Next-generation point-of-care diagnostics for urinary tract infections: a systematic review of rapid pathogen detection methods

id000108 10.3205/id000108 urn:nbn:de:0183-id0001082 Review Article Next-generation point-of-care diagnostics for urinary tract infections: a systematic review of rapid pathogen detection methods Juste-Alvarez Juste-Alvarez Silvia S

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba, s/n, 28041 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

sjustealvarez@gmail.com author Medina-Polo Medina-Polo José J

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

jose.medina@salud.madrid.org author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

610 point-of-care testing urinary tract infections antimicrobial susceptibility testing antimicrobial resistance phenotypic detection 20260916 engl This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). 2195-8831 14 GMS Infectious Diseases GMS Infect Dis 08 Background: Urinary tract infections are among the most prevalent bacterial infections worldwide, with Escherichia coli as the leading pathogen. Conventional diagnostic methods, including urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, require 48–72 hours, often delaying targeted therapy and promoting empirical antibiotic use, thereby exacerbating antimicrobial resistance.Objective: This review summarizes advances in point-of-care diagnostic technologies for rapid detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in localized or uncomplicated urinary tract infections.Methods: A comprehensive literature review of studies published between 2008 and 2025 was conducted using MeSH and free-text searches for “point-of-care testing”, “urinary tract infection”, “rapid diagnostics”, and related terms. Included studies described the mechanisms, performance, and clinical applicability of emerging point-of-care systems.Results: Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Paper-based assays, lateral-flow tests, microfluidic devices, and hydrogel biosensors demonstrated rapid bacterial detection (from <5 min to 6 h) with variable sensitivities (10–106 CFU/mL). Among commercial devices, the Sysmex PA-100 antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) system provided phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing within 30–45 minutes and achieved over 95% specificity compared with standard microbiology, while the Lodestar DX (LAMP-based) and Bosch Vivalytic (PCR-based) systems enabled molecular identification of uropathogens and resistance genes within 40–146 minutes.Conclusions: Point-of-care diagnostic platforms substantially reduce diagnostic turnaround, improve antibiotic stewardship, and offer cost-effective alternatives to conventional culture. The Sysmex PA-100 system currently represents the most clinically validated phenotypic point-of-care tool for uncomplicated urinary infections management. Future research should focus on expanding diagnostic panels, validating clinical outcomes, and facilitating integration into primary care and antimicrobial stewardship programs. BackgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections globally, with a steadily increasing burden. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, UTI cases increased by 66.45% from 1990 to 2021, reaching approximately 4.49 billion worldwide. UTIs disproportionately affect women: up to 40% experience at least one episode during their lifetime and 10% annually, particularly between ages 16 and 35, with nearly half recurring within one year . In Spain, they account for 19.9% of all community-acquired infections in acute care hospitals, imposing substantial economic costs associated with prolonged hospitalization, treatment, and mortality , , .The traditional classification of UTIs as uncomplicated or complicated is being replaced by the European Association of Urology (EAU) with a system distinguishing localized (without systemic signs) from systemic infections (with fever, chills, bacteraemia, or organ involvement such as pyelonephritis or prostatitis). Risk factors including age, anatomical abnormalities, immunosuppression, catheters, and pregnancy are recognized as modifiers of disease course and prognosis. This reclassification enhances diagnostic accuracy, facilitates more rational antimicrobial use, reduces therapeutic errors, and establishes a standardized framework for clinical research and trials .A major concern in UTI management remains the excessive empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly in primary care, where up to 90% of antibiotics in Europe are dispensed and approximately 30% are misused . This practice accelerates antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a critical global health threat. Conventional diagnostic techniques such as urine culture and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are dependable but slow, requiring 48–72 hours and frequently delaying targeted therapy. Consequently, empirical t</PlainText></TextGroup>reatment is often initiated and seldom revised once results are available, promoting resistance and therapeutic failure <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Rapid AST is essential to optimize antimicrobial therapy. Although genotypic AST methods provide faster results through the detection of resistance genes, they are costly and limited to predefined targets. Phenotypic AST remains the gold standard, directly assessing microbial growth in the presence of antibiotics <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. Recent developments incorporating microfluidic and nanofluidic platforms <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink> have significantly shortened diagnostic timeframes, producing actionable results within hours and improving infectious disease management <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Among emerging solutions, point-of-care (POC) diagnostic technologies for localized or uncomplicated UTIs represent a major innovation, enabling rapid and accurate pathogen detection directly from urine samples and supporting timely, evidence-based prescribing <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In this context, we conduct a literature review with the purpose of comparing and highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the emerging POC approaches and the relevant advances in on-site detection of pathogens’ mechanisms, suitable to be adapted to UTI diagnosis.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock name="Material and methods" linked="yes"> <MainHeadline>Material and methods</MainHeadline><Pgraph>A comprehensive literature review was conducted to evaluate current POC diagnostic methods for localized UTIs. The search was carried out using the MeSH database and the free-text fields, reviewing articles from 2008 to 2025. The following search terms were used: “recurrent urinary tract infections“, “point-of-care testing”, “urinary tract infection”, “rapid diagnostics”, and “POC UTI”. Studies will be selected in a two-step procedure. In the first step, the titles and abstracts are screened. In the second step, the full text is examined. The selected studies were analysed to describe the underlying mechanisms of action of each diagnostic approach, including enzymatic reactions, immunochromatographic assays, nucleic acid amplification techniques, and biosensor-based methods. Furthermore, commercially available POC UTI diagnostic devices were identified and systematically compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, turnar<TextGroup><PlainText>ound time, usability, and cost-effectiveness. This me</PlainText></TextGroup>thodological approach allowed for a critical assessment of the advantages and limitations of each model within clinical and resource-limited settings.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock name="Results – summary of the evidence" linked="yes"> <MainHeadline>Results – summary of the evidence</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The literature search identified 54 publications, of which 42 full-text articles were reviewed and 34 met the inclusion criteria. Studies excluded lacked relevance to POC diagnostics for UTIs, sufficient methodological detail, or English-language availability. Urinary pathogen detection is classified as laboratory-based (requiring sample processing) or on-site. Laboratory methods – including culture, ELISA, PCR/FISH, and MALDI-TOF – achieve high accuracy but are limited by cost, turnaround time, and dependence on culture. Conversely, POC approaches by exploiting visible colorimetric or enzymatic reactions for visual interpretation, enable rapid, low-cost, and user-friendly testing, although often at the expense of analytical precision and pathogen identification <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Phenotypic AST remains the diagnostic gold standard, directly observing bacterial growth in the presence of antibiotics <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. POC diagnostic tools studies are summarized in Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table" />. There are different action mechanisms: </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Paper-based tests:</Mark1> Paper-based devices provide lightweight, biocompatible platforms with detection times from <30 s to 12 h, depending on enrichment, and sensitivities of 10–10<Superscript>5</Superscript> CFU/mL, achieving up to 90–100% specificity compared with PCR. Overall, paper matrices demonstrate promising sensitivity and selectivity, though performance strongly depends on the detection chemistry, assay integration, and need for enrichment. They also have limited AST capacity <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Lateral flow assays (LFA):</Mark1> Fluid migrates laterally across membranes, triggering specific biorecognition events. Detection times ranged from minutes to hours, with sensitivities spanning 10<Superscript>4</Superscript>–10<Superscript>6</Superscript> CFU/mL, while specificity was assured by antibody-based recognition and it depends on the detection labels and assay design. <TextGroup><PlainText>RapidBac</PlainText></TextGroup><Superscript>®</Superscript> is a direct sandwich-format LFA which reported 86% overall sensitivity (96–99% for Gram-negative bacteria) and 94% specificity in 20 minutes <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. The Pt-Au nanoparticle LFA <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink> enabled rapid visual detection within minutes, with higher sensitivity than conventional AuNP strips. The dual FITC-LFIA achieved the best numerical performance, with a detection limit of 10<Superscript>4</Superscript> CFU/mL (semi-quantitative) and high specificity via monoclonal antibodies <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>. The PdNP-based LFA demonstrated a 5–10-fold sensitivity increase over AuNP systems, also with rapid readout and high specificity <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>. By contrast, the bidirectional lac-dye LFA showed the lowest sensitivity (10<Superscript>6</Superscript> CFU/mL) and required 12 h pre-culture, although specificity remained adequate <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. Overall, PdNP and FITC-based LFAs offered the greatest improvements in sensitivity, while all systems maintained reliable specificity. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Stack pad assays:</Mark1> Using vertically aligned membranes, they achieve <5 min detection and 10<Superscript>2</Superscript> CFU/mL sensitivity, 1,000× greater than ELISA; and high specificity due to multilayer selective blocking strategies <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Hydrogels:</Mark1> Hydrogel-based biosensors, particularly chitosan hydrogels, provided rapid (5–80 min) and highly sensitive (<1 nM to 10<Superscript>7</Superscript> CFU/mL) detection, highlighting trade-offs between speed, sensitivity, and accessibility <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>. Despite promising analytical performance, clinical validation data remain limited.</Pgraph><Pgraph>These promising approaches to POC detection of pathogens have not consolidated clinical data on sensitivity, specificity, or time-to-result yet available.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Among commercial innovations, the Sysmex PA-100 AST System (Sysmex Astrego AB, Uppsala, Sweden) <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, Bosch Vivalytic UTI POCT (Bosch Healthcare Solutions GmbH, Waiblingen, Germany) <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink> and Lodestar DX (Llusern Scientific, Cardiff, UK) <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink> are leading POC platforms. Sysmex PA-100 AST POCT is a commercialized device which integrates nanofluidics and phase-contrast microscopy to detect bacteriuria (≥5×10<Superscript>4</Superscript> CFU/mL) <TextGroup><PlainText>within 15 minutes</PlainText></TextGroup> and perform phenotypic AST within 30–4<TextGroup><PlainText>5 m</PlainText></TextGroup>inutes <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. It monitors bacterial growth in <TextGroup><PlainText>microchambers</PlainText></TextGroup> with antibiotics, analyzing responses <TextGroup><PlainText>according</PlainText></TextGroup> to EUCAST breakpoints. Optimized for <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2>, <TextGroup><Mark2>K. pneumoniae</Mark2></TextGroup>, <Mark2>P. mirabilis</Mark2>, <Mark2>E. faecalis</Mark2>, and <Mark2>S. saprophyti</Mark2><Mark2></Mark2><TextGroup><Mark2>c</Mark2></TextGroup><Mark2>us</Mark2>, it provides true phenotypic assessment and classifies results as susceptible (S), I (susceptible, increased exposure), R(resistant), or not applicable (NA)m. It uses a proprietary classification algorithm to group isolates (<Mark2>Enterobacterales, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus</Mark2>) and apply the corresponding breakpoints. Non-target species may be detected but could yield inaccurate AST interpretations if resistance is near the breakpoint <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. In other words, Sysmex PA-100 AST POCT offers results as positive or negative response for microorganisms isolation. The bacterial are in different channels in the device and according to the inhibition by antibiotics, it is informed as susceptible or resistant. The results regarding antibiogram may help in the differentiation to fungi. There is some research investigating the concordance with urine cultures <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In comparison, the Lodestar DX employs loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for DNA detection of major uropathogens within 40 minutes. Its target organisms include <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2>, <Mark2>Enterococcus</Mark2> species, <Mark2>S. saprophyticus</Mark2>, <Mark2>P. aeruginosa</Mark2>, <Mark2>P. mirabilis</Mark2>, and <Mark2>Klebsiella</Mark2>. A limitation is that it provides only genotypic data; no phenotypic AST; and there may be possible genotype–phenotype mismatch <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>fASTest<Superscript>®</Superscript> microfluidic system measures single-cell growth dynamics to deliver phenotypic AST in <30 minutes with clinically relevant sensitivity (10<Superscript>4</Superscript> CFU/mL), applicable to multiple body fluids. The single-cell averaging strategy minimizes readout noise and enables reliable detection in 10–30 min, even in <10 min without precultivation. fASTest<Superscript>®</Superscript> extends beyond <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2> to other uropathogens such as<Mark2> K. pneumoniae</Mark2> and <Mark2>S. saprophyticus</Mark2>. The platform offers the potential to identify polymicrobial infections through characteristic broadening of growth rate distributions and contaminants can often be excluded by differences in morphology and growth dynamics <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. Additional POC tests include dipstick-based tools (Dip UTI, TestCard, UriScreen™), which measure indirect markers (nitrites, leucocytes, catalase), offering 2–3 min results via smartphone readout, though lacking pathogen or AST data. In contrast, culture-based systems such as Flexicult™ and Uricult<Superscript>®</Superscript>Trio, DipStreak<Superscript>®</Superscript>, and DiaSlide<Superscript>®</Superscript> provide semi-quantitative identification and AST within 16–24 h, suitable for surveillance but not rapid therapy guidance <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. Two randomised controlled trials evaluated Flexicult Human in uncomplicated UTI in women. It demonstrated pooled sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 67%, with a reduction in initial antibiotic prescribing and high accuracy for phenotypic AST supporting its potential role in guiding targeted therapy rather than empirical treatment. Uricult<Superscript>®</Superscript> Trio was reported to be easy to use and convenient, but available studies provided limited data on its impact on clinical management, particularly in cases of asymptomatic bacteriuria <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The Vivalytic system, currently under development by Bosch Healthcare Solutions GmbH, uses PCR-based microarrays to identify nucleic acids uropathogens from selected uropathogenic species at concentrations above 10<Superscript>4</Superscript>–5×10<Superscript>4</Superscript> CFU/mL and resistance genes in ~14<TextGroup><PlainText>6 m</PlainText></TextGroup>inutes, showing >90% diagnostic accuracy for <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2>, <TextGroup><Mark2>E. faecalis</Mark2></TextGroup>, <Mark2>Proteus </Mark2>spp., <Mark2>P. aeruginosa</Mark2>, and <Mark2>K. pneumoniae</Mark2> (81–88% for resistance markers) <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Limitations include reduced performance after transport, false negatives at low bacterial loads, and a 9–11% invalid rate. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Recent studies also demonstrated ultra-rapid AST directly from positive <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2> blood cultures, providing ciprofloxacin and gentamicin susceptibility results within 30 minutes, substantially outperforming conventional methods. Baltekin et al. <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink> reported concordance rates of 92% for ciprofloxacin and 84% for gentamicin (n=59), with valid results in 86% of cases. When tested on clinical isolates, 30-minute concordance reached 86% and 96%, respectively, increasing to 92% and 100% at 60 minutes. These findings confirm that reliable susceptibility results can be obtained as early as 20 minutes using time-dependent thresholds, allowing near real-time reporting and markedly outperforming conventional 4-hour AST assays in clinical laboratories.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock name="Discussion" linked="yes"> <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>UTIs remain among the most frequent bacterial diseases, with <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2> as the predominant etiological agent. Conventional diagnostic methods, although accurate, require 48–72 hours for results and depend on centralized laboratories, specialized personnel, and strict sample handling. These limitations promote empirical antibiotic use, which often leads to inappropriate therapy and fuels AMR <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Within this context, POC diagnostics have emerged as valuable alternatives, allowing rapid, on-site analysis without the need for complex laboratory infrastructure. POC tools substantially shorten turnaround time, facilitating early, evidence-based decisions and strengthening antibiotic stewardship efforts <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Among these technologies, the Sysmex PA-100 system represents one of the most clinically validated advances. Combining nanofluidics and phase-contrast microscopy, it detects bacteriuria within 15 minutes and performs phenotypic AST within an additional 15–30 minutes. It demonstrated enhanced clinical performance in economic analysis, reducing first-line antibiotic failure rates due to its high concordance with standard microbiological methods <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. Multicenter evaluations demonstrated high concordance with conventional microbiology. A Spanish observational study validated its high sensitivity and specificity, reporting optimized treatment decisions in 78.4% of cases with PA-100, compared to 58.3% under standard clinical practice (p<0.0001). The device markedly reduced unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions: among culture-negative samples, it recommended no treatment in 99.3% of cases versus 49.6% by clinicians (p<0.0001), even among culture-positive patients, the device suggested non-treatment in 34.3% of cases versus 15.4% by clinicians (p=0.0002), and reduced inappropriate antibiotic selection from 18.2% to 2.1% (p<0.0001) <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. Another study in women with uncomplicated UTI showed a sensitivity of 84.0% (65.7% when operator-d<TextGroup><PlainText>ependen</PlainText></TextGroup>t) and specificity near 99% <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Overall categorical agreement for AST ranged from 85.4% (95% CI: 75.9–92.2%) for ciprofloxacin to 96.4% (CI: 89.9–99.3%) for trimethoprim <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>From a health economic perspective, the NICE-commissioned systematic review of 2023 found that evidence to date was insufficient to determine the cost-effectiveness of POCTs for UTI in primary care <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>. However, Medina-Polo et al. in 2024, demonstrated that full implementation of Sysmex PA-100 in Spain yielded substantial cost benefits. A budget impact model estimated annual savings of € 323.7 million (€ 119/patient) including AMR-related costs and € 971 million over three years. Even when excluding AMR, projected savings remained significant at € 4.25 million per year (€ 1.57/patient) <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, underlining the system’s potential not only to optimize patient-level outcomes but also to relieve economic burdens associated with UTI mismanagement and AMR propagation. </Pgraph><Pgraph>However, there are limitations. The device performance may decrease outside the validated sample specifications and it reports bacteriuria only above 50,000 CFU/mL, potentially missing lower yet clinically relevant counts. Its classification is restricted to broad groups (<Mark2>Enterobacterales, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus</Mark2>) without full species identification, and applies uniform breakpoints across Enterobacterales, which may misclassify atypical strains. Performance is slightly reduced in Gram-positive isolates such as <Mark2>S. saprophyticus</Mark2> and <Mark2>E. faecalis </Mark2><TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>. These methods are mainly suitable for uncomplicated UTIs because the most advanced and clinically validated commercial phenotypic platforms analysed in this review such as Sysmex PA-100 System are optimized for a highly specific panel of common uropathoges (<Mark2>E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, E. faecalis</Mark2>…). These systems carry a high risk of missing low yet highly relevant pathogen counts in complicated cohorts so standard centralized cultures are mandatory for complicated UTUs until broader panels and lower analytical thresholds are clinically validated. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Continuous refinement and validation across diverse patient populations are warranted.</Pgraph><Pgraph>When compared with earlier POC platforms, Sysmex P<TextGroup><PlainText>A-1</PlainText></TextGroup>00 offers superior diagnostic and clinical robustness. Paper-based devices are highly portable, inexpensive, and can reach PCR-level sensitivities (as low as 1<TextGroup><PlainText>0 C</PlainText></TextGroup>FU/mL), but their accuracy depends on detection chemistry and often requires several hours of enrichment. In contrast, PA-100 consistently identifies bacteriuria ≥5×10<Superscript>4</Superscript> CFU/mL within 15 minutes and provides phenotypic AST in 30 minutes. Similarly, dipstick and smartphone-based assays (e.g., Dip UTI, TestCard, UriScreen™) enable rapid home screening in <3 minutes and support early triage, but lack pathogen identification and AST capability, making them unsuitable for therapeutic guidance in confirmed or complicated cases. These tests may serve as preliminary screening tools, while the Sysmex PA-100 provides the necessary depth of information for precise therapeutic interventions. </Pgraph><Pgraph>LFAs, such as RapidBac<Superscript>®</Superscript>, further illustrate the trade-off between accessibility and diagnostic depth. RapidBac<Superscript>®</Superscript> achieves >95% sensitivity for Gram-negative bacteria and 94% specificity within 20 minutes, comparable in speed to Sysmex PA-100. Nevertheless, LFAs are limited to pathogen detection and cannot provide phenotypic AST <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. Sysmex PA-100, by directly observing bacterial growth in antibiotic microenvironments, provides both detection and phenotypic AST, being a decisive advantage for managing complicated or recurrent UTIs, where resistance patterns critically influence outcomes <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. The cut-off point was defined in 50.000 CFU/ml, based on accepted positive cut-off for urine infections 100,000 CFU/mL. It is true that lower level of bacteria can be found. However, Tarrés et al. <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink> reported a sensitivity and specificity for detection of microbiologically confirmed bacteriuria were 84.0% (89/106; 95% CI: 75.6–90.4%) and 99.4% (155/156; 95% CI: 96.5–100%), respectively, for bacterial species within the analyser specifications. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Emerging microfluidic and hydrogel-based POC systems, including stack-pad assays, chitosan hydrogels, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) systems, offer remarkable analytical performance, with detection limits as low as 10<Superscript>2</Superscript> CFU/mL and identification within five minutes – performance that far exceeds the analytical sensitivity of Sysmex PA-100. The fASTest<Superscript>®</Superscript> platform, based on single-cell microfluidic imaging, delivers AST <TextGroup><PlainText>in <30 minutes at clinically relevant thresholds</PlainText></TextGroup> (10<TextGroup><Superscript>4</Superscript><PlainText> C</PlainText></TextGroup>FU/mL). It can also assess polymicrobial samples and various body fluids, including blood and cerebrospinal fluid <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Sysmex and fASTest direct susceptibility testing from urine samples may be affected by non-standardized inocula and occasional polymicrobial infections. However, both options determine susceptibility based on the detection of bacterial growth inhibition in the presence of antibiotics, reflecting the overall response of the microorganisms present in the sample. Despite these limitations, Tarrés et al. <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink> reported a high agreement with conventional urine culture results (85.4–96.4%).