Optimism showed the strongest significant correlation with resilience (see table 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>). The inclusion of gender as a confounder showed no significant effect on resilience and had no effect on the correlation of the other variables.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>3.4. Path analysis</SubHeadline><Pgraph>A path analysis was also carried out to examine whether the effect of gratitude on resilience is overlaid by other variables and whether gratitude has an indirect effect on resilience via resilience factors or (reduced) stress. In this analysis, gratitude was selected as the independent variable, resilience as the dependent variable and optimism, self-efficacy expectation, social support and stress as mediators. The results showed that the indirect effect of gratitude on resilience &#8211; mediated by social support, optimism, stress and self-efficacy &#8211; (total indirect effect B&#61;0.315) is statistically significant (p&#60;0.05). It was found that the variable optimism was mainly responsible for this effect (indirect effect B&#61;0.192, p&#60;0.05). All other variables were not statistically significant. This result suggests an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience, mainly mediated by the variable optimism. Adjusting for gender had little overall impact on the effects (see figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>).</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="3. Ergebnisse">
      <MainHeadline>3. Ergebnisse</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>3.1. Stichprobe und deskriptive Statistik</SubHeadline><Pgraph>In die Studie wurden 90 Medizinstudierende eingeschlossen; 30 von ihnen waren m&#228;nnlich (33,3&#37;) und 60 weiblich (66,7&#37;). Die deskriptive Statistik der einzelnen Skalen ist in Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/> dargestellt. Die internen Konsistenzen (Cronbachs &#945;) waren jeweils hoch und lagen zwischen 0,78 und 0,90. Lediglich die Skala &#8222;Optimismus&#8220; hat eine interne Konsistenz von &#945;&#61;0,62, was als vergleichsweise niedrig einzusch&#228;tzen ist.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>3.2. Korrelationsanalysen</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die bivariaten Pearson&#8217;s-Korrelationskoeffizienten der in die Studie eingeschlossenen Skalen sind in Tabelle 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/> dargestellt. Sowohl Dankbarkeit als auch Resilienz korrelierten schwach bis moderat mit allen weiteren in die Studie eingeschlossenen Skalen. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>3.3. Multivariate Regressionsanalyse </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Es wurde eine multivariate Regression durchgef&#252;hrt, um zu untersuchen, wie stark die Variablen Dankbarkeit, Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung und Stress die Resilienz der Studienpopulation vorhersagen. Das Modell sagt statistisch signifikant die Resilienz voraus (F(5,84)&#61;22,44, p&#60;0,001, R<Superscript>2</Superscript>&#61;0,572). Die Variablen Optimismus, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung und Stress trugen dabei jeweils statistisch signifikant zur Vorhersage bei (p&#60;0,05). Dankbarkeit zeigte nur einen minimalen und nicht signifikanten Effekt auf Resilienz. Optimismus zeigte den st&#228;rksten signifikanten Zusammenhang mit Resilienz (siehe Tabelle 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>). Die Aufnahme des Geschlechts als Confounder zeigte keine signifikanten Auswirkungen auf die Resilienz und wirkte sich auch auf den Zusammenhang der anderen Variablen nicht aus.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>3.4. Pfadanalyse</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Um zu pr&#252;fen, ob der Einfluss von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz durch andere Variablen &#252;berlagert wird, und Dankbarkeit &#252;ber Resilienzfaktoren oder (reduzierten) Stress einen indirekten Effekt auf Resilienz hat, wurde im Weiteren eine Pfadanalyse durchgef&#252;hrt. In dieser wurden Dankbarkeit als unabh&#228;ngige, Resilienz als abh&#228;ngige Variable und Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung und Stress als Mediatoren gew&#228;hlt. Im Ergebnis zeigte sich, dass der indirekte Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz &#8211; vermittelt &#252;ber soziale Unterst&#252;tzung, Optimismus, Stress und Selbstwirksamkeit &#8211; (gesamter indirekter Effekt B&#61;0,315) statistisch signifikant ist (p&#60;0,05). Es zeigte sich, dass f&#252;r diesen Effekt haupts&#228;chlich die Variable Optimismus verantwortlich war (indirekter Effekt B&#61;0,192, p&#60;0,05). Alle anderen Variablen waren statistisch nicht signifikant. Dieses Ergebnis spricht daf&#252;r, dass es einen indirekten Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz gibt und dieser haupts&#228;chlich von der Variablen Optimismus mediiert wird. Die Adjustierung f&#252;r das Geschlecht wirkte sich insgesamt kaum auf die Effekte aus (siehe Abbildung 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>).</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="4. Discussion">
      <MainHeadline>4. Discussion</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>4.1. Summary of the most important results </SubHeadline><Pgraph>The aim of the study was to investigate whether gratitude has a direct effect on the resilience of medical students in the sense of an independent resilience factor or whether it has an indirect effect on resilience via other resilience factors such as optimism, self-efficacy expectations, social support, or stress. Previous studies have not sufficiently clarified this relationship, as the relationship between gratitude and resilience has been investigated and confirmed, but other resilience or confounding factors were not included in the respective studies <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. The present study showed a positive correlation between gratitude and resilience. The subsequent regression analysis showed that 57&#37; of the total variance in resilience can be explained by the variables gratitude and the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy expectation, and social support as well as stress. Of these, optimism had the only significant and strongest direct influence on resilience. The direct effect of gratitude on resilience is negligible, which means that gratitude cannot be regarded as a direct predictor of resilience among the medical students in this study. Possible explanations for this result are that the few studies showing that gratitude is a predictor of resilience used a different resilience scale or did not take competing variables (resilience factors) into account <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. However, the path analysis showed that there is an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience and that the relevant parameter is again optimism. Optimism therefore has a direct effect on resilience on the one hand and an indirect effect on the other hand by mediating the effects of gratitude on resilience. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The results of the present study are consistent with findings from research into the relationship between optimism and resilience. An optimistic attitude has long been associated with other positive factors, such as physical and psychological well-being, lower levels of depression, and greater life satisfaction <TextLink reference="62"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="63"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="64"></TextLink>. Both gratitude and resilience are closely related to optimism <TextLink reference="65"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="66"></TextLink>. In addition, optimism also appears to be a predictor of resilience <TextLink reference="67"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>. The present study now shows that this correlation can also be assumed for medical students. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The mean values of medical students for gratitude in this study are high. Studies in which students were also surveyed, albeit of other disciplines, show similarly high or only slightly lower values <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="69"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="70"></TextLink>. The mean values for resilience of the medical students in this study are lower than the values of students of other disciplines <TextLink reference="71"></TextLink> and the German population in the age group from 14 to 30 years <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. There are numerous possible reasons why the resilience scores of medical students are lower than those of other students or other study populations. Surveys show, for example, that medical students are exposed to high levels of stress <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="72"></TextLink>, that they more often suffer from sleep disorders <TextLink reference="73"></TextLink>, and from depression <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. The type of medical program (standard or reform program) also appears to have an influence on students&#8217; stress levels <TextLink reference="74"></TextLink>. Last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic has also led to stress and uncertainty among medical students <TextLink reference="75"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="76"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>. All these factors can have a negative impact on medical students&#8217; resilience. The mean values for optimism in the present study are slightly higher than in comparable studies that also examined medical students <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="78"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink>. One reason for this may be that only medical students at the beginning of their studies were surveyed here, whereas  the comparable studies surveyed medical students of all year groups <TextLink reference="78"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink> or only at an advanced stage <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>. It seems plausible that medical students&#8217; optimism decreases over the course of their studies, as their general mental health also deteriorates <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, it can therefore be stated that gratitude has no significant direct effect on resilience in medical students. The initial hypothesis that gratitude is a predictor of resilience must therefore be rejected. However, the second hypothesis that there are indirect effects of gratitude on resilience that are mediated by resilience factors was confirmed. This shows that optimism in particular strengthens medical students&#8217; resilience.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>4.2. Possible implications for medical education</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Knowledge of the positive effects of an optimistic attitude on medical students&#8217; resilience can support the design and implementation of interventions aimed at positively influencing medical students&#8217; resilience. Approaches such as the &#8220;Best Possible Self&#8221; (BPS) writing intervention developed by Laura King are interesting in this context. In this exercise, participants write about themselves in the future and imagine that their future life will turn out in the best possible way <TextLink reference="80"></TextLink>. The BPS was examined with regard to its effect on a wide range of factors <TextLink reference="81"></TextLink>. It was demonstrated that the BPS can also be used to promote an optimistic attitude <TextLink reference="82"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="83"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="84"></TextLink>. Particularly in view of the limited evidence for resilience interventions that directly target resilience <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, the possible effect of an optimistic attitude on medical students&#8217; resilience is becoming increasingly important. It may therefore be worthwhile to develop interventions that aim to strengthen students&#8217; optimism in order to achieve a positive effect on their resilience and thus promote their mental health. In addition to interventions aimed at strengthening optimism, there is also a large number of gratitude exercises with effects on various outcome variables <TextLink reference="85"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="86"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>. However, the evidence base for gratitude interventions is rather weak <TextLink reference="88"></TextLink>. This could be explained by the overall low direct effects of gratitude on resilience, which the present study also points out. The study shows that it may be useful in future research on gratitude exercises to include optimism as a dependent outcome variable, as it is possible that gratitude training strengthens optimism, which in turn has a positive influence on resilience. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>4.3. Limitations of the study</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The present study has some limitations. