<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE GmsArticle SYSTEM "http://www.egms.de/dtd/2.0.34/GmsArticle.dtd">
<GmsArticle xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>zma001287</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/zma001287</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0012872</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType language="en">editorial</ArticleType>
    <ArticleType language="de">Leitartikel</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Integration in the light of curriculum design</Title>
      <TitleTranslated language="de">Die Integration im Lichte der Curriculumgestaltung</TitleTranslated>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Wijnen-Meijer</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Wijnen-Meijer</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Marjo</Firstname>
          <Initials>M</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Prof. Dr.</AcademicTitle>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Ismaninger Stra&#223;e 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany, Phone: &#43;49 (0)89&#47;4140-6290, Fax: &#43;49 (0)89&#47;4140-6269<Affiliation>Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany</Affiliation></Address>
        <Address language="de">Technische Universit&#228;t M&#252;nchen, Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Medizin, TUM Medical Education Center, Ismaninger Stra&#223;e 22, 81675 M&#252;nchen, Deutschland, Tel.: &#43;49 (0)89&#47;4140-6290, Fax: &#43;49 (0)89&#47;4140-6269<Affiliation>Technische Universit&#228;t M&#252;nchen, Fakult&#228;t f&#252;r Medizin, TUM Medical Education Center, M&#252;nchen, Deutschland</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>marjo.wijnen-meijer&#64;tum.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <SectionHeading language="en">Curriculum Design</SectionHeading>
      <SectionHeading language="de">Curriculumsgestaltung</SectionHeading>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DateReceived>20191007</DateReceived>
    <DateRevised>20191007</DateRevised>
    <DateAccepted>20191007</DateAccepted>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20191115</DatePublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <LanguageTranslation>germ</LanguageTranslation>
    <License license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
      <AltText language="en">This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</AltText>
      <AltText language="de">Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).</AltText>
    </License>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>2366-5017</ISSN>
        <Volume>36</Volume>
        <Issue>6</Issue>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Journal for Medical Education</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS J Med Educ</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>79</ArticleNo>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Editorial">
      <MainHeadline>Editorial</MainHeadline><Pgraph>When discussing the curriculum, it is often the content that is the main topic of discussion. </Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Which topics should be addressed&#63; </ListItem><ListItem level="1">What skills should be learned&#63; </ListItem><ListItem level="1">What concepts should a student learn&#63;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Of course, the content of the training is important, but also the structure is relevant. Because new knowledge is built on existing knowledge, the order in which something is learned affects how the student ultimately remembers what he has learned. </Pgraph><Pgraph>An important concept when it comes to the structure of a curriculum is integration.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The first form of integration is horizontal integration, whereby different disciplines, traditionally taught at the same stage of the curriculum, are thematically clustered. An example of this is a system-based curriculum.  In such a curriculum, all relevant knowledge about, for example, the cardiovascular or musculoskeletal system is taught during the same period <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Although this form of integration makes it easier for students to make the connections between different subjects, the distinction between the pre-clinical (theoretical) and clinical (practical) phase remains. This often results in difficulties for students to apply the knowledge they have learned in the preclinical phase in practice <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In order to facilitate the transition from the pre-clinical phase to the clinical phase, many curricula at medical schools are structured according to the principle of vertical integration. This principle is also described in the Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020, with the aim to connect the clinical and theoretical content. </Pgraph><Pgraph>This form of integration involves the integration of basic science and clinical practice, with both aspects being programmed throughout the curriculum <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Another important feature of vertical integration is that students gain clinical experience in clerkships or other forms of contact with patients from the very beginning of medical school <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Research shows that early clinical experience leads to increased motivation and improvement of clinical skills <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. In addition, the students have a better understanding of the relevance of the theory and they learn early on what it means to behave professionally and to work in a team <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>A central part of vertical integration is the combination of the theoretical and the practical part of the programme. Both components are necessary for the development of medical expertise, and the learning effect is greater if the connection between theory and practice is clear to the students <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. By applying the theory in practice, the theory gets more meaning, which makes it easier to really understand it, which makes it more applicable in practice the next time.