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Despite excellent laboratory performance, these devices remain at proof-of-concept stages without regulatory approval or clinical integration comparable to Sysmex. EIS-based biosensors, validated for both Gram-negative (<TextGroup><Mark2>E. coli</Mark2></TextGroup>) and Gram-positive (<Mark2>S. aureus</Mark2>, including MRSA) pathogens, achieve susceptibility determination within 2–2.5 hours – substantially faster than culture – but <TextGroup><PlainText>remain</PlainText></TextGroup> limited to pilot testing <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Molecular systems such as Lodestar DX and Bosch Vivalytic rely on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and PCR microarrays, respectively, detecting uropathogens and selected resistance genes within 40–146 minutes, respectively. While these provide high analytical specificity, their focus on predefined genetic targets can overlook emerging resistance mechanisms or expression-level variations <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>. PCR-based methods indicate genotypic susceptibility by detecting specific resistance genes or mutations. While they are highly accurate for confirming resistance, they cannot definitively prove susceptibility; missing a resistance gene does not guarantee the bacteria will respond to treatment in a clinical setting. For analysis of antibiotic susceptibility, urine culture remains as the gold standard <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>. Sysmex overcomes this constraint by assessing live bacterial response to antibiotics, yielding a true phenotypic profile within an actionable timeframe. The Vivalytic UTI POCT, though still under evaluation, integrates all processing steps into a disposable cartridge, eliminating the need for laboratory referral and demonstrating >90% accuracy for major uropathogens and 81–88% for resistance gene detection <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Other commercially available, home-use, culture-based POC tests (Flexicult™, Uricult<Superscript>®</Superscript> Trio, and DipStreak<Superscript>®</Superscript>) offer advantages such as affordability, pathogen identification, resistance profiling, and quantification. Although slower, these remain cost-effective and adaptable for resource-limited settings. Similarly, ongoing adaptations of multiplex PCR platforms such as Roche SeptiFast<Superscript>®</Superscript>, bioMérieux FilmArray<Superscript>®</Superscript>, and Cepheid GeneXpert<Superscript>®</Superscript> show potential for urinary diagnostics, yet they currently lack bacterial quantification, a parameter essential for clinical decisions <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. Culture-based POCTs demonstrate better diagnostic accuracy than dipstick-based tools, although robust evidence of clinical benefit is still needed to clarify their real impact on antibiotic stewardship, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness, particularly in primary care.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Overall, while emerging technologies exhibit impressive analytical capabilities, most lack extensive clinical validation and regulatory approval. Sysmex PA-100 remains the only CE-marked phenotypic POC system optimized for urinary pathogens, integrating EUCAST-based interpretive algorithms that ensure standardized and reproducible reporting. Its dual capacity for rapid bacteriuria detection and AST supports rational antibiotic use and has demonstrated both clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency. Broader adoption of such validated POC systems could play a pivotal role in combating AMR by reducing diagnostic delays and minimizing empirical prescribing <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Among rapid POCTs, Lodestar DX demonstrated promising sensitivity and specificity for the detection of <Mark2>E. coli</Mark2> in a laboratory setting, whereas Uriscreen showed only modest accuracy and UTRiPLEX exhibited poor sensitivity despite high specificity. However, the methodological quality of these studies was limited, with high risk of bias, and head-to-head comparisons were rare, meaning that relative test performance is uncertain <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In this line, future evaluations such as the ongoing <TextGroup><PlainText>TOUCAN</PlainText></TextGroup> prospective study in UK primary care, are expected to provide real-world evidence regarding diagnostic accuracy and usability of next-generation POC systems, including Sysmex PA-100 and Lodestar DX. Although focused on diagnostic performance rather than patient outcomes, these studies will help clarify the role of rapid phenotypic testing in improving treatment decisions for female uncomplicated UTI <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In summary, the Sysmex PA-100 system exemplifies the optimal balance between analytical sophistication and clinical practicality. While experimental microfluidic and molecular platforms may surpass it in sensitivity or breadth of detection, Sysmex uniquely delivers clinically actionable, phenotypic AST within 45 minutes using a fully automated workflow. This represents a significant advancement in POC UTI management, offering a practical, validated, and cost-effective solution that enhances antimicrobial stewardship, reduces inappropriate a<TextGroup><PlainText>n</PlainText></TextGroup>tibi<TextGroup><PlainText>ot</PlainText></TextGroup>ic use, and improves patient outcomes.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock name="Conclusion" linked="yes"> <MainHeadline>Conclusion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>POC diagnostic technologies represent a transformative advance in the rapid detection and management of UTIs supporting antimicrobial stewardship. Despite low adoption rates globally, POC systems like PA-100 are shown to be cost-effective and resource-efficient, and its broader implementation is strongly recommended for uncomplicated UTIs diagnosis. Future research should prioritize well-designed randomized controlled trials integrating diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, antimicrobial resistance metrics, and economic endpoints. Such evidence will be essential to define the true clinical value of POCTs within urological and primary care practice. Such developments will be critical to maximizing their impact in both inpatient and outpatient settings, ultimately contributing to reduced AMR prevalence and improved patient outcomes. </Pgraph></TextBlock> <TextBlock name="Notes" linked="yes"> <MainHeadline>Notes</MainHeadline><SubHeadline>Authors’ ORCIDs</SubHeadline><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1">Silvia Juste-Alvarez: <Hyperlink href="https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9591-2610">0009-0002-9591-2610</Hyperlink></ListItem><ListItem level="1">José Medina-Polo: <Hyperlink href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-8669">0000-0003-3626-8669</Hyperlink></ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline>Ethics statement</SubHeadline><Pgraph>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. As no human or animal subjects were involved, ethical approval and informed consent were not applicable.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Competing interests</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock> <References linked="yes"> <Reference refNo="1"> <RefAuthor>He Y</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zhao J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wang L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Han C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Yan R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zhu P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Qian T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Yu S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zhu X</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>He W</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Epidemiological trends and predictions of urinary tract infections in the global burden of disease study 2021</RefTitle> <RefYear>2025</RefYear> <RefJournal>Sci Rep</RefJournal> <RefPage>4702</RefPage> <RefTotal>He Y, Zhao J, Wang L, Han C, Yan R, Zhu P, Qian T, Yu S, Zhu X, He W. Epidemiological trends and predictions of urinary tract infections in the global burden of disease study 2021. Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):4702. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89240-5</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89240-5</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="2"> <RefAuthor>Elsisi GH</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zaky HS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Polo JM</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Budget impact analysis on the use of Sysmex PA-100 AST system as a point of care for uncomplicated urinary tract infections detection and treatment in Spanish females</RefTitle> <RefYear>2024</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Med Econ</RefJournal> <RefPage>1434-43</RefPage> <RefTotal>Elsisi GH, Zaky HS, Polo JM. Budget impact analysis on the use of Sysmex PA-100 AST system as a point of care for uncomplicated urinary tract infections detection and treatment in Spanish females. J Med Econ. 2024;27:1434-43. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2420534</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2420534</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="3"> <RefAuthor>Medina-Polo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gil-Moradillo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Justo-Quintas J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>González-Padilla DA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>García-Rojo E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>González-Díaz A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Abad-López P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hernández-Arroyo M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Santos-Pérez de la Blanca R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Peña-Vallejo H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Téigell-Tobar J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>López-Medrano F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tejido-Sánchez Á</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in a surgical urology ward: observational study-analysis of the problem and strategies for implementation</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>World J Urol</RefJournal> <RefPage>3-8</RefPage> <RefTotal>Medina-Polo J, Gil-Moradillo J, Justo-Quintas J, González-Padilla DA, García-Rojo E, González-Díaz A, Abad-López P, Hernández-Arroyo M, Santos-Pérez de la Blanca R, Peña-Vallejo H, Téigell-Tobar J, López-Medrano F, Tejido-Sánchez Á. Prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in a surgical urology ward: observational study-analysis of the problem and strategies for implementation. World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02648-3</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02648-3</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="4"> <RefAuthor>Medina-Polo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jiménez-Alcaide E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>García-González L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Guerrero-Ramos F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pérez-Cadavid S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Arrébola-Pajares A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Sopeña-Sutil R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Benítez-Salas R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Díaz-González R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tejido-Sánchez Á</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Healthcare-associated infections in a department of urology: incidence and patterns of antibiotic resistance</RefTitle> <RefYear>2014</RefYear> <RefJournal>Scand J Urol</RefJournal> <RefPage>203-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Medina-Polo J, Jiménez-Alcaide E, García-González L, Guerrero-Ramos F, Pérez-Cadavid S, Arrébola-Pajares A, Sopeña-Sutil R, Benítez-Salas R, Díaz-González R, Tejido-Sánchez Á. Healthcare-associated infections in a department of urology: incidence and patterns of antibiotic resistance. Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):203-9. DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2013.834512 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2013.834512</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="5"> <RefAuthor>Bonkat G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wagenlehner F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cai T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Geerlings S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Medina-Polo J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Köves B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pilatz A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schneidewind L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schubert S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Veeratterapillay R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bausch K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Devlies W</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Leitner L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mantica G</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Stangl FP</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kranz J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Classification of Urinary Tract Infections in 2025: Moving Beyond Uncomplicated and Complicated</RefTitle> <RefYear>2025</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eur Urol Open Sci</RefJournal> <RefPage>44-7</RefPage> <RefTotal>Bonkat G, Wagenlehner F, Cai T, Geerlings S, Medina-Polo J, Köves B, Pilatz A, Schneidewind L, Schubert S, Veeratterapillay R, Bausch K, Devlies W, Leitner L, Mantica G, Stangl FP, Kranz J. Classification of Urinary Tract Infections in 2025: Moving Beyond Uncomplicated and Complicated. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Apr 6;75:44-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.010 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.010</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="6"> <RefAuthor>Santos M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mariz M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tiago I</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Martins J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Alarico S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ferreira P</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>A review on urinary tract infections diagnostic methods: Laboratory-based and point-of-care approaches</RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Pharm Biomed Anal</RefJournal> <RefPage>114889</RefPage> <RefTotal>Santos M, Mariz M, Tiago I, Martins J, Alarico S, Ferreira P. A review on urinary tract infections diagnostic methods: Laboratory-based and point-of-care approaches. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022 Sep 20;219:114889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114889 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114889</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="7"> <RefAuthor>Mo Y</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Rapid diagnostics for antibiotic resistance: urgent need for strong clinical evidence</RefTitle> <RefYear>2022</RefYear> <RefJournal>Clin Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>2076-8</RefPage> <RefTotal>Mo Y. Rapid diagnostics for antibiotic resistance: urgent need for strong clinical evidence. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75:2076-8. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac358</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac358</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="8"> <RefAuthor>Smith KP</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kirby JE</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Rapid susceptibility testing methods</RefTitle> <RefYear>2019</RefYear> <RefJournal>Clin Lab Med</RefJournal> <RefPage>333-44</RefPage> <RefTotal>Smith KP, Kirby JE. Rapid susceptibility testing methods. Clin Lab Med. 2019;39:333-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.04.001</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2019.04.001</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="9"> <RefAuthor>Davenport M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mach KE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Shortliffe LMD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Banaei N</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wang TH</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Liao JC</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections</RefTitle> <RefYear>2017</RefYear> <RefJournal>Nat Rev Urol</RefJournal> <RefPage>296-310</RefPage> <RefTotal>Davenport M, Mach KE, Shortliffe LMD, Banaei N, Wang TH, Liao JC. New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol. 2017 May;14(5):296-310. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.20</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.20</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="10"> <RefAuthor>Asif M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Awan FR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Khan QM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ngamsom B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Pamme N</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Paper-based analytical devices for colorimetric detection of S. aureus and E. coli and their antibiotic-resistant strains in milk</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>Analyst</RefJournal> <RefPage>7320-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Asif M, Awan FR, Khan QM, Ngamsom B, Pamme N. Paper-based analytical devices for colorimetric detection of S. aureus and E. coli and their antibiotic-resistant strains in milk. Analyst. 