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small. In addition, only students at one university were recruited, which is why it would be interesting to repeat the study at other locations. Furthermore, only pre-clinical students were examined, so the results can only be applied to a certain proportion of medical students. Possible changes during the course of studies can therefore not be mapped. The fact that the age of the participants was not recorded also leaves open to which extent age influenced the results. Moreover, all values collected are based on self-assessments and are therefore subjective. In order to make resilience research more objective, some researchers extend the self-assessment via questionnaires by also measuring the cortisol levels of test subjects <TextLink reference="89"></TextLink>. It will certainly remain a challenge and the subject of future research to approach constructs such as gratitude and resilience appropriately in terms of objectification and operationalization. While the scales for measuring resilience, stress, self-efficacy expectation, social support and gratitude showed high internal consistencies comparable to other studies <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>, the internal consistency of the scale for measuring optimism (Life Orientation Test) was comparatively low. This is not surprising given that a similarly low internal consistency (&#945;&#61;0.59) was observed in the validation study of the Life Orientation Test. This may indicate general methodological problems with the scale and shows the need for further methodological development in this area. The extent to which the limited internal consistency of the scale influenced the results of the present analysis remains unclear. </Pgraph><Pgraph>More women than men took part in the study. One explanation for this may be that significantly more women than men study medicine in Germany. According to the Federal Statistical Office, 37,036 of 98,736 medical students in 2019 were male (&#8776;38&#37;) and 61,700 were female (&#8776;62&#37;) &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;EN&#47;Themes&#47;Society-Environment&#47;Education-Research-Culture&#47;Institutions-Higher-Education&#47;&#95;node.html">https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;EN&#47;Themes&#47;Society-Environment&#47;Education-Research-Culture&#47;Institutions-Higher-Education&#47;&#95;node.html</Hyperlink>&#93;. These figures are similar to the gender ratio at Witten&#47;Herdecke University (male: 41&#37; vs. female: 59&#37;) &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;ranking.zeit.de&#47;che&#47;de&#47;studiengang&#47;6115">https:&#47;&#47;ranking.zeit.de&#47;che&#47;de&#47;studiengang&#47;6115</Hyperlink>&#93; and also to the gender ratio in the present study. In addition, studies show that women generally appear to be more likely to participate in health surveys than men <TextLink reference="90"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="91"></TextLink>. It is also conceivable that women feel more attracted to a study on gratitude and resilience than men; however, this remains an assumption, as there is insufficient research on this topic. However, other studies on gratitude or resilience also show a similar gender ratio <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. The influence of other variables such as native language, nationality and religious affiliation was not investigated and should be the subject of future research. In addition, results may have been distorted as the survey was designated as a study on resilience and gratitude. This could, in the sense of a selection bias, have appealed to students who had already dealt with the respective concepts. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="4. Diskussion">
      <MainHeadline>4. Diskussion</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>4.1. Zusammenfassung der wichtigsten Ergebnisse </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Ziel der Studie war es zu untersuchen, ob Dankbarkeit bei Medizinstudierenden einen direkten Effekt im Sinne eines eigenst&#228;ndigen Resilienzfaktors auf die Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden hat oder indirekt &#252;ber andere Resilienzfaktoren wie Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung bzw. Stress auf die Resilienz einwirkt. Bisherige Studien konnten diesen Zusammenhang nicht ausreichend kl&#228;ren, da der Zusammenhang zwischen Dankbarkeit und Resilienz zwar untersucht und best&#228;tigt wurde, weitere Resilienz- oder konfundierende Faktoren allerdings nicht in die jeweiligen Untersuchungen einbezogen wurden <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Die vorliegende Untersuchung zeigte eine positive Korrelation von Dankbarkeit und Resilienz. In der anschlie&#223;enden Regressionsanalyse konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Gesamtvarianz der Resilienz zu 57&#37; durch die Variablen Dankbarkeit sowie die ber&#252;cksichtigten Resilienzfaktoren Optimismus, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und soziale Unterst&#252;tzung sowie durch Stress erkl&#228;rt werden kann. Optimismus hatte unter diesen den einzigen signifikanten und st&#228;rksten direkten Einfluss auf Resilienz. Der direkte Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz ist zu vernachl&#228;ssigen, was bedeutet, dass Dankbarkeit bei den Medizinstudierenden dieser Studie nicht als direkter Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz angesehen werden kann. M&#246;gliche Erkl&#228;rungen f&#252;r dieses Ergebnis k&#246;nnten darin liegen, dass in den wenigen Studien, die zeigen, dass Dankbarkeit ein Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz ist, eine andere Resilienzskala verwendet oder konkurrierende Variablen (Resilienzfaktoren) nicht ber&#252;cksichtigt wurden <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Die Pfadanalyse allerdings zeigte, dass es einen indirekten Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz gibt und dass der daf&#252;r ma&#223;gebliche Parameter wiederum Optimismus ist. Optimismus wirkt sich also zum einen direkt auf Resilienz aus und wirkt zum anderen indirekt, in dem er Effekte von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz mediiert. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Arbeit stimmen mit Forschungsergebnissen &#252;berein, die den Zusammenhang von Optimismus und Resilienz untersucht haben. Eine optimistische Grundhaltung wird schon lange mit anderen positiven Faktoren, wie k&#246;rperlichem und psychischem Wohlbefinden, geringerer depressiver Verstimmung oder einer h&#246;heren Lebenszufriedenheit in Zusammenhang gebracht <TextLink reference="62"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="63"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="64"></TextLink>. Sowohl Dankbarkeit als auch Resilienz stehen in einem engen Zusammenhang mit Optimismus <TextLink reference="65"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="66"></TextLink>. Zudem scheint Optimismus auch ein Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz zu sein <TextLink reference="67"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>. Die vorliegende Studie zeigt nun, dass dieser Zusammenhang auch f&#252;r Medizinstudierende angenommen werden kann. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Mittelwerte der Medizinstudierenden f&#252;r Dankbarkeit in dieser Studie sind hoch. Studien, bei denen ebenfalls Studierende, allerdings anderer Fachrichtungen, befragt wurden, zeigen &#228;hnlich hohe oder nur geringf&#252;gig niedrigere Werte <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="69"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="70"></TextLink>. Die Mittelwerte f&#252;r die Resilienz der Medizinstudierenden dieser Studie sind niedriger als die Werte Studierender anderer Fachrichtungen <TextLink reference="71"></TextLink> und der deutschen Bev&#246;lkerung in der Altersgruppe der 14-30-J&#228;hrigen <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. Es lassen sich zahlreiche m&#246;gliche Gr&#252;nde finden, warum die Resilienzwerte bei Medizinstudierenden niedriger sind als bei anderen Studierenden oder anderen Studienpopulationen. Erhebungen zeigen beispielsweise, dass Medizinstudierende einem hohen Stresslevel ausgesetzt sind <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="72"></TextLink>, dass sie h&#228;ufig unter Schlafst&#246;rungen <TextLink reference="73"></TextLink> und &#246;fter an Depressionen leiden <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Auch scheint die Art des Studiums (Regel- oder Reformstudiengang) einen Einfluss auf die Belastungssituation der Studierenden zu haben <TextLink reference="74"></TextLink>. Nicht zuletzt hat auch die COVID-19-Pandemie zu Stress und Unsicherheit bei Medizinstudierenden gef&#252;hrt <TextLink reference="75"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="76"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>. All diese Faktoren k&#246;nnen sich negativ auf die Resilienz der Medizinstudierenden auswirken. Die Mittelwerte f&#252;r Optimismus sind in der vorliegenden Studie etwas h&#246;her als in vergleichbaren Studien, die ebenfalls Medizinstudierende untersucht haben <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="78"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink>. Ein Grund daf&#252;r k&#246;nnte sein, dass hier nur Medizinstudierende am Anfang ihres Studiums befragt wurden, in den vergleichbaren Studien hingegen Medizinstudierende aller Jahrgangsstufen <TextLink reference="78"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink> oder nur in einem fortgeschrittenen Stadium <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>. Es erscheint plausibel, dass der Optimismus von Medizinstudierenden im Laufe des Studiums abnimmt, da auch die allgemeine psychische Gesundheit sich zusehend verschlechtert <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Zusammenfassend l&#228;sst sich also sagen, dass Dankbarkeit bei Medizinstudierenden keinen nennenswerten direkten Effekt auf Resilienz zeigt. Die Eingangs formulierte Hypothese, dass Dankbarkeit ein Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz ist, muss demnach verneint werden. Allerdings best&#228;tigte sich die zweite Hypothese, dass es indirekte Effekte von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz gibt, die von Resilienzfaktoren vermittelt werden. Hier zeigt sich, dass vor allem Optimismus die Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden st&#228;rkt.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>4.2. M&#246;gliche Implikationen f&#252;r das Medizinstudium</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Das Wissen &#252;ber die positiven Effekte einer optimistischen Grundhaltung auf die Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden kann bei der Gestaltung und Umsetzung von Interventionen unterst&#252;tzen, die darauf abzielen, die Resilienz Medizinstudierender positiv zu beeinflussen. Ans&#228;tze wie die von Laura King entwickelte Schreibintervention &#8222;Best Possible Self&#8220; (BPS) sind in diesem Zusammenhang interessant. Bei der &#220;bung schreiben Teilnehmer&#42;innen &#252;ber sich selbst in der Zukunft und stellen sich vor, dass ihr zuk&#252;nftiges Leben auf die bestm&#246;gliche Art und Weise verlaufen wird <TextLink reference="80"></TextLink>. Das BPS wurde hinsichtlich seiner Wirkung auf unterschiedlichste Faktoren untersucht <TextLink reference="81"></TextLink>. Dabei wurde deutlich, dass das BPS auch zur F&#246;rderung einer optimistischen Grundhaltung genutzt werden kann <TextLink reference="82"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="83"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="84"></TextLink>. Vor allem angesichts der begrenzten Evidenz f&#252;r Resilienzinterventionen, die direkt auf die Resilienz abzielen <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, gewinnt der m&#246;gliche Effekt einer optimistischen Grundhaltung auf die Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden an Bedeutung. Es k&#246;nnte sich also lohnen, zuk&#252;nftig Interventionen zu entwickeln, die darauf abzielen, den Optimismus von Studierenden zu st&#228;rken, um einen positiven Effekt auf ihre Resilienz zu erzielen und damit ihre mentale Gesundheit zu f&#246;rdern. Neben Interventionen, die auf die St&#228;rkung von Optimismus abzielen, gibt es auch eine Vielzahl von Dankbarkeits&#252;bungen mit Effekten auf unterschiedliche Outcome-Variablen <TextLink reference="85"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="86"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>. Allerdings ist die Evidenzlage f&#252;r Dankbarkeitsinterventionen eher schwach <TextLink reference="88"></TextLink>. Das k&#246;nnte auch mit den insgesamt geringen direkten Effekten von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz zu tun haben, auf die auch die vorliegende Studie hinweist. Die Arbeit zeigt, dass es in zuk&#252;nftigen Studien zu Dankbarkeits&#252;bungen sinnvoll sein kann, Optimismus als abh&#228;ngige Outcome-Variable zu erheben, da es sein k&#246;nnte, dass Dankbarkeitstrainings den Optimismus st&#228;rken und dieser wiederum die Resilienz positiv beeinflusst. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>4.3. Limitationen der Studie</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Die vorliegende Studie hat einige Limitationen. Zun&#228;chst war die Stichprobengr&#246;&#223;e relativ klein. Au&#223;erdem wurden nur Studierende einer Universit&#228;t rekrutiert, weshalb es interessant w&#228;re, die Untersuchung an weiteren Standorten zu wiederholen. Zudem wurden nur Studierende der Vorklinik untersucht, weshalb sich die Ergebnisse nur auf einen bestimmten Teil von Medizinstudierenden &#252;bertragen lassen. M&#246;gliche Ver&#228;nderungen im Verlauf des Studiums k&#246;nnen also nicht abgebildet werden. Dadurch, dass das Alter der Teilnehmer&#42;innen nicht erhoben wurde, bleibt auch die Frage offen, inwiefern das Alter die Ergebnisse beeinflusste. Auch beruhen alle erhobenen Werte auf der Einsch&#228;tzung der Proband&#42;innen und sind daher subjektiv. Um Resilienzforschung objektivierbarer zu machen, erweitern manche Forscher&#42;innen die Selbsteinsch&#228;tzung durch Frageb&#246;gen dadurch, dass sie beispielsweise auch die Cortisolspiegel von Proband&#42;innen messen <TextLink reference="89"></TextLink>. Sich Konstrukten wie Dankbarkeit und Resilienz angemessen im Sinne einer Objektivierung und Operationalisierung zu n&#228;hern, bleibt sicherlich auch zuk&#252;nftig eine Herausforderung und Gegenstand der Forschung. W&#228;hrend die Skalen zur Messung von Resilienz, Stress, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, soziale Unterst&#252;tzung und Dankbarkeit vergleichbar anderen Studien <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink> hohe interne Konsistenzen aufwiesen, war die interne Konsistenz der Skala zur Messung von Optimismus (Life-Orientation-Test) vergleichsweise niedrig. Vor dem Hintergrund, dass in der Validierungsstudie zum Life-Orientation-Test eine &#228;hnlich niedrige interne Konsistenz (&#945;&#61;0,59) ermittelt wurde, ist das nicht verwunderlich. Dies weist wom&#246;glich auf allgemeine methodische Probleme der Skala hin und zeigt die Notwendigkeit methodischer Weiterentwicklungen in diesem Bereich. Inwiefern die eingeschr&#228;nkte interne Konsistenz der Skala die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Analyse beeinflusst hat, bleibt unklar. </Pgraph><Pgraph>An der Studie nahmen mehr Frauen als M&#228;nner teil. Eine Erkl&#228;rung hierf&#252;r kann darin bestehen, dass in Deutschland wesentlich mehr Frauen als M&#228;nner Medizin studieren. Nach Angaben des Statistischen Bundesamtes waren im Jahr 2019 von 98.736 Medizinstudierenden 37.036 m&#228;nnlich (&#8776;38&#37;) und 61.700 weiblich (&#8776;62&#37;) &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;DE&#47;Themen&#47;Gesellschaft-Umwelt&#47;Bildung-Forschung-Kultur&#47;Hochschulen&#47;Tabellen&#47;lrbil05.html">https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;DE&#47;Themen&#47;Gesellschaft-Umwelt&#47;Bildung-Forschung-Kultur&#47;Hochschulen&#47;Tabellen&#47;lrbil05.html</Hyperlink>&#93;. Diese Zahlen &#228;hneln dem Geschlechterverh&#228;ltnis an der Universit&#228;t Witten&#47;Herdecke (m&#228;nnlich: 41&#37; vs. weiblich: 59&#37;) &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;studiengaenge.zeit.de&#47;studiengang&#47;g3166&#47;humanmedizin">https:&#47;&#47;studiengaenge.zeit.de&#47;studiengang&#47;g3166&#47;humanmedizin</Hyperlink>&#93; und auch dem Geschlechterverh&#228;ltnis in der vorliegenden Untersuchung. Zudem zeigen Studien, dass Frauen grunds&#228;tzlich eher an Umfragen zur Gesundheit teilzunehmen scheinen als M&#228;nner <TextLink reference="90"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="91"></TextLink>. Auch ist es vorstellbar, dass sich Frauen von einer Studie zum Thema Dankbarkeit und Resilienz mehr angesprochen f&#252;hlen als M&#228;nner; dies bleibt jedoch eine Vermutung, da es hierzu keine ausreichenden Forschungsergebnisse gibt. Allerdings zeigt sich auch in anderen Studien zur Dankbarkeit oder Resilienz ein &#228;hnliches Geschlechterverh&#228;ltnis <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. Auch der Einfluss weiterer Variablen wie Muttersprache, Nationalit&#228;t und Religionszugeh&#246;rigkeit konnte nicht untersucht werden und sollte Gegenstand zuk&#252;nftiger Forschung sein. Zudem kann es zu Verzerrung der Ergebnisse gekommen sein, da die Erhebung als Studie zur Resilienz und Dankbarkeit ausgewiesen war. Dies k&#246;nnte, im Sinne eines Selektionsbias, eher Studierende angesprochen haben, die sich schon mit den jeweiligen Konzepten auseinandergesetzt haben. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="5. Conclusions">
      <MainHeadline>5. Conclusions</MainHeadline><Pgraph>This study shows that gratitude has no significant direct effect on resilience. However, it was shown that optimism can strengthen the resilience of medical students and that gratitude has a mediated effect on resilience via optimism. The relationship between resilience and resilience factors therefore appears to be complex, meaning that a number of influencing factors and their interactions must be taken into account when providing trainings to strengthen resilience. The general conditions of studying and working must also be taken into account. Resilience helps people to stay healthy or to recover more quickly after challenges. Against this backdrop, it could make sense to integrate interventions that promote an optimistic attitude into medical studies and thus strengthen the mental health of future doctors in a preventive and long-term manner. Which interventions are particularly suitable for medical students must be further investigated in future controlled and prospective studies. The results of this study can be used to better understand the underlying mechanisms that contribute to medical students&#8217; resilience and the role that optimism plays in this.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="5. Schlussfolgerungen">
      <MainHeadline>5. Schlussfolgerungen</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die vorliegende Studie zeigt, dass Dankbarkeit keinen nennenswerten direkten Effekt auf die Resilienz hat. Allerdings konnte dargelegt werden, dass Optimismus die Resilienz von Medizinstudierenden st&#228;rken kann und dass sich Dankbarkeit vermittelt &#252;ber Optimismus auf die Resilienz auswirkt. Der Zusammenhang zwischen Resilienz und Resilienzfaktoren scheint also komplex zu sein, so dass bei Trainings zur St&#228;rkung der Resilienz eine Reihe von Einflussfaktoren und deren Wechselwirkung zu beachten sind. Dabei ist auch den Rahmenbedingungen des Studierens und Arbeitens Rechnung zu tragen. Resilienz hilft Menschen gesund zu bleiben oder sich nach Herausforderungen schneller zu erholen. Vor diesem Hintergrund k&#246;nnte es sinnvoll sein, Interventionen, die eine optimistische Grundhaltung f&#246;rdern, ins Medizinstudium zu integrieren und damit die mentale Gesundheit der zuk&#252;nftigen &#196;rzt&#42;innen pr&#228;ventiv und langfristig zu st&#228;rken. Welche Interventionen sich f&#252;r Medizinstudierende im Besonderen eignen, muss in zuk&#252;nftigen kontrollierten und prospektiven Studien weiter untersucht werden. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie k&#246;nnen dazu genutzt werden, das Verst&#228;ndnis &#252;ber die zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen, die zur Resilienz bei Medizinstudierenden beitragen und die Rolle, die Optimismus dabei spielt, besser zu verstehen.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Authors&#8217; ORCIDs">
      <MainHeadline>Authors&#8217; ORCIDs</MainHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Nicolai Hahn: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0009-0003-5363-0516">0009-0003-5363-0516</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Patrick Brzoska: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-6489-5198">0000-0001-6489-5198</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Claudia Kiessling: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0003-4104-4854">0000-0003-4104-4854</Hyperlink></ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="ORCIDs der Autor&#42;innen">
      <MainHeadline>ORCIDs der Autor&#42;innen</MainHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Nicolai Hahn: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0009-0003-5363-0516">0009-0003-5363-0516</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Patrick Brzoska: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0001-6489-5198">0000-0001-6489-5198</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">Claudia Kiessling: <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;orcid.org&#47;0000-0003-4104-4854">0000-0003-4104-4854</Hyperlink></ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Acknowledgements">
      <MainHeadline>Acknowledgements</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The authors would like to thank all students of the Faculty of Health at the UW&#47;H who participated in this study and Christina Wagner for her support in translating the English version of the article.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Danksagung">
      <MainHeadline>Danksagung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Autoren&#42;innen danken allen Studierenden der Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Gesundheit der UW&#47;H, die an dieser Studie teilnahmen, sowie Christina Wagner f&#252;r ihre Unterst&#252;tzung bei der Erstellung der englischen Version des Artikels.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Competing interests">
      <MainHeadline>Competing interests</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Interessenkonflikt">
      <MainHeadline>Interessenkonflikt</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Autor&#42;innen erkl&#228;ren, dass sie keinen Interessenkonflikt im Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel haben.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Firth J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Levels and sources of stress in medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1986</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1177-1180</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Firth J. Levels and sources of stress in medical students. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6529):1177-1180. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bmj.292.6529.1177</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bmj.292.6529.1177</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Sherina MS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rampal L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kaneson N</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Psychological stress among undergraduate medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med J Malaysia</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>207-211</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sherina MS, Rampal L, Kaneson N. Psychological stress among undergraduate medical students. Med J Malaysia. 2004;59(2):207-211.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Dahlin M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Joneborg N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Runeson B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Stress and depression among medical students: A cross-sectional study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>594-604</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Stress and depression among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Med Educ. 2005;39(6):594-604. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02176.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02176.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Dyrbye LN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>West CP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Satele D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boone S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tan L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sloan J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shanafeldt TD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Burnout among US medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general US population</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>443-451</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Boone S, Tan L, Sloan J, Shanafeldt TD. Burnout among US medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general US population. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):443-451. DOI: 10.1097&#47;ACM.0000000000000134</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;ACM.0000000000000134</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Rotenstein LS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ramos MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Torre M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Segal JB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Peluso MJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Guille C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mata DA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JAMA</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2214-2236</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ, Guille C, Sen S, Mata DA. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2214-2236. DOI: 10.1001&#47;jama.2016.17324</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;jama.2016.17324</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Wege N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Muth T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Li J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Angerer P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mental health among currently enrolled medical students in Germany</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Public Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>92-100</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wege N, Muth T, Li J, Angerer P. Mental health among currently enrolled medical students in Germany. Public Health. 2016;132:92-100. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.puhe.2015.12.014</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.puhe.2015.12.014</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Watzke S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pukas L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rabkow N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Keuch L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehring E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fuchs S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stoevesandt D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sapalidis A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pelzer A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rehnisch</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Watzke S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Prevalence and predictive factors for depressive symptoms among medical students in Germany-a cross-sectional study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc13</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Watzke S, Pukas L, Rabkow N, Keuch L, Ehring E, Fuchs S, Stoevesandt D, Sapalidis A, Pelzer A, Rehnisch, Watzke S. Prevalence and predictive factors for depressive symptoms among medical students in Germany-a cross-sectional study. GMS J Med Educ. 2022;39(1):Doc13. DOI: 10.3205&#47;zma001534</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;zma001534</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Saleem S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Saleem T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Role of religiosity in psychological well-being among medical and non-medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Relig Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1180-1190</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Saleem S, Saleem T. Role of religiosity in psychological well-being among medical and non-medical students. J Relig Health. 2017;56(4):1180-1190. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10943-016-0341-5</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10943-016-0341-5</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Husnain MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Stress level comparison of medical and non-medical students: A cross-sectional study done at various professional colleges in Karachi, Pakistan</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acta Psychopathol (Wilmington)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>8</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Husnain MA. Stress level comparison of medical and non-medical students: A cross-sectional study done at various professional colleges in Karachi, Pakistan. Acta Psychopathol (Wilmington). 2017;3(2):8. DOI: 10.4172&#47;2469-6676.100080</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.4172&#47;2469-6676.100080</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Noreen A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Iqbal N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hassan B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ali SA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Relationship between psychological distress, quality of life and resilience among medical and non-medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Pak Med Assoc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2181-2185</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Noreen A, Iqbal N, Hassan B, Ali SA. Relationship between psychological distress, quality of life and resilience among medical and non-medical students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(9):2181-2185. DOI: 10.47391&#47;JPMA.04-611</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.47391&#47;JPMA.04-611</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Dyrbye LN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Thomas MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shanafelt TD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Mayo Clin Proc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1613-1622</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(12):1613-1622. DOI: 10.4065&#47;80.12.1613</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.4065&#47;80.12.1613</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Ludwig AB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Burton W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Weingarten J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Milan F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Myers DC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kligler B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Depression and stress amongst undergraduate medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>141</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ludwig AB, Burton W, Weingarten J, Milan F, Myers DC, Kligler B. Depression and stress amongst undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:141. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12909-015-0425-z</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12909-015-0425-z</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Moir F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yielder J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sanson J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chen Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Depression in medical students: current insights</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Adv Med Educ Pract</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>323-333</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Moir F, Yielder J, Sanson J, Chen Y. Depression in medical students: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:323-333. DOI: 10.2147&#47;AMEP.S137384</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.2147&#47;AMEP.S137384</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Hsu K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Marshall V</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Prevalence of depression and distress in a large sample of</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1987</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Am J Psychiatry</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1561-1566</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hsu K, Marshall V. Prevalence of depression and distress in a large sample of. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144(12):1561-1566. DOI: 10.1176&#47;ajp.144.12.1561</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1176&#47;ajp.144.12.1561</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Dong M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zhou FC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Xu SW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zhang Q</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ng CH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ungvari GS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Xiang YT</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Prevalence of suicide-related behaviors among physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Suicide Life Threat Behav</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1264-1275</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dong M, Zhou FC, Xu SW, Zhang Q, Ng CH, Ungvari GS, Xiang YT. Prevalence of suicide-related behaviors among physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020;50(6):1264-1275. DOI: 10.1111&#47;sltb.12690</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;sltb.12690</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Harvey SB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Epstein RM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Glozier N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Petrie K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Strudwick J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gayed A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dean K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Henderson M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mental illness and suicide among physicians</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Lancet</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>920-930</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Harvey SB, Epstein RM, Glozier N, Petrie K, Strudwick J, Gayed A, Dean K, Henderson M. Mental illness and suicide among physicians. Lancet. 2021;398(10303):920-930. DOI: 10.1016&#47;S0140-6736(21)01596-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;S0140-6736(21)01596-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Collier R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Healthier doctors, healthier patients</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>CMAJ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>E895-E896</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Collier R. Healthier doctors, healthier patients. CMAJ. 2012;184(17):E895-E896. DOI: 10.1503&#47;cmaj.109-4327</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1503&#47;cmaj.109-4327</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>Bonanno GA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Galea S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bucciarelli A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vlahov D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Psychological resilience after disaster: New York City in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attack</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Psychol Sci</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>181-186</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bonanno GA, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D. Psychological resilience after disaster: New York City in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attack. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):181-186. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1467-9280.2006.01682.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1467-9280.2006.01682.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Bonanno GA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Am Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>20</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events&#63; Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20. DOI: 10.1037&#47;0003-066X.59.1.20</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;0003-066X.59.1.20</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Southwick SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bonanno GA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Masten AS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Panter-Brick C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yehuda R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Eur J Psychotraumatol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>25338</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Southwick SM, Bonanno GA, Masten AS, Panter-Brick C, Yehuda R. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014;5(1):25338. DOI: 10.3402&#47;ejpt.v5.25338</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3402&#47;ejpt.v5.25338</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>Southwick SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Charney DS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Science</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>79-82</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Southwick SM, Charney DS. The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression. Science. 2012;338(6103):79-82. DOI: 10.1126&#47;science.1222942</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1126&#47;science.1222942</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="22">
        <RefAuthor>MacLeod S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Musich S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hawkins K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Alsgaard K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wicker ER</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The impact of resilience among older adults</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Geriatr Nurs</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>266-272</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>MacLeod S, Musich S, Hawkins K, Alsgaard K, Wicker ER. The impact of resilience among older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2016;37(4):266-272. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.gerinurse.2016.02.014</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.gerinurse.2016.02.014</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="23">
        <RefAuthor>Wermelinger A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lucchetti L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lucchetti G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Association between depression and resilience in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Geriatr Psychiatry</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>237-246</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wermelinger A, Lucchetti L, Lucchetti G. Association between depression and resilience in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(3):237-246. DOI: 10.1002&#47;gps.4619</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;gps.4619</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="24">
        <RefAuthor>Bengel J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lyssenko L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Resilienz und psychologische Schutzfaktoren im Erwachsenenalter: Stand der Forschung zu psychologischen Schutzfaktoren von Gesundheit im Erwachsenenalter</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bengel J, Lyssenko L. Resilienz und psychologische Schutzfaktoren im Erwachsenenalter: Stand der Forschung zu psychologischen Schutzfaktoren von Gesundheit im Erwachsenenalter. K&#246;ln: BZgA Bundeszentrale f&#252;r Gesundheitliche Aufkl&#228;rung; 2012. DOI: 10.4126&#47;38m-005111600</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.4126&#47;38m-005111600</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="25">