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In addition, when students come into contact with specific patient cases early in the curriculum, they build mental structures to which clinical information and pathologies can be linked. These so-called illness scripts make it easier for students to diagnose and to work in clinical practice <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Another important part of vertical integration is the increased role of workplace learning. This gives students the opportunity to perform authentic activities in a real-life context <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. By gradually phasing out supervision and giving them more responsibility, they are progressively being prepared for their future work as doctors. As early as 1978, Vygotsky described in his theory on the &#8220;Zone of Proximal Development&#8221; that competence development should take place step by step, with the help of a more experienced person. When a trainee performs a task for the first time, the supervisor has full control and responsibility. This external control decreases gradually, until the trainee no longer needs it at all and can carry out the task completely independently <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In addition, workplace learning they learn how to work in a team and are included in the medical community at an early stage <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. In 1991, Lave and Wenger introduced the term &#8220;Community of Practice&#8221;. This indicates that it is important for learners to be part of a professional community. The cooperation between inexperienced and experienced members stimulates the exchange of knowledge. In the beginning, the new members fulfil the role of &#8220;peripheral&#8221; participants and are increasingly shifting towards core participants, whereby they can in turn guide new members <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Although vertical integration concerns the structure of medical training, the discussion should not focus on the distribution of hours for certain parts of the curriculum. The core of vertical integration is that students have sufficient and early contact with clinical practice, combined with a good theoretical basis. All this should help to ensure that students are well prepared for their work as doctors, both in terms of knowledge and skills, as well as functioning as a member of the community. This issue describes a number of topics and examples that fit in well with this model.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In Trauschke&#39;s article <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink> it becomes clear that it is not self-evident that what the students learn in the pre-clinical phase can actually be applied in the clinical phase. There appear to be misconceptions regarding the Physiological Electrocardiogram. K&#252;hl et al. <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink> describe a very practical example of vertical integration through the improvement of a Biochemistry Course. Engel et al. <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink> also describe how the connection between example cases and real patient cases can be made, during a course in general medicine. The articles by Kadmon et al. <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink> and Rotthoff et al. <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink> describe how workplace learning can be better structured in the practical year. Through the introduction of entrustable professional activities and structural feedback sessions, students are gradually prepared for their future work. Gebhard et al. <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink> report in their article how clinical experience and early contact with the various disciplines have an influence on the final specialization choice of students. When preparing for work as a doctor, teaching is also relevant. And Fr&#246;hlich et al. <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink> describe how student tutors can be prepared to conduct an ultrasound training to younger students. This allows them to better fulfil their role as a core participant in the community of practice.</Pgraph><Pgraph>We hope these articles will inspire curriculum developers in the further design of medical education.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Leitartikel">
      <MainHeadline>Leitartikel</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Bei der Frage der Gestaltung des medizinischen Curriculums, stehen meistens die zu vermittelnden Inhalte im Mittelpunkt der Diskussion. </Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Welche Themen sollten behandelt werden&#63; </ListItem><ListItem level="1">Welche F&#228;higkeiten sollten erlernt werden&#63; </ListItem><ListItem level="1">Welche Konzepte sollten die Studierenden lernen&#63;</ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Nat&#252;rlich sind die Ausbildungsinhalte wichtig, aber auch die Struktur ist relevant. Da neues Wissen auf vorhandenem Wissen aufbaut, beeinflusst die Reihenfolge, in der etwas gelernt wird, wie sich die Studierenden letztendlich an das Gelernte erinnern. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Ein wichtiges Konzept f&#252;r die Struktur eines Curriculums ist die Integration.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die erste Form der Integration ist die horizontale Integration, bei der verschiedene Disziplinen, die traditionell in der gleichen Phase des Lehrplans unterrichtet werden, thematisch geb&#252;ndelt werden. Ein Beispiel daf&#252;r ist ein systembasierter Lehrplan. In einem solchen Curriculum werden im gleichen Zeitraum alle relevanten Kenntnisse, z.B. &#252;ber den Herz-Kreislauf- oder Bewegungsapparat, vermittelt <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Obwohl diese Form der Integration es den Studierenden erleichtert, die Verbindungen zwischen verschiedenen F&#228;chern herzustellen, bleibt die Unterscheidung zwischen pr&#228;klinischer (theoretischer) und klinischer (praktischer) Phase bestehen. Dies f&#252;hrt oft zu Schwierigkeiten f&#252;r die Studierenden, das &#8211; in der pr&#228;klinischen Phase erworbene Wissen &#8211; in der Praxis anzuwenden <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Um den &#220;bergang von der pr&#228;klinischen Phase in die klinische Phase zu erleichtern, sind viele Lehrpl&#228;ne an medizinischen Fakult&#228;ten nach dem Prinzip der vertikalen Integration aufgebaut. Dieses Prinzip wird auch im Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020 beschrieben, mit dem Ziel, die klinischen und theoretischen Inhalte zu verbinden. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Diese Form der Integration beinhaltet die Integration von Grundkenntnisse und klinischer Praxis, wobei beide Aspekte im gesamten Lehrplan enthalten sind <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Ein weiteres wichtiges Merkmal der vertikalen Integration ist, dass die Studierenden von Anfang an klinische Erfahrungen in Praktika oder anderen Formen des Patientenkontaktes sammeln <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>. Untersuchungen zeigen, dass fr&#252;he klinische Erfahrungen zu einer erh&#246;hten Motivation und Verbesserung der klinischen F&#228;higkeiten f&#252;hren <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. Dar&#252;ber hinaus haben die Studierenden ein besseres Verst&#228;ndnis f&#252;r die Relevanz der Theorie und lernen fr&#252;hzeitig, was es bedeutet, sich professionell zu verhalten und im Team zu arbeiten <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Ein zentraler Bestandteil der vertikalen Integration ist die Kombination aus theoretischem und praktischem Teil des Programms. Beide Komponenten sind f&#252;r die Entwicklung der medizinischen Expertise notwendig, und der Lerneffekt ist gr&#246;&#223;er, wenn der Zusammenhang zwischen Theorie und Praxis f&#252;r die Studierenden klar ist <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. Durch die Anwendung der Theorie in der Praxis erh&#228;lt die Theorie mehr Bedeutung, was deren Verst&#228;ndnis erleichtert und sie beim n&#228;chsten Mal in der Praxis besser anwendbar macht.