2020;145:7320-9. DOI: 10.1039/d0an01075h</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1039/d0an01075h</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="11"> <RefAuthor>Cho S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Park TS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nahapetian TG</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Yoon JY</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Smartphone-based, sensitive μPAD detection of urinary tract infection and gonorrhoea</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>Biosens Bioelectron</RefJournal> <RefPage>601-11</RefPage> <RefTotal>Cho S, Park TS, Nahapetian TG, Yoon JY. Smartphone-based, sensitive μPAD detection of urinary tract infection and gonorrhoea. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;74:601-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.014</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.014</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="12"> <RefAuthor>Shih CM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chang CL</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hsu MY</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lin JY</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kuan CM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wang HK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Huang CT</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chung MC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Huang KC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hsu CE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wang CY</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Shen YC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cheng CM</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Paper-based ELISA to rapidly detect Escherichia coli</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>Talanta</RefJournal> <RefPage>2-5</RefPage> <RefTotal>Shih CM, Chang CL, Hsu MY, Lin JY, Kuan CM, Wang HK, Huang CT, Chung MC, Huang KC, Hsu CE, Wang CY, Shen YC, Cheng CM. Paper-based ELISA to rapidly detect Escherichia coli. Talanta. 2015 Dec 1;145:2-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.051 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.051</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="13"> <RefAuthor>Gunda NSK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dasgupta S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mitra SK</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>DipTest: a litmus test for E. coli</RefTitle> <RefYear>2017</RefYear> <RefJournal>PLoS One</RefJournal> <RefPage>e0186548</RefPage> <RefTotal>Gunda NSK, Dasgupta S, Mitra SK. DipTest: a litmus test for E. coli. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186548. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183234</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183234</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="14"> <RefAuthor>Stapleton AE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cox ME</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>DiNello RK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Geisberg M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Abbott A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Roberts PL</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hooton TM</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Performance of a New Rapid Immunoassay Test Kit for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Significant Bacteriuria</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Clin Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>2805-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Stapleton AE, Cox ME, DiNello RK, Geisberg M, Abbott A, Roberts PL, Hooton TM. Performance of a New Rapid Immunoassay Test Kit for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Significant Bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Sep;53(9):2805-9. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00353-15 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00353-15</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="15"> <RefAuthor>Jiang T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Song Y</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wei T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Li H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Du D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zhu MJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lin Y</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Sensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using Pt-Au bimetal nanoparticles with peroxidase-like amplification</RefTitle> <RefYear>2016</RefYear> <RefJournal>Biosens Bioelectron</RefJournal> <RefPage>687-94</RefPage> <RefTotal>Jiang T, Song Y, Wei T, Li H, Du D, Zhu MJ, Lin Y. Sensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using Pt-Au bimetal nanoparticles with peroxidase-like amplification. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016 Mar 15;77:687-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.017</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.017</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="16"> <RefAuthor>Song C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Liu J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Li J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Liu Q</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Dual FITC lateral flow immunoassay for sensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food samples</RefTitle> <RefYear>2016</RefYear> <RefJournal>Biosens Bioelectron</RefJournal> <RefPage>734-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Song C, Liu J, Li J, Liu Q. Dual FITC lateral flow immunoassay for sensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food samples. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;85:734-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.057</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.057</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="17"> <RefAuthor>Tominaga T</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Enhanced sensitivity of lateral-flow test strip immunoassays using colloidal palladium nanoparticles and horseradish peroxidase</RefTitle> <RefYear>2017</RefYear> <RefJournal>LWT Food Sci Technol</RefJournal> <RefPage>566-70</RefPage> <RefTotal>Tominaga T. Enhanced sensitivity of lateral-flow test strip immunoassays using colloidal palladium nanoparticles and horseradish peroxidase. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2017;86:566-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.027</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.027</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="18"> <RefAuthor>Liu C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fang S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tian Y</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ma J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wang Z</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Xu D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Li Y</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hou D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Liu Q</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in milk, bread, and jelly by lac dye coloration-based bidirectional lateral flow immunoassay strip</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Food Saf</RefJournal> <RefPage>e12862</RefPage> <RefTotal>Liu C, Fang S, Tian Y, Ma J, Wang Z, Xu D, Li Y, Hou D, Liu Q. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in milk, bread, and jelly by lac dye coloration-based bidirectional lateral flow immunoassay strip. J Food Saf. 2021;41:e12862. DOI: 10.1111/jfs.12862</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12862</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="19"> <RefAuthor>Eltzov E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cosnier S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Marks RS</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Biosensors based on combined optical and electrochemical transduction for molecular diagnostics</RefTitle> <RefYear>2011</RefYear> <RefJournal>Expert Rev Mol Diagn</RefJournal> <RefPage>533-46</RefPage> <RefTotal>Eltzov E, Cosnier S, Marks RS. Biosensors based on combined optical and electrochemical transduction for molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11:533-46. DOI: 10.1586/erm.11.38</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1586/erm.11.38</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="20"> <RefAuthor>Afriat R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chalupowicz D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Eltzov E</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Development of a point-of-care technology for bacterial identification in milk</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>Talanta</RefJournal> <RefPage>121223</RefPage> <RefTotal>Afriat R, Chalupowicz D, Eltzov E. Development of a point-of-care technology for bacterial identification in milk. Talanta. 