        <RefAuthor>Kalisch R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#252;ller MB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>T&#252;scher O</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Advancing empirical resilience research</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Behav Brain Sci</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e128</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kalisch R, M&#252;ller MB, T&#252;scher O. Advancing empirical resilience research. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e128. DOI: 10.1017&#47;S0140525X15000023</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1017&#47;S0140525X15000023</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="26">
        <RefAuthor>Southwick SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Charney DS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Resilience: The science of mastering life&#39;s greatest challenges</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Southwick SM, Charney DS. Resilience: The science of mastering life&#39;s greatest challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="27">
        <RefAuthor>Kunzler AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Helmreich I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>K&#246;nig J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chmitorz A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wessa M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Binder H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lieb K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Cochrane Database Systc Rev</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>CD013684</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, K&#246;nig J, Chmitorz A, Wessa M, Binder H, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students. Cochrane Database Systc Rev. 2020;(7):CD013684. DOI: 10.1002&#47;14651858.CD013684</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;14651858.CD013684</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="28">
        <RefAuthor>Linz S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Helmreich I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kunzler A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chmitorz A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lieb K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kubiak T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Interventionen zur Resilienzf&#246;rderung bei Erwachsenen</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>11-21</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Linz S, Helmreich I, Kunzler A, Chmitorz A, Lieb K, Kubiak T. Interventionen zur Resilienzf&#246;rderung bei Erwachsenen &#91;Interventions To Promote Resilience In Adults - A Narrative Review&#93;. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol.. 2020;70(01):11-21. DOI: 10.1055&#47;a-0830-4745</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1055&#47;a-0830-4745</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="29">
        <RefAuthor>Tugade MM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fredrickson BL</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Pers Soc Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>320-333</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL. Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86(2):320-333. DOI: 10.1037&#47;0022-3514.86.2.320</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;0022-3514.86.2.320</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="30">
        <RefAuthor>Panter-Brick C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Eggerman M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Understanding culture, resilience, and mental health: The production of hope</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>The social ecology of resilience: A handbook of theory and practice</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>369-386</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Panter-Brick C, Eggerman M. Understanding culture, resilience, and mental health: The production of hope. In: Ungar M, editor. The social ecology of resilience: A handbook of theory and practice. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2012. p.369-386. DOI: 10.1007&#47;978-1-4614-0586-3&#95;29</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;978-1-4614-0586-3&#95;29</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="31">
        <RefAuthor>Antonovsky A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1997</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Forum f&#252;r Verhaltenstherapie und psychosoziale Praxis.</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>33-46</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Antonovsky A. Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. In: Forum f&#252;r Verhaltenstherapie und psychosoziale Praxis. T&#252;bingen: dgvt-Verlag; 1997. p.33-46.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="32">
        <RefAuthor>Al-Yagon M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Margalit M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Positive and negative affect among mothers of children with intellectual disabilities</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Br J Dev Dis</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>109-127</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Al-Yagon M, Margalit M. Positive and negative affect among mothers of children with intellectual disabilities. Br J Dev Dis. 2009;55(109):109-127. DOI: 10.1179&#47;096979509799103070</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1179&#47;096979509799103070</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="33">
        <RefAuthor>Benight CC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bandura A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Behav Res Ther</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1129-1148</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(10):1129-1148. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.brat.2003.08.008</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.brat.2003.08.008</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="34">
        <RefAuthor>Hojat M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vergare M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Isenberg G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cohen M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Spandorfer J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Underlying construct of empathy, optimism, and burnout in medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>12</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hojat M, Vergare M, Isenberg G, Cohen M, Spandorfer J. Underlying construct of empathy, optimism, and burnout in medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:12. DOI: 10.5116&#47;ijme.54c3.60cd</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.5116&#47;ijme.54c3.60cd</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="35">
        <RefAuthor>Thompson G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McBride RB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hosford CC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Halaas G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Resilience among medical students: the role of coping style and social support</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Teach Learn Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>174-182</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Thompson G, McBride RB, Hosford CC, Halaas G. Resilience among medical students: the role of coping style and social support. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):174-182. DOI: 10.1080&#47;10401334.2016.1146611</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;10401334.2016.1146611</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="36">
        <RefAuthor>Dahlin M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Joneborg N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Runeson B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Performance-based self-esteem and burnout in a cross-sectional study of medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>43-48</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Performance-based self-esteem and burnout in a cross-sectional study of medical students. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):43-48. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590601175309</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590601175309</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="37">
        <RefAuthor>McCullough ME</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Emmons RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tsang JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The Grateful Disposition: A Conceptual and Emperical Topography</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Pers Soc Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>112-127</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The Grateful Disposition: A Conceptual and Emperical Topography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(1):112-127. DOI: 10.1037&#47;0022-3514.82.1.112</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;0022-3514.82.1.112</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="38">
        <RefAuthor>Lambert NM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fincham FD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stillman TF</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gratitude and depressive symptoms: The role of positive reframing and positive emotion</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Cogn Emot</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>615-633</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Lambert NM, Fincham FD, Stillman TF. Gratitude and depressive symptoms: The role of positive reframing and positive emotion. Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):615-633. DOI: 10.1080&#47;02699931.2011.595393</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;02699931.2011.595393</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="39">
        <RefAuthor>Emmons RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shelton CM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gratitude and the science of positive psychology</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Handbook of positive psychology</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>459-471</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Emmons RA, Shelton CM. Gratitude and the science of positive psychology. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p.459-471.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="40">
        <RefAuthor>Wood AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Maltby J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gillett R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Linley PA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Joseph S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Res Pers</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>854-871</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wood AM, Maltby J, Gillett R, Linley PA, Joseph S. The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. J Res Pers. 2008;42(4):854-871. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jrp.2007.11.003</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jrp.2007.11.003</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="41">
        <RefAuthor>Komter AE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gratitude and gift exchange</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>The psychology of gratitude</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>195-212</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Komter AE. Gratitude and gift exchange. In: Emmons RA, McCullough ME, editors. The psychology of gratitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. p.195-212. DOI: 10.1093&#47;acprof:oso&#47;9780195150100.003.0010</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1093&#47;acprof:oso&#47;9780195150100.003.0010</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="42">
        <RefAuthor>Bono G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Emmons RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McCullough ME</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gratitude in practice and the practice of gratitude</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Positive psychology in practice</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>464-481</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bono G, Emmons RA, McCullough ME. Gratitude in practice and the practice of gratitude. In: Linley PA, Joseph S, editors. Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2004. p.464-481. DOI:10.1002&#47;9780470939338.ch29</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;9780470939338.ch29</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="43">
        <RefAuthor>Borgueta AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Adapting gratitude interventions to the practice of clinical psychology: Considerations for treatment selection and implementation</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Borgueta AM. Adapting gratitude interventions to the practice of clinical psychology: Considerations for treatment selection and implementation. Palo Alto (CA): Palo Alto University; 2011.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="44">