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Dar&#252;ber hinaus bauen die Studierenden, wenn sie fr&#252;hzeitig mit bestimmten Patientenf&#228;llen in Ber&#252;hrung kommen, mentale Strukturen auf, mit denen klinische Informationen und Pathologien verkn&#252;pft werden k&#246;nnen. Diese sogenannten Krankheitsskripte erleichtern den Studierenden die Diagnose und die Arbeit in der klinischen Praxis <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Ein weiterer wichtiger Teil der vertikalen Integration ist die zunehmende Bedeutung des Lernens am Arbeitsplatz. Dies gibt den Studierenden die M&#246;glichkeit, authentische Aktivit&#228;ten in einem realen Kontext durchzuf&#252;hren <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. Durch den schrittweisen Abbau der Aufsicht und die &#220;bertragung von mehr Verantwortung werden sie nach und nach auf ihre zuk&#252;nftige T&#228;tigkeit als &#196;rztinnen und &#196;rzte vorbereitet. Bereits 1978 beschrieb Vygotsky in seiner Theorie zur &#8222;Zone der proximalen Entwicklung&#8220;, dass die Kompetenzentwicklung Schritt f&#252;r Schritt mit Hilfe einer erfahreneren Person erfolgen sollte. Wenn Studierende eine Aufgabe zum ersten Mal ausf&#252;hren, haben die Vorgesetzten die volle Kontrolle und Verantwortung. Diese externe Kontrolle nimmt allm&#228;hlich ab, bis die Studierenden sie &#252;berhaupt nicht mehr ben&#246;tigen und die Aufgabe v&#246;llig selbstst&#228;ndig ausf&#252;hren k&#246;nnen <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>&#220;berdies lernen sie am Arbeitsplatz, im Team zu arbeiten und werden fr&#252;hzeitig in die medizinische Gemeinschaft einbezogen <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. 1991 f&#252;hrten Lave und Wenger den Begriff &#8222;Community of Practice&#8220; ein. Dies zeigt, dass es f&#252;r die Lernenden wichtig ist Teil einer professionellen Gemeinschaft zu sein. Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen unerfahrenen und erfahrenen Mitgliedern regt den Wissensaustausch an. Zu Beginn nehmen die neuen Mitglieder die Rolle der &#8222;peripheren&#8220; Teilnehmer wahr und verlagern sich zunehmend zu &#8222;Kernteilnehmern&#8220;, wodurch sie wiederum neue Mitglieder f&#252;hren k&#246;nnen <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Obwohl die vertikale Integration die Struktur der medizinischen Ausbildung betrifft, sollte sich die Diskussion nicht auf die Verteilung der Stunden f&#252;r bestimmte Teile des Lehrplans konzentrieren. Der Kern der vertikalen Integration ist, dass die Studierenden einen ausreichenden und fr&#252;hen Kontakt zur klinischen Praxis haben, kombiniert mit einer guten theoretischen Basis. All dies soll dazu beitragen, dass die Studierenden sowohl in Bezug auf ihre Kenntnisse und F&#228;higkeiten als &#196;rztinnen und &#196;rzte als auch als Mitglied der Gemeinschaft gut auf ihre Arbeit vorbereitet sind. Diese Ausgabe beschreibt eine Reihe von Themen und Beispielen, die gut zu diesem Modell passen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In Trauschkes Artikel <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink> wird deutlich, dass es nicht selbstverst&#228;ndlich ist, dass das, was die Studierenden in der pr&#228;klinischen Phase lernen, tats&#228;chlich in der klinischen Phase angewendet werden kann. Der Artikel zeigt auf wie Fehlvorstellungen, die bez&#252;glich des physiologischen Elektrokardiogramms bestehen, durch lernf&#246;rderliche Interventionen &#252;berwunden werden k&#246;nnen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>K&#252;hl et al. <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink> beschreiben ein sehr praktisches Beispiel f&#252;r vertikale Integration durch die Verbesserung eines Biochemiekurses. Engel et al. <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink> beschreiben auch, wie der Zusammenhang zwischen exemplarischen F&#228;llen und realen Patientenf&#228;llen w&#228;hrend eines Kurses in der Allgemeinmedizin hergestellt werden kann. Die Artikel von Kadmon et al. <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink> und Rotthoff et al. <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink> beschreiben, wie das Lernen am Arbeitsplatz im praktischen Jahr besser gestaltet werden kann. Durch die Einf&#252;hrung von &#8222;Anvertraubaren Professionellen T&#228;tigkeiten (APT)&#8220; und strukturellen Feedbackgespr&#228;chen werden die Studierenden schrittweise auf ihre zuk&#252;nftige Arbeit vorbereitet. Gebhard et al. <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink> berichten in ihrem Artikel, wie die klinische Erfahrung und der fr&#252;he Kontakt mit den verschiedenen Disziplinen einen Einfluss auf die endg&#252;ltige Wahl der Spezialisierung der Studierenden haben. Bei der Vorbereitung auf die Arbeit als Arzt ist auch die Lehre relevant. Und Fr&#246;hlich et al. <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink> beschreiben, wie studentische Tutoren darauf vorbereitet werden k&#246;nnen, eine Ultraschallausbildung f&#252;r j&#252;ngere Studierende durchzuf&#252;hren. Dies erm&#246;glicht es ihnen, ihre Rolle als Kernteilnehmer in der Praxisgemeinschaft besser zu erf&#252;llen.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Wir hoffen, dass diese Artikel die Lehrplanentwickler bei der weiteren Gestaltung der medizinischen Ausbildung inspirieren werden.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Competing interests">
      <MainHeadline>Competing interests</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The author declares that she has no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Interessenkonflikt">
      <MainHeadline>Interessenkonflikt</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Autorin erkl&#228;rt, dass sie keine Interessenkonflikte im Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel hat. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Harden RM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sowden S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dunn WR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1984</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>284-297</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ. 1984;18(4):284-297. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.1984.tb01024.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.1984.tb01024.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Prince KJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boshuizen HP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van der Vleuten CP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scherpbier AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Students&#39;s opinions about their preparation for clinical practice</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>704-712</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Prince KJ, Boshuizen HP, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. Students&#39;s opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Med Educ. 2005;39(7):704-712. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02207.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02207.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Prideaux D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Integrated learning</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>A practical guide for medical teachers</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>181-186</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Prideaux D. Integrated learning. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2009. p.181-186.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Wijnen-Meijer M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>ten Cate OT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van der Schaaf M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Borleffs JCC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Vertical integration in medical school: effect on the transition to postgraduate training</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>272-279</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Wijnen-Meijer M, ten Cate OT, van der Schaaf M, Borleffs JCC. Vertical integration in medical school: effect on the transition to postgraduate training. Med Educ. 2010;44(3):272-279. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2009.03571.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2009.03571.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Kamalski DM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Braak EW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cate OT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Borleffs JC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Early clerkships</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>915-920</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kamalski DM, Braak EW, Cate OT, Borleffs JC. Early clerkships. Med Teach. 2007;29(9):915-920. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590701601576</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590701601576</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Dornan T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bundy C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Learning in practice: What can experience add to early medical education&#63; Consenses survey</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMJ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>834-837</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dornan T, Bundy C. Learning in practice: What can experience add to early medical education&#63; Consenses survey. BMJ. 2004;329:834-837. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bmj.329.7470.834</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bmj.329.7470.834</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Regehr G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Norman GR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1996</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>988-1001</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Regehr G, Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med. 1996;71(9):988-1001. DOI: 10.1097&#47;00001888-199609000-00015</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;00001888-199609000-00015</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Dreyfus HL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dreyfus SE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1984</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell; 1984.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Torre DM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hernandez DA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Castiglioni A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Durning SJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Daley BJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hemmer PA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>LaRochelle J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The Clinical Reasoning Mapping Exercise (CResME): a new tool for exploring clinical reasoning</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Perspect Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>47-51</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Torre DM, Hernandez DA, Castiglioni A, Durning SJ, Daley BJ, Hemmer PA, LaRochelle J. The Clinical Reasoning Mapping Exercise (CResME): a new tool for exploring clinical reasoning. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s40037-018-0493-y</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s40037-018-0493-y</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Liljedahl M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>On learning in the clinical environment</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2018</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Perspect Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>272-275</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Liljedahl M. On learning in the clinical environment. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(4):272-275. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s40037-018-0441-x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s40037-018-0441-x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Ramani S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Leinster S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>347-364</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347-364. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590802061613</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590802061613</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Vygotsky LS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1978</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Minds in society. The development of higher psychological processes</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Vygotsky LS. Minds in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Dornan T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boshuizen HP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>King N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scherpbier AJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students&#39;workplace learning</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>84-91</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dornan T, Boshuizen HP, King N, Scherpbier AJ. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students&#39;workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Lave J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wenger E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1991</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Situated learning: legitmate peripheral participation</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitmate peripheral participation. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991. DOI: 10.1017&#47;CBO9780511815355</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.1017&#47;CBO9780511815355</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Trauschke M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A qualitative study on the development and rectification of advanced medical students&#39; misconceptions about the physiological electrocardiogram (ECG)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc72</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Trauschke M. A qualitative study on the development and rectification of advanced medical students&#39; misconceptions about the physiological electrocardiogram (ECG). GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc72. DOI: 10.3205&#47;zma001280</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;zma001280</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Schneider A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>K&#252;hl M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>K&#252;hl S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Longitudinal curriculum development: gradual optimization of a biochemistry seminar</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc73</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schneider A, K&#252;hl M, K&#252;hl S. Longitudinal curriculum development: gradual optimization of a biochemistry seminar. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc73. DOI: 10.3205&#47;001281</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;001281</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Engel B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Esser M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bleckwenn M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Pilotin a blended-learing-concept for integrating evidence-based medicine into the general practice clerkship</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc71</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Engel B, Esser M, Bleckwenn M. Pilotin a blended-learing-concept for integrating evidence-based medicine into the general practice clerkship. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc71. DOI: 10.3205&#47;zma001279</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;zma001279</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>Berberat PO</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rotthoff T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Baerwald C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehrhardt M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Huenges B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Johannink J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Narciss E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Obertacke U</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Peters H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kadmon M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Entrustable professional activities in final year unterdraduate medical training</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc70</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Berberat PO, Rotthoff T, Baerwald C, Ehrhardt M, Huenges B, Johannink J, Narciss E, Obertacke U, Peters H, Kadmon M. Entrustable professional activities in final year unterdraduate medical training. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc70. DOI: 10.3205&#47;zma001278</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;zma001278</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Schick K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Eissner A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wijnen-Meijer M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Johannink J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Huenges B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehrhardt M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kadmon M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Berberat PO</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rotthoff T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Implementing a logbook on Entrustable professional activities in the final year of undergraduate medical education in Germany - a multicentric pilot study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc69</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schick K, Eissner A, Wijnen-Meijer M, Johannink J, Huenges B, Ehrhardt M, Kadmon M, Berberat PO, Rotthoff T. Implementing a logbook on Entrustable professional activities in the final year of undergraduate medical education in Germany - a multicentric pilot study. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(4):Doc69. DOI: 10.3205&#47;zma001177</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;zma001177</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Gebhard A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#252;ller-Hilke B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Criteria of medical students fort he selection of their future clinical specialisation: a cross-sectional survey at the Medical Faculty of Rostock</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc76</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gebhard A, M&#252;ller-Hilke B. Criteria of medical students fort he selection of their future clinical specialisation: a cross-sectional survey at the Medical Faculty of Rostock. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc76. DOI: 10.3205&#47;zma001284</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;zma001284</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>Celebi N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Griewatz J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ilg M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zipfel S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Riessen R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Malek NP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pauluschke-Fr&#246;hlich J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Debove I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Muller R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fr&#246;hlich E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Three different ways of training ultrasound student-tutors yield significant gains in tutee&#39;s scanning-skills</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2019</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS J Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc77</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Celebi N, Griewatz J, Ilg M, Zipfel S, Riessen R, Malek NP, Pauluschke-Fr&#246;hlich J, Debove I, Muller R, Fr&#246;hlich E. Three different ways of training ultrasound student-tutors yield significant gains in tutee&#39;s scanning-skills. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc77. DOI: 10.3205&#47;001285</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>https:&#47;&#47;doi.org&#47;10.3205&#47;001285</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <NoOfTables>0</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>