2020;219:121223. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121223</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121223</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="21"> <RefAuthor>Ebrahimi MMS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Steinhoff B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schönherr H</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Rapid remote detection of Escherichia coli via a reporter-hydrogel coated glass fiber tip</RefTitle> <RefYear>2015</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eur Polym J</RefJournal> <RefPage>180-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Ebrahimi MMS, Steinhoff B, Schönherr H. Rapid remote detection of Escherichia coli via a reporter-hydrogel coated glass fiber tip. Eur Polym J. 2015;72:180-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.09.015</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.09.015</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="22"> <RefAuthor>Gunda NSK</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chavali R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mitra SK</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>A hydrogel-based rapid test method for detection of Escherichia coli in contaminated water samples</RefTitle> <RefYear>2016</RefYear> <RefJournal>Analyst</RefJournal> <RefPage>2920-9</RefPage> <RefTotal>Gunda NSK, Chavali R, Mitra SK. A hydrogel-based rapid test method for detection of Escherichia coli in contaminated water samples. Analyst. 2016;141:2920-9. DOI: 10.1039/c6an00400h</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1039/c6an00400h</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="23"> <RefAuthor>Jia Z</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Müller M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schönherr H</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Towards multiplexed bacteria detection by enzyme-responsive hydrogels</RefTitle> <RefYear>2018</RefYear> <RefJournal>Macromol Symp</RefJournal> <RefPage>2-7</RefPage> <RefTotal>Jia Z, Müller M, Schönherr H. Towards multiplexed bacteria detection by enzyme-responsive hydrogels. Macromol Symp. 2018;379:2-7. DOI: 10.1002/masy. 201600178</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1002/masy. 201600178</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="24"> <RefAuthor>Kaur K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Chelangat W</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Druzhinin SI</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Karuri NW</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Müller M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Schönherr H</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Quantitative E. coli Enzyme Detection in Reporter Hydrogel-Coated Paper Using a Smartphone Camera</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>Biosensors (Basel)</RefJournal> <RefPage>25</RefPage> <RefTotal>Kaur K, Chelangat W, Druzhinin SI, Karuri NW, Müller M, Schönherr H. Quantitative E. coli Enzyme Detection in Reporter Hydrogel-Coated Paper Using a Smartphone Camera. Biosensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;11(1):25. DOI: 10.3390/bios11010025 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11010025</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="25"> <RefAuthor>Sysmex Corporation</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2014</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>PA-100 AST system</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Sysmex Corporation. PA-100 AST system. 2014. Available from: https://www.sysmex.co.uk/products/products-detail/pa-100-ast-system</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.sysmex.co.uk/products/products-detail/pa-100-ast-system</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="26"> <RefAuthor>Hartmann J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fritzenwanker M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Imirzalioglu C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hain T</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wagenlehner F</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Evaluation of the Vivalytic One Analyser for detecting uropathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial resistances in urine samples of urological patients</RefTitle> <RefYear></RefYear> <RefBookTitle>ECCMID 2024; 2024 Apr 27-30; Barcelona, Spain</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Hartmann J, Fritzenwanker M, Imirzalioglu C, Hain T, Wagenlehner F. Evaluation of the Vivalytic One Analyser for detecting uropathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial resistances in urine samples of urological patients. In: ECCMID 2024; 2024 Apr 27-30; Barcelona, Spain.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="27"> <RefAuthor>Llusern Scientific</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2014</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Lodestar DX UTI test system</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Llusern Scientific. Lodestar DX UTI test system. 2014. Available from: https://llusern.co.uk/lodestardx</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://llusern.co.uk/lodestardx</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="28"> <RefAuthor>Alonso-Tarrés C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Benjumea Moreno C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Navarro F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Habison AC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Gonzàlez-Bertran E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Blanco F</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Borràs J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Garrigó M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Saker J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Bacteriuria and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 45 min by point-of-care Sysmex PA-100 System: first clinical evaluation</RefTitle> <RefYear>2024</RefYear> <RefJournal>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</RefJournal> <RefPage>1533-43</RefPage> <RefTotal>Alonso-Tarrés C, Benjumea Moreno C, Navarro F, Habison AC, Gonzàlez-Bertran E, Blanco F, Borràs J, Garrigó M, Saker J. Bacteriuria and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 45 min by point-of-care Sysmex PA-100 System: first clinical evaluation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;43(8):1533-43. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04862-3 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04862-3</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="29"> <RefAuthor>Turner PJ</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Fanshawe TR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Freeman J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Glogowska M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hay AD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Kenealy N</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Llion O</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lowe R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lown M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Moore M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tate V</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wilcox MH</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wootton M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Butler CC</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hayward GN</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>plaTform fOr Urinary tract infection diagnostiC evAluatioN (TOUCAN): a protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of point-of-care testing in patients suspected of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care clinics in England</RefTitle> <RefYear>2025</RefYear> <RefJournal>BMJ Open</RefJournal> <RefPage>e090012</RefPage> <RefTotal>Turner PJ, Fanshawe TR, Freeman J, Glogowska M, Hay AD, Kenealy N, Llion O, Lowe R, Lown M, Moore M, Tate V, Wilcox MH, Wootton M, Butler CC, Hayward GN. plaTform fOr Urinary tract infection diagnostiC evAluatioN (TOUCAN): a protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of point-of-care testing in patients suspected of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care clinics in England. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):e090012. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090012 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090012</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="30"> <RefAuthor>Baltekin Ö</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Boucharin A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Tano E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Andersson DI</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Elf J</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Antibiotic susceptibility testing in less than 30 min using direct single-cell imaging</RefTitle> <RefYear>2017</RefYear> <RefJournal>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</RefJournal> <RefPage>9170-5</RefPage> <RefTotal>Baltekin Ö, Boucharin A, Tano E, Andersson DI, Elf J. Antibiotic susceptibility testing in less than 30 min using direct single-cell imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:9170-5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708558114</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708558114</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="31"> <RefAuthor>Tomlinson E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Ward M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Cooper C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>James R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Stokes C</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Begum S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Watson J</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hay AD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Jones HE</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Thom H</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Whiting P</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Point-of-care tests for urinary tract infections to reduce antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review and conceptual economic model</RefTitle> <RefYear>2024</RefYear> <RefJournal>Health Technol Assess</RefJournal> <RefPage>1-109</RefPage> <RefTotal>Tomlinson E, Ward M, Cooper C, James R, Stokes C, Begum S, Watson J, Hay AD, Jones HE, Thom H, Whiting P. Point-of-care tests for urinary tract infections to reduce antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review and conceptual economic model. Health Technol Assess. 2024;28(77):1-109. DOI: 10.3310/PTMV8524.</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3310/PTMV8524.</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="32"> <RefAuthor>Baltekin Ö</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Johnsson ATA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wong AYW</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Nilsson K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Mert B</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Söderberg L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Wistrand-Yuen E</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Özenci V</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Evaluation of an ultra-rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing method on positive blood cultures with Escherichia coli [Preprint]</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>medRxiv</RefJournal> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>Baltekin Ö, Johnsson ATA, Wong AYW, Nilsson K, Mert B, Söderberg L, Wistrand-Yuen E, Özenci V. Evaluation of an ultra-rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing method on positive blood cultures with Escherichia coli [Preprint]. medRxiv. 2021 Dec 14. DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.14.21267046</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.14.21267046</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="33"> <RefAuthor>O'Brien K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hillier S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Simpson S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hood K</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Butler C</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>An observational study of empirical antibiotics for adult women with uncomplicated UTI in general practice</RefTitle> <RefYear>2007</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Antimicrob Chemother</RefJournal> <RefPage>1200-3</RefPage> <RefTotal>O'Brien K, Hillier S, Simpson S, Hood K, Butler C. An observational study of empirical antibiotics for adult women with uncomplicated UTI in general practice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Jun;59(6):1200-3. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm108 </RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm108</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="34"> <RefAuthor>National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Point-of-care tests for urinary tract infections to improve antimicrobial prescribing: early value assessment</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Point-of-care tests for urinary tract infections to improve antimicrobial prescribing: early value assessment. 2023. Availabel from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/hte7</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/hte7</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="35"> <RefAuthor>McCarter Y</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Burd EM</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hall GS</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Zervos M</RefAuthor> <RefTitle></RefTitle> <RefYear>2009</RefYear> <RefBookTitle>Cumitech 2C: Laboratory Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections</RefBookTitle> <RefPage></RefPage> <RefTotal>McCarter Y, Burd EM, Hall GS, Zervos M. Cumitech 2C: Laboratory Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2009.</RefTotal> </Reference> <Reference refNo="36"> <RefAuthor>Hannah S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dobrea A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lasserre P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Blair EO</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Alcorn D</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hoskisson PA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Corrigan DK</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Development of a Rapid, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for E. coli Based on Low-Cost, Screen-Printed Electrodes</RefTitle> <RefYear>2020</RefYear> <RefJournal>Biosensors (Basel)</RefJournal> <RefPage>153</RefPage> <RefTotal>Hannah S, Dobrea A, Lasserre P, Blair EO, Alcorn D, Hoskisson PA, Corrigan DK. Development of a Rapid, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for E. coli Based on Low-Cost, Screen-Printed Electrodes. Biosensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;10(11):153. DOI: 10.3390/bios10110153</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110153</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="37"> <RefAuthor>Domingo-Roca R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Lasserre P</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Riordan L</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Macdonald AR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Dobrea A</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Duncan KR</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hannah S</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Murphy M</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Hoskisson PA</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Corrigan DK</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>Rapid assessment of antibiotic susceptibility using a fully 3D-printed impedance-based biosensor</RefTitle> <RefYear>2023</RefYear> <RefJournal>Biosens Bioelectron X</RefJournal> <RefPage>100259</RefPage> <RefTotal>Domingo-Roca R, Lasserre P, Riordan L, Macdonald AR, Dobrea A, Duncan KR, Hannah S, Murphy M, Hoskisson PA, Corrigan DK. Rapid assessment of antibiotic susceptibility using a fully 3D-printed impedance-based biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron X. 2023;13:100259. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosx.2023.100308</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosx.2023.100308</RefLink> </Reference> <Reference refNo="38"> <RefAuthor>Yee R</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Bard JD</RefAuthor> <RefAuthor>Simner PJ</RefAuthor> <RefTitle>The genotype-to-phenotype dilemma: how should laboratories approach discordant susceptibility results?</RefTitle> <RefYear>2021</RefYear> <RefJournal>J Clin Microbiol</RefJournal> <RefPage>e00138-20</RefPage> <RefTotal>Yee R, Bard JD, Simner PJ. The genotype-to-phenotype dilemma: how should laboratories approach discordant susceptibility results? J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(6):e00138-20. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00138-20</RefTotal> <RefLink>https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00138-20</RefLink> </Reference> </References> <Media> <Tables> <Table format="png"> <MediaNo>1</MediaNo> <MediaID>1</MediaID> <Caption><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: POC diagnostic tools for UTI pathogen detection</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption> </Table> <NoOfTables>1</NoOfTables> </Tables> <Figures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </Figures> <InlineFigures> <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures> </InlineFigures> <Attachments> <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments> </Attachments> </Media> </OrigData> </GmsArticle>