        <RefAuthor>Gupta N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kumar S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Significant predictors for resilience among a sample of undergraduate students: Acceptance, forgiveness and gratitude</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2015</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Indian J Health Wellbeing</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>188-191</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gupta N, Kumar S. Significant predictors for resilience among a sample of undergraduate students: Acceptance, forgiveness and gratitude. Indian J Health Wellbeing. 2015;6(2):188-191.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="45">
        <RefAuthor>Isaacs K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mota NP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tsai J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Harpaz-Rotem I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cook JM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kirwin PD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Krystal JH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Soutwick SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pietrzak RH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Psychological resilience in US military veterans: A 2-year, nationally representative prospective cohort study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Psychiatr Res</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>301-309</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Isaacs K, Mota NP, Tsai J, Harpaz-Rotem I, Cook JM, Kirwin PD, Krystal JH, Soutwick SM, Pietrzak RH. Psychological resilience in US military veterans: A 2-year, nationally representative prospective cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:301-309. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jpsychires.2016.10.017</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jpsychires.2016.10.017</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="46">
        <RefAuthor>Proyer R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>A recipe for a &#34;positive psychology stew&#34;: German adaptations of nine questionnaires from positive psychology. 10th Congress of the Swiss Society of Psychology</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Proyer R, editor. A recipe for a &#34;positive psychology stew&#34;: German adaptations of nine questionnaires from positive psychology. 10th Congress of the Swiss Society of Psychology; 2007. Z&#252;rich: Swiss Society of Psychology; 2007.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="47">
        <RefAuthor>Kong F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>You X</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zhao J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Evaluation of the gratitude questionnaire in a Chinese sample of adults: factorial validity, criterion-related validity, and measurement invariance across sex</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Front Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1498</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kong F, You X, Zhao J. Evaluation of the gratitude questionnaire in a Chinese sample of adults: factorial validity, criterion-related validity, and measurement invariance across sex. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1498. DOI: 10.3389&#47;fpsyg.2017.01498</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3389&#47;fpsyg.2017.01498</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="48">
        <RefAuthor>Wagnild GM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Young HM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Development and psychometric</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1993</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurs Meas</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>165-178</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1(2):165-178.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="49">
        <RefAuthor>Leppert K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Koch B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Br&#228;hler E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Strau&#223; B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Die Resilienzskala (RS) - &#220;berpr&#252;fung der Langform RS-25 und einer Kurzform RS-13</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Klin Diagn Eval</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>226-243</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Leppert K, Koch B, Br&#228;hler E, Strau&#223; B. Die Resilienzskala (RS) - &#220;berpr&#252;fung der Langform RS-25 und einer Kurzform RS-13. Klin Diagn Eval. 2008;2:226-243.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="50">
        <RefAuthor>Wagnild G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A review of the Resilience Scale</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Nurs Meas</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>105-113</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wagnild G. A review of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(2):105-113. DOI: 10.1891&#47;1061-3749.17.2.105</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1891&#47;1061-3749.17.2.105</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="51">
        <RefAuthor>Schumacher J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Leppert K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gunzelmann T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Strau&#223; B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Br&#228;hler E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Die Resilienzskala &#8211; Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsf&#228;higkeit als Personenmerkmal</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>16-39</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schumacher J, Leppert K, Gunzelmann T, Strau&#223; B, Br&#228;hler E. Die Resilienzskala &#8211; Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsf&#228;higkeit als Personenmerkmal. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 2005;53(1):16-39.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="52">
        <RefAuthor>Glaesmer H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hoyer J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Klotsche J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Herzberg PY</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Die deutsche Version des Life-Orientation-Tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen Optimismus und Pessimismus</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Gesundheitspsychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>26-31</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Glaesmer H, Hoyer J, Klotsche J, Herzberg PY. Die deutsche Version des Life-Orientation-Tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen Optimismus und Pessimismus. Z Gesundheitspsychol. 2008;16(1):26-31. DOI: 10.1026&#47;0943-8149.16.1.26</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1026&#47;0943-8149.16.1.26</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="53">
        <RefAuthor>Jerusalem M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schwarzer R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Skala zur allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Sch&#252;lermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. Skala zur allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Sch&#252;lermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universit&#228;t Berlin; 1999.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="54">
        <RefAuthor>Sommer G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fydrich T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Entwicklung und &#220;berpr&#252;fung eines Fragebogens zur sozialen Unterst&#252;tzung (F-SOZU)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1991</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Diagnostica</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>160-178</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sommer G, Fydrich T. Entwicklung und &#220;berpr&#252;fung eines Fragebogens zur sozialen Unterst&#252;tzung (F-SOZU). Diagnostica. 1991;37(2):160-178. DOI: 10.1026&#47;&#47;0012-1924.45.4.212</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1026&#47;&#47;0012-1924.45.4.212</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="55">
        <RefAuthor>Fydrich T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sommer G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tydecks S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Br&#228;hler E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterst&#252;tzung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Med Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>43-48</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Fydrich T, Sommer G, Tydecks S, Br&#228;hler E. Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterst&#252;tzung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14) &#91;Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU): Standardization of short form (K-14)&#93;. Z Med Psychol. 2009;18(1):43-48.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="56">
        <RefAuthor>Cohen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kamarck T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mermelstein R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Perceived stress scale</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1997</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>1-2</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. Perceived stress scale. In: Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood GL, editors. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. p.1-2.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="57">
        <RefAuthor>Schneider EE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sch&#246;nfelder S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Domke-Wolf M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wessa M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Measuring stress in clinical and nonclinical subjects using a German adaptation of the Perceived Stress Scale</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Clin Health Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>49-56</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schneider EE, Sch&#246;nfelder S, Domke-Wolf M, Wessa M. Measuring stress in clinical and nonclinical subjects using a German adaptation of the Perceived Stress Scale. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020;20(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ijchp.2020.03.004</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ijchp.2020.03.004</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="58">
        <RefAuthor>Tabachnick BG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fidell LS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Using Multivariate Statistics</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6the edition. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2012.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="59">
        <RefAuthor>Shrout PE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bolger N</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Psychol Method</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>422</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Method. 2002;7(4):422. DOI: 10.1037&#47;1082-989X.7.4.422</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;1082-989X.7.4.422</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="60">
        <RefAuthor>Hayes AF</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Commun Monogr</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>408-420</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408-420. DOI: 10.1080&#47;03637750903310360</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;03637750903310360</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="61">
        <RefAuthor>Rosseel Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Oberski D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Byrnes J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vanbrabant L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Savalei V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Merkle E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hallquist M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rhemtulla M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Katsikatsou M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Barendse M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scharf F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Du H</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Package &#39;lavaan&#39;. R package version 0.6-3</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rosseel Y, Oberski D, Byrnes J, Vanbrabant L, Savalei V, Merkle E, Hallquist M, Rhemtulla M, Katsikatsou M, Barendse M, Scharf F, Du H. Package &#39;lavaan&#39;. R package version 0.6-3. 2018. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: https:&#47;&#47;cran.r-project.org&#47;web&#47;packages&#47;lavaan&#47;index.html</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;cran.r-project.org&#47;web&#47;packages&#47;lavaan&#47;index.html</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="62">
        <RefAuthor>Scheier MF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Carver CS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1992</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Cogn Ther Res</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>201-228</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Scheier MF, Carver CS. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16(2):201-228. DOI: 10.1007&#47;BF01173489</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;BF01173489</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="63">
        <RefAuthor>Conversano C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rotondo A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lensi E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Della Vista O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Arpone F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Reda MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Optimism and its impact on mental and physical well-being</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>25-29</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Conversano C, Rotondo A, Lensi E, Della Vista O, Arpone F, Reda MA. Optimism and its impact on mental and physical well-being. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2010;6:25-29. DOI: 10.2174&#47;1745017901006010025</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.2174&#47;1745017901006010025</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="64">
        <RefAuthor>Patton GC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tollit MM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Romaniuk H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Spence SH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sheffield J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sawyer MG</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A prospective study of the effects of optimism on adolescent health risks</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pediatrics</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>308-316</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Patton GC, Tollit MM, Romaniuk H, Spence SH, Sheffield J, Sawyer MG. A prospective study of the effects of optimism on adolescent health risks. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):308-316. DOI: 10.1542&#47;peds.2010-0748</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1542&#47;peds.2010-0748</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="65">
        <RefAuthor>Kardas F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zekeriya CAM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Eskisu M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gelibolu S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gratitude, hope, optimism and life satisfaction as predictors of psychological well-being</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Eurasian J Educ Res</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>81-100</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kardas F, Zekeriya CAM, Eskisu M, Gelibolu S. Gratitude, hope, optimism and life satisfaction as predictors of psychological well-being. Eurasian J Educ Res. 2019;19(82):81-100. DOI: 10.14689&#47;ejer.2019.82.5</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.14689&#47;ejer.2019.82.5</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="66">
        <RefAuthor>Maheshwari A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jutta MV</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Study of relationship between optimism and resilience in the times of COVID-19 among university students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Indian Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1539-1550</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Maheshwari A, Jutta MV. Study of relationship between optimism and resilience in the times of COVID-19 among university students. Int J Indian Psychol. 2020;8(3):1539-1550. </RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="67">
        <RefAuthor>G&#243;mez Molinero R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zayas Garc&#237;a A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ruiz Gonz&#225;lez P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Guil R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Optimism and resilience among university students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Develop Educ Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>147-154. 2018</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>G&#243;mez Molinero R, Zayas Garc&#237;a A, Ruiz Gonz&#225;lez P, Guil R. Optimism and resilience among university students. Int J Develop Educ Psychol. 2018;1:147-154. 2018. </RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="68">
        <RefAuthor>Segovia F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moore JL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Linnville SE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hoyt RE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hain RE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Optimism predicts resilience in repatriated prisoners of war: A 37-year longitudinal study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Trauma Stress</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>330-336</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Segovia F, Moore JL, Linnville SE, Hoyt RE, Hain RE. Optimism predicts resilience in repatriated prisoners of war: A 37-year longitudinal study. J Trauma Stress. 2012;25(3):330-336. DOI: 10.1002&#47;jts.21691</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;jts.21691</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="69">
        <RefAuthor>Chen LH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chen MY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kee YH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tsai YM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese undergraduate students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Happiness Stud</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>655-664</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Chen LH, Chen MY, Kee YH, Tsai YM. Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. J Happiness Stud. 2009;10(6):655-664. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10902-008-9112-7</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10902-008-9112-7</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="70">
        <RefAuthor>Schnitker SA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Richardson KL</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Framing gratitude journaling as prayer amplifies its hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, but not health, benefits</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Posit Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>427-439</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schnitker SA, Richardson KL. Framing gratitude journaling as prayer amplifies its hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, but not health, benefits. J Posit Psychol. 2019;14(4):427-439. DOI: 10.1080&#47;17439760.2018.1460690</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;17439760.2018.1460690</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="71">
        <RefAuthor>Madewell AN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ponce-Garcia E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Assessing resilience in emerging adulthood: The resilience scale (RS), Connor&#8211;Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC), and scale of protective factors (SPF)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pers Individ Dif</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>249-255</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Madewell AN, Ponce-Garcia E. Assessing resilience in emerging adulthood: The resilience scale (RS), Connor&#8211;Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC), and scale of protective factors (SPF). Pers Individ Dif. 2016;97:249-255. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.paid.2016.03.036</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.paid.2016.03.036</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="72">
        <RefAuthor>Heinen I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bullinger M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kocalevent RD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Perceived stress in first year medical students-associations with personal resources and emotional distress</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Heinen I, Bullinger M, Kocalevent RD. Perceived stress in first year medical students-associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):4. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12909-016-0841-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12909-016-0841-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="73">
        <RefAuthor>Almojali AI</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Almalki SA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Alothman AS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Masuadi EM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Alaqeel MK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The prevalence and association of stress with sleep quality among medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2017</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Epidemiol Glob Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>169-174</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Almojali AI, Almalki SA, Alothman AS, Masuadi EM, Alaqeel MK. The prevalence and association of stress with sleep quality among medical students. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017;7(3):169-174. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jegh.2017.04.005</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jegh.2017.04.005</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="74">
        <RefAuthor>Kiessling C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schubert B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scheffner D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Burger W</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>First year medical students&#39; perceptions of stress and support: a comparison between reformed and traditional track curricula</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>504-509</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kiessling C, Schubert B, Scheffner D, Burger W. First year medical students&#39; perceptions of stress and support: a comparison between reformed and traditional track curricula. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):504-509. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2929.2004.01816.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2929.2004.01816.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="75">
        <RefAuthor>Wathelet M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Duhem S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vaiva G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Baubet T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Habran E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Veerapa E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Debien C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Molenda S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Horn M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Grandgen&#232;vre P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Notredam CE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>D&#8217;Hondt F</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Factors associated with mental health disorders among university students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2020</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JAMA Netw Open</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e2025591</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wathelet M, Duhem S, Vaiva G, Baubet T, Habran E, Veerapa E, Debien C, Molenda S, Horn M, Grandgen&#232;vre P, Notredam CE, D&#8217;Hondt F. Factors associated with mental health disorders among university students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2025591. DOI: 10.1001&#47;jamanetworkopen.2020.25591</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;jamanetworkopen.2020.25591</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="76">
        <RefAuthor>Faisal RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jobe MC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ahmed O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sharker T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mental health status, anxiety, and depression levels of Bangladeshi university students during the COVID-19 pandemic</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2022</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Ment Health Addict</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1500-1515</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Faisal RA, Jobe MC, Ahmed O, Sharker T. Mental health status, anxiety, and depression levels of Bangladeshi university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1500-1515. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s11469-020-00458-y</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s11469-020-00458-y</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="77">
        <RefAuthor>O&#39;Byrne L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gavin B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Adamis D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lim YX</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McNicholas F</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Levels of stress in medical students due to COVID-19</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Med Ethics</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>383-388</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>O&#39;Byrne L, Gavin B, Adamis D, Lim YX, McNicholas F. Levels of stress in medical students due to COVID-19. J Med Ethics. 2021;47(6):383-388. DOI: 10.1136&#47;medethics-2020-107155</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;medethics-2020-107155</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="78">
        <RefAuthor>Shi M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Liu L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wang ZY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wang L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Prevalence of depressive symptoms and its correlations with positive psychological variables among Chinese medical students: An exploratory cross-sectional study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Psychiatry</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shi M, Liu L, Wang ZY, Wang L. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and its correlations with positive psychological variables among Chinese medical students: An exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:3. DOI: 10.1186&#47;s12888-016-0710-3</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;s12888-016-0710-3</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="79">
        <RefAuthor>Souri H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hasanirad T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Relationship between resilience, optimism and psychological well-being in students of medicine</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Procedia Soc Behav Sci</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1541-1544</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Souri H, Hasanirad T. Relationship between resilience, optimism and psychological well-being in students of medicine. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;30:1541-1544. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.sbspro.2011.10.299</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.sbspro.2011.10.299</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="80">
        <RefAuthor>King LA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The health benefits of writing about life goals</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>798-807</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>King LA. The health benefits of writing about life goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(7):798-807. DOI: 10.1177&#47;014616720127700</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1177&#47;014616720127700</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="81">
        <RefAuthor>Loveday PM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lovell GP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jones CM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The best possible selves intervention: A review of the literature to evaluate efficacy and guide future research</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Happiness Stud</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>607-628</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Loveday PM, Lovell GP, Jones CM. The best possible selves intervention: A review of the literature to evaluate efficacy and guide future research. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:607-628. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10902-016-9824-z</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10902-016-9824-z</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="82">
        <RefAuthor>Peters ML</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Flink IK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boersma K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Linton SJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Posit Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>204-211</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Peters ML, Flink IK, Boersma K, Linton SJ. Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies&#63; J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(3):204-211. DOI: 10.1080&#47;17439761003790963</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;17439761003790963</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="83">
        <RefAuthor>Hanssen MM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Peters ML</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vlaeyen JW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Meevissen YM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vancleef LM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Optimism lowers pain: evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pain</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>53-58</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hanssen MM, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Meevissen YM, Vancleef LM. Optimism lowers pain: evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms. Pain. 2013;154(1):53-58. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.pain.2012.08.006</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.pain.2012.08.006</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="84">
        <RefAuthor>Boselie JJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vancleef LM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Smeets T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Peters ML</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Increasing optimism abolishes pain-induced impairments in executive task performance</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Pain</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>334-340</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Boselie JJ, Vancleef LM, Smeets T, Peters ML. Increasing optimism abolishes pain-induced impairments in executive task performance. Pain. 2014;155(2):334-340. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.pain.2013.10.014</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.pain.2013.10.014</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="85">
        <RefAuthor>Froh JJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sefick WJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Emmons RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Sch Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>213-233</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Froh JJ, Sefick WJ, Emmons RA. Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. J Sch Psychol. 2008;46(2):213-233. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.jsp.2007.03.005</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.jsp.2007.03.005</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="86">
        <RefAuthor>Davis DE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Choe E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Meyers J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wade N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Varjas K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gifford A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Quinn A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hook JN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Van Tongeren DR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Griffin BJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Worthington EL</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2016</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Couns Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>20-31</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Davis DE, Choe E, Meyers J, Wade N, Varjas K, Gifford A, Quinn A, Hook JN, Van Tongeren DR, Griffin BJ, Worthington EL. Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. J Couns Psychol. 2016;63(1):20-31. DOI: 10.1037&#47;cou0000107</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;cou0000107</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="87">
        <RefAuthor>Megawati P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lestari S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lestari R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Gratitude training to improve subjective well-being among adolescents living on orphanages</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Human Indonesian Psychol J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>13-22</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Megawati P, Lestari S, Lestari R. Gratitude training to improve subjective well-being among adolescents living on orphanages. Human Indonesian Psychol J. 2019;16(1):13-22. DOI: 10.26555&#47;humanitas.v16i1.9196</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.26555&#47;humanitas.v16i1.9196</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="88">
        <RefAuthor>Bolier L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Haverman M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Westerhof GJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Riper H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Smit F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bohlmeijer E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2013</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Public Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>119</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):119. DOI: 10.1186&#47;1471-2458-13-119</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;1471-2458-13-119</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="89">
        <RefAuthor>Simeon D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yehuda R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cunill R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Knutelska M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Putnam FW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Smith LM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Factors associated with resilience in healthy adults</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Psychoneuroendocrinology</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1149-1152</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Simeon D, Yehuda R, Cunill R, Knutelska M, Putnam FW, Smith LM. Factors associated with resilience in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32(8-10):1149-1152. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.psyneuen.2007.08.005</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.psyneuen.2007.08.005</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="90">
        <RefAuthor>Smith G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Does gender influence online survey participation&#63; A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Smith G. Does gender influence online survey participation&#63; A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. San Jos&#233;: San Jos&#233; State University; 2008.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="91">
        <RefAuthor>Otufowora A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Liu Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Young H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Egan KL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Varma DS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Striley CW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cottler LB</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Sex differences in willingness to participate in research based on study risk level among a community sample of African Americans in North Central Florida</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2021</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Immigrant Minority Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>19-27</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Otufowora A, Liu Y, Young H, Egan KL, Varma DS, Striley CW, Cottler LB. Sex differences in willingness to participate in research based on study risk level among a community sample of African Americans in North Central Florida. J Immigrant Minority Health. 2021;23(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s10903-020-01015-4</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s10903-020-01015-4</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the constructs considered in the study</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 1: Deskriptive Statistik der in der Untersuchung ber&#252;cksichtigen Konstrukte</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">2en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">2de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 2: Correlation analysis of the constructs considered in the study</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 2: Korrelationsanalyse der in der Untersuchung ber&#252;cksichtigen Konstrukte</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">3en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">3de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 3: Multivariate regression analysis to test the hypothesis of whether gratitude is a predictor of resilience in medical students</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 3: Multivariate Regressionsanalyse zur Pr&#252;fung der Hypothese, ob Dankbarkeit bei Medizinstudierenden ein Pr&#228;diktor f&#252;r Resilienz ist</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <NoOfTables>3</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <Figure format="png" height="555" width="792">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: Path model analysis to test the hypothesis that there is an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience. Cross-sectional survey of medical students</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 1: Pfadmodellanalyse zur Pr&#252;fung der Hypothese, dass es einen indirekten Effekt von Dankbarkeit auf Resilienz gibt</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <NoOfPictures>1</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>